The Hermiston herald. (Hermiston, Or.) 19??-1984, March 20, 1920, Image 4

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    CITY
IRRIGATION WATER
MENT FOR 1920.
ASSESS­
Notice Is hereby given that, In accord­
ance with Ordinance No. 76 of the City
of Hermiston, entitled, “An ordinance to
create an Irrigation assessment district in
the City of Hermiston and to provide for
the levy and collection of a special im­
provement assessment therein to pay for
the coot of construction of the Irrigation
system, maintenance and water, and re-
pealing ordinance No. 42,
42,” ---------
an assessment
—-------------
has been levied upon the following lots
and parcels of land In
I d the Irrigation
irrigation dis
dis- ­
trict established by said ordinance for
the purpose of collecting a special im­
provement assessment to pay the cost of
water for Irrigation for the NW% of the
SW1 of section 11 and the NEU of the
SEU of section 10, both in township 4
N. R. 28 E. W. M., block B of the First
addition to Hermiston, lot 2 block C of the
First addition to Hermiston, lots 5, 7 and
10 In block E of the Second addition to
Hermiston, lots 6, 7. 8, » and 10 In block
F of the Second addition to Hermiston,
and block G of the Second addition to
Hermiston, and block H of the Second
addition to Hermiston, the land embraced
in the Irrigation assessment district pro­
vided for in said ordinance No. 76 and
constructing and maintaining an irriga­
tion system therefor in the amount set
forth below.
The total amount of assessment in
said Irrigation district is $1,175.00.
The contract price to be paid the United
States government for water for irriga­
tion In said district is $1.50 per acre for
two acre feet and 50 cents per acre foot
for all water In excess to two acre feet.
The cost of operation and maintenance
of said Irrigation district is established
at $1,175.00.
The assessment shall become due and
payable March 31, 1920, and if not paid by
April 10, 1920, shall become delinquent and
bear Interest from said date at the legal
rate.
City of Hermiston according to plat filed
with County Recorder Nov. 3, 1904.
Amount
Name
Block
Lot 1. 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum
Lbr. Co..........
I 1.75
Lot 2. 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum
1.75
Lbr. Co.........
Lot 3, 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum
Lbr. Co.........
1.75
Lot 4, 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum
1.75
Lbr. Co.........
Lot 5, 25 feet, Tum-A-Lum
1.%5
Lbr. Co.........
Lot «, 53 feet, Tum-A-Lum
3 71
Lbr. Co.........
3 99
Lot 7, 67 feet, E. Maher .._
3.60
Lot 8, 60 feet. E. Maher ....
Block
Lot 1, 50 feet, Mrs. Minnie Brown 3.50
Lot 2, 50 feet, Mrs. Minnie Brown 3.50
Lot 3, 50 feet, Mrs. Minnie Brown 3.60
3.60
Lot 4, 50 feet, J. 8. West ..... ..
8.60
Lot 6, 26 feet, J. S. West _____
Mikeseil
___
_..........
1.75
feet,
Lot 6, 25
Lot 6, 50 feet, Mikesell ................... 3.50
feet,
Tum-A-Lum
7,
50
Lot
3.50
Lbr. Co. _________
Lot 8, 50 feet. Tum-A-Lum
Lbr. Co.......... ........... 3.60
Lot 9, 50 feet, I. It. Stewart . ...... 3.60
Lot 10, 50 feet, D. H. Lower ......... 3.60
Lot 11. 60 feet, D. W. Zellar ......... 3.60
Lot 12, 60 feet, D. W. Zeller ......... 3.50
3.50
Lot 18. 50 feet, Chas. Benson
3.50
50 feet, Chas. Benson
Lol
Chas. Benson
3.50
Lot 16, bu
3.60
Benson
Lot 16, 50 feet.
Block
3.50
Lot 9, 60 feet, H. R. Newport
3.60
Lot 10, 50 feet, G. G. Stewart
3.60
Lol 11, 50 feet, G. G. Stewart
3.50
Lot 12, 50 feet, G. G. Stewart
feet,
McCay ............ 3.50
Lot 13, 60
3.60
“ "
G. Newport
Lot 14, 50 feet, H.
3.60
Lot 16, 50 feet, H. a. Newport
3.60
Lot It. 60 feet, H. u. Newport
Block
Lot 1, 50 feet, H. R. Newport .... 3.50
Lo t 2, 50 feet, H. K. Newport .... 3.60
3.50
C. McKenzie
Lot 3, 50 feet,
3.50
Lot 4, 60 feet, F. C. McKenzie
Block
3.60
feet,
11.
Swayze
6,
60
F.
Lot
3.50
Lot 6, 60 feet, 11. E. Hitt ...
3.50
feet,
Page
&
Son
.
..........
7.
60
Lot
Lot 8. 60 feet, Page & Son ........... 3.50
3.50
60
feet,
F.
Adams
...............
Lot 9,
Lot 10, 60 feet, F. Adams ............... 3.50
Lot H. 60 feet, Tum-A-Lum
3.50
Lbr. Co............... .
