Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Medford mail tribune. (Medford, Or.) 1909-1989 | View Entire Issue (June 16, 1917)
fEDFOTiTJ HrXTE TRTBTTNTI fTCDFOTtH, OT?F.00T. SATURDAY. JUNE 1(1. 1017. EXPECTED TO SOLVE WASHINGTON'. June 10. Ttimsla ha become the, pre-occupying quea tlon at tho state dopurtment with the approach of the Russian mission to 'Washington, the beginning of nego tiations by the American commission to Russia In Petrogrnd und the con tinued reiteration of the demand of tile council of soldiers and workmen's dologatca for a Ktutcment of ullicd peace terms. Kocent reports Indicate that the council of soldiers und workmen's delegates is not so dominating a fac tor as is generally assumed. It rep resents not over five million people of Ilussla's 1X0, lino, mil). The council in confined very largely to the industrial centers, whose voice is always the first heard and the loudest. The peasants, according to these reports, comprise the vast majority of the population and bavo voted over whelmingly In favor of a vigorous prosecution of the war. Moreover, the business men of Hus sla, it is pointed out, bave recently voted practically unanimously thru what corresponds In Hussla to the American chamber of commerce for a vigorous prosecution of tho war. Nevertheless the continued insistence by the soldiers and workmen's dele gates for a new declaration by the allies shows a lack of confidence which It In realized, must bo swept away beforo Kiissin can present a united front. Croat hope in fell, that thn Hoot mission may find some way to appeal ti) tho Russian radical on his own ground, lint no definite advices from the Aniorican envoys aro expected for some days. OF RUSSIAN FLEETS PrcTKOGHAD, June 16. The newspapers report that Admiral Mu (lliiiofr, commander of tho Hhiek Sou fleet, has left Ills post and will be re placed by Itcnr-Admlrtil Verdercskl. General Yudevlteh, commander In chief In the Cuucubub, bun been replac ed by General Prjevulsky. Two officers and two nion of the AiiBtriau espionage bureau havo been arretted. . PARIS, June 10. Tho army cum mitteo of tho chamber of deputies adopted n resolution recommending the, remitting of all outHttindlnK pun ishments In tho army for minor or fenses In honor of General Pershing. Tho resolution nlso requests that an extra ration of a pint of wine be nerved to tho soldiers. ORDINANCE NO. 891. AN OHlINAXn: correcting nml modi fylng certain local iiMneHmuentH upon tho lien docket of tho City of Med ford. WHKHKAH, sundry corrections nml modifications have been made of cer tain special assessments hendnfon levied and confirmed by the City ot Medtord by ordinance for local Im provements: and WHKKKAS, such corrections ami modifications have not hrretofon been authorized and conMiini'd by or dlnanee: ami WIIIMtKAH, It Is ilriMued expedient and for the best Interests of the (lt of Medford and the properties charged with such assessments ami the pcrNon liable therefor that such correction: and modifications be ratified and con firmed bv ordinance: Now. iherelore TIIK CITY OK MKlH-nUO OOTIl OH PAIN AS KOI. LOW S: Section I . That the special assess nienls heretofore levied and asesssed ngalust the several lots, tracts a in'. parcels of land in this ordinance spec! fled In the several principal sunt ami for thn several tmpio eineuls hereli mentioned, be. and they are hereb sevevally modified and corrected as h heroin provided, tnwit : 1 . Assessment No. 1, under Or dl nance No. L':';t. assessed HKaiiisI Fred H. Coolto, in the principal sum of $t'.rtn for the Improvement of Hose avenue from Main street lo Koitrlh street, h water main, reduced to principal sum or $ir.!). 2. Assessment N'i. 1. under Ordi nance No. 'J:'!t. assessed against Km! II. Coose, In tlie pi inctinil sum of $dt' for tin- improvement ol liosi avnue from Main sheet to l-'ontrh s reel by water main, red need in prlnnpa sum of t 'J :i. 3. Assessment No. '. muter Oidi nance No. H;'!. nss'-sed ai:;tlnst Kile I'liilliey, In the principal sum of $n 7.Y for the lnnioenieni of vt Mnin Street, from Lauiel aitvt-t to Columhu nvenne, by water main, itduced t principal mini of fil m 4. Assessmi'tit No. t, uner Ordi nance No. assessed atainsl C W Hnyder, In the prinripul sum of $;: sn fur 'tlio Improvement of Summit ave mm from Wet" Main street to Wcm Fourth Htrool, by ujttfr mam, lednced to principal sum oi r: .to. fi ARKeasmeiit s;- under Ordi lioncu No. ?31 aaw scd arauibt Plvkvl Kluni uiiil M 111 jiliy. In the principal ' mini of ftifi.SU, fur the improvement of Summit avenue, from West Main street to West Fourth street, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $42.30. 6. