Medford mail tribune. (Medford, Or.) 1909-1989, July 07, 1963, Image 4

Historic Oregon Newspapers

Medford mail tribune., July 07, 1963, Image 4

Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR

About Medford mail tribune. (Medford, Or.) 1909-1989 | View Entire Issue (July 7, 1963)

Prev Page of 49 Next Prev Issue Next Text PDF JP2 (2.9 MB) Clip/Print Image

Return to Top

Prev Page of 49 Next Prev Issue Next

Newspaper Page Text!! ; i ! I 4 A SUNDAY. JULY 7, 1963 MEDFOHD MAIL TRIBUNE, MEDFORD, OREGON ''Everyone Id Southern Oregon Re(U The Mill Tribune ' Published Dally except Saturday by 33 North Fir St. Ph. 71H-6141 ROBERT W RUHL. Editor"" ITERB GREY Advertising Menacer GERALD T LATHAM, But Mir ERIC W ALLEN JR.. Mne Editor XAHL H ADAMS, dry eanor RICHARD JEWETT, Sports Editor OLIVE STARCHER Women'! Edltoi DALE ER1CKSON. Circulation Uft An Indenendent Newspapei Entered aa second claai matter Medford. Oregon under Act of March 3, 1897 SUBSCRIPTION RATES B Mall In Advance Dally and Sunday 1 year 118 00 Dallv und Sunday S mog 10 00 ' Dallv and Sunday 3 moi 8.00 Sunday Only One year IS 00 Single Copy (Mailed! lac &v Carriet And Motor Route Dally and Sunday 1 year (21.00 pally and Sunday l mo i o Sundav Onlv 1 mn. SOC Carrier and Vendora Copy 10a Official Papar of City of Medford uinciai i-apcr 01 wwon vouniy United Presa International lull Leased Wire O. P I Telephoto Newiplcturea MEMBER Or AUDIT BUREAU Of CIRCULATIONS ins NELSON ROBERTS & ASSOCI. . ATKfl nrMrM In New York. Chl cago. Detroit. San Francisco. Los Angelas. Deaiue, r o r n o u. . Denver, NEWSPAPI PUIllSHEtS ASSOCIATION NATION At E0ITORIAI N Member California Newapaper Publlihera AasociaUon Flight or Time Medford and Jackson County History from the filet of The Mail Tribune 10. 20. 30. 40 and SO years ago. 10 YEARS AGO July ?, 1953 (Tueiday) The Medford school admin, islratlon, according to Super intendent E. H. Hedrlck, has been advised by the state of fice of education that the ele mentary and Junior high schools are over-crowded to the extent that they cannot be rated as "standard." Medford experienced its hottest day so far this year yesterday when the mercury climbed to 97 degrees. 30 YEARS AGO July 7. 1943 (Tuesday) Elsie Older supervisor at children's playground on East Main at. From Arthur Perry's "Ye Smudge Pot" column: "The people heeded the request of Washington, D.C., not to travel on the Fourth. They only went 39 ways from Sun day Instead of the traditional 40." 30 YEARS AOO July 7. 1933 (Thursday) Beef steaks, round, sirloin or rib roast 19 cents per pounds at City Market. Fire department kept busy putting out vacant lot grass fires. 40 YEARS AGO July 7, 1923 (Friday) Travel records to Crater lake broken over Fourth of July. Car shortage confronts lo cal pear shippers. 50 YEARS AGO July 7, 1913 (Sunday) Fight fan who saw Bud Anderson defeated by Leach Cross considers betting loss only temporary loan at good interest. Old box factory to be used as packing house for fruit. Ownership of Gold Question: la it illegal to own gold bullion? Answer: Yes. The question has been of some interest local ly, and at least a couple of letters to the editor have maintained that a ludee s decision last Au gust makes legal the ownership of gold bullion, We set out to find tne answer, first we con firmed that U.S. District Judce William C, Mathes of Los Angeles had indeed dismissed a grand jury indictment which charged two men with illegal gold ownership, OIS dismissal was based on the Judge's reason ing that the executive order banning gold ownership was valid only in a national emer gency. The Judge held the emergency no longer -Ill- 11 1 1 exjsiea, mereiore goia ownersnip is legal. His action was not widely noted at the time because it was limited in scope. But the Mercury magazine carried a story about the case, and indi cated that the Judge's ruling, in effect, invali- dated the executive order. It was this story which aroused considerable interest in some circles about gold ownership WE HAVE now, with the help of Congressman Rnh Dnnpon nHfainnrl art onf limnf ofi'vt sfnft - v..v-u, uui,uuivi4 Cli HUtllUI ILailVC OLtXLC- ment on the matter. It is contained in a letter from Leland Howard, director of the office of domestic gold and silver operations of the U.S. .treasury Department. In part, he said: "The California case in which the court dismissed a criminal indictment against two men who had ac quired, held, and transported 21 ounces of gold bullion without a license, has no bearing on the holding of gold bullion by private Individuals. The Cold Reserve Act, which is another statutory basis for the Gold Regula tions, was not involved. The penalties prescribed for violations under this Act are forfeiture of the gold and a civil penalty equal to twice the value of the gold involved. This decision, therefore, does not affect the right of the Secretary of the Treasury to control the use of gold within the United Slates or its acquisition, disposition, Importation or exportation. "The criminal prosecution In the California case was based on Section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, which authorizes the regulation of gold transactions during the time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, While Executive Order 280, under which criminal penalties are incurred, was promulgated in 1933, It has been continued, and is currently effective. Its validity at the present time rests upon the Korean and Communist emergency declared on December 16, 1950. The Executive Order has been confirmed and amended by the President as recently as July 20. 