Image provided by: Central Point School District #6; Central Point, OR
About Central Point times. (Central Point, Or.) 1964-19?? | View Entire Issue (July 28, 1966)
FACE 2 THURSDAY, JULY 28, 1966 CENTRAL FOMT T M B CENTKAl POINT TIMES W A S H IN G T O N rubuaiicd w eekly «very Thunday by CENTRAL POINT TIMES, INC. P. O. Box 846 216 E. Pine St. Central Point, Ore Entered ai second class m all matter at the post o tñ c e at Central Point, Ore. 97501, under act o f Congress Mar. J, 1897/ Subscription $ 3 .0 0 per year In Jackson C o ., $3. 50 In the State of Oregon and $ 4 .0 0 outside the state. AND By NEW SPAPER A S S O C IA T IO N EDITORIALS * * • "BULL-HEAPED" SPENDING We don't need more taxing to support more welfare spending and »ocial betterm ent spending; w e need drastically less welfare spending and social betterment spending. We don't need tax- lim itation measures to prevent increased property taxes to cover welfare spending; w e need legislators with enough honest guts to cut the welfare spending. We have tried consistently to explain that legislative measures for more and more taxes to cover more and more welfare spending were actually only measures in a wild scramble for more money with which to buy more votes (with the voters' own ro o ey ) for the legislators— not a desire on the part of those legislators to "do something" for their constituents. For such accusations as this colum n has thus m ade, w e have been caustically criticised by democrats and republicans a lik e, by high-ups and low-downs and a ll in betw een. But since truth w ill out, vindication seem s to be seeping through, com ing from some of the most unexpected quarters, from President on down. In an editorial Sunday headed "BULL-HEADED", the editor of the O egonian referred to last w eek's slick com m ents by President Johnson, "urging Congress to quit increasing his $113 billion bud get. " A ctually, President Johnson has been very pleased by the Congressional additions to his budget; they have not only "proved" that his askings were right and net extravagant, but have given him the opportunity to appear frugal when he chides Congress for its profligacy. The O egon ian editorial writer recognizes this when he says: ' The thing is, President Johnson isn't running for office this year. But all House members and a third of the sena tors are. Congressional leaders see p olitica l advantage in adding to the $23.5 billion proposed by the President for nonm ilitary spending ch iefly for agriculture, health, education and w elfare. WE THINK THEY'D PLEASE THE VOTERS MORE IF THEY WOULD REDUCE EXPENDITURES TO CURB INFLATION AND PREVENT AN INCREASE IN FEDERAL TAXES. "(Capitals ours for emphasis) i We submit that this adm onition on how to please the voters would apply just as effectu ally to Oregon voters on the state le v e l aj on the national le v e l. Instead of looking for sales taxes and other means o f robbing Oregon tax pockets, our legislators would please voters a lot more by cutting out a bunch of unnecessary state spending for "agriculture, health, education and welfare" profligacy. So far, we have heard of few Oregon legislators pos sessed of enough of the above mentioned guts to try to reduce our state spending budget in this manner. A ll the democrats w e know sneer at the idea; and our Governor and all the republican politi cians in Jackson county are fully in love with Mr. Johnson's so cialistic methods— because, up to now, it has successfully bought a whale of a lot of votes on both sides of the p olitical fen ce. But w e honestly b elieve that the good old "ignorant" voters are beginning to realize what beasts of burden the politicians are making of them . More and more people are beginning to reseht hearing by im plication: "What fools ye mortals be, " when the politician grandly asserts "I was instrumental in getting three and a quarter m illion dollars for my district. " It is beginning to be noted by many voters that the p olitician failed to explain whose money it was that he "got" for them . In the face of this, the newspapers advise us that Oregon dem ocrats and republicans in conventions over the weekend adopted almost carbon copy planks and resolutions. In doing so, neither said one word a*x>ut cutting spending. On the national le v el, some dem ocratic and most republican com m ent adverse to Mr. Johnson's spending programs approach the issue only in degree o f spending. Now w e honestly