Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The morning Astorian. (Astoria, Or.) 1899-1930 | View Entire Issue (Sept. 17, 1908)
?-; THE MORNING ASTOMAN, ASTOHIA, OREGON. WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 1G Established 1873. Published Daily Except Monday by THE J. S. DELLINCER CO. SUBSCRIPTION RATES. By mail, per year .... ....$7.00 By carrie-, per month W WEEKLY , By mail, per year, in advance , . .......... , Entered as second-class matter toria, Oregon, under the act of Congress ot Marco 3, 1B7. Orders for the deliverine of The or place of business may be made Any irregularity in delivery should of publication. : TELEPHONE MAIN Mi. THE WEATHER Oregon and Idaho Fair. Washington Fair and cooler in northeast and warmer in southwest. THE SALMON IMBROGLIO. The center of trouble and confu sion, in the enforcement of the new fishing laws of Oregon, seems to have shifted to the Upper Columbia, and by way of adding an odd interest to the situation, Fish Warden Mc Allister finds himself up against his friend, and official sponsor, Frank A. Seufert, the man who did more to place Mr. McAllister where he is than anyone in either State; but to the lasting credit of both gentlemen, the Master Warden is proving him self not only honest, earnest and ef ficient in his new and trying duties, but quite above all claims that might be supposed to exist in favor of the north shore canner; and we hope the whole matter will be pushed to such lengths of license, laches and law, as to bring forth an issue, and an ad justment, as shall forever lay the last dispute in the industry and make it easy for all operators in both States to subscribe heartily and obey de cently. The subject should never be dropped until a finality of legal agreement has been reached; it is obviously necessary, and the im mense values at stake warrant the best and ultimate of all considera tion. ' " - , ; : . f ' Down here on the lower reaches . of the river there seems to be a quiet, and yet ardent, desire to have the controversy quickly settled, once for all, so that all interference and rup ture and loss may be, averted and the men and plants engage seasonably and successfully in the work; especi aay if it can be done with the com mon consent and confirmation of Oregon and Washington and their courts. There is, or should be, a ready and efficacious route out of the turmoil, now that Mr. Seufert is primarily involved; because he is an able man, a good fighter, and rich enough to stand the stress; but above all, he is honest and amenable to the best and worst turn the law may take for him, and will abide straightfor wardly by the climax of settlement, howsoever it may affect his interests. J And to this consumatioh all are now looking hopefully. people' THE SEA-WALL BILL. For the moment there is a notable subsidence in the agitated interest that marked the publication, and re cent comment upon, the Astoria sea wall bill as put forth by the Council Charter Committee; presumably for further consideration, and possibly, for amendment, both of which are due it ' 'I' Such a conclusion warrants the friendly suggestion, that since the framers of the measure were so de voted to the doctrine of excluding all legal interference with their acts, and eschewed the courts with grand and startling sweep, they might, by way of amendment, concede to the people interested in the million-dollar enterprise, the proper, and effec tive, play of the mayor's veto io a general way, so that recourse may be had when less careful people crop to the surface in the handling of this important work Some such relief is indispensable among the provisions of the bill, and it will never reach common acceptence without it; nor should it be adopted without some COFFEE You can buy something called, "coffee" at 10c lb with 3l)C0 miles of R R freight from the roaster ; don't";,--;', Tear trecer reform row money li ra aoe't ' E&e IcaOUEr'i But: w$ pi Hwl ASTORIAN. $1.50 July 30, 1906, a the postoffice at As Morning Astorian to either residence bypostal .card