Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Medford mail tribune. (Medford, Or.) 1909-1989 | View Entire Issue (Oct. 27, 1959)
4 MAIL TRIBUNE, Medford, Or. TiMxby. Oct. 27, 1959 MEDF0RDt4iTBIBUNX "Everyone m Southern Orecoa Reads The Mall Tribune Published Dh11 except Saturday by MJJJr Olti FKtNTINU CO 83 North fit St Ph SP 8-0141 " HOBtm W BUHL. Editor EZRB GRE Advertising Manager GEPjVLD LATHAM Business Mgr ERIC W ALLEN JR. Managing Hditor EARL H ADAMS. "City Editor HARRY CHIP MAN Teleg Editor RICHARD JKWETT Sports Editor OLIVE ST ARCHER Women's Edit DALE BRICKS N Circulation Mag An Independent Newspaper Entered a second class matter al Medforrf Oregon under Act of Man 3 1897 SUBSCRIPTION RATES By M a t . In Advance Copy 10e. DaU--and Sunday 1 vear $15 00 Daily and Sunday 6 mos 8.01 Dallv anc Sunday 3 mos 4.29 Sunday Only One year $430 By Carrier In Advance Medford Ashland, Central Point Eagle Point Jacksonville. Gold Hill Phoenix Shady Cove Rogue Riv er. Talent and on motor routes Dally and Sunday 1 year $18 00 Daily and Sunday I mo 1 -SO Carrier and Dealers-copy 10c All Terms Cash in Advance Official Paper of City ! Medford Official tape ot Jackson County United Press International run Leased Wire " MEMBER "OF" AUDIT BUREAU " OF CIRCULATION Advertising Representative: WEST HOIJDAY CCV, INC Of fices in Npt York. Chicago. De troit. San Francisco. Los Angeles. Seattle. Portland St. Louis, Al lan Vancouver BC J33f NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS "ASSOCIATION NATIONAL EDITORIAL ASCiTKN Flight 'o Time Medford and " Jackson County History from the files ot The Wail Tribune 10, 20. 30. 40 and 50 years ago. 10 YEARS AGO Oct. 27, 1949 (Thursday) West Coast Airlines back In service after colliding with a northbound duck in the fog oVer Trail. Collision proved fatal to the duck, plane re ceived broken windshield. Chamber of Commerce en dorses TB X-ray program in county. 20 YEARS AGO -Oct. 27. 1939 (Friday) Jackson county's budget is approved in amount of $370, 715.13. From Arthur Perry's "Ye Smudge. Pot" column: "The rain freshened up the pastures and gave a rough wash to 6,345 autos." ' 30 YEARS AGO Oct, 27. 1929 (Saturday) Budget committee discusses construction of a new road to Lake of the Woods. Griffin Creek farmer rob bed by two young thugs who takes his car and cash1. 40 YEARS AGO Oct. 27. 1919 (Monday) President Wilson vetoes prohibition bill. Lark Evans, .parolled con vict, arrested in Klamath Falls as Jacksonville murder suspect. .- ' 30 YEARS AGO Oct. 27, 1909 (Wednesday) Rogue River orchards yield $1,000 an acre annually. Medford Commercial club to print 50,000 pamphlets on Medford with all new pictures and data. What's Your I.Q.? Nina or ten correct is tuperfoi;. seven or fcjht is excellent; five si is good. 1 1. Does, an. octupus have six, eight, or 12 legs. 2. What three ingredients are used in making nylon? 3. Was Will Hays once the "czar" of baseball, motion pic tures, or the motor car indus try? ': - ' : 4. What scientist advanced the Theory of Relativity? 5. What sculptor fell in love with a statue he had made, and which came to life? 6. How many men signed the Declaration of Indepen dence? 7. Name the Secretary of State who negotiated the pur chase of Alaska. 8. What character in "The Tale of Two Cities" was an inveterate knitter? 9. What quality in a wine is described by the adjective "dry"? 10. In mythology, the food of the gods was ambrosia; what was the drink of the gods? Answers: 1. Eight. 2. Air, water, and coaL 3. Motion pictures. 4. Albert Einstein. 5. Pygmalion. 6. Fifty six. 7. William H. Seward. 8. Madame Defarge. . 9. Mot sweet. 10. Nectar. REPORT ALL WET Carson City, Nev.-flJPD-Car- son City authorities rushed into action when they re ceived a report that two car loads of teenagers were in volved in a running "gun bat tle" city streets. The guns were water 3n Uses of One popular misconception about the . pur pose of newly-introduced legislation is responsi ble for a lot of misunderstanding. Most people think a bill entered into Congress or the Legislature is a proposal for a law. This, of course, is true. But a new bill is far more than that. It can have purposes other than the ultimate one of producing legislation. This is the fact which, because it is not wide ly acknowledged, causes misunderstanding. HTAKE, f or instance, Congressman Charles Porter's Rogue River basin 5.11. In the popular eye it probably is regarded as a hard and fast and unchangeable proposal for legislation. Nothing could be more wrong. It is a proposal, all right, but it is tentative, and subject to change as circumstances warrant. It was not intended to be passed in the form it was introduced. 