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 2'12, assessed against C. I. Wolvorton, in the principal Hum of $73.15, for the improvement of Hoes Court, from West Main street to West fourth street, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $4fi.!H. 7. Assessment No. I I, under Ordi nance cj. 232, assessed ugainst. C. D. Wolverton, in the principal sum of i.la, for tho iinnrovement of Ross Court, from West Main street to West Fourth street, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $1(1. i)H. H. Assessment No. 1'J, under Ordi nance No. 24 1, assessed ugainst Her? Anderson, in the principal sum of $4(1.20, for Ihe Improvement of Jnolinon hi root, from Grape street to tho West Corporation Houndary, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $44.10. Assessment No. UK, under Ordi nance No, 247, asseswd against Itav M. Toft, in the prinelpii' sum of SGI .GO, for the Improvement of Jackson street, from Grape street to the West Corpo ral ion Houndarv. bv water main, re duced lo the prlnelnal Bum of $17.95. Increased to and Ivonned in the prln elnal sum of J.M.r.n 10. Assessment fo. 1. under Ordi nance No. 251. n-isessed nualiiHt EI- d'f'd a id .?e-' Pfir7e. In the princi pal sum of $t;or no. for tlte Imnrove- ment of Priddy street, from Clark street South to Weit .1 nek son street. by water main, reduced the principal sum of $40-1.841. II. Assessment No. 17, tinder Ordi nance No. 2T.7. assessed ngalest Ada Porter. In tho prlncinal sum of J2S.50, for tho Improvement of Newtown street, from West Main afreet to West Klt'hth street, cancelled. Assessment Nf. 15, under Ordi- nance No. 2(13, asses'-'ed against Marv M. Orp. in tho princii ' l sum of Sag.GQ. for the Improvement of Orange street, from West Main street to West ICIghth street, by water main, cancelled. 13. Assessment. No. 2S, under Ordi nance No. 203, assessed agaitiHt. Hon delln. Ooodulo, In tho principal sum of tr,2S0, for tho Improvement 0f South Oraniro street, rrom West Main street to West, FJcventu Hlreel, by water main, reduced to principal cmin of $4(J.20. 4. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi nance No. LMili, assessed against lion lelln Goodale, In the principal sum of $r2.G0, for (he improvement of South Orange street, from West Main fdreet to Went Eleventh street, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $lti.2U. 15. Assessment No. 23, under Ordi nance No. 2t2, assessed against Jo sephine F. Clark, In the principal Bum of $241.51, for the Improvement of West Fourth street, rrom North Orange lo tho West Corporation Houndary, by water main, reduced to principal sum of 814(1.70. HI. Assessment No. f, tinder Ordi nance No. 2tiit. assessed against M. W. and II. II. Tattle, In tne principal sum of $10(1.10. for the fmnrovement of Dakota avenue, from South Peach street to South Oakdale avenue, by water main, reduced lo principal sum of $r.t.l!S. 17. Assessment, No. 10. under Ordi nance No. 20!), assessed against Flavin llarker. In the principal sum of $208.00, for the Improvement, of Dakota avenue, from South Pench street to South Oak- dale avenue, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $IS3.04. IS. Assessment No. 1 and 2, under Ordinance No. 201), assessed against Hamlin and Parker, in the principal sum of $582.40, for the Improvement of Dakota avenue, front South Peach street to South Oakiiato avenue, by wati'i' main, reduced to principal sum if $-M..It, sulidivjsiou. lit. Assessment No. .'I, 4 and 5, tinder Ordinance No. 2(.!. assessed against Jackson County Hank ami Webb and W viand. In Ihe principal sum of I5S2. 10, fur the Improvement of Da- kola avenue, from South Peach street to South Oakdalo avenue, by water main, reduced to principal aunt of Ml. subdivision. 20. Assessment No. 5 and 0, under Ordinance No. 270, assessed itiuiinst Adam Emlg and II. & M. Emig. in the m-lncfpal sum of $2K4.00, for the Im provement of West Twelfth street. rrom South Laurel to Mistletoe sheet by water main, reduced to principal sum o I JS,t.ui), subdivision, 21. Assessment No, ;i, under Ordi nance No. 272, assessed against Attain Kmlg. in the principal sum of $ISH.0 for the Improvement of Peach street, from Wed Eleventh street to Dakota avenue, by water main, reduced ( principal sum of $158.00, subdivision 22. Assessment No. , under Ordi nance No. 171, assessed attains! John Harnchurg. In the principal sum oi $iuii.:l2, for the Improvement of sewer district No. 0, reduced to principal amount of $;tt 2. 2't. Assessment No. 4. 5 and 0, der Ordinance No. 272, assessed against James Campbell. Hamlin and Parker, In the principal sum of $:M 25. for the improvement of Peach street from West Eleventh sheet lo Duota avenue, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $!f.i,i, subdivision 21. Assessment No. . under Ordi nance No, 171, assessed (mains) C W Palm and W. I. Vawter. in the principal sum of $... tie, for the improvement, o' icwer district No. ti, reduced to putt .'i pa I sum of $'S50. 2.'.. Assessment Ni. , under Ordi nance No. lies, assessed attains! Cum line Pelliuttcr, in the principal sum ot f.i'.nu, for the improvement or sewer district No. 8, reduced to prin .'I pa! oim ol $;ts.oo. 2ii. Assessment No. , under Ordi isnce AO. l!s. assessed ngalust M. C uleiison. in the principal sum of $i.l.7;i tor the improvement of sewer district No. 8, tenured to principal sum id ;;i.io. 2(. Assessment No. , under Ordi annce No. pes. assessed utt.nusl Edgar S llaler. In Ihe principal sum of .:e mi tor the Impi oVeniellt of sewer distiict No. N, eamvIU-d. J. Assessment No. , under Ordi nam e No 2-.:, assessed against E. It Pech, In the principal sum ot $ti !, or tie- Improvement of sewer d strict No. 7, reitmed $.!'. 10. pim.ipal Mini oljnmtli. hv water main, cancelled. 2'.i. Assessment No. - -, under Ordi nance No, assessed against J. E l oh, in t he pi met j .ti sum ot $ lo. or t..e improvement of sewer district No. 7 $.