Lot 12, 50 feet, H. R. Newport .... 3.50
Lot 13, 50 feet, H. R. Newport .... 3.50
50 feet, Thomas Campbell.. 3.60
Lot
Lot 15, 50 feet. Tum-A-Lum
Lbr. Co. -------.......... 3.50
Lot 1«. 50 feet, Thomas Campbell. 3.50
Block
1.76
Lot 1, 25 feet, F. B, Swayze „
1.76
Lot 2, 35 feet, F. B. Swayze .
1.76
Lot 3, ■ feet, H It. Newport
25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
Lot
Lot 5, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
25 feet,
* ‘ B. G. Monkman .... 1.76
Lot
Lot 7, 26 feet, Pacific Tel. &
1.75
Tel. Co........ .......
1.75
Lot 8, 25 feet, H. R. Newport
1.75
Lot », 25 feet, E. W. Mack .....
1.75
- 36 feet, A. L. Larson ....
Lot 10,
1.75
Lot 11. H feet, E. 8. Taylor ....
1.75
Lot 11, 26 feet, C. M. Jensen ....
1.75
Lot 13, 25 feet, H. R. Newport
■
1.75
H.
Newport
Lot
feet,
R.
1.75
Swayze _
Lot 15, ■ feet, F.
feet, F. U. Swayze
1.75
Lot 18,
Lot 17, 25 feet, First National
1.75
Bank
1.75
Lot 17, 25 feet, E. P. Illsley
3.50
Lot 18. 50 feet, F. B. Swayze
3.50
Lot 1». 50 feet, H. 11. Newport
3.60
Lot 20, 50 feet, J. H. Raley .....
3 50
Lot 21, 50 feet, I. S. Taylor ....
3.50
Lot ■ 60 feet, E. 8. Taylor ....
3.60
Lot 23, 60 feet, F. B. Swayze ...
3.50
60 feet, F. B. Swayze
Lot
Block
25 feet, First National
Lot
1.76
Bank ............... .....
1.76
25 feet, F. B. Swayze ......
Lot
■ feet, Nettle Goodwin ...
1.76
Lot
■ feet, H. E Hitt ............
1.76
Lot
1.75
Lot E ■ feet, W. M. Glasson .
1.75
Lot 6, ■ feet, Page & Son ........ .
1.75
Lot 7, ■ feet, Page & Son ..........
1.75
Lot 8. ■ feet, C. 8. McNaught
1.75
Sam Rodgers ......
Lot ». ■
1.76
Lot 10. 25 feet, F. Adams ..............
1.75
26 feet, F. Adams ..... ........
Lot
32 feet, Hermiston Bank
Lot
2.24
& Trust Co-----
1.05
Lot 13. 15 feet, H R. Newport
1.75
25
H R. Newport
Lot
L. Stork .....
1.75
Lot 15. ■ feet, J.
Stork ........... 1.76
Lot 18, ■ feet, 5.
1.76
Commegys.
E.
Lot 17. ■
. 1.75
Lot 18. 35 feet, H. K. Newport
Commegys . 1.76
E.
Lot 19, 25
Frick ..... ..... 1.75
Lot 20, ■ feet, II
Frick ........... 1.76
Lot 31. ■ feet, II
1.75
Lot 13. 25 feet, 11. A. Frick
Block 7-
3.50
Julius
Lund
Lot } 50 feet,
Julius Lund
3.60
50 feet,
Lot
3.60
Lot
50 feet, E P. Illsley ...
3.50
60 feet, U. S. Kingsley
Lot
■ feet,
3 .99
C Gray......
Lot
W. Craik ....
3.60
60 feet,
Lot
2.45
7. ■ feet, Geo. Briggs
.84
8, 1.' feet, Geo Briggs
13
feet,
Deck
.......
.91
Millie
Lot
1.75
25 feet. Millie Deck .......
Lot
25
Sapper
....
1
75
Lot 10.
1.75
Lot 11. ■ feet, J. H. Williams
Lot 11. ■
1 75
M 8.
Lot 13. 25 feet. M
1.75
8.
M 8 Kern ........... 1.75
Lot II. 25
Lot 15. 25 feet, F
McKenzie
1.75
Lot 18, 25 feet, Masonic Lodge ....... 1.75
Lot IT. 25 feet, Masonic Lodge __
Lot 18. 36 feet. Masonic Lodge ...„.
Block
Lot 1. 50 feet, C. O. Wainscott.. . 3.50
50 feet, C. O. Wainscott....
3.50
Lot t E
Lot
feet, H. Peters . . ............ 3.60
3 50
feet, Rena Waterman
Lot
Lot 5, 50 feet, Rena Waterman . 3 50
50
Eriksen ......
3 60
Lot
Erikson ......
Lot
50
8, 50 feet, E. T. Erikson .......
25 feet. K W. Mack .....
1.75
.92
10.
feet. E. W. Mack
feet, K. W. Mack...
19.
et, fc W. Mack..........
1.7.
11,
13.
feet, F. W. Mack
13.
feet, Mrs J. M McCoy
feet. M. D O’Connel....
14,
N H Skinner ....... 1 75
Lot 15.
Lot
E. W. Mack ...........
feet, M W. Sharrard
Lot
1 tl
feet. F. II. Swayze .......