'THEN, itaould be asked, why was it introduced ? For one thing, it was introduced to stimulate discussion and thought about the long-neglected basin development program. This it accomplish ed. For another, it was designed to make possible more rapid and more detailed studies of the basin by the federal agencies involved. This it has also accomplished. vFor still another, it was to serve as the vehicle for hearings on the basin proposals, which would provide the.f ederal agencies and the Congression al committees with information they must have about public response, and both the degree of support or opposition there may be to the proposal as a whole, or to its component parts. - " . , - . . THESE hearings. have. not yet been held, but ' they will be when ; the studies are - further along. Thus it can be seen that the bill, simply through the act of being introduced, has . stimu lated a great deal of activity, all of it designed to help formulate, eventually, a new bill, or an amended bill, which will be responsive to the facts of the situation, and to the desires and needs of the people involved. This was explained at the time the measure was intrpduced, but in many minds it still rep resents a flat and unalterable proposal which it is not. rlERE is a similar misconception about the voriAiic Kille o1Kr nr tVi Tia nvantT rr r-p or. Oregon Dunes National Seashore. Some people have gone so far as to declare that one or another of these bills is designed to "cram down the throats of the people of Oregon" an unwanted Dunes parje. This simply isn't true and it is a misconcep tion based on a lack of understanding of the legislative process, and all the ramifications in volved in the introduction of a piece of legislation. It is a rare bill, indeed, which is passed in just the form in which it is introduced. They all are subject to revision and amendment. E. A. The magazine Architectural Forum reports that there are more people in America living in slums than on farms. This is another sign of the tremendous revolu tion in society which has taken place; in this country, in the past 30 to 40 years. It no longer is an agricultural nation, as such despite the fact that its per capita food production is prob ably the highest in the world. One other wry note from the magazine the federal government spends more on farm aid than it does to improve the conditions of those living in the nation's slums. y ' In one case it is a natural resource which is being aided to. the extent of glutted markets. In the other, - it is human resources which . are, ; too often, going to waste. Which is more valuable? E.A. ; :- ' . : - ; ; Ha, A Thumbing through a magazine that adver tises clothes for men we spied a picture, in color at that, displaying a man wearing a vest. That was not surprising to one who has often contend ed that fashion was a circular affair and that which was most out of style would soon be the reigning fashion. But it was a delight. A vest is the handiest piece of clothing a man can wear; it is so full of pockets. A man can stuff his upper vest pockets with cigarettes or cigars and enhance his chest measurement by two inch es giving him an unearned weight-lifter stance whereas if he carries them in his coat pocket he appeal's heavy about the middle which is definite ly out of style. , A VEST is warm and snugly and the wind "doesn't blow up it to chill the backbone as it does a coat. A well fitted vest looks neater than a shirt that has been worn a few hours and becomes wrinkled or blackened by ashes. , ; ; Man discarded the vest some years ago be cause he wanted to let his abdomen stretch and expand without restraint. Unfortunately an un restrained tummy does not meet the modern de mand for beauty and we judge we are going back to the vest. It will not work if the vest is used as a corset. Even a vest looks better if it is not over extended. . .. Welcome, old friend. Sherman County Jour nal, Moro. a Bill s and Farms Vest Dennis the Menace 11 V . J Ml 10-21 1 m C '1 GUBSS IT WAS PARTLY My FAULT. HE 00SAY'lQOK OUT'' Today & Tomorrow By Walter (Editor's note: The follow ing article comprises ex cerpts from a speech by Waller Lippmann before the Foreign Policy Associa tion last week.) - I would like to say a few words about our common task, which is to report and inter pret the world as it is today. In doing that it is a delusion to suppose that we can or should ob serve events with an open and empty mind. Like Walter Lippmann . anyone who does research, be, : it in the natural sciences or in the his tory of mankind, the raw facts are what William James used to call a, blooming, buzz ing confusion until we . ap proach them with an hypothe sis, with a conceptual frame work into which they fit. What I should like to note is how in my own experience the hypothesis has changed vwith which we interpret our relations with the rest of the world. : :' : -..