( I" i educed lo pi nicipal sum idt;irvft lo Peach street, by sewer, ;io. Assessment No. under Ordi nance No. 22;, assessed against Wil liam Lew is, in the principal sum of fill. iii, tot the Improvement of t-ovUM district No. 7, .reduced to pi inclpal i mum of $83.20. ill. Assessment No. , under Ordi nance No. 22.1, assessed against An derson and Toft, in the principal sum of $08.25, for the improvement of sow er district. No. 7, reduced to principal sum of $117.75. 32. Assessment No. , under Ordi nance No. 22 ;j, assessec against Mrs. S. J. Hayes. In tho principal sum of $20.40, for the improvement of sower district No. j, reduced to principal sum of $29.95. .TI. Assessment No. , under Ordi nance No. 223, assessed against Mrs. S. J. Hayes, In the principal sum of $30.40, for the improvement of sewer district No. 7, reduced to principal sum of $29.95. 34. Assessment No. , under Ordi nance No. 223, assessed against Clara Mcintosh, 'in tho principal sum of $22.50, for the Improvement of sewer district No. 7, cancelled. 35. Assessment No. , undor Ordi nance No. 223, assessed against. S. H. Syncox, In the principal sum of $32.50, for the Improvement of sewer district No. 7, cancelled. 30. Assessment No. , under Ordi nance No. 223, assessed against Aga tha A. Mrandenberg, in the principal sum of $32.5)1, for tho improvement of sewer district No. 7, cancelled. 37. Assessment K. 1, under Ordi nance No. 205, assessed against C. W Palm, in the principal Hum of $21.50, for the iinnrovement of Hamilton Hireet, from Olson street to North Oak dale avenue, by sewer, reduced to principal mini of , cancelled. 38. Assessment No. 25, under Ordi nance No. 205, assessed ugainst J. F. Hutehason, in tho principal sum of $31.50, for the Improvement of Hamil ton Htreet, from West end of said street to Oukdalo avenue, by sewer, cancelled. 311. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi nance No. 205, assessed against Rob ert. Wilson, in the principal sum of $31.50, for the Improvement of Hamil ton street, from West end of said street to Oakdale avenue, bv sewer, cancelled 40. Assessment. No. 27, under Ordi nance No. 205, assessed against Mrs. M. A. Olson, in the principal sum of $31.50, for the Improvement of Ham ilton street, from West end of said street to Oakdalo avenue, by sewer, cancelled. 41. Assessment No. 28, under Ordi nance No. 205, assessed against D. W Heebe, In the principal sum of $31.50 for the improvement, of Hamilton street, from West end of said street to Oakdale avenue avenue, by sewer, cancelled. 42. Assessment No. 4, under Ordi nance No. 205, assessed ngntnst Ore gon and California Land Company, in the principal sum of $12.00, for the improvement of North Oakdale avenue from Hamilton street to Third street, by sower, cancelled. 43. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 274, assessed against Dan iel E. Clay, In the principal sum of $98.34, for the Improvement of New town street, from West Eleventh to Dakota avenue, by sewer, reduced to principal sum of $05.34. 44. Assessment. No. 4J1, under Ordi nance No. 278. assessed against C. T llolloway, in the principal sum of $184.53, for tho improvement of West Second street, from North Oakdale avenue to West Corporation Houndary, by sewer, reduced to principal sum of SS3.4&. 45. Assessment No. 81, under Ordi nance No. 324, assessed against J. C Itrown. in the principal sum of $2,117.93 for the Improvement of West Main street, from Laurel street to Columbus avenue, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $2,09. 40. Assessment No. 77, under Ordi nance No. 358, assessed against Alias Turner, in the principal sum of $59.50, for the improvement nf Jackson street, from Hartlett street to Columbus ave nue, by sewer, reduced to principal sum of $:8.0S. 47. Assessment No. 00, under Ordi nance No. 321, assessed against 1. J Phipps, In the principal sum of $300 00, for the improvement of Riverside ave nue, from Jackson street to North Corporation Houndary, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $280.50. 48. Assessment No. 4, under Ordi nance No. 332, assessed against E Hiden, in the principal sum of $10.83. for the improvement of Court street from Central avenue to a point 10-Sl feet north, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $Hk0O. 49. Assessment Nit. 7, under Ordi nance No. 332, assessed against Mar garet Daily, in the principal sum of $4t.S3, tor tho improvement or Conn street, from Central avenue to a point iUS2 feet north, by water main, re duced to principal sum of $10.00. 50. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 329. assessed against J. A Perry, in the principal sum of $148.75, for the improvement of Central avenue North, from East Second to North Corporation Houndary, by water main. reduced to principal sum of $100.25. 51. Assessment No. 2, under Ordi nance No. 342, assessed against E. P Bennett, in the principal sum of $212.50. for the Improvement of How aid street, front Washington street lo Petinett st reel, by water main, re duced to principal sum of $2"0.25. 52. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi nance No. 34 1, assessed against Jim Herry, in the principal sum of $55.00, for the improvement of East Washing ton street, from Oenessee street to Howard street, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $50.00. 53. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi mince No os, assessed against Wil liam Smith, in (he principal sum of $74.70, for the improvement of South Kir street, from twelfth street to Cor poratioii Houndary, by water main, re duced to principal sum of $71. 07. 51. Assessment No. 11, under Ordi nance No. 4oS. assessed attains! Med ford Ice and Storage Company, in the principal sum of $-55 21, for the im provement of South Kir street, from Twellth street to Corporation Hound ary, by water main, reduced to prin el pa I sum of $2Ji.;l. 65. Assessment No. 1, tinder Or diuance No. 411, assessed attainst W Daily, in the principal sum of $31.13 lor the improvement of Welch sheet from Jackson street to a itoini 6jn fee 5t;. Assessment No. 1. under Ordi nance No. 3iio. assessed attains! "Wil ham il. Ilambn. in the princij al sum of $l Mt.oo, for the I m provement of Fourteenth street, from Newtown duced to principal sum of $!.'." no. 57. Assessment No 21, under Ordt nance No. 3; assessed again! J. 1 Emerick, in the principal sum ot $1037.41. Cor thu improvement of Soutli Riverside avenue, from East Main, street to Twelfth street, ny paving, re- duced to principal sum of $815,10 58. Assessment No. 30, under Ordi nance No. 308, assessed against Caro line K. Damon, in the principal sum of $479.18, for the improvement of South Kiverside avenue, from KftBt Main street to Twelfth street, by paving, re duced to principal sum of $217.36. 59. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi nance No. 308 assessed against Rena Hubbard. In the principal sum of $202.54. for tho Improvement of South Riverside avenue, from Fast Main street to Twelfth street, bv wtvintr, endnced to principal sum of $197.00. 00. Assessment No. 49. under Ordi nance No. 3S0, assessed aininst D. P. Thompson, In the principal sum of ?57.85. for the imnrovement 'if South D'AnJou Hh-eet, from Fast Eighth to East Twelfth street, bv navlng, re duced to nrlncipaJ sum of $40.15. 01. Assessment No. . under Ordi nnnce No. 381. assessed agulnst S. TI. Wood, in the principal turn of $10.00. for the Iinnrovement of North Holly street, from Main street to Second street, bv paving, reduced to principal sum of $ : . cancelled. 02. Assessment No. 37. under Ordi nance No. 384, assessed against Jor dan and Williamson, in the principal um of S7.22. for the iinnrovement of li'ast .Main street, from tho Hridtre to Roosevelt avenue, by naving, reduced to nrlncloal sum of $5.37. 63. Assessment No. 4. under Ordi nance No. 442, assessed against A. R. Moore, in the principal sum of $81.00. for the Improvement of Pine street. from Jackson Btreet to Austin street, bv water main, interest $3.04 deducted when paid. 04. Assessment No. 8, under Ordi nance No. 442. assessed against Wil liam Colvig. in the principal su.n of $07.47, for the improvement of Pine street, from Jackson street to Austin street, bv water main, cancelled. 05. Assessment No. 5, under Ordi Tr 4tG, assessed against F, H. fiV-ont. fn tn nrlncipaJ sum of $109.20, for the imurovetnent of West Thir teenth ntroot. from King street to Pone'' street, by wafer main, reduced to principal sum of $18.20. 0b. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi nance No. 465, assessed against J. W. Herrv, In the principal sum of $56.25. for the improvement of Fust Welling ton street, from Howard Btreet to Roosevelt avenue, by water main, re duced to principal sum of $22.50. ti7. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 409, assessed against h. CI. Porter, In the principal sum of $134.00, for the Improvement or Almond street. from East Main street to South end of street, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $1)3.90. 08. Assessment No. 27, under Ordi nance No. 472, assessed against Angus McDonald, in the principal sum of $127.92. for the Improvement of Cot tage street, from East Main street to the south end of the street, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $11.00. 09. Assessment No. 2, under Ordi nance No. 517, nssessed agulnst W. W. McDonald. In the principal sum of $I0(.92, for the improvement of East main street, from Roosevelt, avenue to the end of the street, by water malnv reduced to principal sum of $94.50. (0. Assessment. NO. 26, under Ordi nance No. 517, assessed against George P. Lindley, In the principal sum or jijj.bo, tor the improvement of East Main street, from Roosevelt a-a.-nie to the end of the street, by water main. reduced to principal sum of $20.03. 1. Assessment No., 7, under Ordi nance No. 585. nssessed against John H. Tyrrell, in the principal sum of $i0.!0. tor the Improvement of Park avenue, from Eleventh street to Dakota avenue, by water main, reduced to principal sum of $51.00. 72. Assessment No. 5, under Ordi nance No. G90, assessed against Clara M. Amaain, In the pitucipal sum of $102.40, for the Improvement of Alice street, from Realty Btreet to Niantic street, by water main, reduced to prin cipal sum of $03. so. i3. Assessment No. 4, under Ordi nance No, t2i, assessed Renins; lleorge H. Herrlck. in the principal sum of $65.00, for the Improvement of Roosevelt avenue, from a point 950 teet north of Main street to Jackson street, by water main, cancelled. i l. Assessment No. 12, under Ordi lance No. 390, assessed against Mrs. O. W. Henderson, in the principal sum of $302.03, for tho improvement of North Kiverside avenue, from Main street to Jackson street, by paving. cancelled. 