or through telephone. be immediately reported to tne ornce I plain and open avenue to immediate (estoppel, at crises which may not be anticipated. With a realizing sense of the ur gent need of such an intervenor, and a hope that the people are not to be disappointed in the essential, along with other amendments just as po tent, we are all waiting the re-appear ance of the bill and will welcome it and work for it if it comes forth shorn of its most flagrant features. CHARLES EVANS HUGHES. We believe this name is one where with the people of the United States will do some of their gravest conjur ing in the early years to come; we are not building unadvisedly when mentally, we construct a predicate that shall put New York's present governor where his predecessor stands, as the highest type we have to offer in the disposal of our great na tional problems of office and govern ent. As' time reveals the man, and his strength and cleanliness' become daily more apparent to the thinking American, the certainty of employ ing him as the arch-representtive of our people and investing him with all our cherished powers and stand ards, looms largely possible and wel come; fof never again will the citi zens of this country tolerate a lesser man man Kooseveit or riugnes or Cleveland, the latter-day exponents of manliness and dignity and safety in this great relation. That Mr. Hughes has emerged from the New York gubernatorial nomination fight triumphant, without ever having raised hand or voice in his own behalf, is indicative of the extraordinary influence he so quietly wields in that commonwealth and of the universal accetpance of the man and his code. That great State is the national political barometer for us all, and even the hard-and-fast doctrine of "States rights" may not prevail against an everlasting succes sion from there, if he continues to thrust forth such sons as these for the Presidency. Thanks be, even Oregon is not too far away from the man and his pale of influence, to be indifferent to the ascendancy of his .star, slow as it may be, or rapid; he has made his impression on the country, and unless we are wonder- : f.fl-. .... . " y " our "'"nations and estimates, it will be many a long day before it is eradicated; which means never in this land. For Rubber Stamps and Typewriter Supplies see Lenora Benoit, Public Stenographer, 447 Commercial street Restaurants, Hotels, Ships, Boats, Mills, Logging Camps, Etc. We will give you low prices and special rates on all kinds of meats. Every pound guaranteed to be fresh, pure, and in perfect condition. Frank L. Smith Meat Co., Twelfth street between Commercial and Bond. 14-tf The General Demand of the Well-informed of the World has always been for a simple, pleasant and effioent liquid laxative remedy of known value; a laxative which physicians could sanction for family use because its com ponent parts are known to them to be wholesome and truly beneficial in effect, acceptable to the system and gentle, yet prompt, in action. In supplying that demand with its ex cellent combination of Syrup of Figs and Elixir of Senna, tbe California Fig Syrup Co. proceeds along ethical lines and relies on the merits of the laxative for its remark able success. That is one of many reasons why Syrup of Figs and Elixir of Senna is given the preference by the Well-informed. To get its beneficial effects always buy the genuine manufactured by the Cali fornia Fig Syrup Co., only, and for sale by all leading druggists. Price fifty cents per bottle. , ' CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET SEPTEMBER TERM, 1908 . The Morning Astorian offers for ievew the standard list of criminal ami civil cases to be presented in the Honorable Circuit Court, in and for Clatsop county, and State of Oregon, conformably with the docket of that court now officially and authentically prepared ami published; and in the disposition of which Hon. Thomas A. McBride, judge of the fifth judicial district, will preside at the Septem ber term, which commences on Mon day jnext, the 21st.: John McQuinn . ' vs. Wm. R. Adair, ft al. Astoria Savings Bank vs. John Ilendrickson R. E. Carruthers vs. . .,. .' ,,. George H. George, et al C. A. Bottom vs. Grand Rapids Lumber Co. The Columbia River & Neha leru Railway Co., a corpora tion vt, The Whitney Land Co., Ltd., Corporation Mary A. Kinsey vs. C. J. Curtis Lottie V. Wolf vs. Chas. Jacob Wolf D. T. Halferty P. F. Halferty A. A. Cook vs. Casper Drilling & Marie Dril ling and W. B. Hayden Salvestra Mardesich vs. Andrew Mardesich Lena F. Welch & D. H. Welch vs. Astoria & Columbia Rjver R. R. Co., (a corporation) ' John Hahn vs. Astoria National Bank, et al. Gussie Wachs vs. Albert Wachs Callander , Navigation Co., (corporation), vs. Clatsop County and Thos. Lin- ville as Sheriff thereof Nellie E. Parker, guardian vs. N Eben Parker Margaret Lupton vs. Charles Shipley Lupton I. B. Heazlit vs. E. T. Phermetton Robert J. Kirkwood vs. Blanche Kirkwood Portland Credit Association (a corporation) vs. N. D. Bain Ross, Higgins'& Co.,(a cor poration) vt. C. H. Osgood Frank Rees vs. Harry Smith Ruth M. Knopf vs. Emilv M. Cashel, Mark M. Minaker and George Cashel Ruth M. Knopf vs. Emily Cashel and Geo. Cashel Daniel H. Welch vs. The A. & C. R. R. Co. (a cor poration) Lena F. Welch vs. The A. & C. R. R. Co. (a cor poration) City Lumber & Box Co. (a corporation) vs. J. E. McCullom & J. J. Red dick E. Z. Ferguson vs. Lucy A Palmer James W. Welch vs. Jas. P. Bain & N. D. Bain Hiram Eadus vs. Old Oregon Mill Co. (a cor poration) In the matter of the applica tion of Robert Wilbur, a mi nor, by his best friend Julius Wilbur for a writ of Heabus corpus Henry Markkala and John Wuopoia vs. The City of Astoria Fisher Bros. Company vs. Demetrius Zackaira, doing business as Tokeland Oys ter House Edward" -. vs. L. M. Sullivnn and Mabel L.. Sullivan Susan Poysky vs, Peter Poysky Cbas. C. C. Rosenberg vs. Isaac Hansen and Hilda Han sen C. M. Cartwright vs. John M. White P. G. P. Attias vs. M. R. Pomcroy, Sheriff of Clatsop County Fishers Brothers Charles A. Davis and Louisa Davis The Portland Oregon Seacoast Railway Co. . .;, vs.'". The Clatsop Mill Company The Portland Oregon Seacoast Railway Co, vs. M. I, Kinney & J. F. Hamilton The Portland Oregon Seacoast Railway Co. vs. John Welch The Portland Oregon Seacoast Railway Co. vs, H. C. Harrison The Portland Oregon Seacoast Kail way Co. . ..vs.,,..,,. . ..' . ,, .... , Harriet Kinney The Portland Oregon Seacoant Railway Co. vs The Astoria Abstract Title & Trust Co., J. F. Hamilton J. P. Scothan vs. C. C. Clark Francis Waring t vs.- . '.' Henry Waring Martha E. Dunbar ' Tt. Oron L, Dunbar Laura A. Shea , Yl. Henrv Lynch Fisher Bros. Company, (a coropration) vs. ' . George W Spere Fisher Bros. Company, (a cororpation) vs. John Capi George H. George vs. Odd Fellows Land & Building Association, (a corporation) Charles W. Holmes vs. Mary E. Holmes Ida Cooper VI. M. J. Kinney and J. F. Hamil ton City of Astoria M. O'Rcmk'e Western Dry Goods Co., Inc. vs., T. J. Robinson Rowena Springer vs. Delmer Sorineer M. G. Harris & T. M. Gardiner J. J. Reid' w. L. Diel, et al. Levi L. Eager . t vs. County of Clatsop and P. H. Marlev . ' The Gilbert Co., (a corpora tion) vs. P. A. Peterson , Maude Alice Wright Charles R. Wright F. L. Darling Mrs. Millie Taylor, Thomas Taylor, D. H. Welch, Tallant-Grant Tacking Co. , Western Fishing Co. The Portland Oregon Seacoast Railway Co. vs. Willamette Pulp & Paper Co. Joe Starr vs. Minnie Starr The Portland Oregon Seacoast Railway Co. vs. Emil P. Althaber & L. M. Harder, his guardian Wiliam Miller vs. Edwin M. Baker Bellini Kinney McKinncy vs. . , George B. McKinney Ira Bid well vs, The Theo. Kruse Catering Co. Edward Anderson, Charlc: Jordan & C. W. Rich vs. D. Cummings & D. Griswold Tallant-Grant Packing Co., (a corporation, Sanborn-Cutt-ing Co., Columbia River Packers' Association vs. The City of Astoria, (a muni cipal corporation) G. M. Grimes ; ' vs. The City of West Seaside R; L. Jcffcry vs. The City of West Seaside Mary E. Stanley ' vs. The Citv of West Seaside E. M. Grimes ; vs. The City of