Image provided by: Clackamas Community College; Oregon City, OR
About The print. (Oregon City, Oregon) 1977-1989 | View Entire Issue (April 25, 1979)
opinion ÿ- $ Endorsements •>î V other viewpoints Editor’s note: This editorial ran in the Oregon Daily Emerald, the student newspaper at the University of Oregon. It was written as a position paper from the University of Oregon Veterans and compiled by Russ Linebarger. average test scores of recruits hiave^ risen (testimony to the fact that the quality of the recruits has improved under the A VF system), educational levels are higher nod retention of enlisted personnel and disciplinary incidents have decreased since the early 70’s. In recorded testimony before the House Armed Services Committee last year, all ol the heads of the Armed Services had to con cede the AVF was working well. Secretary Brown agreed as early as January of this year. veterans. It claims there is no significant emotional affect stemming from the Vietnam War; it continues to ignore the fact that many of us áre chemicál' time-bombs waiting to go off. And how that many of ús are standing up to speak out against another atrocity in the making; we are branded by the VFW, the American Legion (groups supposedly ad vocating for veterans), and the military, as an ti-American or unpatriotic. We are neither. We are veterans who have'seen the waste, corruption and death that our over-zealous military has created and operates within. We search for a way that our young and future generations may live without having to face such degradation. 150,000 are used to build railroads and works on far ms; ¿430,000 for internal security; 500, 000 are permanently stationed^;along the: Sino-Sbvwat border; another -55,000 troops are stationed in Czechoslovakia and would have questioned the quality of these troops. It should also be pointed out that the Soviets have outnumbered us much of the time since] the end of World War II. For the second consecutive year, the Print is making editorial endorsements of can* didates for key Associated Student Gover* •ÍÍ nment positions. University Veterans is an organization of We are doing this because in a student % Vietnam-era and post-Vietnam era veterans. election there is little opportunity for voters $ In recent months this organization hasz led the to really get to know the candidates and $ fight against the draft and draft registration. 3 We have been questioned, chastised and at platforms and goals. tacked for this stand. This statement, Campaigning is done over a short period therefore, is to clarify for the record our intent of time and most students learn little about But, the U .S. needs arms sales to control its and motivation concerning this life>-and-death the candidates except information they gain investments in and access to strategic raw issue. , from posters? materials. Currently the U.S. imports 75 to University Veterans is headed by veterans- 100 percent of these materials. Although this The candidates were interviewed by who have direct war experience through the strategy seems quite apparent, the military members of the editorial board and asked Vietnam War., As survivors of that war, wé still uses fear to persuade civilians that we are identical questions. Based on the results of came home to the alienation of friends, vulnerable to Russian attack . . .out-man these interviews the edit board decided on families and a society caught up in its own ned and out-gunned. But, Pentagon figures candidates to support for each office. We guilt about the war. We were greeted, not by are often (distorted and often downright lies. 1 felt that candidates for business manager brass bands, but by a swollen and inflated For example, the Pentagon would have the economy where unemployment or underem were so closely qualified, that we endorse public believe that the Russians have such a ployment was the norm. Our G.I. Bill was so either candidate. eaten up by inflation that many have been large military that this nation is under im We hope that this makes voting easier minent peril of being attacked. In 1975 the unable to sustain themselves while trying to and helps create an informed voting student gain back the education that was lost .to. time Soviets had 4.8 million troops in their military- as opposed, to our 2.1 million. Yet many of body rather than one that votes on looks or .while fighting a dirty and unpopular war. the Russian troops are used for jobs that our plays eenie-meenie- minie-moe at the ballot The Veterans’ Administration continues to civilians perform here at home, for example:; booths. cut back programs that are a direct benefit to 250,000 troops are used for ¿(instruction; 8 President On the basis of campaign platforms and personal interviews, we believe Cindy Ben nett to be the best qualified candidate for Associated Student Government president. Bennett's enthusiasm and deter mination to get the job done are a serious factor in any election of this caliber. True leadership must be for the benefit of the followers, not the enrichment of the For these reasons, we oppose the current leaders. Bennett’s campaign exemplifies efforts at reinstituting the draft. We know and this leadership behavior both for the benefit see the draft for what it is: a vehicle to carry of her cabinet and the student body. this country to war. She plans to include delegation in her Our top leaders have said so, and still the every day tasks of being president. We feel public remains deaf to these messages. Energy Secretary James Schlesinger > has that to delegate responsibilities and said that the Persian Gulf is the key to the free problems to her staff would benefit the world as we know it. Defense Secretary students in the long run because more Harold Brown has said we would use issues of concern could be covered. There “military force” to protect U.S. oil interests. would also be more creative ideas And Deputy Assistant Secretary William generated because of the increased student $ Crawford has stated that the U.S. would be willing to go to “war” to protect Saudi oil. involvement. Bennett seems to be well informed on When put into context, these statements lend credence to the Pentagon’s new ter student and current issues. She has covered minology of protecting our “national in her bases well and deals well with problems terests.” The military has forgone even trying she faces. to whitewash our intended aggressive action Lao-Tzu, an ancient Chinese philosopher, in the Persian Gulf by labeling it “national once said, “As for the best leaders, the defense.” In the words of the DoD’s own people do not notice their existence. The study, “we depend increasingly on external sources of raw material, with oil the most next best, the people honor and praise. The disturbing example of our dependence. For next, the people fear; and the next the that reason alone, our-interests in the Middle people hate . . . When the best leader's East and the Persian Gulf are bound to be $• work is done the people say, “We did it our substantial.” Even though our leaders and military have ÍÍ selves'.” stated our involvement in the Persian Gulf is We believe, if Cindy Bennett is elected mandatory, the Pentagon still tries to claim its ASG president, the College will benefit All-Volunteer Army is a failure, and that the from a feeling of group accomplishment. I •A Page 2 ‘ £ ÍÍ need for the draft.therefore is crucial. But the .DoD’s own study, entitled “A Report on the All-Volunteer Armed Forces” states. that On the European front, one which the military claims would be overrun in a matter of days, DoD numbers fail to include the 50,000 French troops stationed ¿ in West Germany of the 330,000 troops France has in its military. Our military also does not tell us that NATO outnumbers the Warsaw Pact by 200 million people, has nearly three times the] Gross National Product (GNP) of Russia and a 70 percent higher GNP per capita than the Russians. As University Veterans, we are tired of the facts being distorted to meet the military’s end. As University Veterans, we strongly op pose this kind of national policy . . . a policy built on aggression, selfishness and waste. As veterans, we are painfully aware of the DoD’s intent to use “experienced” veterans to fill initial battle loses of “green” troops, or to train new troops. With a cadre of combat- trained veterans, the DoD intends to boost morale and troop strength, in the event of a sustained conflict, and it has made its attem pt known in provisions set in HR-23. University Veterans contend that what this, country needs is not a foreign policy based on protection of our “national interests,” but rather a national policy based on moral for titude, and a realistic view of Russian “superiority.” As a consumer of 30 percent of the world’s oil, while having only 6 percent of the world population, the U.S. needs to control its energy consumption and rely less on its protection of multinational corporate profits. If this current “national interest” is allowed to continue, then it wil be our sons and daughters paying with their blood so our vehicles can continue* to toll down American highways. , ,j Wednesday, April 25, 1