The Hermiston herald. (Hermiston, Or.) 19??-1984, March 20, 1920, Image 4

Historic Oregon Newspapers

The Hermiston herald., March 20, 1920, Image 4

Image provided by: Hermiston Public Library; Hermiston, OR

About The Hermiston herald. (Hermiston, Or.) 19??-1984 | View Entire Issue (March 20, 1920)

Prev Page of 6 Next Prev Issue Next Text PDF JP2 (1.4 MB) Clip/Print Image

Return to Top

Prev Page of 6 Next Prev Issue Next

Newspaper Page TextCITY IRRIGATION WATER MENT FOR 1920. ASSESS Notice Is hereby given that, In accord ance with Ordinance No. 76 of the City of Hermiston, entitled, “An ordinance to create an Irrigation assessment district in the City of Hermiston and to provide for the levy and collection of a special im provement assessment therein to pay for the coot of construction of the Irrigation system, maintenance and water, and re- pealing ordinance No. 42, 42,” --------- an assessment —------------- has been levied upon the following lots and parcels of land In I d the Irrigation irrigation dis dis- trict established by said ordinance for the purpose of collecting a special im provement assessment to pay the cost of water for Irrigation for the NW% of the SW1 of section 11 and the NEU of the SEU of section 10, both in township 4 N. R. 28 E. W. M., block B of the First addition to Hermiston, lot 2 block C of the First addition to Hermiston, lots 5, 7 and 10 In block E of the Second addition to Hermiston, lots 6, 7. 8, » and 10 In block F of the Second addition to Hermiston, and block G of the Second addition to Hermiston, and block H of the Second addition to Hermiston, the land embraced in the Irrigation assessment district pro vided for in said ordinance No. 76 and constructing and maintaining an irriga tion system therefor in the amount set forth below. The total amount of assessment in said Irrigation district is $1,175.00. The contract price to be paid the United States government for water for irriga tion In said district is $1.50 per acre for two acre feet and 50 cents per acre foot for all water In excess to two acre feet. The cost of operation and maintenance of said Irrigation district is established at $1,175.00. The assessment shall become due and payable March 31, 1920, and if not paid by April 10, 1920, shall become delinquent and bear Interest from said date at the legal rate. City of Hermiston according to plat filed with County Recorder Nov. 3, 1904. Amount Name Block Lot 1. 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum Lbr. Co.......... I 1.75 Lot 2. 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum 1.75 Lbr. Co......... Lot 3, 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum Lbr. Co......... 1.75 Lot 4, 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum 1.75 Lbr. Co......... Lot 5, 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum 1.%5 Lbr. Co......... Lot «, 53 feet, Tum-A-Lum 3 71 Lbr. Co......... 3 99 Lot 7, 67 feet, E. Maher .._ 3.60 Lot 8, 60 feet. E. Maher .... Block Lot 1, 50 feet, Mrs. Minnie Brown 3.50 Lot 2, 50 feet, Mrs. Minnie Brown 3.50 Lot 3, 50 feet, Mrs. Minnie Brown 3.60 3.60 Lot 4, 50 feet, J. 8. West ..... .. 8.60 Lot 6, 26 feet, J. S. West _____ Mikeseil ___ _.......... 1.75 feet, Lot 6, 25 Lot 6, 50 feet, Mikesell ................... 3.50 feet, Tum-A-Lum 7, 50 Lot 3.50 Lbr. Co. _________ Lot 8, 50 feet. Tum-A-Lum Lbr. Co.......... ........... 3.60 Lot 9, 50 feet, I. It. Stewart . ...... 3.60 Lot 10, 50 feet, D. H. Lower ......... 3.60 Lot 11. 60 feet, D. W. Zellar ......... 3.60 Lot 12, 60 feet, D. W. Zeller ......... 3.50 3.50 Lot 18. 50 feet, Chas. Benson 3.50 50 feet, Chas. Benson Lol Chas. Benson 3.50 Lot 16, bu 3.60 Benson Lot 16, 50 feet. Block 3.50 Lot 9, 60 feet, H. R. Newport 3.60 Lot 10, 50 feet, G. G. Stewart 3.60 Lol 11, 50 feet, G. G. Stewart 3.50 Lot 12, 50 feet, G. G. Stewart feet, McCay ............ 3.50 Lot 13, 60 3.60 “ " G. Newport Lot 14, 50 feet, H. 3.60 Lot 16, 50 feet, H. a. Newport 3.60 Lot It. 60 feet, H. u. Newport Block Lot 1, 50 feet, H. R. Newport .... 3.50 Lo t 2, 50 feet, H. K. Newport .... 