West Seaside Grace E. Low vs. The City of West Seaside Willard Houghton vs. Eleanor Houghton Clara E. Adams vs. , J. M, Adams Eastern Investment Co., Ltd. vs. Mary A. Wirt Alfred A. Smith vs. Marshall J, Kinney W. S. Chapman & A. R, Kan aga vs, Sarah Myers, et al. Rothchild Bros, (a corpora- i tion) vs. Edward Anderson C. W. Alley Mary K, Alley Myra Westcott vs. Bert V. Wtstcott N. Jensen vs. The Universal Sash & Door Factory W. P. Wilson , vs. . M, R. Pomeroy , H. A. Kram vs. Harry Hunecke & Charlel Marknu A. R, Cyrui , vs. ' ' H. C. Thompson h Lulu Thompson C. T. Crosby va. ' Henry Lee, & Mrs. Henry Lt E. C Jorgensen VI. August Nelson R. E. Elvers vs. Callendcr Navigation Co. Otto H. Kulper vs. t Franceses A. Kulper Elizabeth H. Hill Isaac HiH J. H. McDermott vs. P. Moon Isabella Alisina Grant . ' VI. William Grant Albion L. Gile, doing business as Chinook Meat Co. r. Tallant-Grant racking Co. C. R. O. Distler VI. Olive Distler John A. Montgomery R. W. Hall' Edith A. L. Smith vs. i Robert Smith State of Oregon V John Statte" State of Oregon Yl. Leon Petsos J State of Oregon vs. Geo. Tidus State of Oregon vs. Michaele Falangui C, Rungc vs. Emma Runge John Carlson vs. Hattie Carlson C. J. Curtis, Lessee Tt. Karl Knutsen & W. F. Dugan. The American Importing Co. n. Frank Scott Charles Frenzel vs. Hulda Frenzel William Murry vs. Birdie Murry A. R. Kanaga FREE TRIAL-AN ELECTRIC IRON Saves backs, footsteps, blistered fingers, and faces fuel ' and tempers. . L ' . ,. , , ')) jjj;. 'i'jji'j!' .,r:,!;1' You feel no electricity attach to any incan descent socket low expense would sur prise you let us explain to YOU. ASTORIA ELECTRIC CO. Musi c anduiiSent nFree Trial We BhlB oa aejproral, without cent flepoatt pay the freight ot nd allow ten days vnaa THIAL on every Edison Phono- EUbi Heat1 Urn to pay and charge no Interest. xprasiafa and i rDh. Olva St It only colt oa eent to hav the TAJ.KiifQ hauhisb proposition , You Uke mo rUk, tf you buy only attar a Pre Trial without, aeciao ix you n nv on m on Ft xpnaa 10 yon. unia same oner hundreds of others during- the last iniwnci im juaiaon was aepv in di Daa mua tneree a reoso ent on request nee toe coopoa. OUR IPBCIAL OUTFIT WO T OJTLT Special outfits to fit aay raw are too mau io secure fagr Manilla, from': Bllers Hon the largest dealers Talking Mtomnes and reoordJ on us voasi or ftonawMt 40 iter. vauttuvjb LaT. T v VI. A. S, Tee ft Catharlna M. Tee A, K, Kuniigu vs. .' , ' The A fttoriu Abstract Title & Trust Company Tullunt-Griint Picking' Co. vt.-. Western FMiIng Co, C. II. Cullender vs. Old Oregon Mills Kate Fox vs. Flei'hvtHid Fox K. 1.. Durham ami Merchant! National Bank of Portland, i Oregon vi. ' M. J. Kinney K. I). Brooki VH T. F. Kyle ? Frances Uel! Carr v. Geo, S. Cnr ' ' J. A. -Oilliuugh & Co. : : vs. ( , : Mm. V. R. Hcyne ' J. A,' Gilbnugh St Company vi. Thomas Brown Frederick B. Tracy ?.. Lulu E. Tracy Margaret Sullivan VI. Eugene Sullivan A. C. Turner vs, Lettie M. Turner Walter Larson va. : Mrs.' Millie Taylor Ron, Higgins 4 Co. , vi. John Hendrickson Juntlna JoKcphina Ahola vi. Hiljami Ahola R. L Eberman Vi. Nora Agnes Eberman vs. Wm. Wcrthes and Pete Wer thes, it Werthei Broi , vt. H. Hanusirde Nancy Kedsicker VI. ,Frank J. Kednicker Ross, Higgins & Co. John Swan and Magdalen Swan F. M. Castro vt.' Alice J, Castro A. .Walter Wolf vs. ' William La Force Regius J. Oxer VI. Deli B. Howard Alfred Longden vt. Dclnura Beach Company W, E. Dement Vfc M. J, Kinney, as Administrator Isaac Gratton' Mary Gratton The First National Bank of Astoria vs. A. Booth k Company C. F. Koell Maud Koeli Nora Bachelder vs. Carroll Bachelder In the matter of the applica tion of William Larson to register title to certain land, etc. falra, Mtcct M th b a iae best ou then jt stated. Ml over ma snt to you then ttiu u anov iiiua naa paan aocepiaa D, month and in every me nuoir-nui one wmcn wui ds S29.B5. UmaoffTBph BoolmtllHioky Dapt. 6 a Taiiu. Plaao hooks, In ISi Waah. H. rSfUBBB, or. Qent1mMf iri u m-ms Catalofue and parUonlan rour uMieoa Free ttUi MSer. . Addtaai yj