Image provided by: Friends of the Dallas Library; Dallas, OR
About Christian herald. (Portland ;) 1882-18?? | View Entire Issue (Oct. 19, 1883)
OFFRISTI AT<T HKRAtD. f Joel- oalled.. paraclete,— Advocate, Helper,) Spirit of truth, Holy’Spirit; the effects of indwell- ing are called teaching, and perfect ing memory, and he was to remain, to remain forever. These things were said just before his crucifix ion. ’ Then after his resurrection, just before his ascension he said to the twelve, “ Behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you; Tut^riyye in® city of.JerusjF Iri n until Ytt ho. idotlual more of this further on. When upon with power from onjhigh.” This Luke said closing his nara- Jesus was baptized, the Spirit was poured out, descended, and for ef tivd ; (24:49) but amplified a lit- fect, assumed viaibiliLy, and tlm form of a dove, and lit, remaining “ Depart not from Jerusalem, but upon him, by which lie was anima lor the promise of the Father, ted. After he was glorified, all which ye have heard of me; for ate Id quo - oL. Lted... wore. -similar-te Jnhn.truly baptised in water; but anointed. “ On the last and great ye shall be baptised in the' Holy estdayoftneTestrval, Jesus"stood "Spi i i tnibt ii fany"dey s'"lienee?'' Here and cried,saying, If any man thirst, Christ clearly asserts that the Holy let him come to me and drink. Spirit baptism, promised by John, He who believes on me, as the was the promise of the Father the Scriptures say, shall be like a cis fulfillment of Joel’s prophesy, and tern, whence rivers of living waters that baptism in Spirit is identical shall flow.” This he spoke of the It is merely incidental, that this Spirit, which they that believed;^pouring out of Spirit was called on him were to receive for the Holy; l>ai>tism, so called from the fact . . ., • h. stJob»wa» ~ Wp4i«tig^ Spirit wasootryct-grrm• -bfecatwe- Jesus was not yet glorified. We Jesus called preaching, fishing, are here taught that all believers when he said to Peter and Andrew, on Christ, were to havo the Spirit who were.. fishera, - Follow me -and giveh then ; they were to receive I will make you fishers of men. it; and it was to dwell in them. No other speaker than John called Jesus says the-Seri ptu res says this. the reception of the Spirit, baptism^ Hediere clearly refers to the prom- as far as the record goes. True, ise of God, by Joel, as already quot Jesus and Peter both allude to John ed. John in speaking of Christ so calling it. baptizing in the Holy spirit does A Criticism from California. the same. From the general man ner in which Joel and John .$peak, S anta R osa ,-C al ., ' it could not be known what class, Oct. 2, 1883. if there was to be any discrimina Dear Bro. Floyd : tion, would receive this gift; but Since my return home I have Jesus confines it to his followers. been favored with the daily f the p«oph?rthnt thr-v wrrr* wpttr- jpg. Who is this ? Can this be the Messiah ?. John replied, “ I am not the Messiah, I baptise only in water; He. the Messiah, shall bap tise you in the Holy Spirit and in fire.” 1 This was a general proposition, applicable to the crowd—the mixed multi tude before him, all of whom were to be baptized, by theKMessiah, in fireToTpartHn the To do this does not require the tbi» d^Tarnt fi»r preachers w+ro arc , workers and instructors, rather than . drones and sCrmonizers. No good workers are looking for fields, but on the contrary, the fields are look ing for the workers. Of course they must be men of acceptable ability and marked piety, but this is not all by at least half. They are ex pected to lay out the work, appoint large measure of practical common sense. The preacher must know men and things. He must know w-hat is possible to be done- and how to accomplish it. Let us strive to be free from the blood of those to w hom we minister. «fe ..... Txyatg.ii.TB, MAN’S WORK IN THE TEMPLE. Bl M. B. I.EMEET. NUMBEB II. In No. 1 of this series it was shown that each subject of the ■—k-mgdom.