FACE 2
THURSDAY, JULY 28, 1966
CENTRAL FOMT T M B
CENTKAl POINT TIMES
W A S H IN G T O N
rubuaiicd w eekly «very Thunday by
CENTRAL POINT TIMES, INC.
P. O. Box 846 216 E. Pine St. Central Point, Ore
Entered ai second class m all matter at the post o tñ c e at
Central Point, Ore. 97501, under act o f Congress Mar. J,
1897/ Subscription $ 3 .0 0 per year In Jackson C o ., $3. 50
In the State of Oregon and $ 4 .0 0 outside the state.
AND
By
NEW SPAPER
A S S O C IA T IO N
EDITORIALS
* * •
"BULL-HEAPED" SPENDING
We don't need more taxing to support more welfare spending
and »ocial betterm ent spending; w e need drastically less welfare
spending and social betterment spending. We don't need tax-
lim itation measures to prevent increased property taxes to cover
welfare spending; w e need legislators with enough honest guts to
cut the welfare spending. We have tried consistently to explain
that legislative measures for more and more taxes to cover more
and more welfare spending were actually only measures in a wild
scramble for more money with which to buy more votes (with the
voters' own ro o ey ) for the legislators— not a desire on the part of
those legislators to "do something" for their constituents.
For such accusations as this colum n has thus m ade, w e have
been caustically criticised by democrats and republicans a lik e, by
high-ups and low-downs and a ll in betw een. But since truth w ill
out, vindication seem s to be seeping through, com ing from some
of the most unexpected quarters, from President on down.
In an editorial Sunday headed "BULL-HEADED", the editor of
the O egonian referred to last w eek's slick com m ents by President
Johnson, "urging Congress to quit increasing his $113 billion bud
get. " A ctually, President Johnson has been very pleased by the
Congressional additions to his budget; they have not only "proved"
that his askings were right and net extravagant, but have given
him the opportunity to appear frugal when he chides Congress for
its profligacy. The O egon ian editorial writer recognizes this
when he says: ' The thing is, President Johnson isn't running for
office this year. But all House members and a third of the sena
tors are. Congressional leaders see p olitica l advantage in adding
to the $23.5 billion proposed by the President for nonm ilitary
spending ch iefly for agriculture, health, education and w elfare.
WE THINK THEY'D PLEASE THE VOTERS MORE IF THEY WOULD
REDUCE EXPENDITURES TO CURB INFLATION AND PREVENT
AN INCREASE IN FEDERAL TAXES. "(Capitals ours for emphasis) i
We submit that this adm onition on how to please the voters
would apply just as effectu ally to Oregon voters on the state le v e l
aj on the national le v e l. Instead of looking for sales taxes and
other means o f robbing Oregon tax pockets, our legislators would
please voters a lot more by cutting out a bunch of unnecessary
state spending for "agriculture, health, education and welfare"
profligacy. So far, we have heard of few Oregon legislators pos
sessed of enough of the above mentioned guts to try to reduce our
state spending budget in this manner. A ll the democrats w e know
sneer at the idea; and our Governor and all the republican politi
cians in Jackson county are fully in love with Mr. Johnson's so
cialistic methods— because, up to now, it has successfully bought
a whale of a lot of votes on both sides of the p olitical fen ce.
But w e honestly b elieve that the good old "ignorant" voters
are beginning to realize what beasts of burden the politicians are
making of them . More and more people are beginning to reseht
hearing by im plication: "What fools ye mortals be, " when the
politician grandly asserts "I was instrumental in getting three and
a quarter m illion dollars for my district. " It is beginning to be
noted by many voters that the p olitician failed to explain whose
money it was that he "got" for them .
In the face of this, the newspapers advise us that Oregon dem
ocrats and republicans in conventions over the weekend adopted
almost carbon copy planks and resolutions. In doing so, neither
said one word a*x>ut cutting spending.
