Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Medford mail tribune. (Medford, Or.) 1909-1989 | View Entire Issue (Oct. 19, 1958)
111 (Advertisement) V M Now! Easier, surer protection for your most intimate marriage problems Tested by doctors . . . trusted by women Does 1 ill J1 a S3! 5 1. Germicidal protection! Norforms are safer and surer than ever! A highly perfected new formula re leases antiseptic and germicidal in gredients right in the vaginal tract. The exclusive new base melts at body tem perature, forming a powerful protec tive film that permits long-lasting . action. Will not harm delicate tissues. 2. Deodorant protection! Norforms were tested in a hospital clinic and found to be more effective than anything it had ever used. Nor forms are deodorant they eliminate (rather than cover up) embarrassing odors, yet have no "medicine" or "disinfectant" odor themselves. 3. Convenience! These small vaginal suppositories are so easy and convenient. Just insert no apparatus, mixing or measuring. Grcaseless and keep in any climate. Your druggist has- them in boxes of 12 and 24. Also available in Canada. Publicity Curb Delinquency? Here are the results of the Family Weel A NORWICH PRODUCT Tested by doctors ... proved in hospital clinics FKE in forma five Norforaif bookltt Just mail thit coupon lo: Dept. FW-810-19 Norwich Pharmacol Company Norwich, N. Y. Please tend me the new Norforms booklet, in a plain envelope. Name Street City State- -Zone s' s Should newspapers print the names of all youngsters under 18 who run afoul of the law? Yes, according to more than two out of three readers who participated in a Family Weekly poll. The poll was based on the re cent article, "Does Publicity Curb Delin quency?" by Dow Richardson. Should papers print only the names of re peaters and serious law violators under 18? Slightly more than half of those participat ing voted "yes" on this question. Should juvenile-court judges decide what names should be printed? Almost five out of every six ballots said "no" to this proposal. ;wrViiiAiftiTA mm m m m VI SS jr rfirn7rn rttu no extra cost in every It's full-sized, fluffy, pastel-colored . . . and it's packed right in the box! Q. Lf4 ' a And remember Breeze is tops for everything you wash trom dungarees to nylon. You can't buy Satisfaction guaranteed by Lever Brothers or your money refunded. a better all-purpose detergent! CANNON FACI CLOTH IN RBOULAR IZB . . . CANNON KITCHEN TOWEL IN OIANT SIZE King Size " 8f3 La Li) 1 - 3 poll on this vital question. The results of the poll generally agreed with a similar survey con ducted by The Cleveland Pres and discussed by Richardson in his ar ticle. In the Cleveland poll, the ma jority of citizens felt that the names of juvenile offenders should be pub lished as a deterrent to crime. Hundreds of Family Weekly read ers who submitted ballots also wrote letters expressing their opinions in ' greater detail. As one writer put it, "There is a need to elaborate on this important subject; a ballot hardly does the job." Coming from nearly every state in the union, the letters told of deep concern about the grow- -ing juvenile problem. Comment approving publication of all names came from teachers, form er social workers, mothers, business men, a former state policeman, and teen-agers, among others. They ranged from vehement suggestions that public whipping and stocks be . revived to matter-of-fact statements agreeing with the position of FBI Di rector J. Edgar Hoover. The nation's top crime fighter recommends publi cizing the names of all young crimi nals, whatever their age. The group favoring publicity in cluded many readers with recent experiences in which youngsters' names were or were not published in connection with misbehavior. One was a mother whose son's name had appeared in the local paper by mis take; another related the case of a boy riding with others in a car he didn't know had been stolen; and a third told of a lad picked up without a driver's license. He had been afraid -to tell his parents that he bought a car with savings from extra work. A number of thoughtful letters from teen-agers made the point that the publication of names, far from being a deterrent to crime, often maKes heroes of offenders and gives vicarious pleasure to their friends. ' Their arguments are supported in at least one case that of a father who learned from the newspaper of his 14-year-old son's implication in a car theft. The young man's exploit made such a hero of him to his class mates that he had to withdraw from high school for the remainder of the term. This boy has accepted counsel ing, as have his parents. His father wrote, "I am in favor of publishing the names of parents of delinquents, who I feel are really to blame. . . I realize the position I would have been put in if my name had been published . . . but my son only became what I let him become. I should be willing to face the ac complishments of my work." Quite a few other readers agreed that parents' names and addresses should be published along with those of offending youngsters. They cited lack of discipline and parental neglect as the chief causes of delinquency. The count of five to one against juvenile-court judges deciding on publication of names may seem sur prising, because judges should know more about individual circumstances and are in a good position to decide fairly. Reasons most often given by writers were that judges were in clined to be lenient, that they were subject to pressures allowing for favoritism, and that favoritism vio lates democratic principles. But one police judge in a South western city wrote that after ten years on the bench he felt "that we should publish the names of all law offenders, regardless of age, and, in the cases of juveniles, their addresses and the names of their parents." A city detective with considerable juvenile experience said he believes in "giving them a second chance; then if they are picked up again, their names should be published." A number of readers compliment ed their local newspaper editors. They said that editors, serving as the community's conscience, do a good job in deciding when to publish the names of juvenile offenders. ' " j ' ' x A' 'Ik Ei . ' r I -! 1 . ' r'r . m : ' a SAm4 ' r-' - 1 - 1 : F (V 1 : 1 ; 5J ? - ' I : Fashions J f ' New Fall bra accentuates without padding By RUTH STONE Permadift Foundation Stylist Family Weekly, October 19, 195 13 The look thi? Fall is relaxed and cas ual. Your hustline, while accentuated, must be modified and natural and "Perma'lift" has come to your rescue with Magic Push-Up, a wonderful new bra that beautifully lives up to its name. You see, Magic Push-Up doesn't pad you it makes the most of you. Special Magic Insets at the base of the cups firmly lift and support you so that your bust completely fills the self fitting cups, no matter what size you are. Style 148 only $3.50 in fine cotton with the Neveride band that keeps your bra securely in place always. Sizes: A cup, 32-36, B & C cups, 32-38. Your Fall foundation wardrobe just isn't complete without a "Perma'lift" Stemline Jr. Magic Oval Pantie. Not only does the special elastic and that V-Panel keep you straight as a stem but this one pantie, I personally guar antee, will never chafe, or irritate and it can't ride up ever! Only $5.95. Visit your favorite dealer today. You'll love these garments for their wonderful comfort and control. Free Booklet Write for free booklet, "Facts About Figures", co Ruth Stone, Dept. "N", A. Stein & Company, 1143 W. Congress Parkway, Chicago 7, 111. .r...u..p.i. xr.