75. Assessment No. 4, under Ordi nance No. 4o0, assessed against Mary It. Martin, in the principal sum o, $2ti.5o, for the improvement of North Central avenue, from Jackson slrect to Court street, hy paving, reduced to principal sum of $106.50. 70. Assessment No. IS, under Ordi nance No. -lot., assessed against The Jackson County Ihiildlng ami Umn An socintum, in ih, principal sum of $344,10, for the Improvement of North Central avenue, from Jackson street to Court street, by paving, reduced to principal sum oi $J3.i.i8. 77. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi nance No. 410, assessed against R, C Kinleyside, in the principal sum of $34.70. for the Improvement of Hennetl avenue, from Howard street to Roose velt avenue, by sewer, reduced to prin cipal sum of $33.00. 78. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 413. assessed against L. (J, Porter, In the principal sunt of $44.00, lor the Improvement of Fast Washing ton street, from Oenessee street to Roosevelt avenue, by sewer, cnucdled 79. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 420, assessed against F. W Hutchlron. in the principal sum of $130.50. for the improvement of West Ninth street, from Orano street to Hamilton street,, by sewer, reduced to principal sum ol $ i ,00. SO. Assessment No. 6. under Ordi nance No. 431, assessed against J M Dodge. In the principal sum of $19S.o0 for the improvement of Park avenue from Eleventh street to Dakota street, by opeuine street, reduced to principal sum of $153.00. M. Assessment No. 6. under Ordi nance No. 4 ( !, assessed attainst Her tha S. Harnutu, in the principal sum of $29. -o. for the improvement of D .Vijou street, from Si;h street to Third sheet, by sewer, teduccd to principal sum of $-1.71 2. Assessment No. 7. under Ordi nance No. u,:, assessed attainst Her tha S. Itanium, In the principal sum of $21i.50. for the raiprovcment of D'AnJou street, from Sixth street to Third street, by sewer, reduced to principal i sum oi 9-i, i . J Assessment No. 9, uuUer Ordi nance No. 443, assessed against Oer- tha 8. Harnum, In the principal sum of $29.50, for the Imu.-ovement of D'AnJou street, from Sixth street, to Third street, by sewer, reduced to principal sum of $21.74. 84. Assessment No. 9, under Ordi nance No. 443, assessed against Ber tha S. Harnum. in the principal sum of $29.50, for the Improvement of D'Anjou street, from Sixth street, to Third street, by sewer, reduced to principal sum of $21.74. 85. Assessment No. 12, under Ordi nance No. 443, assessed against John A. Smith, in the principal sum of $29.50, for the improvement of D'Anjou street, from Sixth street, to Third street, bv sewer, reduced to principal sum of $21.50. 86. Assessment No. 13, under Ordi nance No. 443. assessed against John A. Smith, in tho principal sum of $29.50, for the Improvement of D'Anjou street, from Sixth street to Third street, by sower, reduced to principal sum of $21.50. 87. Assessment No. 14, under Ordi nance No. 443, assessed against Ber tha S. Harnum. in the principal sum of $29.50, for the fmnrovement of D'Anjou j street, from Sixth street, to Third street, hy sewer, reduced to principal , sum of $21.50. 88. Assessment No. 15, under Ordi-! nance No. 443, assessed against Ber tha S. Harnum, In the principal sum of $29.50, for the iinnrovement of D'Anjou street, from Sixth street, to Third street, bv sewer, reduced to principal sum of $21.50. 89. Assessment No. 16, under Ordi-! nance No. 443, assessed against Ber tha S. Harnum, in the principal sum of $29.50, for the Improvement of D Anion street, from Sixth street, to Third street, hv sewer, reduced to principal sum of $21.50. 90. Assessments Nos. 19, 20. 21, 22 and 23, under Ordinance No. 443, as sessed against Alida R. Miner, in the principal sum of $29.50, for the im provement of D'Anjou street, from Sixth street to Third street, by sewer, reduced to principal sum of $2t.50. in each case. 91. Assessment No. 27. under Ordi nance No. 443, assessed against W. S. Bttrniun. in the principal sum of Sn9.00, for the improvement of D'Anjou street. from Sixth street to Third street, by sewer, reduced to principal sum ol $43.00. 92. Assessments Nos. 33 and 34, tin, der Ordinance No. 443, assessed against Bertha S. Harnum. In the prin cipal sum of $147.50. for the improve ment of D'AnJou street, from Sixth street to Third street, by sewer, re duced to principal sum of $ , $3.63 interest deducted by special agree ment. 93. Assessment No. 7, under Ordi nance No. 4b8, assessed against Z. Cameron.' in the principal sum of $174.00, for the Improvement of Sixth street, from Riverside avenue to Ivy street, bv sewer, reduced to principal sum of $87.00. 94. Assessment No. 8. under Ordi nance No. 510, ussessed against Wil liam Shaffer. Estate, in the principal sum of $99.00, for tho Improvement of East Main street, from Roosevelt ave nue to the East end of tho street, by sewer, reduced to principal sum ot $89.93. 