appreciate Republican Representative Frank T . Bow of Ohio has served for many years in Congress. He is a highly responsible and re spected, able man. When President Johnson held his televised press conference on Wednesday of last w eek, it touched off quite a chain of com m ents from Mr. Bow. We want to pass on to you those com m ents, together with some things about Mr. Bow, as reported by Willard Edwards of the Chicago Tribune: Bow was an incredulous “ billions” are often confus lisicofci ua the President vol- ed with “ millions,” a public unieered no comment on debt of 320 billions is mean the budget and was asked ingless. Its interest-cost per no questions about it. The minute, however, is compre discussion ranged over hensible — and staggering. the problems of the Viet For many years, as a Nam war, touched on leader of budget-cuttng “ black power” and politics forces in the House, he has in Virginia and California, waged a battle to reduce but nobody no seemed interest- government spending. There excessive spending were periods when, with bi ■Ï might bring on a partisan support, he enjoyed Huge tax increase f ir wage considerable success and and price controls. was able to report, in some Wien a reporter’s “ Thank sessions, slashes ranging you, Mr. President,” ended from five to ten billions. the news conference, Bow Then, “ economy” became a looked at his watch, scrib forgotten word in Congress bled some figures on a pad, and victories have been and announced: virtu a lly non-existent under the Johnson regime. “ That conference lasted 33 minutes. During that period, Bow was one of those it cost the American taxpay summoned to the White • er almost a m illion dollars House to hear the President just to pay the interest on voice his distress about the the public debt.” refusal of Congress to stay within the bounds of the 113 The figure seemed start billion dollar budget he out ling but he spelled it out. lined last January. He join The national debt created ed others in promising sup by many successive years of port of budget-cutting moves deficit financing has now be but was understandably come so swollen that the in pessimistic. terest alone costs $28,000 a minute. T hirty - three min On three occasions this utes — $924,000. year, he recalled, he offered a spending limitation am Bow has a habit of reduc endment to reduce presiden ing complicated finances to tial budget requests to 95 simple figures which may per cent of their total. If it be understood by the ordin had been adopted each time, ary citizen. In an era when « I HARDER • • • I t h a s r e - __ m a in e d f o r c. W. Harder S e n a to r F ra n k La u sche , O h io , to p in th e reason fo r s ta rv a tio n on th e In d ia n p o litic ia n s By Paul even that much, but w e would appreciate much more an honest effort to stop the federal government's intrusion into our private affairs— and pockets. C. W I L S O N F u r m a n y ye a rs a tte n tio n has I fo r se v e ra l y e a rs M illio n s o f been focused on th e p lig h t o f In d ia n s in th e m e a n tim e d ie d th e p o o r o f In d ia S to rie s o f o f s ta rv a tio n , b illio n s o f A m e r i s t a r v a t i o n h a v e been g iv e n can a id d o lla rs w e re p o u re d g re a t p ro m in e n c e in to In d ia , b u t s t ill th e g o v e rn * • • m e n t w o u ld n o t b u d g e o ne In c h In fact, billions have been fr o m its d o c trin e o f s o c ia lis m * • • taken fro m A m erican ta x p a y e r s to h e l p T h e g overn m en t, of course, feed »'«. h u n 1 took the position th a t In tim e gry o f Ind ia. socialism w ould cure a ll of B ut there has Ind ia 's Ills. And w ho can say been little . If th a t perhaps In tim e they m ay any m ention, be rig h t In this position. A fte r of w hy It was a ll, if Ute pop ulatio n o f a n a necessary to tio n starves 1» d eath, there are have hungry no m ore Ills . . . not to m ention Indians. I no m ore people, eith e r. P U B L IS H E R S FREE PALAVER 420 E Pm, ECONOMY MARKET c"ïî! p"int SM A LL B U S IN E S S ”* H o w e v e r. S e n a to r L a u sche re p o rts th a t th is s itu a tio n has n o w been so lve d . In d ia is p e r m it t in g th e c o m p a n y to b u ild th e p la n t in p a rtn e r s h ip w ith se e th e g o v e rn m e n t, w it h th e s t ip u In a land as ancien t as In d ia , la tio n m a n a g e m e n t w ill be h e ld food stuffs cannot be g row n b y th e fo re ig n in v e