Lot
Lot 19, 25
Wm Rhorer . ..... 1.71
J. Schimke ...........
Lot
feet, J, Schimke .........
Lot
City of Hermiston
Lot
Block
feet. H. R Newport _
3 80
Lot
H R. Newport . .. 3 50
1. 50
City of Hermiston
Lot
City of Hermiston
City of Hermiston
Lot 5.
Mumma .
feet » ------
Lot
3;
12
■
Lot
Lot
Lot
Block
Block
■
E
1
F
E
Mumma
.
Mumma .
W Mack
W Mack
3.50
M umma
R. Newport
IE 50 feet H. R. Newport
b H Brownell
15, 50
Ç 8 McNaught
16, 50 feet, C 8. McNaught
3.50
3 50
Wm
Wm
1 78
1
j
Correll
....
Correll .....
3.88
1.75
feet, Wm. Correll .....__
Lot 3.
feet. Wm. Corred......._ 1.75
3.50
Lot
D. Lowman..
Lot 1. 40 feet.
M F. Callbeck — 1.75! Lot 3, 60 feet. J. D Lowman...
25
3.50
Lot
25
M. F. Callbeck — 1.76
1>
Lowman
Lot
10,
25
feet.
1
75
Lot
■
M. F. Callbeck .._ 1.75
3.50
Lot
D. Lowman...
Lot 11, 50 feet,
Lot ». 25 feet, Xra Hall ..............__
D.
Lowman
..
8.50
1.75
I
12.
50
feet.
J.
-==
Lot
■
Ira Hall...... —___
Lot
Lot 10, 25
E. T. Erikson ___
1.05
R. C. Todd
Lot 1. 15
■
E. T. Eriksen ____ 1.75
. Todd
1.75
Lot H.
l-.t 2. 25
R.
1 75
E. T. Erikson —_
Lot 12. 25
1.75
. Todd
Lot 3, 26
25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Block 11-
Lot
Lot 18, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
2.10
B. Polley
Lot 1, SO
Lot 1». 25 feet, W. W Ilisley ___ 1.76
1.75
feet. B
Lot I
Lot 20. 26 feet. W. W Illsley ....... 1.76
1.76
25
Lot
Harry
Spinning
_
1.76
Lot 21, 25
J H. Raley............. 1.76
Lot $ 25
1.76
Lot 22, 25 feet, Harry Spinning _
feet, Genevieve Kimball L76
Lot 23, 25 feet, Smith ....... .________
Lowman & Pelley 1.75
6. 25
—
Lot 24, ■ feet. Smith .........
Lowman & Pelley 1.76
Lot 7. 25
Art Burkenbine_
1.76
Lot 25, 25
J. D. Lawman....... 1.76
25
Lot
1.75
Lot 26, 25 feet, Art Burkenbine _
1.75
25 feet.
City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot 27. 25
. Barnes
Lot 10, 20
Lot 28,
City of Hermiston 1.76
1.40
Lot 11. 20
E. W. Barnes
City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot 29, 25
1.05
15 feet, E. W. Barnes
Lot
Lot 30, 26 feet. City of Hermiston 1.76
Lot 13, 15 feet, E. W. Barnes
Longley
1.76
H
Lot 31. 25
Barnes
.7»
10
feet,
E.
W.
Lot
1.75
Lot 32, ■ feet. H.
Longley
.35
Lot 15 , 5 feet, E. W. Barnes
Block 11-
E.
W.
Barnes
.35
feet.
Lot 16.
25 feet,
1.75
D.
Lot
3.10
Geo. Briggs
Lot
1.75
Lot 2, 25 feet,
feet, Geo. Briggs ..... ----- 1.75
Lot
1.76
Lot 3, 25 feet.
D.
30. 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
25
1.76
Lot
D.
21. 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot 5, 25 feet,
D.
1.76
Lot 22. 25 feet, E. W. Barnes ....... 1.75
1.76
25 feet,
D.
Lot
1.75
Lot 23, 25 feet, E. W. Barnes _
Lot 7, 25 feet, Q. G. Happer
1.75
Lot 24, 25 feet, J. D. Lowman..
1.76
Lot 8, 25 feet, O. G. Sapper
1.75
Lot 26, 25 feet. J. D. Lowman..
1.76 Block
Lot », 25 feet, O. G Sapper
Lot 10, 25 feet, O. G. Sapper
1.75
80 feet, Lowman & Polley 3.10
Lot
Lot 23, 25 feet, G. A. Cressey
25 feet. Lowman A Pelley 1.76
Lot
25 feet, G. A. Cressey
1.76
Lot
50 feet, Joe Ralph ............... 8.50
Lot
1.75
Lot 26, 25 feet, Geo. Patterson
25 feet. Joe Ralph............... 1.75
Lot
1.76
Lot 26, 25 feet, Geo. Patterson
Lot 5, 25 feet, Joe Ralph ............. - 1.75
1.75
Lot 27, 26 feet, Whitting ..........
25 feet, J. F. McNaught.... 1.76
Lot
1.76
Lot 28, 25 feet, Whitting ........!..