3.60 3.50 C. McKenzie Lot 3, 50 feet, 3.50 Lot 4, 60 feet, F. C. McKenzie Block 3.60 feet, 11. Swayze 6, 60 F. Lot 3.50 Lot 6, 60 feet, 11. E. Hitt ... 3.50 feet, Page & Son . .......... 7. 60 Lot Lot 8. 60 feet, Page & Son ........... 3.50 3.50 60 feet, F. Adams ............... Lot 9, Lot 10, 60 feet, F. Adams ............... 3.50 Lot H. 60 feet, Tum-A-Lum 3.50 Lbr. Co............... . Lot 12, 50 feet, H. R. Newport .... 3.50 Lot 13, 50 feet, H. R. Newport .... 3.50 50 feet, Thomas Campbell.. 3.60 Lot Lot 15, 50 feet. Tum-A-Lum Lbr. Co. -------.......... 3.50 Lot 1«. 50 feet, Thomas Campbell. 3.50 Block 1.76 Lot 1, 25 feet, F. B, Swayze „ 1.76 Lot 2, 35 feet, F. B. Swayze . 1.76 Lot 3, ■ feet, H It. Newport 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Lot Lot 5, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 25 feet, * ‘ B. G. Monkman .... 1.76 Lot Lot 7, 26 feet, Pacific Tel. & 1.75 Tel. Co........ ....... 1.75 Lot 8, 25 feet, H. R. Newport 1.75 Lot », 25 feet, E. W. Mack ..... 1.75 - 36 feet, A. L. Larson .... Lot 10, 1.75 Lot 11. H feet, E. 8. Taylor .... 1.75 Lot 11, 26 feet, C. M. Jensen .... 1.75 Lot 13, 25 feet, H. R. Newport ■ 1.75 H. Newport Lot feet, R. 1.75 Swayze _ Lot 15, ■ feet, F. feet, F. U. Swayze 1.75 Lot 18, Lot 17, 25 feet, First National 1.75 Bank 1.75 Lot 17, 25 feet, E. P. Illsley 3.50 Lot 18. 50 feet, F. B. Swayze 3.50 Lot 1». 50 feet, H. 11. Newport 3.60 Lot 20, 50 feet, J. H. Raley ..... 3 50 Lot 21, 50 feet, I. S. Taylor .... 3.50 Lot ■ 60 feet, E. 8. Taylor .... 3.60 Lot 23, 60 feet, F. B. Swayze ... 3.50 60 feet, F. B. Swayze Lot Block 25 feet, First National Lot 1.76 Bank ............... ..... 1.76 25 feet, F. B. Swayze ...... Lot ■ feet, Nettle Goodwin ... 1.76 Lot ■ feet, H. E Hitt ............ 1.76 Lot 1.75 Lot E ■ feet, W. M. Glasson . 1.75 Lot 6, ■ feet, Page & Son ........ . 1.75 Lot 7, ■ feet, Page & Son .......... 1.75 Lot 8. ■ feet, C. 8. McNaught 1.75 Sam Rodgers ...... Lot ». ■ 1.76 Lot 10. 25 feet, F. Adams .............. 1.75 26 feet, F. Adams ..... ........ Lot 32 feet, Hermiston Bank Lot 2.24 & Trust Co----- 1.05 Lot 13. 15 feet, H R. Newport 1.75 25 H R. Newport Lot L. Stork ..... 1.75 Lot 15. ■ feet, J. Stork ........... 1.76 Lot 18, ■ feet, 5. 1.76 Commegys. E. Lot 17. ■ . 1.75 Lot 18. 35 feet, H. K. Newport Commegys . 1.76 E. Lot 19, 25 Frick ..... ..... 1.75 Lot 20, ■ feet, II Frick ........... 1.76 Lot 31. ■ feet, II 1.75 Lot 13. 25 feet, 11. A. Frick Block 7- 3.50 Julius Lund Lot } 50 feet, Julius Lund 3.60 50 feet, Lot 3.60 Lot 50 feet, E P. Illsley ... 3.50 60 feet, U. S. Kingsley Lot ■ feet, 3 .99 C Gray...... Lot W. Craik .... 3.60 60 feet, Lot 2.45 7. ■ feet, Geo. Briggs .84 8, 1.' feet, Geo Briggs 13 feet, Deck ....... .91 Millie Lot 1.75 25 feet. Millie Deck ....... Lot 25 Sapper .... 1 75 Lot 10. 1.75 Lot 11. ■ feet, J. H. Williams Lot 11. ■ 1 75 M 8. Lot 13. 25 feet. M 1.75 8. M 8 Kern ........... 1.75 Lot II. 25 Lot 15. 25 feet, F McKenzie 1.75 Lot 18, 25 feet, Masonic Lodge ....... 1.75 Lot IT. 25 feet, Masonic Lodge __ Lot 18. 36 feet. Masonic Lodge ...„. Block Lot 1. 50 feet, C. O. Wainscott.. . 3.50 50 feet, C. O. Wainscott.... 3.50 Lot t E Lot feet, H. Peters . . ............ 3.60 3 50 feet, Rena Waterman Lot Lot 5, 50 feet, Rena Waterman . 3 50 50 Eriksen ...... 3 60 Lot Erikson ...... Lot 50 8, 50 feet, E. T. Erikson ....... 25 feet. K W. Mack ..... 1.75 .92 10. feet. E. W. Mack feet, K. W. Mack... 19. et, fc W. Mack.......... 1.7. 11, 13. feet, F. W. Mack 13. feet, Mrs J. M McCoy feet. M. D O’Connel.... 14, N H Skinner ....... 1 75 Lot 15. Lot E. W. Mack ........... feet, M W. Sharrard Lot 1 tl feet. F. II. Swayze ....... Lot Lot 19, 25 Wm Rhorer . ..... 1.71 J. Schimke ........... Lot feet, J, Schimke ......... Lot City of Hermiston Lot Block feet. H. R Newport _ 3 80 Lot H R. Newport . .. 3 50 1. 50 City of Hermiston Lot City of Hermiston City of Hermiston Lot 5. Mumma . feet » ------ Lot 3; 12 ■ Lot Lot Lot Block Block ■ E 1 F E Mumma . Mumma . W Mack W Mack 3.50 M umma R. Newport IE 50 feet H. R. Newport b H Brownell 15, 50 Ç 8 McNaught 16, 50 feet, C 8. McNaught 3.50 3 50 Wm Wm 1 78 1 j Correll .... Correll ..... 