s to rs • * • w ith o u t fe rtilis e r as past cen tu r ie s of c u ltiv a tio n h av e Thus, perhaps, the firs t step sapped the soli. T h e A m erican has been taken to w a rd solving in te rn a tio n a l O il Co. for many the chronic sta rv a tio n or In d ia , years, the Senator reports, has throu gh p ractical capitalism , been ready w ith plans, and and not w ith the b u m b lin g b u w illin g to invest some $60 m il r e a u c r a c y o f s o c i a l i s m . O f lion dollars In a m odern chem course. In a ll fairness. It should ical fe rtilis e r plan t In Ind ia. be perhaps noted th a t a fte r cen • • • tu ries of control by B ritis h B u t fo r ye a rs th e In d ia n g o v monopolies, the In d ia n g o v e rn e rn m e n t k e p t th is p ro je c t, so m ent could have become sus b a d ly needed, fro m s ta rtin g . picious of capitalism . • * • T h e reason was th a t u n d e r its p o lic y o f so cia lism , th e g o v e rn A n d th a t leads to a n o th e r m e n t w o u ld n o t le t the f e r t ili z p a ra d o x . T h e B r itis h , w h o fo r e r p la n t be b u ilt u n le ss it w o u ld g e n e ra tio n s sow ed th e seeds o f be m an a g e d by th e In d ia n g o v s o c ia lis m th ro u g h p ra c tic in g e rn m e n t b u re a u cra ts. m o n o p o ly , n o w in f lu e n c e • « « A m e ric a n g o v e rn m e n t t h in k in g O b v i o u s l y , n o responsible on w h a l s h o u ld be d o n e in o t h m anagem ent of any company e r p a rts o f th e w o r ld , in c lu d in g Is going to invest $60 m illio ns R hodesia * * • of dollars of its stockholders' m oney In a plant and tu rn It T his is lik e the Yankees t r y o ver fo r operation by b u rea u ing to beet up th e ir ball club crats of any nation. by p u ttin g on th ird base a p la y • • • er w ith a life tim e b aitin g a v A n d th u s, th e m a tte r stood erage of .000. <V) N d ltH tia l k rtk -rs f t>4t uf ln<le|wt»,l« tii |tu»lnw«< federal spending in the cur rent fiscal year would have been reduced by 1.5 billions. “ Let me tell you,” he said, “ just how much sup port I got from members o f > the President’s own party each time this amendment was offered. On the Interior Department bill, I had the support of 30 Democrats. On the Treasury-Post Office ap propriations bill. Democrat votes totaled only 16. On the departments of Labor and Health, Education and Wel fare, Democrat votes went up to a grand total of 36. “ With a present House membership of 294 Demo crats and 139 Republicans, that is a pretty sorry effort in support of a modest cut of five per cent in federal spending on three billls. We all know that such a cut could be absorbed by almost any department or agency of the government without adverse effect on any essen tial program.” Where, Bow asked, were Postmaster General L a rry O'Brien and his “ corps of legislative liaison troops” if the President didn't want his budget requests increas ed? g “ When the initial funding of the rent supplement program and the National Teacher Corps were much desired by the President, O' Brien and his arm y came up here and twisted enough arms to assure their approv al,” he said. “ If the Presi dent really wants spending kept within bounds, why doesn’t he get on the tele phone to leaders, as he does in connection with programs he’s genuinely in terested in, and use his fa mous powers of persuasion? , “ When I had tested the temper of the House ant found almost no democrati< support among Democrats for cutting appropriation re quests, I offered amend ments to keep them at the ' level suggested by the President. Even then, the m ajority party refused to support my efforts. “ What has happened to the veto power of the Presi dent? E a rlie r presidents have vetoed appropriation bills and there is no reason w hy President Johnson shouldn't do so. He started this astronomical spending binge which got us into an inflationary spiral and he has the top-heavy majorities in both houses to stop it and enforce a veto if he's sin cere.” To Bow, one of the most frightening elements in the march to fiscal chaos is public apathy. “ The general public has maintained an ominous and — to me — incomprehensi ble silence about the tremendous proliferation of federal programs,” he said. “ I t has the most to lose. That is why I find it hard to believe that the President would not use the opportuni ty of the press conference to appeal for public demands on Congress for reduced