1962. "In spile of the dismissal of the Indictment In this case (which has limited significance because it is not binding upon other courts) violations of the Gold Regu lations will continue to be prosecuted. A number of such cases are now pending in which it Is anticipated the Government will be successful and convictions secured. It would be unfortunate if anyone acquired gold bullion in reliance upon the California case." . And that would appear to be that. E. A.1 "Sorry, But You Have an Incurable Skin Condition" Today & Tomorrow By Walter llppmann iC) 1963. The Washington Poit Lip poison In the Day's News By FRANK JENKINS A T THIS particular moment Question of last week: What Is the Fourth of July? The answer: It is the anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence by the thirteen United States of America. WHAT is the Declaration of Tnripnpnrlpnrp? It is a recital of the griev- nces of the people of the thirteen United Slates of America" against "the present king of Great Britain." in history, when Bible reading in the schools has ap parently been sharply restrict ed by the Supreme Court, the text of the Declaration of In dependence holds a particular interest for us. It begins with these words: "VUHEN in the course of " human events, it be comes necessary for one peo ple to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to as- Matter of Fact By Joseph Alsop (c) Nfw York Herald Tribune Syndicate "'Salt and History What's Your I.Q.? Nina or ten correct li superior; even or ela.hr. It eicelleM; five ar ii li food. 1. Is tapioca obtained from the roots of the cassava, or guava? 2. Is the Gothic arch round, or pointed? 3. Enchiladas ere eaten most In which country? 4. What two numbers are used as a term for confusion? 5. Who wrote, "To err is human, to forgive la divine?" 6. Is the Dominion of Can ada a member of the Pan American Union? 7. Is the Speaker of the House of Representatives se lected by the entire House or by the majority party? 8. Who won the heavy weight boxing title from Jess Willard? 9. How many outs In an In ning of baseball? 10. Is a nephogram a med ical chart, a smoke signal, or photograph of clouds? Antwarsi 1. Canara. 2. Poiniad. 3. Mexico. 4. Sixes and sevens. 5. Alexander Pepa. 1. No. 7. Majority parly. 6. Jack Damptey. 9. Six. 10. Photograph of clouds. RESOLUTION PLANNED Washington - (UPD - Two Republicana plan to Introduce resolution In Congreaa urg ing the Kennedy administra tion to end the balance of payments deficit. Historians will say that no single factor is responsioie lor great turning points in history. But an article in the current issue nf f h Kripn. tific American places a considerable nortion nf the cause of the Middle Aires on two oddlv assort ed but related factors the level of the oceans and the availability of salt plain, ordinary salt. The article itself is a fascinating one, about a commodity which we today take for granted. IT WAS not always so. Salt, of course, is essen tial fnv Ufa WifUrMit- 51- ,,.,l ,i: A -J il. v.. " iinuui it,, ijuupie inc. tfm ine sources of salt are less widespread and less pro ductive than most people imagine. . wars were lought over salt sources, and whole economies were dependent on it. In ancient times, the principal sources were drying pans and salt marshes on the edge of the seas and oceans. When, by about 500 A.D., sea level had risen about six feet higher than m uncteni umes, most of the salt ponds of Europe were inundated, creating a real crisis. . yi-IE article explains: "The effects on Europe were nearly catastrophic. The Belgium historian Henri Pircnnc observes that Europe fell into an economic dark ago. The salt traffic virtually disappeared; the coasts of Britain and France were deserted; the northern part of the continent be came an 'underdeveloped' area, and people began to migrate to the more arid areas of the Mediterranean in quest of llfesavlng salt. "The salt mines, the desert salt lakes and the Dead Sea became tho saving sources for European civiliza tion. This explains the otherwise senseless determina tion of the Roman emperors Vespasian and Tilus to conquer the deserts around the Dead Sea. In the sixth century A.D. the ports and other towns of Palestine became great Undo centers and grew to cities of 100,000 or more. For the suit and salirvi tnnri h vlded to Ihc collapsing West they received gold, mar ble and other luxuries. "The sea receded, and Europe came back. Bv the 10th Century the English, French and Dutch 'were kih matting sail in Ilielr peat bogs . . . (and) salt production was In full swing in Normandv, on Ihc west coast of France, at the mouth of the Rhone. In Sicilv and the Crimea." QVEK the yea re, salt has been mined, quarried. taken from the sea, recovered from peat by burning, extracted from salt lakes, salt bogs, and brine pumped from the earth. Peat, coal. wood, oil and thn snn'o i-n-c V,.,.