--"-r Until very recently, very recently indeed, our views of American foreign policy were controlled by the underlying conception of the 19th cen-tury-the conception that this is one world whose political center is in the North Atlan tic region of the globe. This conception has underlain our thinking in foreign " affairs not only throughout the 19th century but down through both . of the world . wars of this century. . THUS in the first World War we were drawn in when Britain and her ally France were threatened with defeat. We were no longer to remain isolated from Europe and un intangled in the wars of Eu rope, as we had been able during the. 19th century. But how were we drawn into the first World War? We were drawn in to reinforce ' Great Britain. We were the auxil iaries and the reserves. We called ourselves an associated power and our troops fought in Europe under a supreme commander who was a French general, while1 our Navy was under the over-all command of the British Admiralty. " When the war ended in 1918, we hoped and believed that we had won a victory for the idea that the principles! and ideals of our Western so ciety are universal. Woodrow Wilson proclaimed a world order. But it was a world order based on our Western principles and " ideals. More over, it was to be an order in which the nations of the North Atlantic region would con tinue to be the political lead ers of mankind. In 1918 there was much on the surface to justify this op timistic view. The North At lantic community had won a smashing military victory, and the United States had emerged as a new and power ful member " of the Western society. Russia , was still a primitive and backward coun try in the 'throes of a deep so cial revolution. China was a feeble and backward country, divided up among foreign powers. India was still under British rule; North Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia were under British or French imperial dominion. On the surface, in Woodrow Wil son's time, , it: looked as if Britain and France, reinforc ed by the United States and Canada, would prolong indef initely the world order that bad existed in the 19th cen tury, ; .. , , WE NOW know that this . was a brilliant illusion. Both France and Britain were profoundly weakened by their IX Lippmann fearful losses in the first World War. As representa tives of the Western philoso phy, they were challenged as imperialists over all of Asia and of Africa.. We did not know this in 1918. We took it for granted that with Amer ican military and financial help the world-wide predom inance of the Atlantic Com munity would continue. . In the Second World War, the role played by the United States was no longer that of an associated power bringing up the reinforcements and the reserves. But before Pearl Harbor and before we actual ly entered the Second World War, we still thought of our selves in terms of the first World War. We used to talk, you will remember, about aid ing the Allies to defend Amer ica. In fact, however, it was soon plain that we must take up the whole burden of the war in the Pacific, including the defense of Australia and of New Zealand. In Europe the French army had been de feated and Great Britain was under violent assault and strained to the limit. We had not only to supply the weap ons and the other economic necessities but we had to raise a great army ourselves. The difference between the two world wars is marked by the fact that in the second, as distinguished from the first, the supreme commanders on sea and on land were Amer icans. Nevertheless, until World War II ended, we could still believe - perhaps I should say we still tried to believe - that as and when Britain and France and West ern Europe recovered from the damages of the war, the North Atlantic community would still be the political center of the world. . I VENTURE to believe that in the last analysis this was the underlying assumption in the minds of both Churcftui and Roosevelt at the close of the war. They believed that as Britain and America, act ing as partners, they could handle Russia and have the deciding voice in the postwar settlement. They were mistaken. The fact of the matter is that Churchill himself was so big that he made the British power look bigger than it was It soon anpeared that Britain, though it was a great power by the old standards, was not like the U. S- A. and the U. S. S. R-, a super power. It was soon evident tnat in the postwar world the Atlan tic community, with the British-American partnership at is core, was no longer the paramount power in the world. Since the war, we have found ourselves in a Dosition different from anything in our whole previous experience. We are no longer members of the world order which is ac cepted by mankind-as being universal. There are other world orders which challenge ours and which compete with it. What is more, tnrougnout our history as a nation - the center of world power has been in the North Atlantic re gion of the globe and the fun damental decisions of our for eign policy have had to do with our relations in the North Atlantic, particularly with our relations with Great Britain. 