Image provided by: Sherman County Historical Museum; Moro, OR
About Sherman County journal. (Moro, Or.) 1931-current | View Entire Issue (March 21, 1941)
PAGE 1. SHERMAN COUNT^ IOV’RNAI.. MORO. OREGON I FRIDAY, MARCH 21, 1941 _ - Oregon m otorists will begin feel- irg the effects of new legislation 4 a r tost at once. Secretary of State Sherman County Observer » i ;ri Snell has warned th at some Established Nov. 2, 1888 4 <1,000 operators’ licenses will be _________________ I Grass Valley Journal e piring within the next few From the Observer Majch 24, 1922 Established Oct. 14, 1897 i l. .nth'. When these are renewed Born a t The Dalles Monday a f SON SOLI DATED March 6, 1981 ternoon, a son to Mr. and Mrs. Ira n etorists will find th a t the coax Wasco News-Enterprise ! h \’c been increased 50 per cent. B arnett of Wasco. Established Nov. 1891 Two more inches of wet snow ! 1 he legislators tacked on an ex- IONSOLIDATED March 4, 1932 visited Moro Wednesday night. • i 50 cents—25 cents a year— Published Every Friday at Reports say twice as much at . te create a fund to reiiburse hos- piiale* for the care of indigent Morn. Oregon Kent. 1 victims of traffic accidents. A number of farm ers are in the L. French Editor Entered as secon ’-class m atter at fiild plowing since the weather thr Postoffire at Moro, Orcgor. has perm itted field work. Trum an tinder Act of Congress of March Strong was the first one in this vicinity to s ta rt his plows. 3. 1879. A the annual meeting of the fy m u w 3 b » r» *l I In Otiier Jays OFFICIAL COUNTY PAPER S 'M t R CIATI ON SUBSCRIPTION RATES Payable in Advance ONE YEAR ........................... $1.50 MARCH 21, 1941 OF OX-CARTISHNESS Returning home after a couple of months at Salem and takine time to read some of the gather ing of newspapers we find th a t the Optimist in The Dalles is, or at least,, was, grevely upset over the stand of the representative from this district anent the Columbia rivei bridge bill. So much upset wm the editor that he was unaihle to live up to. the paper’s ap pelli tion, Optimist. It is perhaps improper for this paper to rise to the defense of the representative, but we are going to do it nevertheless. Denouncing the opposition to the bi ioge bill as an ox-cart notion the Optimist goes on inveighing against anyone who.- would pre sume to want a bridge anywhere but where The Dalles wants it. His information is less adequate than his temper. The opposition expreessed a- gainst the bridge bill was th a t it included the power to purchase e x itin g bridges across thè Col umbia. We still think th a t a valid objection to the bill which was al so inclusive of nearly every other verb giving power to obtain b r:dges. Headlines in papers along the river especially in towns where I ridges are located were to the effect that the legislature had auhorized the highway commission to make free bridge« of toll bridges. That was not the ihtent of the bill as originally explained. Certainly it should not have beep the intent of The Dalles. If commission funds are used for the purchase of bridges there will be Its* to use for the construction of a new bridge across the upper Coltmbia where The Dalles waints it. ■ Wp, realize also th at the charge of sefishness on the part of Sher man county’s representative was used to further the passage of the b'll. Furtherm ore, no one who had the figures on the financial condi tion of the three bridges could be absolutely without .suspicion as to the motives th a t caused the inclu sion of the word purchase in the bill. Sherman county knows th at if a bridge is built a t or near The Delle« it will help this county. It appahavtly knows th at fact bet ter thfcn The Dalles knows th at if a bridge is built so connect Fed eral Highway 97 across