=of- .Christ U -4VW- ordained priest, without sex; , simply a human child of’God. That too we will call preparatory, and com- mence our work. Eight hundred years before God the Father sent his Son into the world, to save the world, he made a promise, rich and generous in its nature, and as general, as gt^jer- ous; for it embraced high and low, bond and free, male and female, Jew and Gentile. This promise bound him to bestow a gift—one that could not be purchased with money—his spirit called the Holy Spirit. This promise was made by the mouth.. pfJoel... the prophet (2: 28-32) as follows: “ It shall He illustrates the effect of the in come to pass in the last days, saith dwelling of the Spirit, by the flow God, I will pour out of my Spirit ing of rivers of water, while with upon all flesh ; and your sons and out a figure, “They shall proph- your daughters shall prophesy, and 1 esy,’ ’ expresses, tlie-same. J-ustbe- your young men shall see visions, fore leaving them to return to the and your old men shall dream Father, Jesus said to the twelve, dreams; and on my servants—bond “ If ye love me, keep my command servants—and on my handmaidens ments, and I will pray the Father —bond maidens, I will pour out in and he shall give you another Par - those days of my Spirit; and they aclete— Comforter, Advocate, Help shall prophesy.” I will pour out er, that he may be with you for of, or give my Spirit, is emphatic- ever; even the Spirit of truth; ally the promise made by God the whom the world can not receive. Father; upon all flesh, tells the ex But the comforter even the Holy tent of the promise; while pro Spirit, whom the Father will send phesying, dreaming, and seeing in my name, he shall teach you all visions, are results of the reception things, and bring to* you- remem of this promised gift. brance of all things I have said un John’s preaching and baptizing to you.” This, too, has reference excited curiosity, and so aroused ' to the promise of the Father by *. 9 9 Oregonian, published in Portland. In looking over its contents I find an article over the signature of S. CT Adams, of Salem, and headed as follows, “ The Creation and Fall of Man Explained, not Denied.** In reading what follows the above caption I must confess to feelings of not only surprise but of profoundgrief, and I am compelled to regard the whole production as a miserable subterfuge to avoid one of the most direct and plainest statement of man’s history found in the Bible. The very heading looks suspicious. Why did he say not denied ? It seems to me that it was added from an inward convic tion of his own mind that every reader in the - absence of that aeknowle<lgement wouW think that S. Ç Adams had denied the Biblo history of man’s creation. • His in- trod action -isrfalse. ■ it is not true:— that reformations in the Christian religion are a breaking up of old1, forms that new ones may take the place of the old ones ; but it is true-, 1 that reformation in Christianity is a return to the old forms in let ter and spirit ; precisely the op posite of his statement. ■ W y, ■« j cessary to his theory of evolution. If S. C. Adams can show that Christ only means an unfolding from- old forms to new ones better suited to a higher civilization then it wouM'.wiii (fronritnrtfTtfttng of his thought) that the way was tapperl for the unfolding of a tad- pole into the manly proportion of ST statement that man was taken from the earth is found to be simply a figment of a distempered mind’ laboring under a lower plane of civilization and furthermore the history informing us, that Eve was. formed out of a rib taken from the side of Adamis also false, because Atlams-s^^Tt-rè-pTTSTTnrptively true that we have come up “de veloped up from the tadpole.” If Mr. Adams has been simply unfolded from the avum of a tad pole, then he came out of a tadpole, amLxonsequently does not belong to the race that was formed out of the dust of the ground and called man. I must regard his exegesis of the Scripture touching the forbiden fruit as the most whimsical thing that I ever had the misfortune to read, and still again his misrepre • sentation of the Bible doctrine of the Son of God as manifested in the atonement by Christ. I look upon as infidel in all its tendencies. He seems to be travailing in pain pain to give birth to a new monstrosity. —I have written the- above this morning that I may go to record in opposition to his assumption. G. O. B urnett . Schools and Missions. Now is the time to inaugurate questions pertaining to the propa- gation and defense of the Bible, the whole Bible and nothing but the Bible, among the few who do not read anything that wil|, bring them nearer to Christ und the hope of heaven. I am more and more convinced of this fact, that infideli ty is un the increase ill the world- ■3. —