fEDFOTiTJ HrXTE TRTBTTNTI fTCDFOTtH, OT?F.00T. SATURDAY. JUNE 1(1. 1017.
EXPECTED TO SOLVE
WASHINGTON'. June 10. Ttimsla
ha become the, pre-occupying quea
tlon at tho state dopurtment with the
approach of the Russian mission to
'Washington, the beginning of nego
tiations by the American commission
to Russia In Petrogrnd und the con
tinued reiteration of the demand of
tile council of soldiers and workmen's
dologatca for a Ktutcment of ullicd
peace terms.
Kocent reports Indicate that the
council of soldiers und workmen's
delegates is not so dominating a fac
tor as is generally assumed. It rep
resents not over five million people of
Ilussla's 1X0, lino, mil). The council in
confined very largely to the industrial
centers, whose voice is always the
first heard and the loudest.
The peasants, according to these
reports, comprise the vast majority of
the population and bavo voted over
whelmingly In favor of a vigorous
prosecution of the war.
Moreover, the business men of Hus
sla, it is pointed out, bave recently
voted practically unanimously thru
what corresponds In Hussla to the
American chamber of commerce for a
vigorous prosecution of tho war.
Nevertheless the continued insistence
by the soldiers and workmen's dele
gates for a new declaration by the
allies shows a lack of confidence
which It In realized, must bo swept
away beforo Kiissin can present a
united front.
Croat hope in fell, that thn Hoot
mission may find some way to appeal
ti) tho Russian radical on his own
ground, lint no definite advices from
the Aniorican envoys aro expected for
some days.
OF RUSSIAN FLEETS
PrcTKOGHAD, June 16. The
newspapers report that Admiral Mu
(lliiiofr, commander of tho Hhiek Sou
fleet, has left Ills post and will be re
placed by Itcnr-Admlrtil Verdercskl.
General Yudevlteh, commander In
chief In the Cuucubub, bun been replac
ed by General Prjevulsky.
Two officers and two nion of the
AiiBtriau espionage bureau havo been
arretted. .
PARIS, June 10. Tho army cum
mitteo of tho chamber of deputies
adopted n resolution recommending
the, remitting of all outHttindlnK pun
ishments In tho army for minor or
fenses In honor of General Pershing.
Tho resolution nlso requests that an
extra ration of a pint of wine be
nerved to tho soldiers.
ORDINANCE NO. 891.
AN OHlINAXn: correcting nml modi
fylng certain local iiMneHmuentH upon
tho lien docket of tho City of Med
ford.
WHKHKAH, sundry corrections nml
modifications have been made of cer
tain special assessments hendnfon
levied and confirmed by the City ot
Medtord by ordinance for local Im
provements: and
WHKKKAS, such corrections ami
modifications have not hrretofon
been authorized and conMiini'd by or
dlnanee: ami
WIIIMtKAH, It Is ilriMued expedient
and for the best Interests of the (lt
of Medford and the properties charged
with such assessments ami the pcrNon
liable therefor that such correction:
and modifications be ratified and con
firmed bv ordinance: Now. iherelore
TIIK CITY OK MKlH-nUO OOTIl OH
PAIN AS KOI. LOW S:
Section I . That the special assess
nienls heretofore levied and asesssed
ngalust the several lots, tracts a in'.
parcels of land in this ordinance spec!
fled In the several principal sunt ami
for thn several tmpio eineuls hereli
mentioned, be. and they are hereb
sevevally modified and corrected as h
heroin provided, tnwit :
1 . Assessment No. 1, under Or dl
nance No. L':';t. assessed HKaiiisI Fred
H. Coolto, in the principal sum of $t'.rtn
for the Improvement of Hose avenue
from Main street lo Koitrlh street, h
water main, reduced to principal sum
or $ir.!).
2. Assessment N'i. 1. under Ordi
nance No. 'J:'!t. assessed against Km!
II. Coose, In tlie pi inctinil sum of $dt'
for tin- improvement ol liosi avnue
from Main sheet to l-'ontrh s reel
by water main, red need in prlnnpa
sum of t 'J :i.
3. Assessment No. '. muter Oidi
nance No. H;'!. nss'-sed ai:;tlnst Kile
I'liilliey, In the principal sum of $n 7.Y
for the lnnioenieni of vt Mnin
Street, from Lauiel aitvt-t to Columhu
nvenne, by water main, itduced t
principal mini of fil m
4. Assessmi'tit No. t, uner Ordi
nance No. assessed atainsl C W
Hnyder, In the prinripul sum of $;: sn
fur 'tlio Improvement of Summit ave
mm from Wet" Main street to Wcm
Fourth Htrool, by ujttfr mam, lednced
to principal sum oi r: .to.
fi ARKeasmeiit s;- under Ordi
lioncu No. ?31 aaw scd arauibt Plvkvl
Kluni uiiil M 111 jiliy. In the principal '
mini of ftifi.SU, fur the improvement of
Summit avenue, from West Main street
to West Fourth street, by water main,
reduced to principal sum of $42.30.
6. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 2'12, assessed against C. I.
Wolvorton, in the principal Hum of
$73.15, for the improvement of Hoes
Court, from West Main street to West
fourth street, by water main, reduced
to principal sum of $4fi.!H.
7. Assessment No. I I, under Ordi
nance cj. 232, assessed ugainst. C. D.
Wolverton, in the principal sum of
i.la, for tho iinnrovement of Ross
Court, from West Main street to West
Fourth street, by water main, reduced
to principal sum of $1(1. i)H.
H. Assessment No. 1'J, under Ordi
nance No. 24 1, assessed ugainst Her?