the Colum bia it will help The Dalle«. And, if tnere be jealousy be tween communities over the loca tion of a possible bridge, it is just as ox-cartish on the p art of one community as another. Dorcas society held Wednesday afternoon at the Presbyterian church the following officers were elected for the ensuing year: P res ident. Mrs. O. L. Belshei” Vice Presidents: Mrs. L. V. Moore, Mrs. Robert U rquhart, Mrs. M. A. Bull; Secretary, Mrs. A. Rose; T reasurer, Mrs. C. L. Ireland. The county roadm aster has crews at work in different sections of the county levelling, grading and d:aging the roads. B / John W. Kelly From the Observer March 24, 1912 j Continued from page one. Moro high school worn a debate , west, contractors with governm ent from the Grass Valley high school j o- d trs have a cost-plus fixed-fee 'earn last Friday evening a t Grass ; ci ntract and these are around Valley. The Grass Valley speakers , tl ree or four percent of the total were Clyde Horner, Clarence Mor cc-t of he job. There can be no rison and H arry Baker, those from ' p ufiteering by contractors. Moro were John Mowry, M arjory » » » j? 1 R ose.and H arry Pinkerton. With millions of men and women M. JTFinayson, of Antelope, who working at good wages there will ins been treated at The Dailies for b • r vast purchasing power. W ork <n old bullet wound, has recover ers will buy things they have been ed sufficiently to be a t home again. ? able to afford or have been de Born to Mr. and Mrs. Geo. W. prived of in the depression. This Berrian, a t Portland, March 19, a will, naturally, create competition daughter. for consumer goods. This means The board of directors of th? inflation. To nip inflation before Sherman county F air Association it gets under way (it has started met a t Moro Saturday and a rra n g new) the federal governm ent is ed for the erection of a bam 38 x applying priorities. little by 1P- 180 feet, to the rig h t of the en t e priorities are being extended hance; a poultry house was also to various m etals and commodities; oraered build, and the grand stan 1 m m ufacturers of consumer goods finished by the addition of a pa will be limited in their nmnplies. vilion on the ground floor under T’ c first article on |h e. priority neath the seats. li t is aluminum and ¡manufactur- Chris Anderson returned S a tu r e 's of aluminum goods will be out day from a hospital in Portland, o'* business when their present looking nearly as hale and hearty s ock is exhausted unless they can as he did before he underwent the bi y scrap aluminum from airplane operation for appendicitis. factories at 11 cents a pound, the From the Observer March 21, 1902 price fixed by the government. Following the the delegates from Priorities is one way of dealing this precinct to the prohibition with the situation. Another is « convention: J. B. Mowry, W. C. pirn, not yet approved, to p v Smith, S. C. Elder, Jas. Mitchel! workers a certan percentage of J. M. Dvnahoo, R. E. Hoskinson. their wage in government securi W. E. White. ties having a distant m aturity. Mrs. Nellie W heat is g e ttirg a’eng very nicely and may be able to be cut in a few days. Circuit court in Moro this week filed our hotels chock-a-block and emptied out jails. Em mit Sels has resigned f r o r the Kent store and is» now at hon” in Moro. The new school house now be ing built on the O. B. Messinger farm east of Klondike will supplao the superannuated Wehfoot house We tru s t its builders will give i a better name. L. K. Moore’s old shack on M a'r Street has been razed to make room for anobher two story brick. Statehouse Gossip (Continued from page one) the calendar for consideration the following day. Sincethere was to be no ‘‘following day” supporters of the bill tried to suspend the rules ¡n order to advance the m eas ure for immediate consideration but failed to m uster the required votes. This measure was strenuously opposed by m ost of the easteri* Oregon counties whose taxpayers would have been hard hit in order to subsidize school? in the W illam ette valley and western Oregon The Multnomah county" delegation STRIKE divided on the bill. It would have Dcwn'in Portland the team ster’s cost th a t county approxim ately in added taxes. Union, set upon aiding the Mont $400,000 a year • * * gomery Ward workers who are Distinction as to the “screw iest” striking, has done its best to stor development of the ses-sion goes to all shipments of less than car load a i innocent appearing bit of leg to anyone. There is ju st nothing islation known as the “parsonage going to stop the freight yards. bill.” As introduced and passed in Of course, what one thinks about the House this m easure wou'd such measures depends on several have exempted parsonages from things. If he believes th a t a union assessm ent and taxation. . As because it controls one class ol workers should be perm itted to enme out of the senate committee on assessm ent and taxation a tie up industry while the nation reference to parsonages had been is at war then »the pickets are eliminated and in place thereof the necessary. bill had been amended to provide If one is imbued with an older for an ad valorem tax on municipal and much different type of Amer and public power districts. When icanism he will think th at the this development was discovered effort of the team sters in making the senators sent the bill back to a sym patretic strike is bad public j the committee with instructions to policy for them and a dangerous | restore it to its original form. This m atter for officials to condone. | committee did but its proponents We often hear the inquiry J were not a^le to bring it up for “Who’s running this country, third reading before adjournm ent anyw ay?” Well, judging from and it rem ains on tlje calendar. this evidence it surely is not the public. The way to run this coun try is to get control of a well situated minority and put a spoke in the wheel of industry. Then Foi; become somebody of real im portance like, say, H itler whose ntMsanee -value is almost un- 1 limited. b lit z - CO- rcRf. * $&»- J u s t pure pessimism leads to ie thought th a t this bright arch weather may lead up to »me blustery days in April, but > one caret if there are really me April showers. .h NOT! E CF EXPIRATION OF REDEMPTION PERIOD Public notice is hereuy given th at I, C. C. Wilson, Sheriff and Lax LUihitvor for Sherman County, ,S tate of Oregon, on the 24th day ol April, 1941, will issue <to said Sherm an County, State of Orer gon, a deed covering each of the hereinafter described real properties ¿.n oeing located in Sherman County, S tate of Oregon, unless such properties be redeemed before the said April 24, 1941, from a tax fore closure sale to said Sherman County, Oregon, made on the 22nd day of April, 1940, pursuant to a Judgm ent and Decree of the Circuit Court of the S tate of Oregon, made and entered on the 21st day of December, 1939, and an Order of Sale of the Circuit Court of the State of Ore gon, made and entered on the 22nd day of April, 1940, foreclosing cer tain certificates of delinquency heretofore issued against said prop erties; and I n a : on the execution of such died to said Sherman County, Oregon, adores-aid, each and all of said properties not so redeeded will be forever worfeited to said Sherm an County, Oregon, and all rights of redemption whatsoever will term inate and expire; and 1 hat tpe names of the several record owners a t the time of the foreclosure, a description of each of the several properties on which the period of redemption is about to expire, and the total amount of taxes, interest, penalties and costs due on the several parcels and tracts on the 24th day of April, 1941, the day a deed for said properties will be issued to. Sherm an County, Oregon, is ^ » fo llo w s Certificate numiher, Name of Owners and Description of Property U2 O 1. O.is niiey Estate, Clements Addition to the L ity ol Grass Valley, Lots 1, 2, and 3 2 $12.91 2. American Legion, Biggs Addition to the City of Wasco, East 12 ft. of Lot 9 and West 38 ft. of Lot .................................... 