Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Portland observer. (Portland, Or.) 1970-current | View Entire Issue (May 8, 2024)
May 08, 2024 Page 9 Opinion articles do not necessarily represent the views of the Portland Observer. We welcome reader essays, photos and story ideas. Submit to news@portlandobserver.com. o piNioN A Win for Black Entrepreneurship: Is the New FTC Ban Good for Black Businesses? In what has since created shockwaves across the nation, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted 3-2 for banning noncompete agreements, which goes into effect 120 days after the rule is officially published in the Federal Register. This decision will undoubtedly have significant impact on both employers and employees alike, but what about black entrepreneurs? The FTC defines a non-com- pete clause as, “a term or condi- tion of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalizes a work- er for, or functions to prevent a worker from (1) seeking or ac- cepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condi- tion; or (2) operating a business in the United States after the con- clusion of the employment that includes the term or condition.” Historically, non-competes have been used to restrict em- ployees from working in the same industry after leaving their former employer. Though the intention is to protect the intel- lectual property of businesses, non-competes have often neg- atively affected competition in product and service markets, es- pecially with Black workers. If written properly, most non-competes have outlined spe- cific restrictions of a current or former worker, who can be their employer, where they can work for said employer, and for how long they aren’t allowed to work for an employer, which can be unduly burdensome. Imagine be- Taalib Saber, attorney and owner of The Saber Firm ing told who to work for and who not to work for. That basically is a non-compete. Those who have signed non-competes and wish to increase their salaries, will either have to accept where they are or change industries and pos- sibly, locations. These are all un- necessary hassles that restrict a competitive market and perpetu- ate wage suppression. I have reviewed contractual agreements of several Black cli- ents who I have worked with in a variety of areas, from tech to en- tertainment. Many of my clients desired to venture out or hang up their proverbial “shingle,” signaling the start of their own business, but have been deterred by these non-compete clauses. Approximately 18 percent of the workforce, which is about 30 million people, is covered by non-compete agreements. In the Black community, there’s a say- ing that goes, “If a white person has a cold, then a black person has pneumonia.” What this essen- tially means is that if the majority of Americans are suffering from a particular thing, that thing al- ready has, currently is, or will be suffered much more by Black peo- ple. Here, if many Americans are experiencing the effects of wage suppression and restrictions in the market, then the Black commu- nity feels it worse. Add in Black workers who want to start their journey to entrepreneurship and it becomes an almost impossible task to accomplish. FTC estimates that the impact of banning non-competes could increase worker pay by $300 bil- lion and it can lead to 8,500 more new businesses each year. For Black entrepreneurs, the elimi- nation of non-competes can now open the door to new innovations, creativity, and fairer competition in the marketplace. This ban can help business owners attract top talent, as there would be no restrictions on the mobility of skilled workers; thus, strengthen- ing their businesses and enhanc- ing their competitiveness. With that stated, there will be several legal challenges to the implementation of the FTC’s non-compete ban. Within 24 hours of the vote being pub- lished, both the United States (US) Chamber of Commerce, the world’s largest business or- ganization, and the Business Roundtable, an association of chief executive officers of Amer- ica's leading companies, filed suit against the federal agency. In a statement released an- nouncing the lawsuit, the US Chamber of Commerce declares, “[t]he FTC contends that by using regulation they can simply declare common business practices to be ‘unfair methods of competition’ and thus illegal. This is despite the fact that noncompete agreements have been around longer than the 110-year-old FTC and until now no one has suggested that they are illegal.” It goes on to state, “[i]f the FTC can regulate noncompete agreements, then they can decide to regulate or even ban any other business practice. All without a vote from Congress.” I believe that many more busi- nesses, organizations, associa- tions, and groups will file law- suits and lobby against, what they believe, is an overreach by the Federal Trade Commission on governing business transactions. Furthermore, if any of the federal courts who hear the cases decide to grant a stay or a preliminary injunction on the ruling, the ef- fective date could be postponed. Then, if the cases are appealed thereafter, the ruling would be de- layed for many more months. So while this non-compete ban could take some time to go into effect, black entrepreneurs should start positioning themselves to take advantage of it.