Anderson, in the principal sum of
$4(1.20, for Ihe Improvement of Jnolinon
hi root, from Grape street to tho West
Corporation Houndary, by water main,
reduced to principal sum of $44.10.
Assessment No. UK, under Ordi
nance No, 247, asseswd against Itav
M. Toft, in the prinelpii' sum of SGI .GO,
for the Improvement of Jackson street,
from Grape street to the West Corpo
ral ion Houndarv. bv water main, re
duced lo the prlnelnal Bum of $17.95.
Increased to and Ivonned in the prln
elnal sum of J.M.r.n
10. Assessment fo. 1. under Ordi
nance No. 251. n-isessed nualiiHt EI-
d'f'd a id .?e-' Pfir7e. In the princi
pal sum of $t;or no. for tlte Imnrove-
ment of Priddy street, from Clark
street South to Weit .1 nek son street.
by water main, reduced the principal
sum of $40-1.841.
II. Assessment No. 17, tinder Ordi
nance No. 2T.7. assessed ngalest Ada
Porter. In tho prlncinal sum of J2S.50,
for tho Improvement of Newtown
street, from West Main afreet to West
Klt'hth street, cancelled.
Assessment Nf. 15, under Ordi-
nance No. 2(13, asses'-'ed against Marv
M. Orp. in tho princii ' l sum of Sag.GQ.
for the Improvement of Orange street,
from West Main street to West ICIghth
street, by water main, cancelled.
13. Assessment. No. 2S, under Ordi
nance No. 203, assessed agaitiHt. Hon
delln. Ooodulo, In tho principal sum
of tr,2S0, for tho Improvement 0f
South Oraniro street, rrom West Main
street to West, FJcventu Hlreel, by
water main, reduced to principal cmin
of $4(J.20.
4. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi
nance No. LMili, assessed against lion
lelln Goodale, In the principal sum of
$r2.G0, for (he improvement of South
Orange street, from West Main fdreet
to Went Eleventh street, by water
main, reduced to principal sum of
$lti.2U.
15. Assessment No. 23, under Ordi
nance No. 2t2, assessed against Jo
sephine F. Clark, In the principal Bum
of $241.51, for the Improvement of
West Fourth street, rrom North Orange
lo tho West Corporation Houndary, by
water main, reduced to principal sum
of 814(1.70.
HI. Assessment No. f, tinder Ordi
nance No. 2tiit. assessed against M. W.
and II. II. Tattle, In tne principal sum
of $10(1.10. for the fmnrovement of
Dakota avenue, from South Peach
street to South Oakdale avenue, by
water main, reduced lo principal sum
of $r.t.l!S.
17. Assessment, No. 10. under Ordi
nance No. 20!), assessed against Flavin
llarker. In the principal sum of $208.00,
for the Improvement, of Dakota avenue,
from South Pench street to South Oak-
dale avenue, by water main, reduced
to principal sum of $IS3.04.
IS. Assessment No. 1 and 2, under
Ordinance No. 201), assessed against
Hamlin and Parker, in the principal
sum of $582.40, for the Improvement
of Dakota avenue, front South Peach
street to South Oakiiato avenue, by
wati'i' main, reduced to principal sum
if $-M..It, sulidivjsiou.
lit. Assessment No. .'I, 4 and 5, tinder
Ordinance No. 2(.!. assessed against
Jackson County Hank ami Webb and
W viand. In Ihe principal sum of
I5S2. 10, fur the Improvement of Da-
kola avenue, from South Peach street
to South Oakdalo avenue, by water
main, reduced to principal aunt of
Ml. subdivision.
20. Assessment No. 5 and 0, under
Ordinance No. 270, assessed itiuiinst
Adam Emlg and II. & M. Emig. in the
m-lncfpal sum of $2K4.00, for the Im
provement of West Twelfth street.
rrom South Laurel to Mistletoe sheet
by water main, reduced to principal
sum o I JS,t.ui), subdivision,
21. Assessment No, ;i, under Ordi
nance No. 272, assessed against Attain
Kmlg. in the principal sum of $ISH.0
for the Improvement of Peach street,
from Wed Eleventh street to Dakota
avenue, by water main, reduced (
principal sum of $158.00, subdivision
22. Assessment No. , under Ordi
nance No. 171, assessed attains! John
Harnchurg. In the principal sum oi
$iuii.:l2, for the Improvement of sewer
district No. 0, reduced to principal
amount of $;tt 2.
2't. Assessment No. 4. 5 and 0,
der Ordinance No. 272, assessed
against James Campbell. Hamlin and
Parker, In the principal sum of $:M 25.
for the improvement of Peach street
from West Eleventh sheet lo Duota
avenue, by water main, reduced to
principal sum of $!f.i,i, subdivision
21. Assessment No. . under Ordi
nance No, 171, assessed (mains) C W
Palm and W. I. Vawter. in the principal
sum of $... tie, for the improvement, o'
icwer district No. ti, reduced to putt
.'i pa I sum of $'S50.
2.'.. Assessment Ni. , under Ordi
nance No. lies, assessed attains! Cum
line Pelliuttcr, in the principal sum ot
f.i'.nu, for the improvement or sewer
district No. 8, reduced to prin .'I pa!
oim ol $;ts.oo.
2ii. Assessment No. , under Ordi
isnce AO. l!s. assessed ngalust M. C
uleiison. in the principal sum of $i.l.7;i
tor the improvement of sewer district
No. 8, tenured to principal sum id
;;i.io.
2(. Assessment No. , under Ordi
annce No. pes. assessed utt.nusl Edgar
S llaler. In Ihe principal sum of .:e mi
tor the Impi oVeniellt of sewer distiict
No. N, eamvIU-d.
