Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Portland observer. (Portland, Or.) 1970-current | View Entire Issue (May 24, 1973)
Page 2 Portland/O beerver I Thursday, M ay 24, WE SEE THE WORLD 0 » THROUGH BLACK EYES With Ron Hsndren A YOUNG VIEW OF WASHINGTON ALFRED LEE HENDERSON EDITOR/PUBLISHER AMERICA’S BICENTENNIAL TEST OF MATURITY King Richard : guilty or innocent ? P resident N ix o n has d ire c tly or in d ire c tly b ro k e n e v e ry te n e t on w h ic h the p rin c ip le s o f d e m o c ra c y a n d th e p h ilo s o p h y a n d system o f A m e rica n g o v e rn m e n t a re based. Can a m an w h o has so su b ve rte d th e g o v e rn m e n t he w as e le cte d to lea d a n d th e C o n s titu tio n he w as sw orn to u p h o ld c o n tin u e to g u id e n ot o n ly the A m e ric a n p e o p le b ut the n a tio n s o f the w o rld ? W h a t is a d e m o cra cy? O r if you p re fe r, w h a t is o u r re p u b lic a n fo rm o f g o v e rn m e n t? It is based on som e v e ry s im p le b u t im p o rta n t ide als: The rig h t o f th e p e o p le to choose th e ir re p re s e n ta tiv e in a fre e e le c tio n , based upo n a tw o -p a rty system ; checks a n d b a la n ce s on g o v e rn m e n t p o w e r th ro u g h th e se p a ra tio n a n d e q u a lity o f the th re e bra nch es o f g o v e rn m e n t — th e e x e c u tiv e , le g is la tiv e a n d ju d ic ia l; a system o f c iv il lib e rtie s th a t insures p e rs o n a l fre e d o m a nd p riv a c y so th a t the c itize n n e e d n ot fe a r h arassm ent or in tim id a tio n fro m th e p o lic e a rm o f th e a o v e rn m e n t. P resident N ix o n a n d his closest frie n d s a n d a d visors h a ve in th e ir q ue st fo r p o w e r b ro ke n a ll o f these basic rig h ts o f o u r g o v e rn m e n t. He has p la c e d h im s e lf a b o v e th e la w , a b o v e the courts, a b o v e th e C o n s titu tio n o f the U n ite d States. Fearing th a t the A m e ric a n p e o p le w o u ld e le c t so m eone e ise , the N ix o n c a m p a ig n not o n ly used p o litic a l e s p io n a g e , b ro k e c a m p a ig n fin a n c e law s, d e a lt in s la n d o r, a n d used a ll o f th e a g e n cie s o f g o v e rn m e n t to o b ta in re -e le c tio n , th e y e ve n w e n t so fa r as to in te rfe re w ith the rig h t o f the m e m b e rs o f the o p p o s in g p a rty to choose th e ir o w n c a n d i date. This com es ve ry close to c re a tin g a o n e - p arty system th a t w e so lo u d ly co nd em n w h e n fo u n d in o th e r natio ns. The in te rfe re n c e w ith th e e le c tio n is but a m in o r p a rt o f th e a d m in is tra tio n 's m isuse o f p o w e r. The a d m in is tra tio n m a d e g re a t e ffo rts to co n ce a l those a c tiv itie s , g o in g so fa r as to b u y w itnesses, c o m m it p e rju ry , b rib e g o v e rn m e n t o ffic ia ls , in te rfe re w ith th e courts, use th e C IA a n d th e FBI a n d d estroy records. This show s n ot o n ly a d isre g a rd fo r the e le c to ra l process, b u t a su bve rsio n o f the courts a nd p o lic e p o w e rs. President N ix o n has o p e n ly d e fie d Congress. He has im p o u n d e d m o n e y vo te d fo r p a rtic u la r uses by Congress. He has e ven im p o u n d e d m o n e y b e lo n g in g to p ro g ra m s he su pp o rte d h im s e lf b e fo re the e le c tio n . He has c o n tin u e d the b o m b ing o f C a m b o d ia a g a in s t th e w ishe s o f Congress, a n d e ven said th a t if C ongress refuses fu n d s fo r b o m b in g , he w ill fin d th e m e lse w h e re . He has in te rfe re d w ith th e system o f justice. His in te rfe re n c e in th e Ellsberg case caused the charges to be dism issed. He o ffe re d th e ju d g e h e a rin g th e Ellsberg tria l a h ig h o ffic e d u rin g the course o f th e tria l. He has used the Justice D e p a rtm e n t, th e C IA a n d th e FBI to spy on the o p p o s itio n a n d p ro v id e in fo rm a tio n to his p o litic o 1 c a m p a ig n . N ot o n ly is this u n fa ir a n d