11TE achieved our independ- ence amidst the rivalry in the 18th century of the North Atlantic powers. We developed the continent in se curity behind the supremacy of the British power. .We fought the first World War as an auxiliary of the Atlan tic powers. We fought the second World War as the leading power of the Atlantic community. Now this situation U funda- Washington Report By William S. White PERSUASION WONT DO Washington - A favorite anecdote of old newspaper men deals with the cub re porter who was dispatched by his city editor to cover a mine d i s a s ter. It was a big story and the i news desk waited with growing im patience to hear from its man on the scene. A t length, long after the early editions had all gone to press, the cub filed this sole and poignant message to his paper: "All is confusion; can send nothing." To almost every Congres sional faction on the issue of labor legislation President Eisnehower, however uninten tionally, has just sent about the same kind of message. In his last press conference he has hit a hard, sudden blow at the hopes of the great bulk of his own party for a "tougher" labor bill at the next session of Congress. By indicating that he didn't think much of the Taft-Hartley Act he has, in a single, casual sen tence, thrown down the most significant single legislative achievement of the GOP in the postwar years. AND, in the eyes of the or thodox Republicans, he has dropped a curious and un deserved slur upon the late "Mr. Republican." Senator Robert A. Taft of Ohio, the fa ther of that legislation. Worse yet, from the view point, of the Republicans, he has indicated that while Taft- Hartly isn't adequate, no new legislation might be . de sirable, either. This is strange ly similar to the position of the extremist labor leaders themselves. To them it is the most unexpected - support from the most unexpected quarter. But it is not only the Re publicans who have been put in a different position. So has management generally. ' And so, too, for that matter, has a majority of the Democrats. For, by at least 3 to 1, both parties in Congress are com mitted to the policy that great labor - management struggles cannot simply be left to work themselves out. Both parties in Congress have, long since firmly concluded, that, some sort of that "compulsory type of action" so deplored by the President is necessary if the government is to continue to govern in strike emergencies, It may be, of course, that Mr. Eisenhower did not mean literally to imply that the only good .solution of big strikes, like the present one mentally altered. The great est powers with which we have to concern ourselves are no longer in the North Atlan tic region. They are in East ern Europe and in Asia. While the welfare of the Atlantic community is a close and vi tal interest of the United States, the Atlantic commun ity is no longer the political center of the world. We are living in the midst of the de cline of Britain as one of the leading powers of the world and .we find ourselves with out a powerful ally in the face of the new powers of Eastern Europe and of Asia and of Africa. .. To dramatize the rapid change in the past hundred years, we might say' that throughout most of the 19th century the world capital was London. After the first World War the world capitals were London and Washington.- Af ter the second World War, the V world capitals were Washington, Moscow, and London. Now, as the postwar period comes to an end, the world capitals are Washing ton, Moscow, London, Peking, New Delhi, and , who knows, p e r h a p s i eventually, , also Cairo. . v I SAID earlier . and I must say again, that we are in a wholly new situation. It is not a clearly visible situation, with all its land-marks and features weU defined.There are no reliable maps. This is in part because so much of th world is hidden by cen sorship and obscured by prop aganda.. But there is another reason, ' and perhaps a more compelling reason why there are no reliable maps. It is that so much of the world is in the midst of revolutionary changes of which, we cannot now foresee the outcome. I am sorry I cannot finish with a neat useful conclusion. The task of reporting and in-, terpreting this ' changed and changing world is a very dif ficult one. We have to find our way across rough seas and through uncharted for ests. But that is what makes our lives interesting. And that is why, once we have been bitten by the bug, as are the best men in our two profes sions, we never get over it. (c) 1959 New York Herald Tribune Inc. It William S. White Red Chinese Threats Aids In Indian-Pakistani Settlement BY PHIL NEWSOM TJPI Foreign Editor Pakistan believes that Red China will be in a position to attack both Pakistan and In- d i a in five years. Both coun tries share a common apprehensi o n over the net work of roads being built by Soviet Rus sion engineers Phil Nrwsom in Aignani- stan and by the Red Chinese in conquered Tibet. One road newly bailt by the Red Chi nese allegedly with Tibetan slave labor cuts directly across the disputed territory