J. Assessment No. , under Ordi
nam e No 2-.:, assessed against E. It
Pech, In the principal sum ot $ti !,
or tie- Improvement of sewer d strict
No. 7, reitmed
$.!'. 10.
pim.ipal Mini oljnmtli. hv water main, cancelled.
2'.i. Assessment No. - -, under Ordi
nance No, assessed against J. E
l oh, in t he pi met j .ti sum ot $ lo.
or t..e improvement of sewer district
No. 7
$.( I"
i educed lo pi nicipal sum idt;irvft lo Peach street, by sewer,
;io. Assessment No. under Ordi
nance No. 22;, assessed against Wil
liam Lew is, in the principal sum of
fill. iii, tot the Improvement of t-ovUM
district No. 7, .reduced to pi inclpal i
mum of $83.20.
ill. Assessment No. , under Ordi
nance No. 22.1, assessed against An
derson and Toft, in the principal sum
of $08.25, for the improvement of sow
er district. No. 7, reduced to principal
sum of $117.75.
32. Assessment No. , under Ordi
nance No. 22 ;j, assessec against Mrs.
S. J. Hayes. In tho principal sum of
$20.40, for the improvement of sower
district No. j, reduced to principal
sum of $29.95.
.TI. Assessment No. , under Ordi
nance No. 223, assessed against Mrs.
S. J. Hayes, In the principal sum of
$30.40, for the improvement of sewer
district No. 7, reduced to principal
sum of $29.95.
34. Assessment No. , under Ordi
nance No. 223, assessed against Clara
Mcintosh, 'in tho principal sum of
$22.50, for the Improvement of sewer
district No. 7, cancelled.
35. Assessment No. , undor Ordi
nance No. 223, assessed against. S. H.
Syncox, In the principal sum of $32.50,
for the Improvement of sewer district
No. 7, cancelled.
30. Assessment No. , under Ordi
nance No. 223, assessed against Aga
tha A. Mrandenberg, in the principal
sum of $32.5)1, for tho improvement of
sewer district No. 7, cancelled.
37. Assessment K. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 205, assessed against C. W
Palm, in the principal Hum of $21.50,
for the iinnrovement of Hamilton
Hireet, from Olson street to North Oak
dale avenue, by sewer, reduced to
principal mini of , cancelled.
38. Assessment No. 25, under Ordi
nance No. 205, assessed ugainst J. F.
Hutehason, in tho principal sum of
$31.50, for the Improvement of Hamil
ton Htreet, from West end of said
street to Oukdalo avenue, by sewer,
cancelled.
311. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi
nance No. 205, assessed against Rob
ert. Wilson, in the principal sum of
$31.50, for the Improvement of Hamil
ton street, from West end of said street
to Oakdale avenue, bv sewer, cancelled
40. Assessment. No. 27, under Ordi
nance No. 205, assessed against Mrs.
M. A. Olson, in the principal sum of
$31.50, for the Improvement of Ham
ilton street, from West end of said
street to Oakdalo avenue, by sewer,
cancelled.
41. Assessment No. 28, under Ordi
nance No. 205, assessed against D. W
Heebe, In the principal sum of $31.50
for the improvement, of Hamilton
street, from West end of said street
to Oakdale avenue avenue, by sewer,
cancelled.
42. Assessment No. 4, under Ordi
nance No. 205, assessed ngntnst Ore
gon and California Land Company, in
the principal sum of $12.00, for the
improvement of North Oakdale avenue
from Hamilton street to Third street,
by sower, cancelled.
43. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 274, assessed against Dan
iel E. Clay, In the principal sum of
$98.34, for the Improvement of New
town street, from West Eleventh to
Dakota avenue, by sewer, reduced to
principal sum of $05.34.
44. Assessment. No. 4J1, under Ordi
nance No. 278. assessed against C. T
llolloway, in the principal sum of
$184.53, for tho improvement of West
Second street, from North Oakdale
avenue to West Corporation Houndary,
by sewer, reduced to principal sum of
SS3.4&.
45. Assessment No. 81, under Ordi
nance No. 324, assessed against J. C
Itrown. in the principal sum of
$2,117.93 for the Improvement of West
Main street, from Laurel street to
Columbus avenue, by paving, reduced
to principal sum of $2,09.
40. Assessment No. 77, under Ordi
nance No. 358, assessed against Alias
Turner, in the principal sum of $59.50,
for the improvement nf Jackson street,
from Hartlett street to Columbus ave
nue, by sewer, reduced to principal
sum of $:8.0S.
47. Assessment No. 00, under Ordi
nance No. 321, assessed against 1. J
Phipps, In the principal sum of $300 00,
for the improvement of Riverside ave
nue, from Jackson street to North
Corporation Houndary, by water main,
reduced to principal sum of $280.50.
48. Assessment No. 4, under Ordi
nance No. 332, assessed against E
Hiden, in the principal sum of $10.83.
for the improvement of Court street
from Central avenue to a point 10-Sl
feet north, by water main, reduced to
principal sum of $Hk0O.
49. Assessment Nit. 7, under Ordi
nance No. 332, assessed against Mar
garet Daily, in the principal sum of
$4t.S3, tor tho improvement or Conn
street, from Central avenue to a point
iUS2 feet north, by water main, re
duced to principal sum of $10.00.
50. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 329. assessed against J. A
Perry, in the principal sum of $148.75,
for the improvement of Central avenue
North, from East Second to North
Corporation Houndary, by water main.
reduced to principal sum of $100.25.
51. Assessment No. 2, under Ordi
nance No. 342, assessed against E. P
Bennett, in the principal sum of
$212.50. for the Improvement of How
aid street, front Washington street
lo Petinett st reel, by water main, re
duced to principal sum of $2"0.25.
52. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi
nance No. 34 1, assessed against Jim
Herry, in the principal sum of $55.00,
for the improvement of East Washing
ton street, from Oenessee street to
Howard street, by water main, reduced
to principal sum of $50.00.
53. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi
mince No os, assessed against Wil
liam Smith, in (he principal sum of
$74.70, for the improvement of South
Kir street, from twelfth street to Cor
poratioii Houndary, by water main, re
duced to principal sum of $71. 07.
51. Assessment No. 11, under Ordi
nance No. 4oS. assessed attains! Med
ford Ice and Storage Company, in the
principal sum of $-55 21, for the im
provement of South Kir street, from
Twellth street to Corporation Hound
ary, by water main, reduced to prin
el pa I sum of $2Ji.;l.
65. Assessment No. 1, tinder Or
diuance No. 411, assessed attainst
W Daily, in the principal sum of $31.13
lor the improvement of Welch sheet
from Jackson street to a itoini 6jn fee
5t;. Assessment No. 1. under Ordi
nance No. 3iio. assessed attains! "Wil
ham il. Ilambn. in the princij al sum
of $l Mt.oo, for the I m provement of
Fourteenth street, from Newtown
duced to principal sum of $!.'." no.
57. Assessment No 21, under Ordt
nance No. 3; assessed again! J. 1
Emerick, in the principal sum ot
$1037.41. Cor thu improvement of Soutli
Riverside avenue, from East Main,
street to Twelfth street, ny paving, re-
duced to principal sum of $815,10
58. Assessment No. 30, under Ordi
nance No. 308, assessed against Caro
line K. Damon, in the principal sum of
$479.18, for the improvement of South
Kiverside avenue, from KftBt Main
street to Twelfth street, by paving, re
duced to principal sum of $217.36.
59. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi
nance No. 308 assessed against Rena
Hubbard. In the principal sum of
$202.54. for tho Improvement of South
Riverside avenue, from Fast Main
street to Twelfth street, bv wtvintr,
endnced to principal sum of $197.00.
00. Assessment No. 49. under Ordi
nance No. 3S0, assessed aininst D. P.
Thompson, In the principal sum of
?57.85. for the imnrovement 'if South
D'AnJou Hh-eet, from Fast Eighth to
East Twelfth street, bv navlng, re
duced to nrlncipaJ sum of $40.15.
01. Assessment No. . under Ordi
nnnce No. 381. assessed agulnst S. TI.
Wood, in the principal turn of $10.00.
for the Iinnrovement of North Holly
street, from Main street to Second
street, bv paving, reduced to principal
sum of $ : . cancelled.
02. Assessment No. 37. under Ordi
nance No. 384, assessed against Jor
dan and Williamson, in the principal
um of S7.22. for the iinnrovement of
li'ast .Main street, from tho Hridtre to
Roosevelt avenue, by naving, reduced
to nrlncloal sum of $5.37.
63. Assessment No. 4. under Ordi
nance No. 442, assessed against A. R.
Moore, in the principal sum of $81.00.
for the Improvement of Pine street.
from Jackson Btreet to Austin street,
bv water main, interest $3.04 deducted
when paid.
04. Assessment No. 8, under Ordi
nance No. 442. assessed against Wil
liam Colvig. in the principal su.n of
$07.47, for the improvement of Pine
street, from Jackson street to Austin
street, bv water main, cancelled.
05. Assessment No. 5, under Ordi
Tr 4tG, assessed against F, H.
fiV-ont. fn tn nrlncipaJ sum of $109.20,
for the imurovetnent of West Thir
teenth ntroot. from King street to
Pone'' street, by wafer main, reduced
to principal sum of $18.20.
0b. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi
nance No. 465, assessed against J. W.
Herrv, In the principal sum of $56.25.
for the improvement of Fust Welling
ton street, from Howard Btreet to
Roosevelt avenue, by water main, re
duced to principal sum of $22.50.
ti7. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 409, assessed against h. CI.
Porter, In the principal sum of $134.00,
for the Improvement or Almond street.
from East Main street to South end
of street, by water main, reduced to
principal sum of $1)3.90.
08. Assessment No. 27, under Ordi
nance No. 472, assessed against Angus
McDonald, in the principal sum of
$127.92. for the Improvement of Cot
tage street, from East Main street
to the south end of the street, by
water main, reduced to principal sum
of $11.00.
09. Assessment No. 2, under Ordi
nance No. 517, nssessed agulnst W.
W. McDonald. In the principal sum of
$I0(.92, for the improvement of East
main street, from Roosevelt, avenue
to the end of the street, by water
malnv reduced to principal sum of
$94.50.
(0. Assessment. NO. 26, under Ordi
nance No. 517, assessed against
George P. Lindley, In the principal sum
or jijj.bo, tor the improvement of East
Main street, from Roosevelt a-a.-nie to
the end of the street, by water main.
reduced to principal sum of $20.03.
1. Assessment No., 7, under Ordi
nance No. 585. nssessed against John
H. Tyrrell, in the principal sum of
$i0.!0. tor the Improvement of Park
avenue, from Eleventh street to Dakota
avenue, by water main, reduced to
principal sum of $51.00.
72. Assessment No. 5, under Ordi
nance No. G90, assessed against Clara
M. Amaain, In the pitucipal sum of
$102.40, for the Improvement of Alice
street, from Realty Btreet to Niantic
street, by water main, reduced to prin
cipal sum of $03. so.
i3. Assessment No. 4, under Ordi
nance No, t2i, assessed Renins;
lleorge H. Herrlck. in the principal
sum of $65.00, for the Improvement
of Roosevelt avenue, from a point 950
teet north of Main street to Jackson
street, by water main, cancelled.
i l. Assessment No. 12, under Ordi
lance No. 390, assessed against Mrs.