10 1 55.08 3. A merican Legion, Barnums Addition to the City of Moro, W est 154 ft. of Lot 4 and ..................................................... . 5 B 345.50 4. George P. Amo, P a r t of Southeast Q uarter of Southeast QuarJ^pr in Sherman County , ........... .... 36 IS 18E 8.99 o. Jessie Amos, iBiggs Addition to the c.^y of Wasco, North Half of Lots 1 and 2 12 233.92 6. i.mil Anderson, City of Wasco. O rigi nal -Site, ,Lot 6 and West Half of Lot ........ ** 5 3 57.41 7. I .a M. Andrews, Dunlap’s Second Addition to the Q ty of Wasco, Lots 6 and ......................................;............. 6 8 66.81 3- G. T. and Ida M. Andrews, D unlap’s Second Addition to the City of Wasco, .......................................... Lots 1 and 2 7 82.18 9. G. T. Andrew?, Biggs Second Addi tion to the City of Wasco, Ix>ts 9, 10, 11 and .................... .7...................... 12 18 ' 392.65 10. Jumes 1C. Ashley, Henarieville Addi tion to the City of Grass Valley, Lot ........ 6 2 31.83 12. Andrew B arnett E state, City of W asco,O riginal Site, Lot 9 and ............ . 10 7 57.95 14. George Baker, Biggs Addition to the City of Wasco, Lot .................................. 4 1 135.46 15. Eraaline Belshee, City of Moro, Ori ginal Site, Lots 6 and .......................... 7 7 61.89 17. Jchn Biggs Estate, Dunlap’s Second Addition to the City of Wasco, Fraction of Lo:s 9, 10, 11 and ................................ 12 5 Dunlap's F irst Addition to the City of Wasco, Lots 4, 7 and 8 and a Fraction of 5 and e .......................................................... 6 4 Dunlap’s F irst Addition to the City of Wasco, Fraction of Lots 11 and ................ 12 A 56.03 18. Eva Pearl Binder, City of Moro, O igina1 Site. W esterly 35 ft, of Lot ....... . 2 5 199.05 20. Mary E. Booth, Armsworthy Addi- t on to the City of Wasco, Lot .......... :.......... 6 2 68.27 21. J. W. tBooth Estate, Biggs Addition to the ¡City of Wasco, Southerly 135 f t in cluding alley of entire block 5 349.53 22. • J. H. Botte-miller, Kent Town, O ri ginal Site, Lot ........................................ 4 1 ■ Kent Town., Original Site, W est 80 ft. of-- Lots 6. 7, and all^of Lots 8, 9 and ................ ‘ 10 7 Kent Town., Original Site, Lots 9 and ....... 10 11 T ro tte r’s Addition to Ken-t Town., Lots 4 and .............. .......................................... 5 r ’ 17 Ragsdale and Morrison Addition to Kent Town., all of .......................................... 6 Ragsdale and Morrison Addition to Ken-t Town., all of ............................................ 7 • Ragsdale and Morrison Addition to Kent Town., all of ............................................ 10 Ragsdale and Morrison Addition to Kent Town., Lots 1, 2. 3, 4, 6 and ........................ 7 9 Ragsdale and Morrison Addition to Kent Town., Lot? 3, 4, and 7 2 Ragsdale and Morrison Addition to Kent Town. ................................................. 10 4 176.99 23. J. N. Boyd, Sherman Addition to the City ,of Grass Valley, Lots 7 and ............... 10 16 14.60 24. S. P. Brisbine E state, Hays Addition to the City of Moro, Ix)ts 8 and ............. ...... 9 12.21 25. M p 3. C. J. Bright, City of Wasco, O ri ginal Site, Lois 11 and .............................. 