Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Lincoln County leader. (Toledo, Lincoln County, Or.) 1893-1987 | View Entire Issue (Sept. 25, 1908)
Cenvlnelnf Kxposltiea ef Fallacy el Iryaa'a raaaeea fer Belying Problems at Modern Sualnast. w m if f FALL The finest line of Fall Clothing and Furnishing Goods ever shown in To ledo has just arrived. CaH and see J: S. AKIN THE WHI FE HOUSE LEADER Or'egon Builders Are you doing what you can to populate your State? OREGON NEEDS PEOPLE-Sett lers, honest farmers, mechanics, merchants, clerks, people with brains, strong hands and a willing heart capital or no capital. Southern Pacific Co. (Lines in Oregon) is sending tons ot Oregon literature to the East for distribution through every available agency. Will you not help the good woric of building Oregon by sending us the names and adifresses of your friends who are likely to be interested in this state? We will be glad to bear the expense of sending them complete information about OREGON and its opportunities. Colonist Tickets will be on saleduring SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER from the East to all points in Oregon. The fares from a few principal cities are From Denver. . . $30.00 " Omaha . . 30.00 " Kansas City 30.00 " St. Louis . 35.50 " Chicago .. 38.00 TICKETS CAN BE PREPAID If you want to bi iug a friend or relative to Oregon, deposit the proper amount with any of our agents. The tickets will then be furnished by telegraph. W. E. PETERSON, Local Agent, Toledo, Oregon. VM. McMURRAY, General Passenger Agent, Portland, Oregon LINCOLN COUNTY ABSTRACT COMPANY O. B. CROSNO & C. E. HAWKINS Abstractors Toledo, Liscoln Oocntt, Oregon It is not business to buy real estate with out an almtract of title. We are pre pared to luiiiiih n n e pnniptlyau corree.llv. t.kfejM4j.. SO YEARS' vK V, EXPERIENCE Designs CnovmaHTS Ac. nulcklr ascertain our oiinlon free whether an liiTOKtlnn Is prohalily piitentnble. Commuiilra. Uonsalrtcllrconliaeiitlal. HANDBOOK on Patent ent free. Oldest agency for securing patents. Pntnnta taken through Munn A Co. receive tpeeial notlc. without chante. in the Scientific nmmi A handsomely fllnstrated weekly. Largest elr- MUNN &Co.3eiBrMd"t"- New York Branch OSoa, SS F BU Washington, D. C HERBERT F. JENKINS WATCHMAKER AND JEWELER Watches, Jewelry. Repairing Done All Work Guaranteed NEWPORT, OREGON. GOODS IN LOW PRICES Call and we will prove it. We haven't time to tell you all about it here. Come in and eee as. Yours With Bargains HENRY LEWIS, Prop. TOLEDO, OREGON. From Louisville $41.70 " Cincinnatte 42.20 " Cleveland- 44.75 New York 55.00 NOTICE FOR PLBLICATION. V. 8. Land Ollice, Portland, Oregon. September 6, 1908. KnlLe is hereby given that Rialto L. Weath erford.nl Sileti, Oregon, who, on Augut 15, 1907, mad liomeileail entry No; 163(18, serial No. 0378. for oi nw4, se'i of nw" and no'i of tw, section 25. township 9 south, range 10 west, Willamette Meridian, has Hied notice of intention to make final commutation proof, to establish claim to the laud above described, before the County Clerk of Lincoln count.,, at Toledo, Oregon, on Iho 24th day of October, r. us. Claimant mimes as witnesses: Clayton Pond. J. J. Derby. W. C. Pischxt and W. R. Hall, all of SilotK, Oregon. Alorknon 8. tiKE.sHER, Register NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION. U. 8. Laud Ollice, Portland, Oregon. September 21. 1908. Notice is hereby triven thai Harry J. Marker, f Uucco. Oregon, who. on June 27, HOT, mnde homestead entry No. nasi, Serlui No. 0405, for of neli and nU iiw'4. section 8. tnwimhln 9ontli, ranee 7 we-it, Willameito Meridian, hits "Jed uoike. of intention to make llnul commutation proof, to establish claim to the bind above described, before tho IteglKler and Receiver, it Portland, Orison, on the (ith day of November, 19C8. Claimant tiauicH ah ivllnees: B. C. Rose, W. R. Mel onaM, Fred Wltenstrom and Albert Wilts, all of Roccn, Oregon. Alukbmon 8 Dbesskk. HeglKter. NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION U. 8. Laud Olllee, Portland, Oregon, SuptoiiilwrVI, ItKW. Notice is hereby given that Edmund McNett of Falls City, Oregon, who, on August 24, 1907, made homestead entry No. 16.112, Serial No. Own, for e! of se, of He'.,', mid self of v4. sevttciu 7, lowii-hip8(intn, ratine 9 went Willamette Meridian, him filed notice of Inten tion to make Una! commutation proof, to establish clniiu lo the land above described, before the Rcgifiter md Receiver, at Portland, Oregon, on tin 5th day of November, 100M. Claitnant namisns witnesses. Clark W. father, lames It McMillan, Andrew .I.Hplllersand Vasco W. lather, all of Falls City, Oregon. " ALOKHKoN 8. tlKKHAKK, Register. (From Got. Hughes Youngstown speech.) When we conalder remedlea that are proposed for tke trusts, we find our selves Journeying la land of dreams. Again the magician of 1896 waves his wand. At a stroke difficulties dlsap pear and the complex problems of mod ern business are forgotten In the fas cination of the simple panacea. And, as the free coinage of silver In the ratio of 16 to 1 was to destroy the curse of gold, so the new found specific of equal perfection