95. Assessment No, 26. under Ordi nance No. 510, assessed against George P. Dudley, In the principal sum of $44.00, for the improvement of East Main street, from Roosevelt avenue to the East end of tho street, hy sewer, reduced to principal sum of $19. 2S. 90. Assessment No. 30, under Ordi nance No. 510, assessed against J. D, Skinner, in the principal sum of $80.24. for the improvement of East Main street, from Roosevelt avenue to the East end of the street, by sewer, re duced lo principal sum of $85.38. 97. Assessment No. 17, tmder Ordi nance No. 513, assessed against the Big Ben Milling Company, in the prin cipal sum of $155.75, for the Improve ment of Sixth street, from Riverside avenue to D'AnJou street, hy paving reduced to the principal sum of $124.60. 98. Assessment No. 33, tinder Ordi nance No. 515, assessed against A. M Forbes, in the principal sum of $280.00 for the Improvement of North Bart lett street, from Sixth street to Jack son street, hy paving, reduced to the principal sum of $84.00. 99. Assessment No. 37. under Ordi nance No. 523, assessed against Lillic Sample, in the principal sum of $o5.44. for the improvement, of West Fourth street, from Oakdale lo est City Limits, by paving, reduced to princi pal sum of $423.94. 100. Assessment No. , under Ordi nance No. 524, nssessed against E. E. Miner, in the principal sum of $23.04, for the improvement of N. D'Anjou street, from Sixth street to Jackson street, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $t;.00. lol. Assessment No. 64. under Ordi nance No. 529, assessed against J, L Black, in the principal sum of $351.00, for the Improvement of West Jackson street, from Riverside avenue to Co lumbus avenue, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $330.40. H2. Assessment No. 96, under Ordi nance No. 629. nssessed against S. I Leonard, in the priclpal sum of $707. 00 for the improvement of West Jackson street, from Riverside avenue to lo- lumhus avenue, by paving, reduced to principal sum of filS.03. 103. Assessment No. 71, under Ordi nance No. 433, assessed against M. M Maine, in the principal sum of $195.50. lor the Improvement of West Second street, from Holly street to the W Cltv Limits, bv paving, reduced to principal sum of $142.00. 1". Assessment No. 4, under Ordi nance No. 649, nssessed against V. J Emerick, in the principal sum of $104.00, for the Improvement of West Eighth street, from Oakdale nveniif to Holly street, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $424.00. H5. Assessment No. 4. under Ordi nance No. 547, assessed against 11. J Tttchnor, in the principal pum of $527.52. for the Improvement of North Riverside avenue, from Jackson street to North City Limits, by pavine, re duced to principal mun of $309 00 1";. Assessment No. 7. under Ordi nance No. 51". assessed scainst Charles M. Smith, in the principal sum of $'51.05, for the Improvement of North Riverside avenue, from Jackson street to the North City Limits, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $032 15. 1"7. Assessment No. 0. under Ordi nance No. 517. assessed acainst Luan da IVnton, in the principal "ei "f 15-S. for the improvement of North Riverside avenue, from Jackson street to the North City Limits, by paving, cancelled. 108. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi nance No. 647, assessed against W. E. Phipps, in the principal sum of $1549.52. for the Improvement of North Riverside avenue, from Jackson rftreet to the North City Limits, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $1510.00. 109. Assessment No. 34, under Ordi nance No. 547, nssessed agaiiiBt J. A. Lyon, in the principal sum of $672.56. for the Improvement of North River side avenue, from Jackson street to the North City Limits, by paving, re duced to principal sum of $072.00. 110. Assesment No. 40. under Ordi nance No. 54 7, assessed against Emll Cordes, in thu principal sum of $537.60, for the Improvement of North River side avenue, from Jackson street to tho North City Limits, by paving, re duced to principal sum of 5537.00, 111. Assessment No. 3, under Ordi-i nance No. 552, assessed against 1. Neldormeyer, in the principal sum of $826.00, for the improvement of Grape street, from Sixth street to the South! City Limits, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $7i0.80. Assessment No. 42, under Ordi nance No. 552, assessed against F. E. Martin, in the principal sum of $483.80, for the improvement of Grape street, from Sixth street to the South City iniits. by paving, reduced to principal sum of 413.00. 113. Assessment No. 44, under Ordi nance No. 552, assessed against Del- rov Getchell, in the principal sum of $4L3.0O, for the improvement of Grape street, from Sixth street to the South City Limits, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $385.00. 114. Assessment No. 45, under Ordi nance No. 552, assessed against Gar-nett-Corey Company, in the principal sum of $826.00, for the improvement of Grape street, from Sixth street to tho South City Limits, by paving, re duced to principal sum of $737.(1S. 115. Assessment No. 5, tmder Ordi nance No. 539, assessed against. Jo senh Caskey, in tho principal sum of $162.40, for the improvement of Man zunlta street, from Riverside avenue to Beutty street, by sewer, reduced to principal sum of $46.40. 