ille g a l, it is a m isuse o f fe d e ra l funds. He o rd e re d th e w ire ta p p in g o f his o w n a nd K issinger's sta ff. He set up a secret u n it o f the Justice D e p a rtm e n t to spy on the p o litic a l o p p o s i tio n . He used th e FBI a n d th e C IA to his o w n p o litic a l ends. He has in te rfe re d and) re a ch e d into th e v a rio u s a g e n c ie s o f g o v e rn m e n t — Justice, C o m m e rce , S e curities — u n til no d ire c to r kn ow s w h e th e r his e m p lo y e e s a re p u b lic servants or ser vants o f th e President. N o o ne is r e a lly safe fro m th e e s p io n a g e a n d s p yin g o f th e a d m in is tra tio n — not c o n gressm en, not Senators, n ot peace groups, not the press, n ot c iv il rig h ts lea de rs, not e ven the c o m m o n c itiz e n . H o w can th e p re s id e n t n o w le a d the p e o p le o f th is n a tio n ? W h e th e r or not d ire c t e v id e n c e in c o n c lu s iv e ly b in d s h im to these crim es, is not his a b ility to g o v e rn se riou sly in d o u b t? For if the P resident has so is o la te d h im s e lf th a t he does not k n o w w h a t his closest frie n d s , associates a n d a d visors a re d o in g , h o w can he k n o w w h a t is h a p p e n in g in th is n a tio n ? If, w h e n ru m o rs w e re ra m p a n t across the c o u n try , he d id not e v e n b oth e r to ask frie n d s w h a t w as g o in g on, th e n does he h a v e th e in s ig h t a n d a b ility to le a d ? If he chose those m en, a n d e v e n c o n tin u e d to c o ll them h o n o ra b le b u t m is le d w h e n he had to le t th em go to save h im s e lf, does he h ave th e ju d g e m e n t to lead? As J u lia n Bond said, "T h e m a n is e ith e r a fo o l or a c ro o k. Either he c a n n o t c o n tro l his s ta ff a n d they h id it fro m h im , in w h ic h case he's a fo o l; or he k n e w a n d a p p ro v e d , w h ic h m akes h im a th ie f and a c r o o k ." W h e th e r he is g u ilty or w h e th e r he has m e re ly b e e n used is n o t im p o rta n t. N ix o n is c a lle d "K in g R ic h a rd " in jest -- b ut he is the closet th in g w e h a v e e v e r h ad to a d ic ta to r. If he re a lly b e lie v e s in th e d e m o c ra tic process, in th e p e rso n a l lib e rty a n d in th e fu tu re o f n a tio n , he a n d his e n tire a d m in is tra tio n w ill resign . Those w h o say "in n o c e n t u n til p ro v e n g u ilty " a re rig h t. N ix o n is in n o c e n t u n til p ro v e n g u ilty . But w e a re n ot ta lk in g a b o u t c o n v ic tin g h im o f a c rim e a n d p u ttin g h im in ja il; w e are ta lk in g a bo ut s a lv a g in g a c o u n try . As fo r Spiro A g n e w , p erh a p s he is an in n o ce n t b y s ta n d e r; h o w e v e r, w e m ust not fo rg e t th a t he w as e le c te d w ith th e sam e m o n e y, th e same crim e s a n d th e sam e "C o m m itte e to R e-E lect" as th e President. W e d o not n e e d to th in k a b o u t im p e a c h m e n t because th e y w e re not e le c te d le g a lly . Since the e le c tio n w as rig g e d a n d ille g a l, the e le c tio n should be th ro w n o u t a n d N ix o n a n d A g n e w d e th ro n e d . W ASHINGTON With the opening o f the Watergate hearings last week, the Ameri can government, now approaching its 200th anniversary, undertook an impor tant test of its maturity. Pew courses are more heavily laden with potential disaster than one which even hints of the possibility of serious wrongdoing on the part of the President. And although there is no evidence at this time to implicate Mr. Nixon, enough doubt has been cast to set in motion a dangerous undertow in the still-rising Watergate tide How the investigators handle that un dertow is as much a key to the final outcome of the matter as are the facts themselves. One of the problems is that the actions and styles of Mr Nixon and many of those he gathered about him, both inside the White House and throughout the executive branch, have not been calcu- froin those in the