O. W. Henderson, in the principal sum
of $302.03, for tho improvement of
North Kiverside avenue, from Main
street to Jackson street, by paving.
cancelled.
75. Assessment No. 4, under Ordi
nance No. 4o0, assessed against Mary
It. Martin, in the principal sum o,
$2ti.5o, for the improvement of North
Central avenue, from Jackson slrect to
Court street, hy paving, reduced to
principal sum of $106.50.
70. Assessment No. IS, under Ordi
nance No. -lot., assessed against The
Jackson County Ihiildlng ami Umn An
socintum, in ih, principal sum of
$344,10, for the Improvement of North
Central avenue, from Jackson street
to Court street, by paving, reduced
to principal sum oi $J3.i.i8.
77. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi
nance No. 410, assessed against R, C
Kinleyside, in the principal sum of
$34.70. for the Improvement of Hennetl
avenue, from Howard street to Roose
velt avenue, by sewer, reduced to prin
cipal sum of $33.00.
78. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 413. assessed against L. (J,
Porter, In the principal sunt of $44.00,
lor the Improvement of Fast Washing
ton street, from Oenessee street to
Roosevelt avenue, by sewer, cnucdled
79. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 420, assessed against F. W
Hutchlron. in the principal sum of
$130.50. for the improvement of West
Ninth street, from Orano street to
Hamilton street,, by sewer, reduced to
principal sum ol $ i ,00.
SO. Assessment No. 6. under Ordi
nance No. 431, assessed against J M
Dodge. In the principal sum of $19S.o0
for the improvement of Park avenue
from Eleventh street to Dakota street,
by opeuine street, reduced to principal
sum of $153.00.
M. Assessment No. 6. under Ordi
nance No. 4 ( !, assessed attainst Her
tha S. Harnutu, in the principal sum of
$29. -o. for the improvement of D .Vijou
street, from Si;h street to Third
sheet, by sewer, teduccd to principal
sum of $-1.71
2. Assessment No. 7. under Ordi
nance No. u,:, assessed attainst Her
tha S. Itanium, In the principal sum of
$21i.50. for the raiprovcment of D'AnJou
street, from Sixth street to Third
street, by sewer, reduced to principal
i sum oi 9-i, i .
J Assessment No. 9, uuUer Ordi
nance No. 443, assessed against Oer-
tha 8. Harnum, In the principal sum of
$29.50, for the Imu.-ovement of D'AnJou
street, from Sixth street, to Third
street, by sewer, reduced to principal
sum of $21.74.
84. Assessment No. 9, under Ordi
nance No. 443, assessed against Ber
tha S. Harnum. in the principal sum of
$29.50, for the Improvement of D'Anjou
street, from Sixth street, to Third
street, by sewer, reduced to principal
sum of $21.74.
85. Assessment No. 12, under Ordi
nance No. 443, assessed against John
A. Smith, in the principal sum of
$29.50, for the improvement of D'Anjou
street, from Sixth street, to Third
street, bv sewer, reduced to principal
sum of $21.50.
86. Assessment No. 13, under Ordi
nance No. 443. assessed against John
A. Smith, in tho principal sum of
$29.50, for the Improvement of D'Anjou
street, from Sixth street to Third
street, by sower, reduced to principal
sum of $21.50.
87. Assessment No. 14, under Ordi
nance No. 443, assessed against Ber
tha S. Harnum. in the principal sum of
$29.50, for the fmnrovement of D'Anjou j
street, from Sixth street, to Third
street, hy sewer, reduced to principal ,
sum of $21.50.
88. Assessment No. 15, under Ordi-!
nance No. 443, assessed against Ber
tha S. Harnum, In the principal sum of
$29.50, for the iinnrovement of D'Anjou
street, from Sixth street, to Third
street, bv sewer, reduced to principal
sum of $21.50.
89. Assessment No. 16, under Ordi-!
nance No. 443, assessed against Ber
tha S. Harnum, in the principal sum of
$29.50, for the Improvement of D Anion
street, from Sixth street, to Third
street, hv sewer, reduced to principal
sum of $21.50.
90. Assessments Nos. 19, 20. 21, 22
and 23, under Ordinance No. 443, as
sessed against Alida R. Miner, in the
principal sum of $29.50, for the im
provement of D'Anjou street, from
Sixth street to Third street, by sewer,
reduced to principal sum of $2t.50. in
each case.
91. Assessment No. 27. under Ordi
nance No. 443, assessed against W. S.
Bttrniun. in the principal sum of Sn9.00,
for the improvement of D'Anjou street.
from Sixth street to Third street, by
sewer, reduced to principal sum ol
$43.00.
92. Assessments Nos. 33 and 34, tin,
der Ordinance No. 443, assessed
against Bertha S. Harnum. In the prin
cipal sum of $147.50. for the improve
ment of D'AnJou street, from Sixth
street to Third street, by sewer, re
duced to principal sum of $ , $3.63
interest deducted by special agree
ment.
93. Assessment No. 7, under Ordi
nance No. 4b8, assessed against Z.
Cameron.' in the principal sum of
$174.00, for the Improvement of Sixth
street, from Riverside avenue to Ivy
street, bv sewer, reduced to principal
sum of $87.00.
94. Assessment No. 8. under Ordi
nance No. 510, ussessed against Wil
liam Shaffer. Estate, in the principal
sum of $99.00, for tho Improvement of
East Main street, from Roosevelt ave
nue to the East end of tho street, by
sewer, reduced to principal sum ot
$89.93.
