Medford mail tribune. (Medford, Or.) 1909-1989, October 19, 1958, Image 42

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    111
(Advertisement)
V M
Now! Easier,
surer protection
for your most
intimate marriage
problems
Tested by doctors . . .
trusted by women
Does
1
ill
J1
a
S3!
5
1. Germicidal protection!
Norforms are safer and surer than ever!
A highly perfected new formula re
leases antiseptic and germicidal in
gredients right in the vaginal tract. The
exclusive new base melts at body tem
perature, forming a powerful protec
tive film that permits long-lasting .
action. Will not harm delicate tissues.
2. Deodorant protection!
Norforms were tested in a hospital
clinic and found to be more effective
than anything it had ever used. Nor
forms are deodorant they eliminate
(rather than cover up) embarrassing
odors, yet have no "medicine" or
"disinfectant" odor themselves.
3. Convenience!
These small vaginal suppositories are
so easy and convenient. Just insert
no apparatus, mixing or measuring.
Grcaseless and keep in any climate.
Your druggist has- them in boxes of
12 and 24. Also available in Canada.
Publicity
Curb
Delinquency?
Here are the results of the Family Weel
A NORWICH
PRODUCT
Tested by doctors ...
proved in hospital clinics
FKE in forma five Norforaif bookltt
Just mail thit coupon lo: Dept. FW-810-19
Norwich Pharmacol Company
Norwich, N. Y.
Please tend me the new Norforms booklet,
in a plain envelope.
Name
Street
City
State-
-Zone
s'
s
Should newspapers print the names of all
youngsters under 18 who run afoul
of the law?
Yes, according to more than two out of
three readers who participated in a Family
Weekly poll. The poll was based on the re
cent article, "Does Publicity Curb Delin
quency?" by Dow Richardson.
Should papers print only the names of re
peaters and serious law violators under 18?
Slightly more than half of those participat
ing voted "yes" on this question.
Should juvenile-court judges decide what
names should be printed?
Almost five out of every six ballots said
"no" to this proposal.
;wrViiiAiftiTA
mm m m m
VI SS jr
rfirn7rn rttu
no extra cost in every
It's full-sized, fluffy,
pastel-colored . . . and it's
packed right in the box!
Q.
Lf4
'
a
And remember Breeze is tops for everything you
wash trom dungarees to nylon. You can't buy
Satisfaction guaranteed by Lever Brothers
or your money refunded.
a better all-purpose detergent!
CANNON FACI CLOTH IN RBOULAR IZB . . . CANNON KITCHEN TOWEL IN OIANT SIZE
King Size "
8f3
La
Li)
1
-
3
poll on this vital question.
The results of the poll generally
agreed with a similar survey con
ducted by The Cleveland Pres and
discussed by Richardson in his ar
ticle. In the Cleveland poll, the ma
jority of citizens felt that the names
of juvenile offenders should be pub
lished as a deterrent to crime.
Hundreds of Family Weekly read
ers who submitted ballots also wrote
letters expressing their opinions in '
greater detail. As one writer put it,
"There is a need to elaborate on this
important subject; a ballot hardly
does the job." Coming from nearly
every state in the union, the letters
told of deep concern about the grow- -ing
juvenile problem.
Comment approving publication of
all names came from teachers, form
er social workers, mothers, business
men, a former state policeman, and
teen-agers, among others. They
ranged from vehement suggestions
that public whipping and stocks be
. revived to matter-of-fact statements
agreeing with the position of FBI Di
rector J. Edgar Hoover. The nation's
top crime fighter recommends publi
cizing the names of all young crimi
nals, whatever their age.
The group favoring publicity in
cluded many readers with recent
experiences in which youngsters'
names were or were not published in
connection with misbehavior. One
was a mother whose son's name had
appeared in the local paper by mis
take; another related the case of a
boy riding with others in a car he
didn't know had been stolen; and a
third told of a lad picked up without
a driver's license. He had been afraid
-to tell his parents that he bought a
car with savings from extra work.
A number of thoughtful letters
from teen-agers made the point that
the publication of names, far from
being a deterrent to crime, often
maKes heroes of offenders and gives
vicarious pleasure to their friends. '
Their arguments are supported in
at least one case that of a father
who learned from the newspaper of
his 14-year-old son's implication in
a car theft. The young man's exploit
made such a hero of him to his class
mates that he had to withdraw from
high school for the remainder of the
term. This boy has accepted counsel
ing, as have his parents.
His father wrote, "I am in favor
of publishing the names of parents of
delinquents, who I feel are really to
blame. . . I realize the position I
would have been put in if my name
had been published . . . but my son
only became what I let him become.
I should be willing to face the ac
complishments of my work."
Quite a few other readers agreed
that parents' names and addresses
should be published along with those
of offending youngsters. They cited
lack of discipline and parental neglect
as the chief causes of delinquency.
The count of five to one against
juvenile-court judges deciding on
publication of names may seem sur
prising, because judges should know
more about individual circumstances
and are in a good position to decide
fairly. Reasons most often given by
writers were that judges were in
clined to be lenient, that they were
subject to pressures allowing for
favoritism, and that favoritism vio
lates democratic principles.
But one police judge in a South
western city wrote that after ten
years on the bench he felt "that we
should publish the names of all law
offenders, regardless of age, and, in
the cases of juveniles, their addresses
and the names of their parents."
A city detective with considerable
juvenile experience said he believes
in "giving them a second chance;
then if they are picked up again,
their names should be published."
A number of readers compliment
ed their local newspaper editors.
They said that editors, serving as the
community's conscience, do a good
job in deciding when to publish the
names of juvenile offenders.
' " j
' ' x A' 'Ik
Ei . ' r I -!
1 . ' r'r .
m : ' a SAm4 ' r-' - 1 -
1 : F (V
1 : 1 ; 5J ? - '
I : Fashions J f
'
New Fall bra
accentuates without padding
By RUTH STONE
Permadift Foundation Stylist
Family Weekly, October 19, 195
13
The look thi? Fall is relaxed and cas
ual. Your hustline, while accentuated,
must be modified and natural and
"Perma'lift" has come to your rescue
with Magic Push-Up, a wonderful new
bra that beautifully lives up to its name.
You see, Magic Push-Up doesn't pad
you it makes the most of you.
Special Magic Insets at the base of
the cups firmly lift and support you so
that your bust completely fills the self
fitting cups, no matter what size you are.
Style 148 only $3.50 in fine cotton
with the Neveride band that keeps
your bra securely in place always.
Sizes: A cup, 32-36, B & C cups, 32-38.
Your Fall foundation wardrobe just
isn't complete without a "Perma'lift"
Stemline Jr. Magic Oval Pantie. Not
only does the special elastic and that
V-Panel keep you straight as a stem
but this one pantie, I personally guar
antee, will never chafe, or irritate and
it can't ride up ever! Only $5.95.
Visit your favorite dealer today.
You'll love these garments for their
wonderful comfort and control.
Free Booklet
Write for free booklet, "Facts About
Figures", co Ruth Stone, Dept. "N",
A. Stein & Company, 1143 W. Congress
Parkway, Chicago 7, 111. .r...u..p.i. xr.