is to remove the curse of Industrial oppression. The de lusion of 1908 Is comparable only to that of twelve years ago. The Brat sugestlon is that the law should prevent a duplication of di rectors among competing corporations. However advisable it may be to have independent directorates of competing corporations, It would seem still more Important to have Independent stock holders, for a majority of the stock holders of a corporation choose the di rectors. ' If a law were passed pre venting the duplication of directors It would easily be evaded in the selection of men who would represent the same Interests. The most ordinary exper ience shows that it Is not necessary to serve on a board of directors in order to control Its proceedings. Whatever the advantage of such a law as Is pro- pobed, 11 liuiuly lines lo the uiguily ut a "remedy," or vindicates Its title to a place In an Imposing scheme of reform outlined in a national platform. But the more Important proposal la "that any manufacturing or trading corporation engaged In Interstate com merce shnll be required to take out a federal license before it shall be per mitted to control as much as 25 per cent of the product In which It deals." A license Is permission, and the object of the remedy is not to regulate large businesses, but to destroy trusts. Hence the supposed efficiency of the plan is to be found in the prohibition of the con trol by any such corporation "of more than 50 per cent of the total amount of any product consumed In the United States." This is another delusion of ratio. It might be interesting to Inquire what Is the meanlirg of "any product consumed in the United States." Does It refer to a class of commodities? And, if so, how shall the classes be de fined? Or does it refer to each sepa rate article of commerce? And, If so, what account does this proiHisal take of the skill and Initiative of manufac turers who have built up a more or less exclusive trade In particular ar ticles, often protected by trade-marks, although In most active competition with other articles designed for the same general purpose and seeking the same market? In a desire to correct the evils of business are we to place an embargo upon honest endeavor whose activities present none of the abuses requiring remedies? And, if not, what statutory definitions shall be found to be adequate and Just If we lay down our prohibition In terms of volume or ratio of business and not in terms of right and wrong? If we adopt Mr. Bryan's proposal, to what pe riod of production Is the prohibition to apply? Is the excess for a day or for a month to be considered? Or is the average production for a year to bo takeo? And what system shall be de vised by which suitable Information may be furnished in the nature of dan ger signals along the routes of trade so that the manufacturer may -know when he is about to exceed the pre scribed ratio? He may Justly be re quired to govern his own conduct, but how shall he be apprised of the con duct of others upon which Is to depend bis guilt or innocence? The patent laws confer a true monopoly In the exclusive right to man ufacture and sell. Are these laws to be repealed because a" "private mon opoly Is Indefensible and Intolerable?" Bonn's CrnA Reasonls. An example of Mr. Bryan's reason ing Is found In his statement thut "when a corporation controls 50 per cent of the total product It supplies forty millions of people with that prod uct." There are, of course, specialties which have a limited market and are used by a relatively mall number of the people of the United States. More than 50 per cent, and indeed even as much as 100 per cent of the trade In such articles may be In the control of a particular corporation. This may, In fact, be relatively a small corpora iniu. ii may never mtrr Khpirwa ;j uits unsavory renown of a "trust." But by prosecuting Its particular line' with fidelity and meeting satisfactorily a limited want; or by reason of some secret processes or advantage of experi ence, it may control the trade In a giv en article of commerce. Or, suppose a concern controls the whole trade In some useful byproduct which It has found it advantageous to make, Is the trade to be prohibited? The Democratic platform makes no ALtHAM WATOifclSk. IS WATCHES, CLOCKS, JEWELRY H and SILVERWARE Greatest Assortment of every description ever seen in Lincoln County jjjj A Beautiful Line of 1 1 SPECTACLES and EYE GLASSES Fine Watch Repairing a Specialty (TV rty Years' Experience) H. b PETERSON, va nmaker, Jeweler .md Optician TOLEDO, exceptions to cover such cases, and we have learned that it Is equally "binding as to what It omits." If we could Imagine such a crude prohibition to be enacted Into law, and to be regarded as valid, what would be the effect? Mr. Bryan, with his usual readiness, suggests that the concern may sell as much of its plants as are not needed to produce the amount al lowed by law. He speaks as though eveiy iiKinufucturiug concern had as many fully equipped units of produc tion as would correspond to any given percentage of trade which It might be required to lop off. Plants, are not so easily dismembered. Reduction