3.88 1.75 feet, Wm. Correll .....__ Lot 3. feet. Wm. Corred......._ 1.75 3.50 Lot D. Lowman.. Lot 1. 40 feet. M F. Callbeck — 1.75! Lot 3, 60 feet. J. D Lowman... 25 3.50 Lot 25 M. F. Callbeck — 1.76 1> Lowman Lot 10, 25 feet. 1 75 Lot ■ M. F. Callbeck .._ 1.75 3.50 Lot D. Lowman... Lot 11, 50 feet, Lot ». 25 feet, Xra Hall ..............__ D. Lowman .. 8.50 1.75 I 12. 50 feet. J. -== Lot ■ Ira Hall...... —___ Lot Lot 10, 25 E. T. Erikson ___ 1.05 R. C. Todd Lot 1. 15 ■ E. T. Eriksen ____ 1.75 . Todd 1.75 Lot H. l-.t 2. 25 R. 1 75 E. T. Erikson —_ Lot 12. 25 1.75 . Todd Lot 3, 26 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Block 11- Lot Lot 18, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 2.10 B. Polley Lot 1, SO Lot 1». 25 feet, W. W Ilisley ___ 1.76 1.75 feet. B Lot I Lot 20. 26 feet. W. W Illsley ....... 1.76 1.76 25 Lot Harry Spinning _ 1.76 Lot 21, 25 J H. Raley............. 1.76 Lot $ 25 1.76 Lot 22, 25 feet, Harry Spinning _ feet, Genevieve Kimball L76 Lot 23, 25 feet, Smith ....... .________ Lowman & Pelley 1.75 6. 25 — Lot 24, ■ feet. Smith ......... Lowman & Pelley 1.76 Lot 7. 25 Art Burkenbine_ 1.76 Lot 25, 25 J. D. Lawman....... 1.76 25 Lot 1.75 Lot 26, 25 feet, Art Burkenbine _ 1.75 25 feet. City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 27. 25 . Barnes Lot 10, 20 Lot 28, City of Hermiston 1.76 1.40 Lot 11. 20 E. W. Barnes City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 29, 25 1.05 15 feet, E. W. Barnes Lot Lot 30, 26 feet. City of Hermiston 1.76 Lot 13, 15 feet, E. W. Barnes Longley 1.76 H Lot 31. 25 Barnes .7» 10 feet, E. W. Lot 1.75 Lot 32, ■ feet. H. Longley .35 Lot 15 , 5 feet, E. W. Barnes Block 11- E. W. Barnes .35 feet. Lot 16. 25 feet, 1.75 D. Lot 3.10 Geo. Briggs Lot 1.75 Lot 2, 25 feet, feet, Geo. Briggs ..... ----- 1.75 Lot 1.76 Lot 3, 25 feet. D. 30. 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 25 1.76 Lot D. 21. 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 5, 25 feet, D. 1.76 Lot 22. 25 feet, E. W. Barnes ....... 1.75 1.76 25 feet, D. Lot 1.75 Lot 23, 25 feet, E. W. Barnes _ Lot 7, 25 feet, Q. G. Happer 1.75 Lot 24, 25 feet, J. D. Lowman.. 1.76 Lot 8, 25 feet, O. G. Sapper 1.75 Lot 26, 25 feet. J. D. Lowman.. 1.76 Block Lot », 25 feet, O. G Sapper Lot 10, 25 feet, O. G. Sapper 1.75 80 feet, Lowman & Polley 3.10 Lot Lot 23, 25 feet, G. A. Cressey 25 feet. Lowman A Pelley 1.76 Lot 25 feet, G. A. Cressey 1.76 Lot 50 feet, Joe Ralph ............... 8.50 Lot 1.75 Lot 26, 25 feet, Geo. Patterson 25 feet. Joe Ralph............... 1.75 Lot 1.76 Lot 26, 25 feet, Geo. Patterson Lot 5, 25 feet, Joe Ralph ............. - 1.75 1.75 Lot 27, 26 feet, Whitting .......... 25 feet, J. F. McNaught.... 1.76 Lot 1.76 Lot 28, 25 feet, Whitting ........!.. Lot 7, 25 feet, J. F. McNaught. .. 1.75 1.76 Lot 2», 25 feet, G. A. Cressey Lot 8, 25 feet, J. F. McNaught. .. 1.75 1.75 Lot 30, 25 feet, G. A. Cressey 25 feet, J. F. McNaught... 1.75 Lot Lot 31, 25 feet, G. A. Cressey 1.75 Lot 10, 25 feet, J. F. McNaught.. 1.75 1.75 Lot 32, 25 feet. G. Lot H. 25 feet, J. F. McNaught... 1.75 Block Lot 12. 25 feet, J. F. McNaught... 1.75 Lot 2, 25 feet, O. C. Gray ........ 1.75 Lot 13. 25 feet. Hermiston Bank 1.75 Lot 3, 25 feet, O. Gray ..... . & Trust Co. ...... .... 1.75 25 feet, O. C. Gray ____ 1.76 Lot Lot 14, 35 feet. Hermiston Bank 1.75 Lot 5, 25 feet, O. C. Gray .,..._ & Trust Co. .. .... ... 1.76 1.33 Lot 6, 1» feet. O. C. Gray ------ Lot 15, 26 feet, J. F. McNaught . 1.75 1.75 Lot 8. E. O. Blackwood. Lot 16, 25 feet, J. F. McNaught.... 1.75 Lot », E. O. Blackwood... Lot 18, 30 feet, Mrs. J. F. Mc E. O. Blackwood.. Lot 10, Naught ............ — 3.10 E. O. Blackwood. .. Lot 11, Lot 1». 26 feet, Mrs. J. F. Me- Lot 12, 18212 feet, E. O. Blackwood 12.77 1.75 Naught Lot 17, 25 feet, J. D. Watson ....... 1.75 Lot 30, 25 feet. Mrs. J. F. Me 1.75 Lot 18, 25 feet, J. D. Watson ... 1.75 Naught .88 Lot 1», 121, feet, J. D. Watson Lot 21, 25 feet, Mrs. J. F. Me .88 Lot 19, 1212 feet, F. B. Swayze 1.75 Naught 1.76 Lot 20, 25 feet, F. B. Swayze ... Lot 22. 