Lot 7, 25 feet, J. F. McNaught. .. 1.75
1.76
Lot 2», 25 feet, G. A. Cressey
Lot 8, 25 feet, J. F. McNaught. .. 1.75
1.75
Lot 30, 25 feet, G. A. Cressey
25 feet, J. F. McNaught... 1.75
Lot
Lot 31, 25 feet, G. A. Cressey
1.75
Lot 10, 25 feet, J. F. McNaught.. 1.75
1.75
Lot 32, 25 feet. G.
Lot H. 25 feet, J. F. McNaught... 1.75
Block
Lot 12. 25 feet, J. F. McNaught... 1.75
Lot 2, 25 feet, O. C. Gray ........
1.75
Lot 13. 25 feet. Hermiston Bank
1.75
Lot 3, 25 feet, O.
Gray ..... .
& Trust Co. ...... .... 1.75
25 feet, O. C. Gray ____
1.76
Lot
Lot 14, 35 feet. Hermiston Bank
1.75
Lot 5, 25 feet, O. C. Gray .,..._
& Trust Co. .. .... ... 1.76
1.33
Lot 6, 1» feet. O. C. Gray ------
Lot 15, 26 feet, J. F. McNaught . 1.75
1.75
Lot 8.
E. O. Blackwood.
Lot 16, 25 feet, J. F. McNaught.... 1.75
Lot »,
E. O. Blackwood...
Lot 18, 30 feet, Mrs. J. F. Mc­
E. O. Blackwood..
Lot 10,
Naught ............ — 3.10
E. O. Blackwood. ..
Lot 11,
Lot 1». 26 feet, Mrs. J. F. Me-
Lot 12, 18212 feet, E. O. Blackwood 12.77
1.75
Naught
Lot 17, 25 feet, J. D. Watson ....... 1.75
Lot 30, 25 feet. Mrs. J. F. Me
1.75
Lot 18, 25 feet, J. D. Watson ...
1.75
Naught
.88
Lot 1», 121, feet, J. D. Watson
Lot 21, 25 feet, Mrs. J. F. Me
.88
Lot 19, 1212 feet, F. B. Swayze
1.75
Naught
1.76
Lot 20, 25 feet, F. B. Swayze ...
Lot 22. 25 feet. Mrs. J. F. Mc-
26 feet,
‘
- B.
- - Swayze
1.75
F.
Lot
1.75
Naught
1.75
Lot 22, 25 feet, F. B. Swayze
Lot 23, 25 feet, Mrs. J. F we-
1.76
Lot 23, 25 feet, D. W. Zellar
1.75
Naught ........... .
1.75
1.75
Lot 24, 25 feet, D. W. Zellar
Lot 24. 25 feot, M. Rhymerson
Block
1.75
Lot 25, 26 feet, M. Rhymerson
Lot 4. 25 feet. Dr. Kern
Block
Kern Addition __
1.75
3.50
Lot
60 feet, Pearson
8.50
Block
Lot 2, 60 feet, O. P. Brigham
Lot 1-8 194 feet, I. E. Ltnbr. Co.— 13.58
3.50
Lot 3, 50 feet, O. P. Brigham
3.50
Block
50 feet, H. W. Coe _____
Lot
3.60
Lot 1, 50 feet, O.-W. R. & N. Co. 3.60
Coe
____
-
Lot 5. 60 feet, H. W.
City of Hermiston according to plat filed
3.60
Lot 6, 50 feet, H. w. Coe _____
with County Recorder April 5, 1905.
8.50
Lot 7, 50 feet, H. w. Coe _____
—*
Amount
Name
3.50
Lot 8, 50 feet, H. w.
Hermiston
3.50
Block 1-
Lot 9, 80 feet, City of
Lot 1, 30 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 2.10
Lot 10, 50 feet, Wm. Brown ........... 3.50
8.60
Lot 2, 25 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 1.75
City
of
Hermiston
Lot 11. 50 feet,
Lot 3. 25 feet, Hermiston Realty
3.50
Lot 12. 50 feet, B. H. Prior......... .
1.75 Block
Co........ ........ .............
Lot 4, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot 1. 40 feet, City of Hermiston 2.80
Lot 5, 25 feet, Tom Marxon ......... 1.76 Block
Lot «, 25 feet, Tom Marxon ......... 1.75
50 feet, City of Hermiston 8.50
Lot
Lot 7, 26 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 1.76
1.75
26 feet, C. J. Flynn
Lot
Lot 8, 25 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 1.75
50 feet, C. J. Flynn --------- 8.50
Lot
Lot », 30 feet, Lowman & Pelly.. 1.75
8.60
Flynn
------
....
50
feet,
C.
J.
Lot 5,
Lot 10, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
1.40
Lot 8, 20 feet, C. J. Flynn ........ .
Lot 11, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
2.80
C.
J.
Flynn
...........
40
feet,
Lot ».
Lot 12, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot 10, 30 feet, City of Hermiston 2.10
Lot 13, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
2.10
~
‘
Smith
...........
E.
30
feet,
Lot 11.
1.40
Lot 14. 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
Smith
Lot 12, 20 feet. E.