12 23.16 9 , 26. Mary K. Britton, City of Wasco, Ori ginal Site, Lots 5 and ................................ ‘ 6 6 Dunlap’s F irst Addition to the City of Wasco, Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and ................... 12 1 283.44 27. M. A. Brock E state, McPherson Ad 8 dition to the City of Wasco, Lots 7 a n d ....... 4 143.20 28. Brugman Timber Company, N orth 24 east Q uarter of Southeast Q uarter of ....... 4S 14E 17.99 29. Mrs. L. i A. Bruley, McPherson Addi tion to t{ie City of Wasco, Lot .......... ........... 9 4 ’ 57.91 30. Elva A. ¡Bryant, Mowry Addition to the City of Moro, Lots 4, 5, and .................... A 6 2 30.76 3.T S. O. IClodfelter, McPherson Addition 205.46 to the City of Wasco. Ix>ts 1 and ............... 2 1 34. B. F. Cochran E state, DeMoss Town., Original Site, Lot .................................. 3 2.37 7 35. George E. Coesen, Hays Addition to if* ' 24.70 the City of Moro. Lots 7, 10, and .................. 38. Hattie Craig, -Kent Town., Original Site, Lot 6 3.32 10 39. George N. Cro-sfield E state, A rm s 262.65 worthy Addition to the City of Wasco, Lot 8 1 40. Pierre Cutehierre, City of Wasco, Ori 7 82.31 8 ginal Site, Lots 7 and .............................. 41. J. E. Davis, Kent Town., Original 4 6.67 Site, Lot . ........................................~ 8 42. W. K. Deal, City of Moro, Original 85.93 Site, Lot ........................................ 36 1 43. 1C. E. Deal. City of Moro, Original 51.30 6 21 Site, Northerly Half of ............................. 44. Juanita DeFoe, Rollins F irst Addi tion to the City of Grass Valley, Lots 7 32.44 » 5 8 and ........................ ?...............'................ 46. Nancy J. Dunlap, Dunlap’s F irst Ad dison to the City of Wasco, Lots 1, 2, 3 80.30 6 4, 5, and ................................................ 2 49. S. P. Brisbine E state, City of Moro, 214.22 5 5 Original Bite .......................................... 50. Eastern Oregon Trading Co., Kent 10.85 10 9 Town., Original Site, Lots 3. 8, and ....... « 52. J. W Eaton, City of Wasco, Original 173.84 8 3 Site, Lots 1, 2, and .................................. 53. J. M. Eddy. City of Moro, Original 18 2 Site, Lots 3 and W esterly Half of ................ 249.47 34 City cf-Morp. Original Site, Lots 8, 9, and W 54. R O E lwards, City of Grass Valley, 25.96 2 4- O rigin?’. Site ...<............ ....................... 65. J. A. Ellis, McPherson F irst Addi tion to the Citv of Wasco, V ol.-V, Page 475. North Half of Lots 7 and 8 except a 443.47 1 strip 5 ft. x 60 ft. off Southwest side .........: 57. G ertrude'Epperson, McPherson Ad V < -t ■ * 101. i r 7 12 dition to the C’tv of Wasco Lots 11 and 58 Ernest Eslinger, City of Grass Val 1 41-39 5 ley. Original Site, Ixits 3, 4. and ........... 59. M. Estay. T hat part, of N orthw est Q uarter of N ortheast Quarter in Sherman IN 20E 12.35 , 31 County .................................. ..». 61. Pov Feelev. Clements Addition to the 141.40 12 12 - Citv e r Q’-as- Valley. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 62. Myrtle WalkeT Fenwick, Biggs A.ddi- - 240.69 3 6 tion to the City of Waspo, Lots 5 and ........ ...J ♦ » Certificate number, Name of Owners and Description of Property . _____________________ t . ~ o2 5 i 30 à 60. n arv ey J. Ferrell, Southwest Quar- ter ........................................................ 9 IN 19E N orthw est Q uarter and W est H alf of N ortheast Q uarter ........................ a ...... 16 IN 19E 203.78 o4. Nellie Dingle Fields, City of Wasco, Original Site, Vol. W, Page 163b, Lots 7 and .......................................... :........... 8 5 Dunlap’s Second Addition to the City of ’ Wasco, Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and ...................... 