25 feet. Mrs. J. F. Mc- 26 feet, ‘ - B. - - Swayze 1.75 F. Lot 1.75 Naught 1.75 Lot 22, 25 feet, F. B. Swayze Lot 23, 25 feet, Mrs. J. F we- 1.76 Lot 23, 25 feet, D. W. Zellar 1.75 Naught ........... . 1.75 1.75 Lot 24, 25 feet, D. W. Zellar Lot 24. 25 feot, M. Rhymerson Block 1.75 Lot 25, 26 feet, M. Rhymerson Lot 4. 25 feet. Dr. Kern Block Kern Addition __ 1.75 3.50 Lot 60 feet, Pearson 8.50 Block Lot 2, 60 feet, O. P. Brigham Lot 1-8 194 feet, I. E. Ltnbr. Co.— 13.58 3.50 Lot 3, 50 feet, O. P. Brigham 3.50 Block 50 feet, H. W. Coe _____ Lot 3.60 Lot 1, 50 feet, O.-W. R. & N. Co. 3.60 Coe ____ - Lot 5. 60 feet, H. W. City of Hermiston according to plat filed 3.60 Lot 6, 50 feet, H. w. Coe _____ with County Recorder April 5, 1905. 8.50 Lot 7, 50 feet, H. w. Coe _____ —* Amount Name 3.50 Lot 8, 50 feet, H. w. Hermiston 3.50 Block 1- Lot 9, 80 feet, City of Lot 1, 30 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 2.10 Lot 10, 50 feet, Wm. Brown ........... 3.50 8.60 Lot 2, 25 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 1.75 City of Hermiston Lot 11. 50 feet, Lot 3. 25 feet, Hermiston Realty 3.50 Lot 12. 50 feet, B. H. Prior......... . 1.75 Block Co........ ........ ............. Lot 4, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 1. 40 feet, City of Hermiston 2.80 Lot 5, 25 feet, Tom Marxon ......... 1.76 Block Lot «, 25 feet, Tom Marxon ......... 1.75 50 feet, City of Hermiston 8.50 Lot Lot 7, 26 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 1.76 1.75 26 feet, C. J. Flynn Lot Lot 8, 25 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 1.75 50 feet, C. J. Flynn --------- 8.50 Lot Lot », 30 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 1.75 8.60 Flynn ------ .... 50 feet, C. J. Lot 5, Lot 10, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 1.40 Lot 8, 20 feet, C. J. Flynn ........ . Lot 11, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 2.80 C. J. Flynn ........... 40 feet, Lot ». Lot 12, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 10, 30 feet, City of Hermiston 2.10 Lot 13, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 2.10 ~ ‘ Smith ........... E. 30 feet, Lot 11. 1.40 Lot 14. 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Smith Lot 12, 20 feet. E. ’ * 15, 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Block Lot Lot 16, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 .70 10 feet, J. D. Lowman.... Lot Hermiston 1.75 Lot 17. 25 feet, City of ______ .70 Lowman..., Lot 2, 10 feet, 1.40 Lot 18, 20 feet, J. D. Lowman. 1.06 D. Lowman.... Lot 3. 15 feet, 1.75 D. Lowman. Lot 19. 25 feet, 1.40 Lowman.... 20 feet, Lot D. Lowman. 1.75 Lot 20, 26 feet, 1.40 Lowman.... Lot 5, 20 feet, 1.76 Lowman Lot 21. 25 feet, .35 D. Lowman.... Lot 6, 5 feet, 1.76 25 D. Lowman 22, feet, J. 1.40 F. McNaught. Lot 7, 20 feet, Lot 23, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 1.75 Lot 8, 25 feet, J F. McNaught. Lot 24. 26 feet, J. D. Lowman....... 1.75 F. McNaught. Lot 9, 25 feet, Lot 25, 25 feet, J. D. Lowman....... 1.75 1.75 Lot 10, 25 feet, R. Boswell Block 2— 1.75 Lot H, 25 feet, R. Boswell 2.10 30 feet, J. W. McDermed Lot 1.75 Lot 12, 25 feet, R. Boswell 1.76 Lot 2. 25 feet, J. W. McDermed. 2.10 Lot 13. 30 feet, R. Boswell 1.75 Block Lot 3. 25 feet, Walter Oaks .... 1.76 Lot 25 feet, Prescott Oaks.... Lot 1, 47.6 feet, J. H. Reid........... 3.33 1.75 Lot 6, 25 feet, J, D. Lowman.... Lot 2, 47.5 feet, City of 1.06 3.37 Lot 6, 16 feet, J. D. Lowman.... Hermiston ........... .70 Lot 0, 10 feet, H. G. Newport . Lot 3, 47.5 feet, City of 1.75 Lot 25 feet, H. G. Newport Hermiston . .......... 3.33 Lot 8, 25 feet. Syndicate Lot 4, 47.5 feet, E. E. McMillan . 3.33 1.75 Bldg. Co. _____ E. E. McMillan.. 3.33 5. 47.5 feet, Lot Lot 9, 30 feet, Syndicate Lot 6, 47.5 feet, E. E. McMillan.. 3.33 2.10 Bldg. Co. ............ Lot 7, 47.5 feet. City of Lot 10. 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Hermiston ........... 3.33 Lot 11. 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 8, 47.5 feet, City of Lot 12, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Hermiston ........... 