’ * 15, 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76 Block
Lot
Lot 16, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
.70
10 feet, J. D. Lowman....
Lot
Hermiston 1.75
Lot 17. 25 feet, City of ______
.70
Lowman...,
Lot 2, 10 feet,
1.40
Lot 18, 20 feet, J. D. Lowman.
1.06
D. Lowman....
Lot 3. 15 feet,
1.75
D. Lowman.
Lot 19. 25 feet,
1.40
Lowman....
20 feet,
Lot
D. Lowman.
1.75
Lot 20, 26 feet,
1.40
Lowman....
Lot 5, 20 feet,
1.76
Lowman
Lot 21. 25 feet,
.35
D. Lowman....
Lot 6, 5 feet,
1.76
25
D.
Lowman
22,
feet, J.
1.40
F. McNaught.
Lot 7, 20 feet,
Lot 23, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
1.75
Lot 8, 25 feet, J F. McNaught.
Lot 24. 26 feet, J. D. Lowman....... 1.75
F. McNaught.
Lot 9, 25 feet,
Lot 25, 25 feet, J. D. Lowman....... 1.75
1.75
Lot 10, 25 feet, R. Boswell
Block 2—
1.75
Lot H, 25 feet, R. Boswell
2.10
30 feet, J. W. McDermed
Lot
1.75
Lot 12, 25 feet, R. Boswell
1.76
Lot 2. 25 feet, J. W. McDermed.
2.10
Lot 13. 30 feet, R. Boswell
1.75 Block
Lot 3. 25 feet, Walter Oaks ....
1.76
Lot
25 feet, Prescott Oaks....
Lot 1, 47.6 feet, J. H. Reid........... 3.33
1.75
Lot 6, 25 feet, J, D. Lowman....
Lot 2, 47.5 feet, City of
1.06
3.37
Lot 6, 16 feet, J. D. Lowman....
Hermiston ...........
.70
Lot 0, 10 feet, H. G. Newport .
Lot 3, 47.5 feet, City of
1.75
Lot
25 feet, H. G. Newport
Hermiston . .......... 3.33
Lot 8, 25 feet. Syndicate
Lot 4, 47.5 feet, E. E. McMillan . 3.33
1.75
Bldg. Co. _____
E. E. McMillan.. 3.33
5.
47.5
feet,
Lot
Lot 9, 30 feet, Syndicate
Lot 6, 47.5 feet, E. E. McMillan.. 3.33
2.10
Bldg. Co. ............
Lot 7, 47.5 feet. City of
Lot 10. 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
Hermiston ........... 3.33
Lot 11. 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot 8, 47.5 feet, City of
Lot 12, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
Hermiston ........... 3.33
Lot 13, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
Lot 9, 47.5 feet. City of
feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
Lot 14,
Hermiston ..... ___ 3 33
feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
Lot 16,
Lot 10, 47.5 feet, E. E. McMillan.. 3.33
Lot 16, 25 feet, City of Hermiston
E. E. McMillan.. 3.33
feet,
Lot
11,
47.6
Lot 17, 25 feet, City of Hermiston
Lot 12, 47.5 feet. E. E. McMillan . 3,33
2.10
Lot 18, 30 feet, J. D. Lowman___
Block
C
—
1.76
Lot 1». 25 feet, J. D. Lowman
3.50
Lot 2, 50 feet. Parsons
Lot 30, 25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot 21. 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75 Block E—
3.78
Lot 3. 54 feet, W. S. Boynton.
Lot 22, 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
3.78
Stevens ........
Lot 6, 54 feet,
Lot 23, 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
3.78
Stevens .......
Lot 7, 54 feet,
Lot 24, 26 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
H.
Crandall
3.78
feet,
C.
Lot
10,
54
Lot 25, 25 feet. City of Hermiston 1.76
Block
Block 3—
3.78
Reeder
F.
6,
54
feet,
Lot
3.50
Lot 1, 50 feet, J. H. Reid .......
Lot 7, 54 feet, O. P. Brigham ..... 3.78
8.50
Lot 2, 60 feet, I. E. Lmbr. Co. .
3.78
Mrs.
E.
H.
Geary..
8,
54
feet,
Lot
3.50
E. Lmbr. Co. .
Lot 3, 50 feet,
Lot ». 54 feet, J. T. Hinkle —....... 8.78
3.60
4, 50 feet,
S. McNaught.
3.78
Mrs.
E.
H.
Geary..
feet.
Lot
10,
54
3.60
8. McNaught.
Lot 6. 60 feet,
3.60 Block
Lot 6, 50 feet, Chas. Hahn
3.50
C.
8.
McNaught.