in out put means reduction in work, reduction In the number of men employed and curtailment ef the efficiency of a going concern. Let us suppose a concern which controls SO per cent of a given product that Is to say, makes and sells S,000,000 In value out of a total trade in the product amounting to $10, COO.OCO. Is It to be compelled to reduce its output to $2,000,(XX) because only $2,000,000 In value are made by others? Then, if It could sell a purt of Its plant on Mr. Bryan's theory, what should It sell? Should It sell off euouKb to re duce Us capacity to $5,000,000, and allow three-fifths of Its plant to remain Idle until others developed a capacity for handling the other $5,000,000? Should It assume that the total trade will Increase and Is not always to re main at $10,000,000, and hence retain a larger portion of its plant in idle ness? Or suppose a concern controls 100 per cent of the trade in some arti cle, what plauts shall it retain? It can proiluce nothing until others pro duce; but It may produce an amount equal to the production of others, and it holies the trade will grow. What a vision of business uncertainty and con fusion, of idle and impaired plants, of the ruin of worklngmen whose lives have clustered around particular Indus tries and who depend upon their con tinued efficiency, Is presented by this fanciful remedy for the destruction of trusts I Apart from this, if the dissolution were effected in the manner desired and portions of plants could be sold and were sold as suggested, to whom would the sale be made? Would It be necessarily to foes or to those ambi tious to be competitors and anxious to take advantage of Its plight? This proposal In Its utter disregard of the facts of business, in its substi tution of the phantasies of the imagin ation fo the realities of life, stamps the Democratic platform with the fatal stamp of 1S!H. The commerce and In dustry of this country, the interests of its wage earners and of Its interdepend ent masses, who must rely upon the stability ef business, cannot afford to give license to such vagaries. In the solemnity with which this proposal has been declared, and the in sistence with which It Is advocated, we find an appropriate test of the capacity of our opponents to dotl wisely with the problems of the duy. BEST TR E ATM ENT FOR A TORN. If fur no other reason, ChHinunrlHin's Salve hliouM be kept in every hoime hold on account of Its great value in the treatment of burns. It allays the pain almost instantly, bikI unless the injury is a severe one hetils the part without leaving a scar. Thist-alve is also uneqtialed for chapped hands. Mire tipples and dUtnt.es of the skin Price 25 cents for bale by Ot.lo O. Krogntad. M. E. Church Sunday Services. Sunday School at 10 :30 a. m. (Jeorge lie'tierx, Superintendent. PrenchinK at 11 a. in. Clttsa meeting at close of morning service. Junior League at 3 p. m. Preaching at 7:30 p. m. All are cordially invited lo worship with us. W. E. Rogers, Pastor. I "I! i) V OREGON THE "OLIVER" VISIBLE TYPEWRITER Without doubt Die strongest anl most perfect typewriter made Standard keyboard. Vis ible writing. R. E. COLLINS, Agent, Toledo NOTIOK FOR PUBLICATION. V. 8. Land Cilice, Portland, Oregon, AtlKHHt 7, 1908. Notice Is hereby given that l.ou A. Klllnlf, of Sllets, OntKon, who, on April 9, IDtW, madu bomeHtcad application No. 15WH. Burial No. 0180, for Loll 1, 2. 3 and t, section 3D, township 8 south, ranue 10 w, Willamette Meridian, haa, filed notice of intention to make Huh! commu tation proof, to estalillnh claim to the land above described, before Ira Wade, County Clerk of Lincoln County, at Toledo, Ortgon, on th2Istday of Septen bar, ItHW. Claimant names as witnesses: Warren It. Hall, Ueorxe Miller, Henry Wilson and o. C. Hell, all of Siletz, Orcjcun. Alqeiinon H Piikkhkk, Register. NOTICE KOR PUBLICATION. U. S. Land Ollice, Portland, Oregon, Heintemhor 21, lUOS. Notice is hereby given that Stephen 1 Stiatton, of Bili'ti, Oregon, who, on June 2i, 1!KI5, made homestead entry No. 15732, Herlal No. 0371. fori'.jof m'i ! section 25, and on October 27. 19u5, iidilitlonal homestead entry No. 10K14, Serial No. 0t.i5, for a", of sw'4, see tion 25, towimhlpS south, range 10 west. Wil lunette Meridian, has tiled notlca ol intention to make final three year proof, to establlali claim to the land above described, before tho Register and Receiver, at Portland, Oregon, on tne un day of November, lixig. Clniinant imniex as witnesses: A. W. Mortrim, Lambert Nelson, of SMels.Or.j Jay W. Dunn, of Toledo, Or.; Ueorgu lleirels, of Globe, Washington. Attorneys for Plain tiff. &- AT TO R NHYS-A T-LA W U. S. Laud Office Business j a Specialty. J Twenty yearn' expeiionoa befoj 1J: Liocal and the tieneral Land Olliue and the Interior Dopml tnent at WiiHltinuton, U. P. Rooms 500 507 , , Columbia linii.iiiitr Portland, Or, I THE . B0NB0N1ERE CEORfiE A. IIAI.L, Proprietor S Choice Confections V Summer Drinks V Ice Cream S) Fralts, Nuts ,v Tubaccos, Cigar Stationery B0NB0NIERE ANNEX S Two Doors South ' v POOL, BILLIARD and CARD TABLES A BOWLINQ ALLOY A Oulet. Orderly Place to Plav TOLEDO, OR Eli ON v dp mm mm ef