95. Assessment No, 26. under Ordi
nance No. 510, assessed against George
P. Dudley, In the principal sum of
$44.00, for the improvement of East
Main street, from Roosevelt avenue to
the East end of tho street, hy sewer,
reduced to principal sum of $19. 2S.
90. Assessment No. 30, under Ordi
nance No. 510, assessed against J. D,
Skinner, in the principal sum of $80.24.
for the improvement of East Main
street, from Roosevelt avenue to the
East end of the street, by sewer, re
duced lo principal sum of $85.38.
97. Assessment No. 17, tmder Ordi
nance No. 513, assessed against the
Big Ben Milling Company, in the prin
cipal sum of $155.75, for the Improve
ment of Sixth street, from Riverside
avenue to D'AnJou street, hy paving
reduced to the principal sum of
$124.60.
98. Assessment No. 33, tinder Ordi
nance No. 515, assessed against A. M
Forbes, in the principal sum of $280.00
for the Improvement of North Bart
lett street, from Sixth street to Jack
son street, hy paving, reduced to the
principal sum of $84.00.
99. Assessment No. 37. under Ordi
nance No. 523, assessed against Lillic
Sample, in the principal sum of $o5.44.
for the improvement, of West Fourth
street, from Oakdale lo est City
Limits, by paving, reduced to princi
pal sum of $423.94.
100. Assessment No. , under Ordi
nance No. 524, nssessed against E. E.
Miner, in the principal sum of $23.04,
for the improvement of N. D'Anjou
street, from Sixth street to Jackson
street, by paving, reduced to principal
sum of $t;.00.
lol. Assessment No. 64. under Ordi
nance No. 529, assessed against J, L
Black, in the principal sum of $351.00,
for the Improvement of West Jackson
street, from Riverside avenue to Co
lumbus avenue, by paving, reduced to
principal sum of $330.40.
H2. Assessment No. 96, under Ordi
nance No. 629. nssessed against S. I
Leonard, in the priclpal sum of $707. 00
for the improvement of West Jackson
street, from Riverside avenue to lo-
lumhus avenue, by paving, reduced to
principal sum of filS.03.
103. Assessment No. 71, under Ordi
nance No. 433, assessed against M. M
Maine, in the principal sum of $195.50.
lor the Improvement of West Second
street, from Holly street to the W
Cltv Limits, bv paving, reduced to
principal sum of $142.00.
1". Assessment No. 4, under Ordi
nance No. 649, nssessed against V. J
Emerick, in the principal sum of
$104.00, for the Improvement of West
Eighth street, from Oakdale nveniif
to Holly street, by paving, reduced
to principal sum of $424.00.
H5. Assessment No. 4. under Ordi
nance No. 547, assessed against 11. J
Tttchnor, in the principal pum of
$527.52. for the Improvement of North
Riverside avenue, from Jackson street
to North City Limits, by pavine, re
duced to principal mun of $309 00
1";. Assessment No. 7. under Ordi
nance No. 51". assessed scainst Charles
M. Smith, in the principal sum of
$'51.05, for the Improvement of North
Riverside avenue, from Jackson street
to the North City Limits, by paving,
reduced to principal sum of $032 15.
1"7. Assessment No. 0. under Ordi
nance No. 517. assessed acainst Luan
da IVnton, in the principal "ei "f
15-S. for the improvement of North
Riverside avenue, from Jackson street
to the North City Limits, by paving,
cancelled.
108. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi
nance No. 647, assessed against W. E.
Phipps, in the principal sum of
$1549.52. for the Improvement of North
Riverside avenue, from Jackson rftreet
to the North City Limits, by paving,
reduced to principal sum of $1510.00.
109. Assessment No. 34, under Ordi
nance No. 547, nssessed agaiiiBt J. A.
Lyon, in the principal sum of $672.56.
for the Improvement of North River
side avenue, from Jackson street to
the North City Limits, by paving, re
duced to principal sum of $072.00.
110. Assesment No. 40. under Ordi
nance No. 54 7, assessed against Emll
Cordes, in thu principal sum of $537.60,
for the Improvement of North River
side avenue, from Jackson street to
tho North City Limits, by paving, re
duced to principal sum of 5537.00,
111. Assessment No. 3, under Ordi-i
nance No. 552, assessed against 1.
Neldormeyer, in the principal sum of
$826.00, for the improvement of Grape
street, from Sixth street to the South!
City Limits, by paving, reduced to
principal sum of $7i0.80.
Assessment No. 42, under Ordi
nance No. 552, assessed against F. E.
Martin, in the principal sum of $483.80,
for the improvement of Grape street,
from Sixth street to the South City
iniits. by paving, reduced to principal
sum of 413.00.
113. Assessment No. 44, under Ordi
nance No. 552, assessed against Del-
rov Getchell, in the principal sum of
$4L3.0O, for the improvement of Grape
street, from Sixth street to the South
City Limits, by paving, reduced to
principal sum of $385.00.
114. Assessment No. 45, under Ordi
nance No. 552, assessed against Gar-nett-Corey
Company, in the principal
sum of $826.00, for the improvement
of Grape street, from Sixth street to
tho South City Limits, by paving, re
duced to principal sum of $737.(1S.
115. Assessment No. 5, tmder Ordi
nance No. 539, assessed against. Jo
senh Caskey, in tho principal sum of
$162.40, for the improvement of Man
zunlta street, from Riverside avenue
to Beutty street, by sewer, reduced to
principal sum of $46.40.
110. Assessment No. 6. under Ordi
nance No. 539, assessed against W, G.
Gordon, in the principal sum of $121.48,
for the Improvement ot Maimuiita
street, from Riverside avenue to Henhy
street, bv cower, reduced to principal
sum of $5.48.