18.90
Lot 7, 60 feet,
370 feet, Tom Fraser
3.50 Block H—
Lot 8, 60 feet, C. 8. McNaught
3.50
8. McNaught
Lot », 60 feet,
Lot 1, 54 feet, City of Hermiston 3.78
8.60
Lot 10, 50 feet,
8. McNaught.
Lot 2. 54 feet, City of Hermiston 8.78
3.50
Lot 11, 60 feet, C. S. McNaught
Lot 3, 64 feet, City of Hermiston 3.78
Lot 12, 50 feet, Hermiston Bank
Lot 4. 64 feet, Thon. Jaques ..... .. 3.78
3.50
& Trust Co.___
Lot 5, 64 feet, City of Hermiston 4.48
Block
Lot 8, 54 feet, Genevieve Reid .... 3.78
Lot
59 feet, J. F. McNaught.... 3.60
Peer Bokish —....... 3.78
Lot
7, 54
feet, J. F. McNaught.. . 3.60
Lot ad e
Lot 8, 64 feet, City of Hermiston 3.78
Lot 3. fa feet, City of Hermiston 3.60
9.
54
feet,
Owen White ....... 3.78
Lot
Lot
50 feet, City of Hermiston 3.50
Lot 10, 54 feet. Owen White ....... 3.78
Lot 5. 50 feet, City of Hermiston 3.50
Dated
at
Hermiston,
Oregon, this 13th
«, 40 feet, City of Hermiston 2.80
Lot 8. 40 feet, Geo. C. Ellison .... 2.80 day of March, 1920.
3.50
Lot », 50 feet, R. Boswell
C. M. JENSEN, Recorder.
3.50
Lot 10, 5o feet, R. Boswell
3.50
Lot 11, 50 feet, R. Boswell
Lot 13, 50 feet, R. Boswell
3.50
Treaty Obligations Hold.
Block
3.50
Lot 1, 50 feet, It. Boswell
Paris.
—Fulfillment of treaty obliga­
3.50
Lot 3, 60 feet,
* * R. Boawell
3.50 tions by the new German government
Lot 2. 50 feet, R. Boswell
1.40
Lot 4, 20 feet, R. Boswell
1.80 will be insisted upon, said Premier
Lot 10, 20 feet, R. Boswell
1.50
Lot 11, 60 feet, R. Boswell
3.60 Millerand Monday.
Lot 12. 50 feet, R. Boswell
Block
"Although the news from Berlin
Lot 1, 50 feet, Genevieve Kimball 3.50
Lot 3. 60 feet, Genevieve Kimball 3.50 as yet not sufficiently complote to
3.50
Lot 3. 50 feet, J 8. Beal . ...... .
3 60 enable one to form an opinion
Lot 4. 50 feet,
F. McNaught.
F McNaught.
3.60 garding the counterrevolution and its
Lot 6. 50 feet,
3.50
Lot 6, 50 feet.
McNaught
3.60 effects,” the premier declared, "I may
J. F. McNaught.
Lot 7. 50
Lot I M feet, J. F. McNaught
say that, whatever may be the char­
Lot », 50 feet, J. F. McNaught. .
Lot 10. 50 feet. City of Hermiston 3.50 acter or extent of the revolution in
3 60
Lot 11. 60 feet. J. H. Reid
Lot 12, 50 feet, Genevieve Kimball 3 50 Germany, the allies are determined
Block 7—
1.10 that full execution of the treaty of
Lot 1. 30 feet, Chezik ..................
26 feet, Chezik ..................
1.75
Lot
Lot 3. 25 feet, F. A. Cheslk........... 1.75 Versailles shall not be hindred in any
25 feet, F A. Chezik.....___ 1.75
Lot
25 feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot
Lot
feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
$ 25
■ feet, City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot
50,000 Dead to be Taken
25
feet,
Lowman & Pelly. 1.75
Lot
Lot ». 30
Lowman & Pelly . 1 10
Washington,
D. C.—The bodies of
■
feet,
J
1.76
Lot 1«.
D. Lowman.___
Lot
25 feet,
D. Lowman....... 1.78 about 50,000 of the American dead in
Lot it 25 feet, J. F. McNaught
1.76
25 feet, J. F McNaught... 1.75 France will be returned to the United
Lot
Lot 14. ■ feet, F. C. Woughter... 1 75
Woughter
Lot 15, 25 feet,
1.75 States, while between 30,000 and 25,-
25
Lot
D. Lowman.. ..... 1.76 000 will remain permanently interred
Lot 17. 30 feet, J. D. Lowman.
310
Lot 18, 25 feet J D Lowman.....
1.75 overseas. Secretary Baker Saturday in­
Lot I». 25 feet,
1.76
D. Lowman___
formed Chairman Wadsworth of the
Lot 20, ■ feet, H
Newport
1.75
Lot 31. 25 feet, ..
H. G.
_. Newport
senate military committee. The secre­
25 feet. Mrs. J. F.
Lot
McNaught ___ ....... 1.75 tary estimated the coot of returning
Lot ». 85 feet, Genevieve Kimball 1.75
■ feet,
1.75 the dead and concentrating the bodies
Lot
Lot
25 feet. City of Hermiston 1.76
remaining in cemeteries overseas at
Block
I. 30 feet, Mrs. C. R. Durfey 2.10 «30,000,000.
M feet, City of Hermiston 1.78
Lot
feet, City of Hermiston 1.76
36 feet. First National
Lot
Invited Nations All In.
Bank ......................