On the national le v el, some dem ocratic and most republican
com m ent adverse to Mr. Johnson's spending programs approach
the issue only in degree o f spending. Now w e honestly appreciate
Republican Representative Frank T . Bow of Ohio has served
for many years in Congress. He is a highly responsible and re
spected, able man. When President Johnson held his televised
press conference on Wednesday of last w eek, it touched off quite
a chain of com m ents from Mr. Bow. We want to pass on to you
those com m ents, together with some things about Mr. Bow, as
reported by Willard Edwards of the Chicago Tribune:
Bow was an incredulous
“ billions” are often confus
lisicofci ua the President vol-
ed with “ millions,” a public
unieered no comment on
debt of 320 billions is mean
the budget and was asked
ingless. Its interest-cost per
no questions about it. The
minute, however, is compre
discussion
ranged
over
hensible — and staggering.
the problems of the Viet
For many years, as a
Nam
war,
touched
on
leader
of
budget-cuttng
“ black power” and politics
forces in the House, he has
in Virginia and California,
waged a battle to reduce
but nobody
no
seemed interest-
government spending. There
excessive spending
were periods when, with bi
■Ï
might bring on a
partisan support, he enjoyed
Huge tax increase f ir wage
considerable success and
and price controls.
was able to report, in some
Wien a reporter’s “ Thank
sessions, slashes ranging
you, Mr. President,” ended
from five to ten billions.
the news conference, Bow
Then, “ economy” became a
looked at his watch, scrib
forgotten word in Congress
bled some figures on a pad,
and victories have been
and announced:
virtu a lly non-existent under
the Johnson regime.
“ That conference lasted 33
minutes. During that period,
Bow was one of those
it cost the American taxpay
summoned to the White •
er almost a m illion dollars
House to hear the President
just to pay the interest on
voice his distress about the
the public debt.”
refusal of Congress to stay
within the bounds of the 113
The figure seemed start
billion dollar budget he out
ling but he spelled it out.
lined last January. He join
The national debt created
ed others in promising sup
by many successive years of
port of budget-cutting moves
deficit financing has now be
but
was
understandably
come so swollen that the in
pessimistic.
terest alone costs $28,000 a
minute. T hirty - three min
On three occasions this
utes — $924,000.
year, he recalled, he offered
a spending limitation am
Bow has a habit of reduc
endment to reduce presiden
ing complicated finances to
tial budget requests to 95
simple figures which may
per cent of their total. If it
be understood by the ordin
had been adopted each time,
ary citizen. In an era when
«
I
HARDER
• • •
I t h a s r e - __
m a in e d f o r
c. W. Harder
S e n a to r F ra n k La u sche , O h io ,
to p in th e reason fo r s ta rv a tio n
on th e In d ia n p o litic ia n s
By Paul
even that much, but w e would appreciate much more an honest
effort to stop the federal government's intrusion into our private
affairs— and pockets.
C. W I L S O N
F u r m a n y ye a rs a tte n tio n has I fo r se v e ra l y e a rs M illio n s o f
been focused on th e p lig h t o f In d ia n s in th e m e a n tim e d ie d
th e p o o r o f In d ia S to rie s o f o f s ta rv a tio n , b illio n s o f A m e r i
s t a r v a t i o n h a v e been g iv e n can a id d o lla rs w e re p o u re d
g re a t p ro m in e n c e
in to In d ia , b u t s t ill th e g o v e rn
* • •
m e n t w o u ld n o t b u d g e o ne In c h
In fact, billions have been fr o m its d o c trin e o f s o c ia lis m
* • •
taken fro m A m erican ta x p a y
e r s to h e l p
T h e g overn m en t, of course,
feed »'«. h u n
1 took the position th a t In tim e
gry o f Ind ia.
socialism w ould cure a ll of
B ut there has
Ind ia 's Ills. And w ho can say
been little . If
th a t perhaps In tim e they m ay
any m ention,
be rig h t In this position. A fte r
of w hy It was
a ll, if Ute pop ulatio n o f a n a
necessary to
tio n starves 1» d eath, there are
have hungry
no m ore Ills . . . not to m ention
Indians.
I no m ore people, eith e r.
P U B L IS H E R S
FREE PALAVER
420 E Pm, ECONOMY MARKET c"ïî! p"int
SM A LL B U S IN E S S ”*
H o w e v e r. S e n a to r L a u sche
re p o rts th a t th is s itu a tio n has
n o w been so lve d . In d ia is p e r
m it t in g th e c o m p a n y to b u ild
th e p la n t in p a rtn e r s h ip w ith
se e
th e g o v e rn m e n t, w it h th e s t ip u
In a land as ancien t as In d ia , la tio n m a n a g e m e n t w ill be h e ld
food stuffs cannot be g row n b y th e fo re ig n in v e s to rs
• * •
w ith o u t fe rtilis e r as past cen
tu r ie s of c u ltiv a tio n h av e
Thus, perhaps, the firs t step
sapped the soli. T h e A m erican has been taken to w a rd solving
in te rn a tio n a l O il Co. for many the chronic sta rv a tio n or In d ia ,
years, the Senator reports, has throu gh
p ractical capitalism ,
been ready w ith plans, and and not w ith the b u m b lin g b u
w illin g to invest some $60 m il r e a u c r a c y o f s o c i a l i s m . O f
lion dollars In a m odern chem course. In a ll fairness. It should
ical fe rtilis e r plan t In Ind ia.
be perhaps noted th a t a fte r cen
• • •
tu ries of control by B ritis h
B u t fo r ye a rs th e In d ia n g o v monopolies, the In d ia n g o v e rn
e rn m e n t k e p t th is p ro je c t, so m ent could have become sus
b a d ly needed, fro m s ta rtin g . picious of capitalism .