spending. “ What does it all add up to for the people? First, we shall continue to have price inflation which may reach serious proportions in the months ahead. We can ex pect an unabated demand fo r goods and services which w ill result in price in- c r e a s e s throughout the economy. “ Second, we can expect a demand fro m the adminis tration for a tax increase to ease the inflationary pres sures. I would guess that we can expect such a request no later than next January. "T h ird , if the Viet Nam w ar continues and escalates, we may very well see the adm inistration’s ‘voluntary guideposts’ replaced by statutory wage and price controls. Except for the 1930’s - type of depression I cannot think of anything that would be more deva stating to our economy than «uch controls. “ M ark Twain once said: ’Thunder is good, thunder is impressive, but it is light ning that does the work,’ ’’ Bow commented. "We need some lightning, not thunder, from the White House If _____ - X. Congress is to be stopped from needless dissipation of the public’s hard-earned tax dollars.” 8 to 9 DAILY COMPLETE BEVERAGE LINE FRUITS & PRODUCE DELICATESSEN 9 to 9 SUNDAY LET FERS TH°t EDITOR D e e r Editor? 7 T h e " C iv il Rights A ct of . 1966” gives Attorney G eneral Nicholas Kstzenbach a ll the power he needs to establish a Police State In A m eric a. Even though you have no In tention o r d esire to e v e r de p rive your fellow citizen of anything that Is rig h tfu lly his, s till you are threatened by the C iv il Rights Act of 1966. F o r this b ill Is the legal fram e work on which local agents of the Justice Departm ent can build a c rim in a l case against even the most innocent of p e r sons whom they may wish to harass fo r any reason. Includ ing political reasons. (See An a ly s is ," Page 4 .) Labor Union m em bers are one of the p a rtic u la r targets of this b ill, and they Should be told about the contents a tT it le V , which In v e ry plain words forbids them to In te rfe re with the use of any "advantages of membership’ ’ by o t h e r s (whether union m em bers o r not) If such Interference might be construed as " d is c rim in a tio n ." Union m em bers should be urged to Insist on an e a - planotion from their local even though the p ro - visions of T it le I V , the Housing" section of this M il, appear to be the m o « objec tionable of Its contents, a close reading of T it le V reveals the s ta rk outline <3~ the Police State of the n ear future; a fu ture In which the Supreme Court w in legislate “ tig h ts " Into being . . . the President w in Issue Executive O rd ers . . . . and the Justice D epart ment win use the powers of T it le V to control the popula tion by threats of One Y e a r prison sentences sod $1,000 fines. (M ental pain). F o r example: T h e Supreme C o u rt of C a lifo rn ia has over turned the ex tre m ely "Prop ositio n 1 4 ," t h e . F a ir Housing law w hlcl , approved by the voters 2-1 In the 1964 election. Apparently, the court ru le d that " F a i r Housing" was a constitutional rig h t, establlshedby the Four teenth Amendment. Now, I f this ruling should be upheld by the W arren C o u rt, I t be comes the “ law o f the land,” and under T it le V of this C iv il Rights Act “ F a ir H o w - la g " can be enforced by the Attorney G eneral E V E N IF T H E F A IR HOUSING SEC T IO N O F T H S B IL L (T itle I V ) IS D E F E A T E D BY T H E CONGRESS! Obviously, thia en tire K B mum be stoppedl I t can be •tappet^ I f we d ire c t o u r e f fo rts where they w in do the m o « good. In the Senate, 8 3296 la be fo re the Judiciary C om m ittee, w here Chairm an James O. Eastland la f a c e d with an " a d d te s t" la his election y e a n Win he defy the Admin istra tio n and refuse to allow a y p a rt of thia U H to became law? O r, w ill he yield to A d - m inistration pressures? Ia tbt H o w e , Chairm an Emanuel C e lla r of the Judi ciary Com m ittee la handling H R 14765, and la certain to report the U U w ith only m inor at tiw u n the be up to ' - fenlth a t C hairm an of tbs C om m ittee, who power to tt public suppon. „ Rem em ber, YOUR IN F L U - BNCE COUNTS;................... ______ tier? use »Tea.aee. m u in " 300 « A ve., &.E. Washington, D .C . 20003 BRITT FESTIVAL BENEFIT HOUSE TOUR Thursday, August 11th — betw een hours 10 - 12 a . m . Following the tour refresh ments w ill be served on the Britt grounds. Proceeds to help m eet Britt Festival expenses in curred during current Festi val season................ H e llg a te C anyon on the lo w e r Rogue R iv er, cuts th ro u g h rugged stone fo rm a tio n s on its w a y to th e sea. T h is scene shows tw o boats passing th ro u g h H e llg a te on th e ir w a y to fis h in g fa rth e r d o w n the r iv e r A rra n g e m e n ts m ay be m ade fo r a t r ip fro m G ra n ts Pass to G o ld Beach on the r iv e r by c o n ta c tin g guides at (G ra n ts Pass. (O regon S tate H ig h w a y D e p a rt- ■ m e n t Photo). 104 oog In Our Opinion Miss Buchanan’s Trial H P H E CASE o f . Annette L. Buchan- an’s contempt trial has drawn edi torial comment from almost every ma jor— and thousands of lesser— news papers in the United States— and most surely, there has been comment in the press of other nations. That Annette was fined $300, but not given a jail sentence, has been seen by many as an indication of the court’s humanity. But this is hogwash. If the court had been concerned with the dignity of a citizen who still believed in principles, yet con cerned with the need to abide with the letter of the law, it could have just as easily fined Miss Buchanan $1.00, Among the hundreds of clippings we have received from throughout the country, three were on the side of law and order. A ll the others were in agree ment that the sources of press informa tion were sacrosanct. One letter to the editor pointed out that if the press were protected a robber could walk up to a reporter and say: "Hey, jezz, I just robbed a bank. I ’ll tell you all about it but you can’t squeal on me because you’re a reporter.” W ell, obviously, there’s no parallel. This is not a case of a reporter searching out the facts, and in order to obtain them, promising to protect sources. The case for law and order seems to be based on the concept that society needs informers. IRS, F B I, who else? In some countries this is carried to the point where a guy would turn in his own grandmother. I suspect that the forces of law and order are so powerful that they have little need for the confes sions of Annette Buchanan. It is hard to ril believe that the police could not io fik.w ,.> trate the college campus— in fact, w jtlu .jg a little bit of work they could probably put the whole country in jail ( I know of a case that happened this past weekend I was driving down to the shore and a ja desperado driving a motorcycle threw a beer can over his shoulder-—this is a $300 dollar fine— what's my cut if I turn him in?) •q Objectively, A n n e t t e Buchanan served little purpose. Articles about marijuana and other dopes have ap peared in papers all over the country. Everybody’s taking pills. W e’ve really gone to hell. Why the district attorney decided that he’d make an issue over a matter of principle is hard to see— but maybe he didn't have anything else to do. From some of the questions he asked Miss Buchanan, wc wonder if he knows what marijuana is. He wanted to know if Miss Buchanan used mariju ana (now, really); whether the law was proper; whether her story had benefited the public; whether she wanted to be a hero and go to jail; and how she spelled her middle name. Instead of working over Miss Bu chanan, the police could have checked out University of Oregon students. In this manner, they might have jailed all the marijuana smokers ( I smoke Luck ies). The point being, let’s leave enough room in the interpretation of the law, that a citizen can retain his dignity and not be humiliated by the massive power of the law. Any decent police system should be able to collect evidence with the right leads— there should be cheers for the press, for spotlighting danger areas.— git T h e individual’ s right to f a ir play versus society’ s right to maintain law and or d e r has been brought I n t o sharp focus by a recent Su prem e Court decision. News week magazine states In . feature a rtic le that the CovkV« ru lin g , ’ ’. . . Imposed sharp new lim its an the police power to question suspects— a power lawmen claim Is vital to con victions In fo u r out of five c rim in a l c a s e s . " T h e new rules provide, among other things, that a fte r a r r e « po lic e may not question a sus pect until they have told him that he has a rig ht to rem ain silent, that what he says may be held against him and that he Is entitled to have his law y e r with him In the In te rro g a tion room . It Is almost certain that according to ethical prac tice and “ good professional Judgment" the law yers w ill advise th eir clients not to an sw er. I t appears to many law enforcement o fficers, and with some justification, that under these conditions It w ill be a l most Impossible to ev er get a confession. Chief Justice E a r l W arren, expressing fo r the Court the b itte rly contested five to four m a jo rity opinion, states that, • • • • T h e . . . practice of Incommunicado Interrogation Is at odds with one of our na tion's m o « cherished princi ples— that the Individual may not be compelled to In c rim i nate h im s e lf." In his dissent ing opinion. Justice Harlan stated that, “ T h is doctrine . . .has no sanction, no sanc tion. , .It’ s obviously going to mean a gradual disappearance of confessions as a legitim ate tool of law enforcem ent.” Ab- though, In general, law en forcem ent agencies across the country w e r e apprehensive and c ritic a l of the Court’ s de cision, opinions are sharply divided even amoung nolle« officers and th e ir c lo s e « allie s, prosecuting attorneys. Despite the Supreme Court's legal rh eto ric and the debate which follows It , certain facts stand out. T h e rights of the accused have been fu rth er protected, tu t the problems of law enforcement have been vastly Increased. T h is comes at a tim e when c rim e Is In creasing at a sharp rate— six dm es fas ter than population since 1958 and s till growing. Last year, m ore than 2 ,6 0 0 ,- 000 serious crim es w ere r e ported in the United States. In o ur great c itie s , minority population ghettos are become lng m ore and m ore of a law enforcement problem and In many cases rio t spawners and potential battlegrounds as '• jiq 4sO «S* 04 kt 4«. A? H S«i ll/b -tat □ OQ iaO kW io l (PUBLISHERS AUXILIARY) Suppressing Enforcement Of The Law 04 "*A demonstrated In the W atts dis t r ic t of Los Angeles. P atrol ling such areas, day o r night, a police o ffic er puts hls life on the Une every step of the way. But, as Newsweek observes, we are In a tim e of transition. T h e re ts developing a new ap proach, a renaissance In law enforcement procedures. Law enforcement has become a of m a jo r study fo r ^ tropic and government research agencies. T h e Ford Foundation alone, " , . .has poured m ore than $5 m illion into police studies and ed u ca tion protects.” T h e re a re such proposals as one fo r a " rw o - filatoon police fo rc e " in which, 'One group would handle ma»- « r e requ iring the sophiati- c a e d approach: social prob lems - - like Juvenile delin quency — and m a jo r Investi gations. T he other group would do the manual labor: directing t r a f f i c , Investigating acci dents. . . New Ideas are being discussed re la tiv e to handling narcotics problem s, alcoholics and homosexuals. However, In the light of such developments as the Supreme Court’ s present ru lin g , some authorities feel that we may be moving too fast. Such laws may be too sophisticated to be applicable until o ur society has evolved to a little higher level than It has yet reached. M r . CJ>. DeLoach, assistant d ire c to r of the F ed era l Bu reau of Investigation has put It this way: " , . .to aU those who continually cla m o r fo r more restrictio n s on law en fo rc«- ment, I pose this question— W here wlU you turn fo r p r o tection of your Individual rights when you have totally destroyed the effectiveness of law enforcement?*’ T h is Is a question that concerns every person In the nation. How wlU the naw rules affect the rights of the Individual, the m orale and effectiveness of police o ffic ers , the o rd erlin ess of community life and the safety cuzlty of every c ltlz e a . “Tick Tock” Goes The Ferry Clock SAN II* O4 FRANCISCO— Inquire ’ ' lng repo rters, digging fo r news, have come up with some •’ I facts about the F e rr y Bulld->2F lng clock here which arc old enough to be news. The huge clock which adorns the F e rry Building tow er has four faces; the outer dials are M 23.3 feet in d ia m e te r, seven inches w ider than the dials of Btg Ben, the c l o c k on the tower of the House of P a r lia ment In London. F o u r Inner Illum inated dials are 14 feet In diam eter. The minute hands of the clock, 11 feet six Inches long. Jump ahead a half minute ev e ry th irty seconds, electroni cally controlled. T h e clock ticked its firs t tick on the tow er June 28. 1898. It was b u i l t by the Howard Watch and Clock Co. at a c o « of $5,335. Som ebare galnl i I