- been used to evaporate sea water and brine. in todays industrial civilization, the article points out. the dancer of a "salt fa minn' Vine largely been removed. The sea is an inexhaustible source, and with modern energy sources, salt al ways win oe available. But there is a cautionary note: About sn lu cent of the world's salt is stil! obtainpil from son. coast solar ponds, which remain vulnerable to a rise in sea level, and thus "small . . . fluctuations of the ocean level may produce profound effects Human (.-.viiizauon in me iuiure as they have in the nnn " V A KHRUSHCHEV'S NEW OFFER Washington Gov. Averell Harriman's mission to Mos cow, to resume talks about a ban on nu clear tests has suddenly been trans formed. From a lac kluster g e s t u re of good will foredoomed to f r uitlcssness it has been turned Into an absorbingly Interesting ven ture. The man who wrought this transformation was Nikita S. Khrushchev. Less than a fort. night before the resumption of negotiations, Khrushchev has abruptly altered the So viet position regarding a nu clear test-ban, in a way that can ratner easily lead to So. viet-Amerlcan agreement. This was the crucial point of Khrushchev's remarkable Berlin speech. The point was entirely missed In the first reports of the speech, mainly because Khrushchev himself blandly denied that he was saying anything of great significance. "We have made this pro posal before," he declared, after announcing the Soviet union s willingness to "con clude an agreement banning nuclear tests In the atmos phere, in out space and un der water," but omitting the underground tests which are so difficult to police. TN REALITY, those who 1 "made the proposal be fore" were the American nu clear test negotiators; and when they made the proposal, they all but had their heads bitten off by their Soviet op posite numbers. The Ameri can government has, in fact, been seeking this kind of ninelcnths ban on nuclear tests, which can be fully po liced with existing detection apparatus, ever since the end of the Eisenhower adminis tration. Such a test ban would leave both sides free to proceed with underground tests. which cannot be policed without the enormous appar atus for on-site inspection to which the Soviets so billet !v object. But the admission of underground tests would not much impair the nowcr of an enforced agreement to ban all otner tests. Above all. such an agreement would have the effect of halting further mulll national development of nuclear weapons. To be sure, it is much too early to throw any hats In the air over Khrushchev's new offer for such it must be called. In the Berlin speech, the test-ban offer was coupled with a call for a 'non-aggression pact between tne two main military groups of states the NATO coun tries and the Warsaw Treaty states." IT IS not clear whether Khrushchev meant his of fer to be strictly conditional on tha signing of such a non aggression pact. It Is not clear, either, whether the real intention of the proposed pact is to entangle the West ern powers In several highly undesirable p r e d icaments. such as effective recognition of the puppet communist re gime in East Germany. in short, a lot of careful staff work Is going to have to be done with America's allies, and particularly with the West Germans, before Governor Harriman Dacks hl bags to go to Moscow. And when Harriman reaches Mos cow, ne will also have to walk with his customary war iness, until he has reconnoi- tered the terrain much more completely. All the same, this new move by Khrushchev looks like one of those events which shift the scene, so to say, and in augurate a new act in the drama. Unless the Khru shchev offer Is a mere fraud, moreover, it clearly implies that a great shift of scene and the opening of a new act In the drama have al ready taken place In inner Kremlin politics. If the offor Is genuine, in fact, it marks the end of the long period of constantly In creasing military influence on Soviet policy decisions. This period opened on the same theme, when the Kremlin abruptly rejected President Kennedy's first test-ban nro- posai and DroKe off the Gen eva negotiations in the win ter of 1961. OOV1ET nuclear testing was then resumed In response to the urgent demands of the Russian military leaders. Thereafter, indications of mil itary influence on Soviet nol. Icy were a recurrent phe nomenon. A climax was reached this winter, in the post-Cuba challenge to Khru. shchev's own position. In which some of the military leaders are known to have joined. The new offer is the clear- est sign to date