• * •
T h e reason was th a t u n d e r its
p o lic y o f so cia lism , th e g o v e rn
A n d th a t leads to a n o th e r
m e n t w o u ld n o t le t the f e r t ili z p a ra d o x . T h e B r itis h , w h o fo r
e r p la n t be b u ilt u n le ss it w o u ld g e n e ra tio n s sow ed th e seeds o f
be m an a g e d by th e In d ia n g o v s o c ia lis m
th ro u g h
p ra c tic in g
e rn m e n t b u re a u cra ts.
m o n o p o ly , n o w in f lu e n c e
• « «
A m e ric a n g o v e rn m e n t t h in k in g
O b v i o u s l y , n o responsible on w h a l s h o u ld be d o n e in o t h
m anagem ent of any company e r p a rts o f th e w o r ld , in c lu d in g
Is going to invest $60 m illio ns R hodesia
* * •
of dollars of its stockholders'
m oney In a plant and tu rn It
T his is lik e the Yankees t r y
o ver fo r operation by b u rea u ing to beet up th e ir ball club
crats of any nation.
by p u ttin g on th ird base a p la y
• • •
er w ith a life tim e b aitin g a v
A n d th u s, th e m a tte r stood erage of .000.
<V) N d ltH tia l k rtk -rs f t>4t uf ln<le|wt»,l« tii
|tu»lnw«<
federal spending in the cur
rent fiscal year would have
been reduced by 1.5 billions.
“ Let me tell you,” he
said, “ just how much sup
port I got from members o f >
the President’s own party
each time this amendment
was offered. On the Interior
Department bill, I had the
support of 30 Democrats. On
the Treasury-Post Office ap
propriations bill. Democrat
votes totaled only 16. On the
departments of Labor and
Health, Education and Wel
fare, Democrat votes went
up to a grand total of 36.
“ With a present House
membership of 294 Demo
crats and 139 Republicans,
that is a pretty sorry effort
in support of a modest cut
of five per cent in federal
spending on three billls. We
all know that such a cut
could be absorbed by almost
any department or agency
of the government without
adverse effect on any essen
tial program.”
Where, Bow asked, were
Postmaster General L a rry
O'Brien and his “ corps of
legislative liaison troops” if
the President didn't want
his budget requests increas
ed?
g
“ When the initial funding
of the rent supplement
program and the National
Teacher Corps were much
desired by the President, O'
Brien and his arm y came
up here and twisted enough
arms to assure their approv
al,” he said. “ If the Presi
dent really wants spending
kept within bounds, why
doesn’t he get on the tele
phone to leaders, as he
does in connection with
programs he’s genuinely in
terested in, and use his fa
mous powers of persuasion?
, “ When I had tested the
temper of the House ant
found almost no democrati<
support among Democrats
for cutting appropriation re
quests, I offered amend
ments to keep them at the '
level
suggested
by the
President. Even then, the
m ajority party refused to
support my efforts.
“ What has happened to
the veto power of the Presi
dent?
E a rlie r
presidents
have vetoed appropriation
bills and there is no reason
w hy
President Johnson
shouldn't do so. He started
this astronomical spending
binge which got us into an
inflationary spiral and he
has the top-heavy majorities
in both houses to stop it and
enforce a veto if he's sin
cere.”
To Bow, one of the most
frightening elements in the
march to fiscal chaos is
public apathy.
“ The general public has
maintained an ominous and
— to me — incomprehensi
ble
silence
about
the
tremendous proliferation of
federal programs,” he said.
“ I t has the most to lose.
That is why I find it hard to
believe that the President
would not use the opportuni
ty of the press conference to
appeal for public demands
on Congress for reduced
spending.
“ What does it all add up
to for the people? First, we
shall continue to have price
inflation which may reach
serious proportions in the
months ahead. We can ex
pect an unabated demand
fo r goods and services
which w ill result in price in-
c r e a s e s throughout the
economy.