3.33 Lot 13, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Lot 9, 47.5 feet. City of feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Lot 14, Hermiston ..... ___ 3 33 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Lot 16, Lot 10, 47.5 feet, E. E. McMillan.. 3.33 Lot 16, 25 feet, City of Hermiston E. E. McMillan.. 3.33 feet, Lot 11, 47.6 Lot 17, 25 feet, City of Hermiston Lot 12, 47.5 feet. E. E. McMillan . 3,33 2.10 Lot 18, 30 feet, J. D. Lowman___ Block C — 1.76 Lot 1». 25 feet, J. D. Lowman 3.50 Lot 2, 50 feet. Parsons Lot 30, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 21. 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Block E— 3.78 Lot 3. 54 feet, W. S. Boynton. Lot 22, 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 3.78 Stevens ........ Lot 6, 54 feet, Lot 23, 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 3.78 Stevens ....... Lot 7, 54 feet, Lot 24, 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 H. Crandall 3.78 feet, C. Lot 10, 54 Lot 25, 25 feet. City of Hermiston 1.76 Block Block 3— 3.78 Reeder F. 6, 54 feet, Lot 3.50 Lot 1, 50 feet, J. H. Reid ....... Lot 7, 54 feet, O. P. Brigham ..... 3.78 8.50 Lot 2, 60 feet, I. E. Lmbr. Co. . 3.78 Mrs. E. H. Geary.. 8, 54 feet, Lot 3.50 E. Lmbr. Co. . Lot 3, 50 feet, Lot ». 54 feet, J. T. Hinkle —....... 8.78 3.60 4, 50 feet, S. McNaught. 3.78 Mrs. E. H. Geary.. feet. Lot 10, 54 3.60 8. McNaught. Lot 6. 60 feet, 3.60 Block Lot 6, 50 feet, Chas. Hahn 3.50 C. 8. McNaught. 18.90 Lot 7, 60 feet, 370 feet, Tom Fraser 3.50 Block H— Lot 8, 60 feet, C. 8. McNaught 3.50 8. McNaught Lot », 60 feet, Lot 1, 54 feet, City of Hermiston 3.78 8.60 Lot 10, 50 feet, 8. McNaught. Lot 2. 54 feet, City of Hermiston 8.78 3.50 Lot 11, 60 feet, C. S. McNaught Lot 3, 64 feet, City of Hermiston 3.78 Lot 12, 50 feet, Hermiston Bank Lot 4. 64 feet, Thon. Jaques ..... .. 3.78 3.50 & Trust Co.___ Lot 5, 64 feet, City of Hermiston 4.48 Block Lot 8, 54 feet, Genevieve Reid .... 3.78 Lot 59 feet, J. F. McNaught.... 3.60 Peer Bokish —....... 3.78 Lot 7, 54 feet, J. F. McNaught.. . 3.60 Lot ad e Lot 8, 64 feet, City of Hermiston 3.78 Lot 3. fa feet, City of Hermiston 3.60 9. 54 feet, Owen White ....... 3.78 Lot Lot 50 feet, City of Hermiston 3.50 Lot 10, 54 feet. Owen White ....... 3.78 Lot 5. 50 feet, City of Hermiston 3.50 Dated at Hermiston, Oregon, this 13th «, 40 feet, City of Hermiston 2.80 Lot 8. 40 feet, Geo. C. Ellison .... 2.80 day of March, 1920. 3.50 Lot », 50 feet, R. Boswell C. M. JENSEN, Recorder. 3.50 Lot 10, 5o feet, R. Boswell 3.50 Lot 11, 50 feet, R. Boswell Lot 13, 50 feet, R. Boswell 3.50 Treaty Obligations Hold. Block 3.50 Lot 1, 50 feet, It. Boswell Paris. —Fulfillment of treaty obliga 3.50 Lot 3, 60 feet, * * R. Boawell 3.50 tions by the new German government Lot 2. 50 feet, R. Boswell 1.40 Lot 4, 20 feet, R. Boswell 1.80 will be insisted upon, said Premier Lot 10, 20 feet, R. Boswell 1.50 Lot 11, 60 feet, R. Boswell 3.60 Millerand Monday. Lot 12. 50 feet, R. Boswell Block "Although the news from Berlin Lot 1, 50 feet, Genevieve Kimball 3.50 Lot 3. 60 feet, Genevieve Kimball 3.50 as yet not sufficiently complote to 3.50 Lot 3. 50 feet, J 8. Beal . ...... . 3 60 enable one to form an opinion Lot 4. 50 feet, F. McNaught. F McNaught. 3.60 garding the counterrevolution and its Lot 6. 50 feet, 3.50 Lot 6, 50 feet. McNaught 3.60 effects,” the premier declared, "I may J. F. McNaught. Lot 7. 50 Lot I M feet, J. F. McNaught say that, whatever may be the char Lot », 50 feet, J. F. McNaught. . Lot 10. 50 feet. City of Hermiston 3.50 acter or extent of the revolution in 3 60 Lot 11. 60 feet. J. H. Reid Lot 12, 50 feet, Genevieve Kimball 3 50 Germany, the allies are determined Block 7— 1.10 that full execution of the treaty of Lot 1. 30 feet, Chezik .................. 26 feet, Chezik .................. 1.75 Lot Lot 3. 25 feet, F. A. Cheslk........... 1.75 Versailles shall not be hindred in any 25 feet, F A. Chezik.....___ 1.75 Lot 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot Lot feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 $ 25 ■ feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 50,000 Dead to be Taken 25 feet, Lowman & Pelly. 