LI 7. Assessment No.54. under Ordi
nance No. 542, assessed against J, H.
Andrews, in the principal sum of $45.00,
for the improvement of allev between
Benson and Plum, from Washington
street to Dakota avenue, by sewer, re
duced to the principal sum of $38.00.
118. Assessment No. 7, under Ordi
nance No. 546, assessed against Philip
J. Snencer, in the principal sum of
SIM. 80, for the Improvement of South
Peach street, from Eleventh street, to
Dakota avenue, by sewer, reduced to
principal sum of $150.80.
119. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 508. assessed a-rainst Rich
ard Schuler, in the principal sum of
$i 14.82, tor tne improvement of Orange
street, from West Tenth to West
Eleventh sheet, by paving, reduced to
the principal sum of $697.47.
120. Assessment No. 20, under Ordi
nance No. 569. assessed against George
P. Lindley, In the principal sum of
$287.50, for the Improvement of Fast
Main Btreet, from Roosevelt avenue to
East end of th street, by paving, can
celled.
121. Assessment No. 54. under Ordi
nance No. 509, assessed against Corde
lia Ankeny. In the principal sum of
$i tl.i5, for the improvement of Fast
Main street, from Roosevelt avenue to
the East end of the street, by paving,
reduced to principal sum of $509.25.
122. Assessment No. 9. under Ordi
nance No. 569, assessed against W. K
Hlack. in the principal sum of $4" 1.25
for the Improvement of East Main
street, from Roosevelt avenue to the
East end of the street, by paving, re
duced to principal sum of $287.50.
123. Assessment No. 10, under Ordi
nance No. 569, assessed against W. K
Black. In the principal sum of $ 108.25.
for the improvement of East Mam
street, from Roosevelt avenue to the
Eat end of the street, by paving, re
duced to principal sum of $287.50.
124. Asse"ment No. 7, under Ordi
na.iee No. 557, nssessed against John
R. Tyrrell, in the principal sum of
$52.80, for the improvement of Park
avenue, from Eleventh street to Da
kota avenue, by sower, reduced to the
principal sum of $48.00.
125. Assessment No. 9, under Ordi
nance No. 563, assessed against llarrit-
Hundy, in the principal sum of $87.30
for the Improvement of Sherman street.
from Geneva street to Stark street
by sewer, reduced to principal sum ot
$18.50.
126. Assessment No. S. under Ordt
nance No. 557, assessed against A. P
Talent, in the principal sum of $52.80
for the Improvement of Park avenue
from Eleventh street to Dakota ave
line, by sewer, reduced lo the principal
sum of $17.20.
127. Assessment No. 5, under Ordi
nance No. 57)!. assessed against Charles
B. Gay. In the principal sum of $210.00
for the improvement of Newtown
street, from West Main to West Tenth
hy paving, reduced to principal sum o:
$2OS.50.
128. Assessment No. 7, under Ordi
nance No. 576, nssessed against Jesse
Houck, iu the principal sum of $210 00
for the Improvement of Newtowr
street, from West Main to West Tentl
street, by paving, reduced to principa
sum of $208.50.
129. Assessment No. S. under Ordi
nance No. 576, assessed ugainst Jessi
Houck, in the principal sum of $210.00
for the improvement of Newtown
street, from West Main to West Tentl'
street, by paving, reduced to tho prin
cipal sum of 52ns.sso.
13't. Assessment No. 24. undor Ordi
nance No. 570. assessed against Henn
H. Patterson, in the principal sum ot
$2iit 20, for the improvement of Now
town street, from West Main street t
West lenth street, by paving, reduce)
to the principal sum of $251.70.
131. Assessment No. 20. under Oidi
mince No. 01., assessed neainst A. L
Wull.im. in the principal sum of $'i9i'i
for the improvement of North Centra
avenue, from Jackson street to tin
j North City Limits, by sewer, reduce
uc n iih Mini iii tn...i
132. Assessment No. 24. under Ord
nance No. )."4. assessed aeainst
Charles O. Crouch, in the principa
sum of $275.96. for the improvement
of North Grape street, from Sixth
street io crmont street, by p-ivitiK
reonceii to tne principal sum of $1
l..l. Assessment No. 30. under Ordi
nance No. M3. assessed against ott
Schrader, in the principal sum oi
$:47.o for the iinprovemvut of Hcattj
street, from 'North Central street to
Munzanihi street, by paving, ruucea
to the principal sum of $225.78.
134. Assessment No. 5. under Ordi
nance No. 027, assessed against Nanna
Mutney, In the principal sum of $37.00,
for the Improvement of alley through
block 9, original town or Medford, by
sewer, cancelled.
135. Assessment No.8, under Ordi
nance No. 627, assessed against Jo
seph Taylor, in the principal sum of
$37.00. for the improvement of alley
through block 9. original town of Med
ford, by sewer, cancelled.
136 Assessment No. 4, under Ordi
nance No. OSS. assessed against Ore
gon und California R. R. Company, In
the principal sum of $127.50. for the
improvement, of Eleventh street, from
Oakdale avenue to central jtvenue,
paving, reduced to tne principal um
of $69.44. .
137. Assessment No. 5, mmer urui
nanoc No. 088, usses;wd against Ore
gon and California H. R. Conrtnny,
In the principal sum of $127.50, for
the improvement of Eleventh street
from Oakdnle avenue to Central ave
nue, bv paving, reduced to the princi
pal Hinil of $09.44.
138 Assessment o. imuer v-mui-nance
No. 088. assessed against Ore
gon and California R. R. Company, in
the principal sum of $127.50, for the
iinnrovement of Eleventh street, from
Oakdalo avenue to Central avenue, by
nuving, reduced to tho principal sum
of $69.44. , n .. .