“ Second, we can expect a
demand fro m the adminis
tration for a tax increase to
ease the inflationary pres
sures. I would guess that we
can expect such a request
no later than next January.
"T h ird , if the Viet Nam
w ar continues and escalates,
we may very well see the
adm inistration’s ‘voluntary
guideposts’
replaced
by
statutory wage and price
controls. Except for the
1930’s - type of depression
I cannot think of anything
that would be more deva
stating to our economy than
«uch controls.
“ M ark Twain once said:
’Thunder is good, thunder is
impressive, but it is light
ning that does the work,’ ’’
Bow commented. "We need
some lightning, not thunder,
from the White House If
_____ - X.
Congress
is to be stopped
from needless dissipation of
the public’s hard-earned tax
dollars.”
8 to 9 DAILY
COMPLETE BEVERAGE LINE
FRUITS & PRODUCE
DELICATESSEN
9 to 9 SUNDAY
LET FERS TH°t EDITOR
D e e r Editor?
7
T h e " C iv il Rights A ct of
. 1966” gives Attorney G eneral
Nicholas Kstzenbach a ll the
power he needs to establish
a Police State In A m eric a.
Even though you have no In
tention o r d esire to e v e r de
p rive your fellow citizen of
anything that Is rig h tfu lly his,
s till you are threatened by the
C iv il Rights Act of 1966. F o r
this b ill Is the legal fram e
work on which local agents of
the Justice Departm ent can
build a c rim in a l case against
even the most innocent of p e r
sons whom they may wish to
harass fo r any reason. Includ
ing political reasons. (See An
a ly s is ," Page 4 .)
Labor Union m em bers are
one of the p a rtic u la r targets
of this b ill, and they Should be
told about the contents a tT it le
V , which In v e ry plain words
forbids them to In te rfe re with
the use of any "advantages of
membership’ ’
by o t h e r s
(whether union m em bers o r
not) If such Interference might
be construed as " d is c rim in a
tio n ." Union m em bers should
be urged to Insist on an e a -
planotion from their local
even though the p ro -
visions of T it le I V , the
Housing" section of this M il,
appear to be the m o « objec
tionable of Its contents, a close
reading of T it le V reveals the
s ta rk outline <3~ the Police
State of the n ear future; a fu
ture In which the Supreme
Court w in legislate “ tig h ts "
Into being . . . the President
w in Issue Executive O rd ers
. . . . and the Justice D epart
ment win use the powers of
T it le V to control the popula
tion by threats of One Y e a r
prison sentences sod $1,000
fines. (M ental pain).
F o r example: T h e Supreme
C o u rt of C a lifo rn ia has over
turned the ex tre m ely
"Prop ositio n 1 4 ," t h e .
F a ir Housing law w hlcl
, approved by the voters 2-1 In
the 1964 election. Apparently,
the court ru le d that " F a i r
Housing" was a constitutional
rig h t, establlshedby the Four
teenth Amendment. Now, I f
this ruling should be upheld
by the W arren C o u rt, I t be
comes the “ law o f the land,”
and under T it le V of this
C iv il Rights Act “ F a ir H o w -
la g " can be enforced by the
Attorney G eneral E V E N IF
T H E F A IR HOUSING SEC
T IO N O F T H S B IL L (T itle
I V ) IS D E F E A T E D BY T H E
CONGRESS!
Obviously, thia en tire K B
mum be stoppedl I t can be
•tappet^ I f we d ire c t o u r e f
fo rts where they w in do the
m o « good.
In the Senate, 8 3296 la be
fo re the Judiciary C om m ittee,
w here Chairm an James O.
Eastland la f a c e d with an
" a d d te s t" la his election
y e a n Win he defy the Admin
istra tio n and refuse to allow
a y p a rt of thia U H to became
law? O r, w ill he yield to A d -
m inistration pressures?
Ia tbt H o w e , Chairm an
Emanuel C e lla r of the Judi
ciary Com m ittee la handling
H R 14765, and la certain to
report the U U w ith only m inor
at
tiw u n
the
be up to '
- fenlth a t
C hairm an of tbs
C om m ittee, who
power to
tt
public suppon.
„ Rem em ber, YOUR IN F L U -
BNCE COUNTS;...................
______
tier?
use »Tea.aee.
m u in "
300
« A ve., &.E.
Washington, D .C . 20003
BRITT FESTIVAL BENEFIT
HOUSE TOUR
Thursday, August 11th —
betw een hours 10 - 12 a . m .