1.75 Lot Lot ». 30 Lowman & Pelly . 1 10 Washington, D. C.—The bodies of ■ feet, J 1.76 Lot 1«. D. Lowman.___ Lot 25 feet, D. Lowman....... 1.78 about 50,000 of the American dead in Lot it 25 feet, J. F. McNaught 1.76 25 feet, J. F McNaught... 1.75 France will be returned to the United Lot Lot 14. ■ feet, F. C. Woughter... 1 75 Woughter Lot 15, 25 feet, 1.75 States, while between 30,000 and 25,- 25 Lot D. Lowman.. ..... 1.76 000 will remain permanently interred Lot 17. 30 feet, J. D. Lowman. 310 Lot 18, 25 feet J D Lowman..... 1.75 overseas. Secretary Baker Saturday in Lot I». 25 feet, 1.76 D. Lowman___ formed Chairman Wadsworth of the Lot 20, ■ feet, H Newport 1.75 Lot 31. 25 feet, .. H. G. _. Newport senate military committee. The secre 25 feet. Mrs. J. F. Lot McNaught ___ ....... 1.75 tary estimated the coot of returning Lot ». 85 feet, Genevieve Kimball 1.75 ■ feet, 1.75 the dead and concentrating the bodies Lot Lot 25 feet. City of Hermiston 1.76 remaining in cemeteries overseas at Block I. 30 feet, Mrs. C. R. Durfey 2.10 «30,000,000. M feet, City of Hermiston 1.78 Lot feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 36 feet. First National Lot Invited Nations All In. Bank ...................... Lot 25 feet D. Lowman g I London.—Salvador and Venezuela 17 J. D. Lowman J D Lowman 7 have deposited their declarations of Lot J. D. Lowman » 25 1.75 Lot 3« feet. First National assent to the covenant of the league Hank 2.10 Lot 10, J D. Lowman....... 1.75 of nations, thus completing the list of Lot feet, J. D. Lowman....... 13 nations invited to become original Lot it feet. Stanley ................... Lot Stanley ............... members of the league. Lot 14. City of Hermiston Lot it City of Hermiston 1 75 I ot feet City of Hermiston 1.75 Lot 17, City of Hermiston 3 10 Lot 18, City of Hermiston 1 75 Paris— The government has acquir Lot 19, City of Hermiston 1 78 Lot 20 City of Hermiston Lot 91 C R McNaught _ C. 8 McNaught — W F Woodstock STREETS OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, FLOODED 176 Block 18 29 148 3.8 I Lot 3». 25 feet. 1.75 Rank German “big Bertha.” % Copyright, s c Vederwood & t 3538% Undarwoed s The storm which has been sweeping the Atlantic coast caused an unusually high tide, and many of the streets of Norfolk, Va^ were flooded. This photograph shows automobiles making their way through the flooded streets. ROAD TO SPAN CONTINENTS Ten-Thousand-Mile Une From Hudson Bay to Pata gonia Planned. PROGRESS III THE PROJECT Several Sections Already Have Been Completed—American Investors Are Invited to Aid—Dream of Fifty Years. conference held In Mexico City In 1902, which appointed a permanent Pan- American railway committee composed of prominent citizens of the United States and diplomatic officials of Latin- American countries resident in Wash ington. Former Senator Davis and Mr. Carnegie were members of It. “In the eighteen years since the plan was indorsed by the Mexican confer ence,” explained Mr. Pepper In his re port, “considerable progress has been made In joining up various railway sections. Chile has completed the lon gitudinal line from Puerto Montt in the south to the railways In the north, which form junctions with the main trunk of the Pan-American system. “The Transandean line, from Valpa raiso to Buenos Aires, also has been completed, while the lines joining the Brizilian systems radiating from Rio de Janeiro have been finished so that they form junctions with Uruguayan and Argentine Unes. “The Argentine Une was finished to the southern border of Bolivia at La Quiaca several years ago, while Bo livia has closed up most of the links New York.