12 7 157.88 66. T. L. Fields, Arm sworthy Addition to the City of Wasco, Lot 7 and West Half of ..... .................. .......................... • 8 3 Arm sw orthy Addition to the City of W as 6 co, Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, and ............................ 3 ' 667.17 67. I. E. Fields, Lots 3 and 4 .................... 7 4S 18E 77.97 70. F. E. Fortner, Southeast Q uarter of Southwest Q uarter .............................. 24 IN 18E 20.91 73. L. R. French, JClements Addition to the City of Grass Valley ............................ 2 10 11.10 75. H attie E. French, Clements Addition to the City of Grass Valley, Lots 14 and 15 13 211.24 77. G rant Garland, City of Wasco, Origi * nal Site, Lots 4 and ............. ...................... 5 5 McPherson Addition to the City of Wasco - 6 - 305.44 11 79. W. A. Gentry, Dunlap’s Second Ad dition to the City of Wasco, Lots 5*and ..... 6 7 45.16 80. Sadie Gideon E state, Rollins F irst Addition to the City of Grass Valley, South Half of ........ :......................... ....... 5.62 12 81. R. J. G.nn E state, Clements Addition to the City of Grass Valley, Lots 5. and ..... 6 6 28.26 83. Mary Girt, Sherman Addition to the City of Grass Valley, Vol. O, Page 168, Lots 5 and ............................................ 8 15.68 7 84. Ira J. Goin, McPherson Addition to the City of Wasco, Lots 11 a n d .................... 12 61.65 9 86. Ray Hansel, City of Moro, Original Site, All of .........................I............ • 27 171.23 87. C. »A. H arper, Southeast Q uarter of Southwest Q uarter and Southwest Quar- • ter of Southeast Q uarter ........................ 35 IS 18E West Half of N ortheast Q uarter ..... - ........ 2 2S 18E 158.95 90. Heath & Sons, City of Grass Valley, 45.79 Original Site, Lot .................................... 6 4 91. A rthur L. Helliwell, Kent Tdwn., Ori 4 ginal Site, Lots 9 and ............................ 10 A int Town., Original Site, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 5, 6, and .................................................. 7 L Kent Town., Original Site, Lots 7, 8, 9, 5 and ...................................................... 10 11 Kent Town., Original Site, Lots 6, 7, and M T ro tter’s Addition to Kent Town., all of 50.32 17 blocVs 13, 14, 15, 16 and Lots 1, 2, and . 3 92. Godfery Hendricks, Sherm an’s F irst Addition to the City of Grass Valley, Lots 4 1, 2, 3, 4, and ....... •.................................... 5 Henarieville» Addition to the City of Grass 38.73 ....... /................... 3 Valley, Lots 1, 2, and 93. Bertha Glenn Heroux, Kent Town., . 12.63 10 Original Site ....................?................... 7 - 94. Maggie Higinbotham E state, Mowry 1 . Addition to the City of Moro, Lots 1 and 2 Mowry Addition to the 0>ty of Moro, 2 Lots 1, 2, 7 and ............................- .......... 8 5 Mowry Addition to the City of Moro, ....... 8 Mcwrv Addition to the City of Moro, 147.83 8 Lots 5 and ............................................ 6 95. H erbert Hill, Rufus Town., Original 13 Site, Lots 5, 6, and ................................;......... 7 Rufus Town., Original Site, Lots 1, 2, 3, 14.57 16 4, 6, and ................................................ 7 96. L. S. Hines, MoPherson Addition to 16.49 6 the City of Wasco, Fraction of Lots 5 and . v 6 97. Jam es Hoag, ’City of Wasco, Origi 2 nal Site, Lots 9, 10 and .......................... 11 Biggs Addition to the City of Wasco, 112.85 2 Fraction of Lots 1 and ................ ....... 2 98. E tta Hoag, City of Wasco, Original 140.62 2 Site, Lots 1, 2, and Fraction of 3 and ....... 4 99. W alter E. Holman. Vol. W, Page 437, 103.57 6 Mowry Addition to the City of Moro ......... 