media who exposed this sordid affair or those in Congress who are now charged with investigating it. Indeed, when the resignations of Mr Haldeman and Mr Erlichman were finally announced, the first reaction on Capitol Hill was jubilation These men played key roles in establishing and maintaining the overall attitude of contempt which the White House for years has displayed toward Congress and the press Pew were sony to see them go The temptation, then, is to administer to the President and his former advisors some of the same medicine which they themselves dished o u t - t o let personal feelings turn what should be a careful and deliberate process into a charade When Senator Ervin opened the hear ings. he voiced his determination to avoid that pitfall His Republican counterpart. Senator Howard Baker (Tenn.), under scored that determination Certainly, Senator Ervin is the man to head the committee There is no question in anybody's mind about his integrity There are no questions as to his skill as a lawyer and his expertise as an authority on the Constitution If any member of the Senate could keep the Watergate committee on course, it is he But Senator Ervin's assurance notw ith standing, the doubt is still .here The heat of scandal is a powerful force which has consumed many o f the best intentions, and when the glare of national television is added to that heat, the outcome is somehow all the more unpredictable This is not to say the heanngs should not go on What appears to have been perpetrated is of so serious a nature as to compel a thorough public examination which would not likely be achieved through the courts alone Persons, almost on the eve o f our 200th anniversary as a free nation, have attempted to thwart the democratic pro cess which has kept us free for these two centuries. And apparently, they did not do it for money or for personal gain, but rather out of a commitment to the President they served and ideals he stood for And no matter how tired we become of reading about the Watergate, we must not let that thought pass from our minds As Senator Ervin said, "There are people who wouldn't steal a penny o f your money but who would steal your vote That is a queer kind of morals " It is more than a queer kind of morals It is an unacceptable kind of morals And it is a kind o f morals which must not be in dulged in to any degree by any o f those investigating the Watergate affair Call 283-2486 and trv an & OBSERVER SyndKalad I »7.1 by WASHINGTON WEEKLY. Ins All rights rasar««! f i t your ¿eroico. . . This is Stan Do you re m e m b e r Stan M cK e nzie? Stan w as a g u a rd fo r the P ortlond T railblazers. N o w Stan is a S e a r g e n f in th e O r e g o n N a tio n a l G u ard. MEMBER President or dictator 'HON&TY'fa sell a car... e^to rent a house... <** to improve ■\» business... This a d co urtesy o f: Support C o m p a n y 162nd In fa n try , O reA R N G C am p W ith y c o m b e , C lackam as, O re g o n T e le ph on e 648-2632 ————————————--------------------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— W U H ■ O H M w a r n Association • Foundsd 1085 0 TAX-PAYERS WANT A BREAK'. (THErMToiw) ' I Just fill out and mail this coupon Published every Thursday by Exie Publishing Company, 2201 N. Killingsworth, Port land, Oregon 97217. Mailing address. Box 3137. Portland, Oregon 97208. P O . Box 3137 P o rtlan d , O re g o n Second Class Postage Paid at Portland, Oregon Please enter my subscription to the Portland O bserver a t Subscriptions 5.25 per year Tri-County area, 6.00 per year outside Tri-County area. Telephone 283 2486 The Observer's official posi tion is expressed only it its Publisher's Columns (We See the World Through Black Eyes, The Observation Post, Editor’s Desk). Any other material throughout the pa per is the opinion of the individual w riter or submit ter and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Observer. Portland Observer 97208 $5.25 ( ) annually Addraaa — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — —— — — V w «