Following the tour refresh
ments w ill be served on the
Britt grounds.
Proceeds to help m eet
Britt Festival expenses in
curred during current Festi
val season................
H e llg a te C anyon on the lo w e r Rogue R iv
er, cuts th ro u g h rugged stone fo rm a tio n s on its
w a y to th e sea. T h is scene shows tw o boats
passing th ro u g h H e llg a te on th e ir w a y to fis h
in g fa rth e r d o w n the r iv e r A rra n g e m e n ts m ay
be m ade fo r a t r ip fro m G ra n ts Pass to G o ld
Beach on the r iv e r by c o n ta c tin g guides at
(G ra n ts Pass. (O regon S tate H ig h w a y D e p a rt- ■
m e n t Photo).
104
oog
In Our Opinion
Miss Buchanan’s Trial
H P H E CASE o f . Annette L. Buchan-
an’s contempt trial has drawn edi
torial comment from almost every ma
jor— and thousands of lesser— news
papers in the United States— and most
surely, there has been comment in the
press of other nations. That Annette
was fined $300, but not given a jail
sentence, has been seen by many as an
indication of the court’s humanity. But
this is hogwash. If the court had been
concerned with the dignity of a citizen
who still believed in principles, yet con
cerned with the need to abide with the
letter of the law, it could have just as
easily fined Miss Buchanan $1.00,
Among the hundreds of clippings we
have received from throughout the
country, three were on the side of law
and order. A ll the others were in agree
ment that the sources of press informa
tion were sacrosanct. One letter to the
editor pointed out that if the press were
protected a robber could walk up to a
reporter and say: "Hey, jezz, I just
robbed a bank. I ’ll tell you all about it
but you can’t squeal on me because
you’re a reporter.” W ell, obviously,
there’s no parallel. This is not a case of
a reporter searching out the facts, and
in order to obtain them, promising to
protect sources.
The case for law and order seems to
be based on the concept that society
needs informers. IRS, F B I, who else?
In some countries this is carried to the
point where a guy would turn in his
own grandmother. I suspect that the
forces of law and order are so powerful
that they have little need for the confes
sions of Annette Buchanan. It is hard to
ril
believe that the police could not io fik.w ,.>
trate the college campus— in fact, w jtlu .jg
a little bit of work they could probably
put the whole country in jail ( I know of
a case that happened this past weekend
I was driving down to the shore and a
ja
desperado driving a motorcycle threw a
beer can over his shoulder-—this is a
$300 dollar fine— what's my cut if I
turn him in?)
•q
Objectively, A n n e t t e
Buchanan
served little purpose. Articles about
marijuana and other dopes have ap
peared in papers all over the country.
Everybody’s taking pills. W e’ve really
gone to hell. Why the district attorney
decided that he’d make an issue over a
matter of principle is hard to see— but
maybe he didn't have anything else to
do. From some of the questions he
asked Miss Buchanan, wc wonder if he
knows what marijuana is. He wanted to
know if Miss Buchanan used mariju
ana (now, really); whether the law was
proper; whether her story had benefited
the public; whether she wanted to be a
hero and go to jail; and how she spelled
her middle name.
Instead of working over Miss Bu
chanan, the police could have checked
out University of Oregon students. In
this manner, they might have jailed all
the marijuana smokers ( I smoke Luck
ies). The point being, let’s leave enough
room in the interpretation of the law,
that a citizen can retain his dignity and
not be humiliated by the massive power
of the law. Any decent police system
should be able to collect evidence with
the right leads— there should be cheers
for the press, for spotlighting danger
areas.— git
T h e individual’ s right to
f a ir play versus society’ s
right to maintain law and or
d e r has been brought I n t o
sharp focus by a recent Su
prem e Court decision. News
week magazine states In .
feature a rtic le that the CovkV«
ru lin g , ’ ’. . . Imposed sharp
new lim its an the police power
to question suspects— a power
lawmen claim Is vital to con
victions In fo u r out of five
c rim in a l c a s e s . " T h e new
rules provide, among other
things, that a fte r a r r e « po
lic e may not question a sus
pect until they have told him
that he has a rig ht to rem ain
silent, that what he says may
be held against him and that
he Is entitled to have his law
y e r with him In the In te rro g a
tion room . It Is almost certain
that according to ethical prac
tice and “ good professional
Judgment" the law yers w ill
advise th eir clients not to an
sw er. I t appears to many law
enforcement o fficers, and with
some justification, that under
these conditions It w ill be a l
most Impossible to ev er get
a confession.