3 100. Charles and Anna Hull, City of 274.55 6 Wasco. Original Site, Lots 7, 8, and .... ....... 9 « 101. J. K. Irby, Ragsdale - and Morrison 1 4 9.31 Addition to Kent Town., Lots 4 and ........... 5 102. Lucy Isaacs, Sherman Addition to 45.53 6 the City of Grass Valley, Lots 2, 3, 6, and 7 103. Emil R. Jaekel, Fraction of N orth 6.42 IS 16E east Q uarter of Southeast Q uarter .... 8 104. Joe Jam es, Henarieville Addition to 11.33 9 the Cifv cf Grass Valley ... 7..................... 8 107. Jean Day Power Company, P a rt of 2N 18E 14.35 Lots 1 and 8, West of John Day R iv e r....... 13 108. Ella Jones, Armsworthy Addition to 2 » the City of Wasco, Lots 8 and ..................... 9 A rm sw orthy Addition to the City of W as 143.28 2 co, Lots 3, 4, and .............................. . 5 110. Grace L. Kelley, Sherman Addition 26.01 16 to the lOity of Grass Valley, Lots 5, 8 and 9 I'll. W. A. K entner E state, Ragsdale and Morrison Addition to Kent Town., Lots 1, 13.84 4 2, and ............................................... ' 8 112. H. la u g h te r, City oi Wasco, Origi 128.47 2 .............................. ...................... 12 nal Site 113. Mary Leonard Estate, Kent Town., 3.77 5 Original Site, ............................................ « 114. May Lowden,-Rufus Town., Original 2.25 12 Site, Lot 8 and Northerly 45 ft. of ...... —... 7 115. Emma E. Lucas E state, Biggs Addi- 18 ton to the City of Wasco .......................... 7 Biggs Addtion to the City of Wasco, 113.41 18 Lots 7 and .............................................. ° 116. H. B. Lusk, Mowry Addition to the 250.88 4 City, of Moro, Lots 5 and ....................... • 117. - Charles McAllister, City of Wasco, 125.60 5 Original Site, Lots 1, 2, and .................... 3 118. Cherles McAllister, City of Wasco, 1 Original Site, Lots 9 and ............ ;......... 10 City of Wasco, Original Site, Fraction of 138.63 9 cf Lots 4, 5, and ........................................ 8 119. P. W. McDonald E state, N orthwest X Q uarter and N orth H alf of Southwest IS 18E 91.72 Q uarter .......................................... 36 120. A. W. M cFarland, Clements Addi 11.11 4 tion to the iC-ity of Grass Valley ............... 1 124. M. McKenzie, Rufus Town., Original 3.81 12 SPe, Ix>t 6 and Southerly 5 ft. of I^ e t......... 7 126. Glenn E. M aurer, Armsworthy Ad 21.68 4 dition to the Oity of Wasco .................. — 7 127. Jessica M aurer, Oity of Moro, Ori ginal Site, Vol. Q, Page 200 and 231 25 C ity o f Moro, Original Site, all of ............... Citv of Moro, Original Site, Lots 1, 2, 3, 160.15 24 4, 5, and .J .............................. .................. 1® 130. Elsie L. Miller, Vol. N, Page 142, Southeast Q uarter and Tract 10 rods wide IN 19E 268.68 in E ast Side of Southwest Q u a rte r............ ; 8 131. Bertha F. Moon. City of Wasco, Ori 56.12 9 ginal Site. Vol. W, Page 251. Lots 7 ajid 8 134. Moro St^te Bank, City of Moro, 61.13 16 Original Site, Vol. V. Page 582, Lots 4 and 5 136. E dgar ' L. and Jam es A. Muckle, Part, of Ix>t 7 and N orthw est Q uarter of Southeast Q uarter rod W est Half of IS 19E 7.54 N ortheast Q uarter in Sherman County .... 30 137. N atatores. Inc., Vol. M, Page 458 T ^ ^ t South of Biggs Addition to the City 8 17.66 of Wasco ...... ’........................................ 140. Em m ett Olds E state. Sherman Ad dition to the C.ity of Grass Valley, Lots 2 and . . ........ ............................................. . 3 Qhnnman Addition to the 'City of Grass < / 64.88 Valley, all of ........................................... - r 141. L. A. Olds and Ida Olds, Citv of Grass Valley, Original Site, Southerly 528 53 H alf of .............................. t.... .............'2 143. Dean Olds, Sherman Addition to the Continued on page four. X