Lot
25 feet
D. Lowman
g
I
London.—Salvador and Venezuela
17
J. D. Lowman
J D
Lowman
7
have deposited their declarations of
Lot
J. D. Lowman
» 25
1.75
Lot
3« feet. First National
assent to the covenant of the league
Hank
2.10
Lot 10,
J D. Lowman....... 1.75 of nations, thus completing the list of
Lot
feet, J. D. Lowman.......
13 nations invited to become original
Lot it
feet. Stanley ...................
Lot
Stanley
...............
members of the league.
Lot 14.
City of Hermiston
Lot it
City of Hermiston 1 75
I ot
feet City of Hermiston 1.75
Lot 17,
City of Hermiston 3 10
Lot 18,
City of Hermiston 1 75
Paris— The government has acquir
Lot 19,
City of Hermiston 1 78
Lot 20
City of Hermiston
Lot 91
C R McNaught _
C. 8 McNaught —
W F
Woodstock
STREETS OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, FLOODED
176 Block
18 29
148
3.8
I
Lot 3». 25
feet.
1.75
Rank
German “big Bertha.”
% Copyright, s
c Vederwood & t
3538% Undarwoed s
The storm which has been sweeping the Atlantic coast caused an unusually high tide, and many of the streets
of Norfolk, Va^ were flooded. This photograph shows automobiles making their way through the flooded streets.
ROAD TO SPAN
CONTINENTS
Ten-Thousand-Mile Une From
Hudson Bay to Pata­
gonia Planned.
PROGRESS III THE PROJECT
Several Sections Already Have Been
Completed—American Investors Are
Invited to Aid—Dream of
Fifty Years.
conference held In Mexico City In 1902,
which appointed a permanent Pan-
American railway committee composed
of prominent citizens of the United
States and diplomatic officials of Latin-
American countries resident in Wash­
ington. Former Senator Davis and Mr.
Carnegie were members of It.
“In the eighteen years since the plan
was indorsed by the Mexican confer­
ence,” explained Mr. Pepper In his re­
port, “considerable progress has been
made In joining up various railway
sections. Chile has completed the lon­
gitudinal line from Puerto Montt in the
south to the railways In the north,
which form junctions with the main
trunk of the Pan-American system.
“The Transandean line, from Valpa­
raiso to Buenos Aires, also has been
completed, while the lines joining the
Brizilian systems radiating from Rio
de Janeiro have been finished so that
they form junctions with Uruguayan
and Argentine Unes.
“The Argentine Une was finished to
the southern border of Bolivia at La
Quiaca several years ago, while Bo­
livia has closed up most of the links
New York.—Realization of the dream
of a railroad from Hudson bay to Pata­
gonia has been brought nearer as a
result of the recent Pan-American
financial conference in Washington, ac­
cording to Charles M. Pepper, who In
1903 was appointed by President Roose­
velt to visit the several countries from
Mexico southward and report on the
project.
A journey by rail from the Arctic
circle to the tip of South America, ap­
proximately ten thousand miles, could
be made under good traffic conditions,
it has been estimated, in sixteen to
eighteen days. At present twenty-four
days are required for the 5,871-mile sea
voyage from New York to Buenos Aires.
This dream of a transhemisphere
trunk Une, running almost the entire
length of the two American continents,
was born in the brain of Hinton Rowan
Helper, a southern writer and former
United States consul In South America,
mere than fifty years ago. The late
United States Senator Henry Gassaway He Adequately Combines the
Davis of West Virginia, a practical rail­
Functions of the Miner and
road builder, saw its feasibility, and,
with Andrew Carnegie and other
Practical Engineer.
wealthy Americans, gave the idea a
fresh impetus. James G. Blaine also
once advocated it.
Takes Definite Form.
The project received first definite
form at the international American
Mining Engineer of the Future Is
Likely to Bo More Liberally Edu­
cated Than the Engineer
KILL THOUSANDS OF RABBITS
of the Past
Idaho Conducta Big Drives Against
Animals That Menaced Irri­
New York.—The new type of geolo­
gated Lands.
gist Is coming into his own, If the
opinion of Dr. Charles P. Berkey, pro­
Washington.—Idaho has conducted fessor of geology at Columbia univer­
rabbit drives in recent weeks on as sity, is given weight.
This modern
big a scale as when the country was geologist has an instinct for practical
new.
Because the cold ' weather
problems, is qualified to give prompt,
brought the rabbits by the thousands
decisive advice when minutes mean
to feed in the irrigated lands they
dollars, possibly hundreds of them, in
threatened to do extraordinary damage
connection with big exploration or en­
in some sections. One drive netted
gineering works.
ever 8,000 rabbits and another 3,500.
In the old days the mining en­
In Minidoka county, Idaho. 29,000 jack
gineer or explorer was his own geolo­
rabbits have been killed this winter in
organized drives and 00,000 additional gist, making his observations and col-
by poisoning campaigns. Once school lcting his own data. Later came the
was dismissed to permit the boys to day of the purely scientific geologist,
take part. Four hundred people par» who, according to Professor Berkey,
tieipated. Six rabbit drives In Lincoln “failed to make good In the applied
science field," or at least not “to any
greater degree than the practical en­
gineer.”
The modern geologist, said the pro­
fessor recently, has taken advantage
of “the very detailed observations
made in underground explorations and
developments of all kinds, checking his
original conclusions and advice by the
nctual findings after the work has
been done.