Chief Justice E a r l W arren,
expressing fo r the Court the
b itte rly contested five to four
m a jo rity opinion, states that,
• • • • T h e . . . practice of
Incommunicado Interrogation
Is at odds with one of our na
tion's m o « cherished princi
ples— that the Individual may
not be compelled to In c rim i
nate h im s e lf." In his dissent
ing opinion. Justice Harlan
stated that, “ T h is doctrine
. . .has no sanction, no sanc
tion. , .It’ s obviously going to
mean a gradual disappearance
of confessions as a legitim ate
tool of law enforcem ent.” Ab-
though, In general, law en
forcem ent agencies across the
country w e r e apprehensive
and c ritic a l of the Court’ s de
cision, opinions are sharply
divided even amoung nolle«
officers and th e ir c lo s e «
allie s, prosecuting attorneys.
Despite the Supreme Court's
legal rh eto ric and the debate
which follows It , certain facts
stand out. T h e rights of the
accused have been fu rth er
protected, tu t the problems
of law enforcement have been
vastly Increased. T h is comes
at a tim e when c rim e Is In
creasing at a sharp rate— six
dm es fas ter than population
since 1958 and s till growing.
Last year, m ore than 2 ,6 0 0 ,-
000 serious crim es w ere r e
ported in the United States.
In o ur great c itie s , minority
population ghettos are become
lng m ore and m ore of a law
enforcement problem and In
many cases rio t spawners and
potential
battlegrounds
as
'• jiq
4sO
«S*
04
kt
4«.
A?
H
S«i
ll/b
-tat
□
OQ
iaO
kW
io l
(PUBLISHERS AUXILIARY)
Suppressing Enforcement Of The Law
04
"*A
demonstrated In the W atts dis
t r ic t of Los Angeles. P atrol
ling such areas, day o r night,
a police o ffic er puts hls life
on the Une every step of the
way.
But, as Newsweek observes,
we are In a tim e of transition.
T h e re ts developing a new ap
proach, a renaissance In law
enforcement procedures. Law
enforcement has become a
of m a jo r study fo r
^
tropic and government
research agencies. T h e Ford
Foundation alone, " , . .has
poured m ore than $5 m illion
into police studies and ed u ca
tion protects.” T h e re a re such
proposals as one fo r a " rw o -
filatoon police fo rc e " in which,
'One group would handle ma»-
« r e requ iring the sophiati-
c a e d approach: social prob
lems - - like Juvenile delin
quency — and m a jo r Investi
gations. T he other group would
do the manual labor: directing
t r a f f i c , Investigating acci
dents. . .
New Ideas are
being discussed re la tiv e to
handling narcotics problem s,
alcoholics and homosexuals.
However, In the light of such
developments as the Supreme
Court’ s present ru lin g , some
authorities feel that we may
be moving too fast. Such laws
may be too sophisticated to be
applicable until o ur society
has evolved to a little higher
level than It has yet reached.
M r . CJ>. DeLoach, assistant
d ire c to r of the F ed era l Bu
reau of Investigation has put It
this way: " , . .to aU those who
continually cla m o r fo r more
restrictio n s on law en fo rc«-
ment, I pose this question—
W here wlU you turn fo r p r o
tection of your Individual
rights when you have totally
destroyed the effectiveness of
law enforcement?*’ T h is Is a
question that concerns every
person In the nation. How wlU
the naw rules affect the rights
of the Individual, the m orale
and effectiveness of police
o ffic ers , the o rd erlin ess of
community life and the safety
cuzlty of every
c ltlz e a .
“Tick Tock” Goes
The Ferry Clock
SAN
II*
O4
FRANCISCO— Inquire ’ '
lng repo rters, digging fo r
news, have come up with some •’ I
facts about the F e rr y Bulld->2F
lng clock here which arc old
enough to be news.
The huge clock which adorns
the F e rry Building tow er has
four faces; the outer dials are M
23.3 feet in d ia m e te r, seven
inches w ider than the dials of
Btg Ben, the c l o c k on the
tower of the House of P a r lia
ment In London. F o u r Inner
Illum inated dials are 14 feet
In diam eter.
The minute hands of the
clock, 11 feet six Inches long.
Jump ahead a half minute ev
e ry th irty seconds, electroni
cally controlled.
T h e clock ticked its firs t
tick on the tow er June 28.
1898. It was b u i l t by the
Howard Watch and Clock Co.
at a c o « of $5,335. Som ebare
galnl
i
I