—Realization of the dream of a railroad from Hudson bay to Pata gonia has been brought nearer as a result of the recent Pan-American financial conference in Washington, ac cording to Charles M. Pepper, who In 1903 was appointed by President Roose velt to visit the several countries from Mexico southward and report on the project. A journey by rail from the Arctic circle to the tip of South America, ap proximately ten thousand miles, could be made under good traffic conditions, it has been estimated, in sixteen to eighteen days. At present twenty-four days are required for the 5,871-mile sea voyage from New York to Buenos Aires. This dream of a transhemisphere trunk Une, running almost the entire length of the two American continents, was born in the brain of Hinton Rowan Helper, a southern writer and former United States consul In South America, mere than fifty years ago. The late United States Senator Henry Gassaway He Adequately Combines the Davis of West Virginia, a practical rail Functions of the Miner and road builder, saw its feasibility, and, with Andrew Carnegie and other Practical Engineer. wealthy Americans, gave the idea a fresh impetus. James G. Blaine also once advocated it. Takes Definite Form. The project received first definite form at the international American Mining Engineer of the Future Is Likely to Bo More Liberally Edu cated Than the Engineer KILL THOUSANDS OF RABBITS of the Past Idaho Conducta Big Drives Against Animals That Menaced Irri New York.—The new type of geolo gated Lands. gist Is coming into his own, If the opinion of Dr. Charles P. Berkey, pro Washington.—Idaho has conducted fessor of geology at Columbia univer rabbit drives in recent weeks on as sity, is given weight. This modern big a scale as when the country was geologist has an instinct for practical new. Because the cold ' weather problems, is qualified to give prompt, brought the rabbits by the thousands decisive advice when minutes mean to feed in the irrigated lands they dollars, possibly hundreds of them, in threatened to do extraordinary damage connection with big exploration or en in some sections. One drive netted gineering works. ever 8,000 rabbits and another 3,500. In the old days the mining en In Minidoka county, Idaho. 29,000 jack gineer or explorer was his own geolo rabbits have been killed this winter in organized drives and 00,000 additional gist, making his observations and col- by poisoning campaigns. Once school lcting his own data. Later came the was dismissed to permit the boys to day of the purely scientific geologist, take part. Four hundred people par» who, according to Professor Berkey, tieipated. Six rabbit drives In Lincoln “failed to make good In the applied science field," or at least not “to any greater degree than the practical en gineer.” The modern geologist, said the pro fessor recently, has taken advantage of “the very detailed observations made in underground explorations and developments of all kinds, checking his original conclusions and advice by the nctual findings after the work has been done. An Applied Science. “Geology has become an applied sci ence to a very considerable extent,” said he. “It is now well understood that great numbers of so-called acci dents in engineering and mining work, of calamitous or costly failures, of ex cessive expense and delay, of inappro priate design and plan of operation, and of entirely mistaken or erroneous conception of the problem in hand have' been due to ignorance or neglect of the geologic factors Involved, quite as aa often ss to mistakes on the strictly engineering questions. “A dam that Is built, a tunnel that A Few of the Rabbits Killed in Drive. Is constructed, a mine that is devel county. Idaho, resulted in killing 1,800 oped, a bridge, pier, or other heavy bunnies. Each event took on the char structure that Is located, or a natural acter of a community gathering. Sand resource that is exploited without due regard for all the geological condi wiches and coffee were served. In Walla Walla county, Washington. tions has not the same certainty of 11.000 rabbits were killed by 000 sports- success that attends a proper consid men armed with shotguns. They formed eration of these factors." This Is the field of tbe new type of a Une five miles long and drove the animals to the point where tbe Snake | engineering and mining geologist. According to Columbia authorities, s and Columbia rivers unite. Local representatives of the United marked and growing demand is