110. Assessment No. 6. under Ordi nance No. 539, assessed against W, G. Gordon, in the principal sum of $121.48, for the Improvement ot Maimuiita street, from Riverside avenue to Henhy street, bv cower, reduced to principal sum of $5.48. LI 7. Assessment No.54. under Ordi nance No. 542, assessed against J, H. Andrews, in the principal sum of $45.00, for the improvement of allev between Benson and Plum, from Washington street to Dakota avenue, by sewer, re duced to the principal sum of $38.00. 118. Assessment No. 7, under Ordi nance No. 546, assessed against Philip J. Snencer, in the principal sum of SIM. 80, for the Improvement of South Peach street, from Eleventh street, to Dakota avenue, by sewer, reduced to principal sum of $150.80. 119. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 508. assessed a-rainst Rich ard Schuler, in the principal sum of $i 14.82, tor tne improvement of Orange street, from West Tenth to West Eleventh sheet, by paving, reduced to the principal sum of $697.47. 120. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi nance No. 569. assessed against George P. Lindley, In the principal sum of $287.50, for the Improvement of Fast Main Btreet, from Roosevelt avenue to East end of th street, by paving, can celled. 121. Assessment No. 54. under Ordi nance No. 509, assessed against Corde lia Ankeny. In the principal sum of $i tl.i5, for the improvement of Fast Main street, from Roosevelt avenue to the East end of the street, by paving, reduced to principal sum of $509.25. 122. Assessment No. 9. under Ordi nance No. 569, assessed against W. K Hlack. in the principal sum of $4" 1.25 for the Improvement of East Main street, from Roosevelt avenue to the East end of the street, by paving, re duced to principal sum of $287.50. 123. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi nance No. 569, assessed against W. K Black. In the principal sum of $ 108.25. for the improvement of East Mam street, from Roosevelt avenue to the Eat end of the street, by paving, re duced to principal sum of $287.50. 124. Asse"ment No. 7, under Ordi na.iee No. 557, nssessed against John R. Tyrrell, in the principal sum of $52.80, for the improvement of Park avenue, from Eleventh street to Da kota avenue, by sower, reduced to the principal sum of $48.00. 125. Assessment No. 9, under Ordi nance No. 563, assessed against llarrit- Hundy, in the principal sum of $87.30 for the Improvement of Sherman street. from Geneva street to Stark street by sewer, reduced to principal sum ot $18.50. 126. Assessment No. S. under Ordt nance No. 557, assessed against A. P Talent, in the principal sum of $52.80 for the Improvement of Park avenue from Eleventh street to Dakota ave line, by sewer, reduced lo the principal sum of $17.20. 127. Assessment No. 5, under Ordi nance No. 57)!. assessed against Charles B. Gay. In the principal sum of $210.00 for the improvement of Newtown street, from West Main to West Tenth hy paving, reduced to principal sum o: $2OS.50. 128. Assessment No. 7, under Ordi nance No. 576, nssessed against Jesse Houck, iu the principal sum of $210 00 for the Improvement of Newtowr street, from West Main to West Tentl street, by paving, reduced to principa sum of $208.50. 129. Assessment No. S. under Ordi nance No. 576, assessed ugainst Jessi Houck, in the principal sum of $210.00 for the improvement of Newtown street, from West Main to West Tentl' street, by paving, reduced to tho prin cipal sum of 52ns.sso. 13't. Assessment No. 24. undor Ordi nance No. 570. assessed against Henn H. Patterson, in the principal sum ot $2iit 20, for the improvement of Now town street, from West Main street t West lenth street, by paving, reduce) to the principal sum of $251.70. 131. Assessment No. 20. under Oidi mince No. 01., assessed neainst A. L Wull.im. in the principal sum of $'i9i'i for the improvement of North Centra avenue, from Jackson street to tin j North City Limits, by sewer, reduce uc n iih Mini iii tn...i 132. Assessment No. 24. under Ord nance No. )."4. assessed aeainst Charles O. Crouch, in the principa sum of $275.96. for the improvement of North Grape street, from Sixth street io crmont street, by p-ivitiK reonceii to tne principal sum of $1 l..l. Assessment No. 30. under Ordi nance No. M3. assessed against ott Schrader, in the principal sum oi $:47.o for the iinprovemvut of Hcattj street, from 'North Central street to Munzanihi street, by paving, ruucea to the principal sum of $225.78. 134. Assessment No. 5. under Ordi nance No. 027, assessed against Nanna Mutney, In the principal sum of $37.00, for the Improvement of alley through block 9, original town or Medford, by sewer, cancelled. 135. Assessment No.8, under Ordi nance No. 627, assessed against Jo seph Taylor, in the principal sum of $37.00. for the improvement of alley through block 9. original town of Med ford, by sewer, cancelled. 136 Assessment No. 4, under Ordi nance No. OSS. assessed against Ore gon und California R. R. Company, In the principal sum of $127.50. for the improvement, of Eleventh street, from Oakdale avenue to central jtvenue, paving, reduced to tne principal um of $69.44. . 