139. Assessment No. 2, tinner ui
rance No. 0h8, assessed ugainst Ore-
f',.iif,ni:i M It. Coninanv. in
the principal sum of $127.50, for the
Improvement of Eleventh street, Trom
Oakdalo avenue to Central avenue, by
navlng. reduced to tho principal sum
of $09.44. ,
140. Assessment No. 21. under urui-
v,. (:( -luiioMued niTiiinst. W. E.
n... ..i!. ' i.. 4Via iii-iiif) niil sum of
$100.89, for the improvement of Soutli
Riverside avenue, irom lwenui miwn
to Fourteenth street, by water main,
reduced to the princtnat sum oi m.ui.
141.. Assessment No. 22, under Ordi
nance No. 032, assessed against W. M.
Holmes, In the principal sum of $04.71,
for the improvement or South River
side avenue, from Twelfth street to
Fourteenth street, by water main, re
duced to Hie principal sum of $01.95.
142. Assessment ao. unoei umr
...... v.. r.-e nuufiiiueii HLr;nii.s- 1.
Orth. iu the principal sum of $18.45,
fur tho improvement of Soutli Central
avenue, from existing main to South,
end of street, by water main, reduced
to the principal sum oi $u.:u.
t x'n. 14. tinder Oi-ul-
nnnce No. 729, ussessoil UKalnst Max
llnlisechild, in the principal sum ui
$25.80, fur the improvement of Apple
ot,.ot frnm Flflll RlrOOt tO .TackSOll
street by water main, reduced to tha
principal sum of ?JJ.fsM.
144. Assessment No. 22, under Ordi
nance No. t'.M, assessed against E. X.
Hiden, in the principal sum of $:s3.15,
for the improvement of Court. Btreet,
from Central avenue to sub-trunk out
let, bv sewer, reduced to the principal
sum of $32.50.
l lti. Assessment No. U, under urui
nance No. GS4, assessed attainst. A. C.
Aylur, in the principal sum or $10.25,
for the improvement of Court street.
from Central avenue to sun-irunn out
let, by sewer, reduced to tho principal
sum of $15.25. '
11G. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 754. assessed against IS. It.
McCnlie. In the principal sum of $58.80,
for the Iinnrovement of Kast. Kloventli
street, from Portland avenue to Ash
land avenue, by sewer, reduced to mo
principal sum of $1C.S0.
147. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. Sill, assessed against 11, E.
riudehues, in the principal Bum of
,;,, ,7 r,,- th imnrnvement of XeW-
lov.n street, from Eleventh street to
Dakota avenue, by paving, reduced to
Ihe principal sum of $i;n:i.12.
lis. Assessment No. 10. under Ordt-
ance No. uifl. assessed against hip
liam H. Hamlin, in the principal aum
of $i',42.lll'i, for the Improvement of
Newtown street, from Klevenlh street
to Dakota avenue, by paving, reduced,
lo ihe principal sum of $5i',0.4S.
1 !0. Assesment No. 24, under OiiSjr
nance No. Ml, assessed against Mis.
K. A. Dyke, in Ihe principal Birn ot
$11111.25, for the improvement of New
town street, from Klevenlh street to
Dakota avenue, by paving, reduced to
Ihe principal sum of $105.75.
150. Assessment No. HO, under Ordi
nance No. -,! 1 . assessed against K;i.a
belh Ferguson. In tho principal sum ot
t',:tl.50, for the Improvement of New
town street, from Eleventh street to
Dakota avenue, hy paving, reduced to
Ihe principal sum of $i'.i:',.35.
151. Assessment No. 13, under Ordi
nance No. 7 IS. assessed against 11. P.
Little, In the principal sum of $72.58,
for the improvement of Taylor street,
from Myrtle sheet to Cottage street,
by paving, reduced lo the principal
sum of $71.1 1.
152. Assessment No. 1, under Ordi
nance No. 7l',5. assessed against Wil
liam l lrich. In the principal sum of
H. 51. 51. for the Improvement of West
Kleventh street, from Oakdale avenue
to Peach street, hy paving, reducMl to
;he principal sum of $1121. IK!.
5;'.. Assessment No. 8, tinder Ordi
nance No. 7(l-"i, assessed against .1. T.
Kads, in Ihe principal sum of $212.00,
for the improvement of West Eleventh
street, from Oakilale avenue to Pen-J
street, by paving, reduced to the prin
cipal sum of $212.50.
151. Assessment No. 23, under Ordi
lance No. 202, assessed ugainst WJ1
liam Kidman. In the principal sum of
5220. 0:1. for Ihe iiuplovenicnt of West
i-'ourlh street, from North Orange
meet lo the West Col poratlon llound
:irv. by water main, reduced to the
principal sum of $lis,57, subdivision.
Si'C 2. Thai the city recorder be
mil he hereby Is liulllorize1, empow
ered and directed to cause the mior
notations to Vie made upon the lien
I. icket In accordance with provisions
of mis ordinance.
See. it. Any unauttioi Ucd corree
ious anil n (lifieatlons appearing upon
he lien docket affecting any of the
r,M goiiig aessnicn!s. to the extent
'hat ihe same conform to the changes
herein authorized, are hereby lalillcd
and c. mill uied.
Passed the City Council this 6lh
lay of June, nnd signed by me In
uiihentication of lis passage this 6th
lay of June. I'.MT.
I Signed i ('. E. C.ATES.
Attest: Mayor.
iSe.llI
I Signed i V. T. FOrtS.
Cily Hecoider.
Approve,!:
(Signed! C. K. CATES.
ilt.) or.