that Khru shchev, after some anxious moments, ended by repelling tho challenge to his leader ship with complete, even shattering success. As a sign, it goes even further than the recent meeting of the Soviet Central Committee, or the Kremlin's stonewall tactics in the face of the Chinese Com- STRENGTH TO GOVERN WELL This Congress was already in a jam before the Negro demonstrations caused the ad- ministrat I o n to propose the new civil rights bill Without any f i 1 ibuster on the floor of the Senate there has been so much delay and obstruc- tion in the committees that after six months no important measure has been acted upon, and many of the critical measures, such as tax reduction, are bogged down - it would seem deliberately - in the commit teee. What kind of legislative body is it that will not cannot legislate? a rpHIS would be a serious question at any time. But it is a critical question at this time. A new generation of Ne groes has emerged, one which has lost the fear of being ar rested and jailed, and has steeled itself to use the weap on of the weak, which is to be prepared' to suffer more pain than the oppressor will dare to inflict. When an aggrieved people reach this point, they have acquired a force which governments must reckon with and people must respect, If then it turns out that the government is paralyzed and impotent to deal with their grievances, the prospect is in deed dark and ominous. . T IS TRUE, quite evidently, that in their swelling dis content the Negro people might be incited, even ex ploited, to permit acts of vio lence which would recoil upon the Negro minority itself. But how is wisdom to be made to prevail as against reckless folly? There is only one way. By an unmistakable showing that the Negroes live under a strong government, one which is not only strong enough to suppress mobs, but is also strong enough to redress grievances and raise the standard of public righteous ness. ' . If, after the President has proposed legal remedies for an undeniable evil, the Con gress of the United States then smothers and obstructs the enactment of laws, on what ground can a rational appeal be made to the Negro people and their leaders? As one who has always opposed cloture except in extreme emergen cies, I would say now that the present situation Is ex' :e. It is whether the Negro can count upon the government under which he lives to re dress his ances. undeniable griev- sume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature AND OF NA TURE'S GOD entitle them, a decent respect to the opin ions of mankind requires that they should declare the caus es which impel them to the separation." 'T'HAT raises this question: -- Would our present Su preme Court have sanctioned the Delcaration of Independence? IF, therefore, we have a fili buster against civil rights on top of the logjam about everything else, we shall have to say - distressing as it Is - that in one of the coordinate branches the capacity to gov ern has broken down. If this continues, if we linger on in a deadlock in which the Presi dent proposes and Congress will not even dispose, there are very difficult days ahead for the republic. A government must be able to govern. When it cannot govern, a government is sick. If things go as badly this summer as they threaten to go, and the session drags on into the autumn with little accomplished amidst many angry words, something will have to be done about it. Next to defense and the enlightened conduct of the cold war, the question of highest priority will be how to overcome the paralysis of Congress. a MY own view is that the mnct mnnHant -nJ needed reform would be a rule that measures proposed by the President, if he labels them urgent, must be reported oui oi committees within a certain time and brought to a vote within a certain time. The administration should have the right to have its pro posals voted up or voted down within a reasonably short time. It cannot be the genuine right of a legislature to smother and strangle the pro posals of the executive. For that would leave us with just about the worse of all forms of popular government - gov ernment by large assemblies or, as we call it in this cen tury, congressional govern ment. Writing this on the dav be fore the Fourth of July, I find myself thinking how rarely free governments have been overthrown by foreign ty rants, except temporarily in time of war, but how often free governments have fallen because of their own weak ness and incapacity. To one thinking such thoughts, there is nothing re assuring about the present Congress. GREAT IDEAS... 