An Applied Science.
“Geology has become an applied sci­
ence to a very considerable extent,”
said he. “It is now well understood
that great numbers of so-called acci­
dents in engineering and mining work,
of calamitous or costly failures, of ex­
cessive expense and delay, of inappro­
priate design and plan of operation,
and of entirely mistaken or erroneous
conception of the problem in hand have'
been due to ignorance or neglect of
the geologic factors Involved, quite as
aa
often ss to mistakes on the strictly
engineering questions.
“A dam that Is built, a tunnel that
A Few of the Rabbits Killed in Drive. Is constructed, a mine that is devel­
county. Idaho, resulted in killing 1,800 oped, a bridge, pier, or other heavy
bunnies. Each event took on the char­ structure that Is located, or a natural
acter of a community gathering. Sand­ resource that is exploited without due
regard for all the geological condi­
wiches and coffee were served.
In Walla Walla county, Washington. tions has not the same certainty of
11.000 rabbits were killed by 000 sports- success that attends a proper consid­
men armed with shotguns. They formed eration of these factors."
This Is the field of tbe new type of
a Une five miles long and drove the
animals to the point where tbe Snake | engineering and mining geologist.
According to Columbia authorities, s
and Columbia rivers unite.
Local representatives of the United marked and growing demand is noted
States department of agriculture have for geologists of this type, having the
point of view of the applied science
This to reported directed the work or have co-operated
with the local county agent or other man—the engineer. The engineer of
the future is likely. It to pointed out,
authority.
In her Pan-American trunk line. There
are now less than 125 miles In Bolivia
to be completed, some of which is also
graded In order to provide through
railway connection from Buenos Aires
to La Paz and to the Pacific. It would
cost approximately $5,000,000 to com­
plete it.
Bolivia to Get Loan.
“The group committee on Bolivia at
the recent Pan-American financial
conference recommended that a loan be
granted Bolivia for the purpose of
completing this link. It was explained
that the gauge was the same as that
of the Argentine Unes and an arrange­
ment by which Bolivia could use Ar­
gentine rolling stock was suggested.”
The war, it is said, has made It vir­
tually impossible for European coun­
tries to continue their financing of
South America, and this Is why delega­
tions from Colombia, Peru, Chile, Bra­
zil, Ecuador, Uruguay, Paraguay and
other South American lands have vis­
ited the United States in recent years
to awaken American investors to what
they call “a big investment opportu­
nity.” The proposed trunk Une would
run from the United States through
Mexico, Central America, Colombia.
Ecuador. Peru, almost the entire length
of Chile and from La Quiaca, Bolivia,
to Buenos Aires. From this main Une
would be connecting roads, some al­
ready completed, extending like "fin­
gers” in mnny directions toward the
Atlantic ocean.
GEOLOGIST NOW
ALL-ROUND MAN
SUCH MEN ME IN DEMAND
*----------------------------------
to be more liberally educated than the
engineer of the past.
Foundation Training.
“The best foundation training,” says
Professor Berkey, “for the men who
are to do work in this field of engineer­
ing and mining geology is the educa­
tional foundation given to engineers,
and the best additional training Is
connected with the fundamental en­
gineering subjects.”
This must be accomplished, he
thinks, by a thorough working knowl­
edge of geology almost equivalent to
that given to a Ph. D. candidate. The
practical education problem at Colum­
bia has been solved by the adoption
of a course in mining geology in en­
gineering schools as a definite brandi
of applied science training.
“This three-year course trains men
for advisory and professional work,”
he says, “in connection with engineer­
ing and other operations, involving a
knowledge of ground structure and
conditions, as well as for special stud­
ies of mining prospects and mine de­
velopment or other more formal geo­
logical investigations.
The course
leads to the degree of engineer of
mines in geology. Men preparing for
the operating or construction fields or
for the ore-dressing side of mining
work, take the regular mining sched­
ule.
“The principal members of the staff
are men of much experience In advis­
ory work, in connection with exten­
sive mining and engineering opera­
tions, and accustomed to handling
practical problems of the greatest pos­
sible variety. Columbia’s setting, tn
this great business center, with Its
own immense undertakings and Its
worldwide interests, adds further to
this atmosphere of the practical, the
applied and the economic.”
GERMAN SHIELD KEEPS EAGLE
But
Papers Ridicule the New
cutcheon, Saying Bird la
“Skinny, Homely."
Es­
Berlin.—The new German coat of
arms adopted by the national assem­
bly consists of a one-headed eagle, on
a yellow gold shield, and without the
old-time crown.
The eagle will be displayed In sim-
pie heraldic form without any acces­
sories.
The Hohenzollern coat of arms and
the chain of the order of the Silver
Eagle, all parts of the old Prussian
coat of arms, have been omitted. Ths
bill of the eagle, the tongue and tbe
talons are In red.
Servants of tbe
government are to wear tbe device
without tbe shield, so It can be pinned
to their uniforma.
Some of the pan-German papera
ridicule IL saying the “skinny, homely
eagle with extended tongue” violatea
all the rules of good taste.