where Indian and Chinese troops already, have clashed. ' The latter runs from Chi na's Sinkiang Province to Ti bet, through the. towering Hi malaya mountains where any road at all is a major engi neering feat. ' It, like the Russian-built roads in Afghanistan, points south, toward the heart of Pakistan and India, Red Chi nese airfields also dot the area. . The fear uniting the two nations provides the best pos sibility now that they will settle their own frequently bloody differences in a com mon defense against a greater enemy. . Settle Border Dispute One immediate result has been announcement of settle ment-of a long-standing bor der dispute between India and East Pakistan. There are indications that a better at mosphere has been estab lished for settlement of the Kashmire dispute between the two nations, each of whom now holds a part of Kashmir territory along a shaky cease fire line. " : .' " The lone-standing dispute over use of Indus River wat ers also" seems virtually in steel, would come through "self-discipline" on both sides. . : TJUT whether or not he so A intended, one thing can be said for sure: there is no tough labor union negotiator, no hard-bitten management negotiator, in all the country who can accept without a wry smile so hopeful a view o nu man nature. It may be, too, that the President himself will later support additional legislation. At the moment, however, he has thrown the greatest cloud over any early prospect for anything of that land. ' And in all these various un certainties there is one posn tive certainty in the incident. This is another of many illus trations of the President s amiable but disturbing lack of grasp of the vital details of the many domestic prob lems which in any administra tion just come to rest at last upon the White House door step. Actually, too, it is not so much the opposition Demo crats as the Republicans themselves who, privately chafe bitterly at this circum stance. For no Republican aware of recent history, can go along with the notion that Mr. Eisenhower has anything approaching the understand ing of. the labor problem that Taft earned by years1 of hard and devoted work ' jn this field. -" . And no one who has ever himself been close to any strike can accept the happy view that once the disputants realize the harm they are do ing they wiU, voluntarily lay down their economic wea pons. It simply does not ever work out that way any more than this kind of moral per suasion was able to stop the big-business trusts a genera tion ago. At last, there had to be an anti-trust act. (Copyright, 1959, . by United Feature Syndicate, Inc.) New York Man Has $400,000 to Spend New ; York-flJPD-Eugene Fi Suter Jr. had $400,000 to spend today but he wouldn't have if he had been permit ted to give it away in 1955 as he tried to io. , ( '. - : Suter, 27, petitioned ' the court Monday to let him han dle the legacy from his father, a manufacturer of permanent wave machines; Supreme Court Justice Henry -: Clay Greenberg declared him- com petent to manage his own af fairs. -- 1 ' " ' " Suter gave, away the first $36,000 in income from" the legacy when he -was a student at Yale university " in 1953. He said that he gave it up on "moral and political" grounds. - He was declared incompe tent in August, . 1957 after trying to give away the $350, 000 inheritance and the mon ey was saved for him. It grew to $400,000, which he now can spend. settled. The Indus has its headquar ters in the deep gorges of that part of Kashmir held by In dia. Thence it flows into Pakistan's Punjab which without it would be a desert. Both nations have a vital in terest in the areasnow claimed by China.' No .formal demands yet have been made on Pakistan by the Reds but Red Chinese maps claim Pakistan as well as Indian lands. The Ladakh area where Red Chinese surprised an In dian police patrol, killing two of its members and taking others prisoner, is valuable only stategically. Little Arable Land It has little arable land and is thinly populated by a peo ple who have been the pawns of conquerors for 2,000 years. Its huge mountain peaks in clude such famous : Mames as Godwin Austen K-2 and Broad Peak, all noted "chair Matter of Fact REALLY HOG-TIED? Hong Kong The Chinese Communists have now made their comment on the sad Tibetan debate in the U. N. by all but wiping out a troop of Indian soldiers on the dis puted Indian-Tibetan border. To a great many people, this -t new brand of Chinese Com- m u n l st ag- ) gression is not j merely alarm- ing. It is also totally bewil 1 dering. Jawa harlal Nehru himself re cently told a ; A A. 1 A. loonh Alton viMiur mm not so long ago "Chou En-Lai absolutely sat at my feet, seeking instruction -as a pu pil might seek guidance from a revered teacher. What on earth, Nehru sadly asked, had caused the terrible change in Chou and his gov ernment? There are analysts here, however, who do not look at the Chinese Communists with Nehru's blinkers. These