1 From the Great Books my By Mortimer J. Adler (c) 1063, Publiiheri Newapaper Syndicate CHURCH -STATE RELATIONS Dear Dr. Adler: There has been a conflict all through history about tha separa tion of church and stale. What have tha great phil osophers and religious lead ers had to say on this sub ject? Where have they agreed and where have they differed? Baa B. Gardner 1990 Browning ave. Salt Lake City B.Utah Dear Miss Gardner: John Locke, writing in the 17th cen tury, stated t h e view of church-state relations which is espoused by the majority of Supreme Court justices today He held that religion and gov ernment are two entirely sep arate spheres of human activ ity, neither of which must en croach on the other. In his view, the church is a voluntary association of in dividuals who join together to worship God, while the state is a community organized to handle economic, social, and political matters. The church should not call on the govern ment for aid or support, while conversely, the state should not compel church members to profess beliefs or perform acts which go against their con science. Church and state both have jurisdiction over moral conduct, the church insofar as conduct concerns man's serv ice to God and his inner life, the state insofar as it affects other persons and their property. Jefferson and Madison took essentially the same position as Locke. In arguing against a Virginia tax to support reli gious teachers, they held that government may neither hin der nor aid religion, and that even a "three pence" tax to aid religious instruction was illegitimate and tyrannical Later, in commenting on the Iirst Amendment to the Con stitution, Jeffersen said that it set up "a wall of separation between church and state. The opinions of Jefferson and Madison have provided the present - Supreme Court g with its ruling principles on church-state relations, partic ularly in regard to educational matters. In a decision handed down in 1947, the court ruled 5-4 in favor of a New Jersey statute providing that bus transportation for parochial school children be paid through public funds. Both the majority and minority deci sions agreed that Jefferson and Madison's interpretation of the First Amendment was correct, but disagreed as to whether publicly paid bus transportation constituted aid to the church which sponsored the schools. Despite its ruling in favor of bus transportation, the ma jority decision, because it re lied on the opinions of Jeffer son and Madison, was at-, tacked by those who hold that the First Amendment permits non-preferential aid of all re ligious faiths. A more far reaching and profound criti cism was the view that in con crete actuality no absolute wall can be set up between church and state. In the so ciety we live in, these critics said, church and state are pres ent together, cheek by jowl, and cannot be separated, save as an abstract, legal fiction. This view transfers tha question from one of the rela tion between church and state to one of the relation between religion and society (or "cul ture"). Yet we cannot be sure that posing the question in this way will materially alter subsequent Supreme Court decisions. For example. Jus tice Douglas proclaimed in one case that we are a religious people whose institutions pre suppose a Supreme Being," and yet he later concurred in the decision which- declared unconstitutional a state-spon sored prayer in the public schools. In his view, even though we are a religious peo ple or society, it is not the function of government to aid and foster religious institu tions and instruction. That is to be left to the free activity of individuals and groups. The government is neutral as be tween religion and irreligion. However, many critics of tha court maintain that this pre sumed "neutrality" actually operates against religion and in favor of secularism. Rein hold Neibuhr, the eminent Protestant theologian, said of the school prayer decision, that such a rigid construc tion of the First Amendment results in "a consistently sec ular education that the Found ing Fathers certainly did not intend. He added, however, that the preservation of our religious substance depends not on state-sponsored prayers but on "the creative relation of religious piety to the indi vidual and common problems of our daily life. JicEJ?.V.w; nam wi "Pshaw! Haven't heard of any of 'em breaking into major league ball yet!" You ran win a 54-volume art of the Great Books of the West ern World by writing a letter, not to exceed 150 words, Incor porallns a question of general Interest for Or. Adler to con sider for Inclusion in Utis col umn. Earh week he will select . as first prize winners the writ ers of the three hest letters. -He will use ONE of these let ters as a basis for a future column and will answer It In terms of the Intellectual heritage nf the Great Books 443 works by 74 authors, spanning 30 cen turies of thought. Address tha letters to Or. Mortimer J. Adler, In care of this newspaper. Comfortable Europe Seeking Solutions By ERIC SEVAREID London - Kennedy and Khrushchev have gone home, the foreign policy carnival of crowns ana banners and s p e e c hes Is ended, but the Wall that dl vides not only Berlin but the v--.V "Td deepest beliefs yr.V7'j of Western ! y'j J i man remains. aaaai AaJ The "immobl- Senareld Hsm" of t h e two great powers since the Cuban crisis continues. Mos. munisls' hysterical invective ; cow hints that it