137. Assessment No. 5, mmer urui nanoc No. 088, usses;wd against Ore gon and California H. R. Conrtnny, In the principal sum of $127.50, for the improvement of Eleventh street from Oakdnle avenue to Central ave nue, bv paving, reduced to the princi pal Hinil of $09.44. 138 Assessment o. imuer v-mui-nance No. 088. assessed against Ore gon and California R. R. Company, in the principal sum of $127.50, for the iinnrovement of Eleventh street, from Oakdalo avenue to Central avenue, by nuving, reduced to tho principal sum of $69.44. , n .. . 139. Assessment No. 2, tinner ui rance No. 0h8, assessed ugainst Ore- f',.iif,ni:i M It. Coninanv. in the principal sum of $127.50, for the Improvement of Eleventh street, Trom Oakdalo avenue to Central avenue, by navlng. reduced to tho principal sum of $09.44. , 140. Assessment No. 21. under urui- v,. (:( -luiioMued niTiiinst. W. E. n... ..i!. ' i.. 4Via iii-iiif) niil sum of $100.89, for the improvement of Soutli Riverside avenue, irom lwenui miwn to Fourteenth street, by water main, reduced to the princtnat sum oi m.ui. 141.. Assessment No. 22, under Ordi nance No. 032, assessed against W. M. Holmes, In the principal sum of $04.71, for the improvement or South River side avenue, from Twelfth street to Fourteenth street, by water main, re duced to Hie principal sum of $01.95. 142. Assessment ao. unoei umr ...... v.. r.-e nuufiiiueii HLr;nii.s- 1. Orth. iu the principal sum of $18.45, fur tho improvement of Soutli Central avenue, from existing main to South, end of street, by water main, reduced to the principal sum oi $u.:u. t x'n. 14. tinder Oi-ul- nnnce No. 729, ussessoil UKalnst Max llnlisechild, in the principal sum ui $25.80, fur the improvement of Apple ot,.ot frnm Flflll RlrOOt tO .TackSOll street by water main, reduced to tha principal sum of ?JJ.fsM. 144. Assessment No. 22, under Ordi nance No. t'.M, assessed against E. X. Hiden, in the principal sum of $:s3.15, for the improvement of Court. Btreet, from Central avenue to sub-trunk out let, bv sewer, reduced to the principal sum of $32.50. l lti. Assessment No. U, under urui nance No. GS4, assessed attainst. A. C. Aylur, in the principal sum or $10.25, for the improvement of Court street. from Central avenue to sun-irunn out let, by sewer, reduced to tho principal sum of $15.25. ' 11G. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 754. assessed against IS. It. McCnlie. In the principal sum of $58.80, for the Iinnrovement of Kast. Kloventli street, from Portland avenue to Ash land avenue, by sewer, reduced to mo principal sum of $1C.S0. 147. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. Sill, assessed against 11, E. riudehues, in the principal Bum of ,;,, ,7 r,,- th imnrnvement of XeW- lov.n street, from Eleventh street to Dakota avenue, by paving, reduced to Ihe principal sum of $i;n:i.12. lis. Assessment No. 10. under Ordt- ance No. uifl. assessed against hip liam H. Hamlin, in the principal aum of $i',42.lll'i, for the Improvement of Newtown street, from Klevenlh street to Dakota avenue, by paving, reduced, lo ihe principal sum of $5i',0.4S. 1 !0. Assesment No. 24, under OiiSjr nance No. Ml, assessed against Mis. K. A. Dyke, in Ihe principal Birn ot $11111.25, for the improvement of New town street, from Klevenlh street to Dakota avenue, by paving, reduced to Ihe principal sum of $105.75. 150. Assessment No. HO, under Ordi nance No. -,! 1 . assessed against K;i.a belh Ferguson. In tho principal sum ot t',:tl.50, for the Improvement of New town street, from Eleventh street to Dakota avenue, hy paving, reduced to Ihe principal sum of $i'.i:',.35. 151. Assessment No. 13, under Ordi nance No. 7 IS. assessed against 11. P. Little, In the principal sum of $72.58, for the improvement of Taylor street, from Myrtle sheet to Cottage street, by paving, reduced lo the principal sum of $71.1 1. 152. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi nance No. 7l',5. assessed against Wil liam l lrich. In the principal sum of H. 51. 51. for the Improvement of West Kleventh street, from Oakdale avenue to Peach street, hy paving, reducMl to ;he principal sum of $1121. IK!. 5;'.. Assessment No. 8, tinder Ordi nance No. 7(l-"i, assessed against .1. T. Kads, in Ihe principal sum of $212.00, for the improvement of West Eleventh street, from Oakilale avenue to Pen-J street, by paving, reduced to the prin cipal sum of $212.50. 151. Assessment No. 23, under Ordi lance No. 202, assessed ugainst WJ1 liam Kidman. In the principal sum of 5220. 0:1. for Ihe iiuplovenicnt of West i-'ourlh street, from North Orange meet lo the West Col poratlon llound :irv. by water main, reduced to the principal sum of $lis,57, subdivision. Si'C 2. Thai the city recorder be mil he hereby Is liulllorize1, empow ered and directed to cause the mior notations to Vie made upon the lien I. icket In accordance with provisions of mis ordinance. See. it. Any unauttioi Ucd corree ious anil n (lifieatlons appearing upon he lien docket affecting any of the r,M goiiig aessnicn!s. to the extent 'hat ihe same conform to the changes herein authorized, are hereby lalillcd and c. mill uied. Passed the City Council this 6lh lay of June, nnd signed by me In uiihentication of lis passage this 6th lay of June. I'.MT. I Signed i ('. E. C.ATES. Attest: Mayor. iSe.llI I Signed i V. T. FOrtS. Cily Hecoider. Approve,!: (Signed! C. K. CATES. ilt.) or.