able men offer a perfectly coher ent explanation of the border episodes, which is well worth summarizing. On the one hand, the hopes that the Chinese Communists cherished when Cou En-Lai used to sit at Nehru's feet have now been severely dis appointed. Sweetness and light of the Bandung type have not paid off m the tang ible form of important gains by the Asian Communist par ties. After long hesitation, Nehru himself liquidated the biggest, gain that had been achieved, by suspending the Communist government of the Indian state of Kerala. AN the . other hand, Peking " could not continue the policy of sweetness and light, while suppressing the Tibetan rebellion with the necessary ferocity. When they were forced to choose between good public relations in Asia and firm control of Tibet, the Chinese Communists did not hesitate for an instant." "What we have we hold,"" is their motto. The Tibetan rebellion, in turn, created the necessity for the border incidents.. ;The two Chinese Communist viceroys there, Generals Chang Kuo Hua and Chang 'Ching-Wu, have not crushed the dissi dents despite their utter ruth lessnesg. They have only five Chinese divisions; in Tibet. Yet the task of supplying these troops in active opera tions, across the . trackless. fuel-less, food-less roof of the world, is a heavy burden for overstrained China. The pres sure to get the job finished must therefore be great. ' Counsel With . Mr. Insurance - : Fred Brennan : - or call . Mr. Friendly Bill Fish Phone SP 3-7343 MEDFORD INSURANCE AGENCY 27 NORTH HOLLY ST. v v. Arte & ss $ a lenges to ambitious mountain climbers. The general area long has been known as Indian Tibet. Its people are of Tibetan ori gin and its forbidding geo graphy also matches that of Tibet For hundreds of years the people of Ladakh, itself a part of Kashmier, paid trib ute to or were under the domi nation of Tibetan rulers at Lhasa. Moslem, Chinese and other conquerors have fought through its narrow valleys for hundreds of years, as often as not falling to the murderous weather rather than to the sword. ' But it is the gateway to In dia and it is territory Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru has said he will never give up. As for Pakistan, a Pakistan ian leader summed up the Red Chinese-Indian territorial dis pute simply. "We share the same fate," he said. By Joseph AIsop Hope is the great nourisher of aU rebellions. With the Da lai Lama a refugee in India, the need was surely felt to show the Tibetan dissidents that India offered them no hope. What could be more useful, then, than troop movfr ments on the border, to assert the territorial claims long made by Peking, and also to show that the Indians are weak and easily bullied? Such is the remarkably con vincing expert explanation of this ugly business. It leaves only one area of mystery, the area of the relations between Communist China and Soviet Russia, or it is pretty certain that Peking's shows of force on the Indian border have not been, approved by Moscow. Does this mean, then, that Nikita S. Khrushchev "can no longer restrain Mae Tse-e Tung," as some people say? Is Mao-now really going hog wild? - THE best tentative answer to these questions lies in the nature of the border inci dents. They are military oper ations, but they do not in- : volve the slightest military -risk for China. At times in the past, when under special--stress, the Chinese have ven tured to take action on their own hook - as long as no mil itary risk was involved. The most important instance of. this character was the Indian" proposal for a Korean truce,; which so enraged Josef Sta-: lin. The proposal actually emanated from Chou En-Lai, via the Indian Ambassador in : Peking; and this was why Sta lin . was. so angry. But at no time in the past, have the Chinese Commun ists ever taken any action in volving any - military risk, without securing Moscow's prior.- approval. Last year's probe at Quemoy, concerted at the Peking meeting of Mao, Khrushchev, nnd their De fense Ministers, is the classic case in point. All the other past -cases fit the same pat tern. It is still reasonable to expect that the pattern will hold. It is -also reasonable to ex pect, however, that the Sino Soviet partnership will go on puzzling simple people by the seeming conflict between the peaceable Khrushchev and the warlike Mao. In any part nership, after all, it is ex tremely useful for one part ner to show the world a smil ing, friendly face, while the other partner plays the hard nosed role. The outer contrast need not imply inner dis agreement, as this reporter can testify, having once be longed to a partnership which sometimes indulged in this no doubt reprehensible practice. (c) 1959 New York Herald Tribune Inc. Fred Brennan WHAT KIND OF SENSE? o . . Incense, horse - sense or nonsense . all have their place but if you want to make GOOD CENTS, you'll place your INSURANCE with us. Bill Fish pistols. . , ... . . . . ... . ti" ,-