worn. .o. sign, it also means thai oilier interesting developments of many kinds may now be ex pected. In inner-Kremlin poli tics, for Instance, the possi bility is now rather strong that Marshal Rodion Malin ovsky will be replaced as So viet Defense Minister before very long. The new test-ban offer can hardly have been made. In short, without a decisive prior defeat of the most rigid and conservative group of Soviet policy-makers. If such a de feat has occurred, it is an enormously important event. And if Khrushchev's offer is centime, and if this offer opens the way to a practical though limited testban agree ment, this will be another cvenl of hardly calculable Im commodation, but does not clearly indicate where; Wash ington does more than hint, but finds no piece on the chessboard it can pull back of its own volition. The most sensitive human antennae sense that something should give, but none knows where, and In this interregnum what hopes exist fasten on the nu clear test ban talks. NATO, the formal arrange ment of the great Alliance. wnicn me trench with some Justice differentiate from the Alliance Itself, remains stalled One could easily despair and conclude that no peace time alliance of nations equal in sovereignty but vastly un equal In power can hold to gether minus the goad of fre quent threats from a common enemy. Yet one feels as he makes his inquiries around this new Europe, where life is so good, that even if the machinery dissolved, this Al liance itself will remain intact in heart and spirit until and unless the East makes some overriding, self-enforcing ac commodation that would obvi ate the necessity of this Al liance. That time has not yet come, as the President warned, but China and pro liferation of the final weapon could yet make it come. A third force." so often pre-! dieted, can arise in the Far East before It arises in Europe, with the whole world balance and alignment Just as profoundly altered. e Time, after all, is life; life is good in the West and get ting better in Russia, and there may be a certain Inborn, unconscious but instinctive hu man wisdom involved in the painful forward motion of common policy through the comfortable a sensation, but it is the sensation one acquires in the new Europe. It is a question of one's sense of pace and of historic continuity and this contest of visceral atti tudes can be applied to in ternal, national societies as well as to the external, inter national scene. Britain today is a prime case in point. The average Englishman, I would think, has a sensation of living better than he has ever lived. Employment and wages are high, the shops are full, the new cars pour out of the factories, berthings for sporting Boats are as hard to magazine, its entire issue de voted to this question: "Sui cide of a Nation?" If Britain is dying, as so many of its intellectuals fear, its common people are enjoy ing the process and, indeed, feeling intensely alive hr-rein. They have an instinctive aver sion to defining "the national purpose," an instinctive fear that effccicncy is the natural enemy of tolerance and kindli ness. The world scientific revolution may have made the British system old hat, but they happen to like old hats and find them comfortable. One's heart is with them in this, but one's reason is obli- come by now as parking space ! gated to believe that kindli- lor auiomooties. Icw houses, new colleges are going up me fcngiishman. as a pri vate person, is doing very well; but England as a nation competing for trade and pres tige with other nations is do ing very badly. Britain's share of world trade has dropped precipitately in the last ten years. Her productivity per worker is near the bottom of the western list. Rule of gov ernment and industry by the ness is not and must not be incompatible with efficiency, or this democracy, like our own. is in for the deepest 'rouble. In the very long view, it may be. indeed, that Britain's solution of her internal prob lem will prove mere impor tant to this Alliance and to American world interests than any new weapon and com mand machinery within the Alliance. Germany Is the im- vaguely educated ama t e u r j mediate key lo the Alliance, continues - there is but one j and she may become, by the f .,mh. rt Jit SU,f ! "?cm"bl clust" rational; scientist in the Ministry of; book figures, our number one fumbling for practical ways to share the leadership with al lies, no two of which agree in their Immediate interests or their long range view of po litical and military strategy. obstacles. Speed of decision j Science and one in the freas- j ally. But not by the final ac somewhow does not comport ; ury, and outside Treasury and counting, that of the sDirit. with the awful finality of the slakes, at least In this part of the globe. Perhaps this is mucri too Agriculture there arc exactly four full-time economists In government service. So reports "Encounter' f There Britain is surelv secure. (Diitributad 1963. by Tha Hall Syndicate. Inc.) (All Rights Reserved! 7 r :