noted States department of agriculture have for geologists of this type, having the point of view of the applied science This to reported directed the work or have co-operated with the local county agent or other man—the engineer. The engineer of the future is likely. It to pointed out, authority. In her Pan-American trunk line. There are now less than 125 miles In Bolivia to be completed, some of which is also graded In order to provide through railway connection from Buenos Aires to La Paz and to the Pacific. It would cost approximately $5,000,000 to com plete it. Bolivia to Get Loan. “The group committee on Bolivia at the recent Pan-American financial conference recommended that a loan be granted Bolivia for the purpose of completing this link. It was explained that the gauge was the same as that of the Argentine Unes and an arrange ment by which Bolivia could use Ar gentine rolling stock was suggested.” The war, it is said, has made It vir tually impossible for European coun tries to continue their financing of South America, and this Is why delega tions from Colombia, Peru, Chile, Bra zil, Ecuador, Uruguay, Paraguay and other South American lands have vis ited the United States in recent years to awaken American investors to what they call “a big investment opportu nity.” The proposed trunk Une would run from the United States through Mexico, Central America, Colombia. Ecuador. Peru, almost the entire length of Chile and from La Quiaca, Bolivia, to Buenos Aires. From this main Une would be connecting roads, some al ready completed, extending like "fin gers” in mnny directions toward the Atlantic ocean. GEOLOGIST NOW ALL-ROUND MAN SUCH MEN ME IN DEMAND *---------------------------------- to be more liberally educated than the engineer of the past. Foundation Training. “The best foundation training,” says Professor Berkey, “for the men who are to do work in this field of engineer ing and mining geology is the educa tional foundation given to engineers, and the best additional training Is connected with the fundamental en gineering subjects.” This must be accomplished, he thinks, by a thorough working knowl edge of geology almost equivalent to that given to a Ph. D. candidate. The practical education problem at Colum bia has been solved by the adoption of a course in mining geology in en gineering schools as a definite brandi of applied science training. “This three-year course trains men for advisory and professional work,” he says, “in connection with engineer ing and other operations, involving a knowledge of ground structure and conditions, as well as for special stud ies of mining prospects and mine de velopment or other more formal geo logical investigations. The course leads to the degree of engineer of mines in geology. Men preparing for the operating or construction fields or for the ore-dressing side of mining work, take the regular mining sched ule. “The principal members of the staff are men of much experience In advis ory work, in connection with exten sive mining and engineering opera tions, and accustomed to handling practical problems of the greatest pos sible variety. Columbia’s setting, tn this great business center, with Its own immense undertakings and Its worldwide interests, adds further to this atmosphere of the practical, the applied and the economic.” GERMAN SHIELD KEEPS EAGLE But Papers Ridicule the New cutcheon, Saying Bird la “Skinny, Homely." Es Berlin.—The new German coat of arms adopted by the national assem bly consists of a one-headed eagle, on a yellow gold shield, and without the old-time crown. The eagle will be displayed In sim- pie heraldic form without any acces sories. The Hohenzollern coat of arms and the chain of the order of the Silver Eagle, all parts of the old Prussian coat of arms, have been omitted. Ths bill of the eagle, the tongue and tbe talons are In red. Servants of tbe government are to wear tbe device without tbe shield, so It can be pinned to their uniforma. Some of the pan-German papera ridicule IL saying the “skinny, homely eagle with extended tongue” violatea all the rules of good taste.