Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Oregon daily emerald. (Eugene, Or.) 1920-2012 | View Entire Issue (Oct. 1, 1963)
Discipline Code Lists Violations, Sanctions I THE CODE A PREAMBLE 1 The University is dedicated not only to learning and the advancement of knowledge but also to the development of ethically sensitive ami responsible persons. It is believed that these goals can best be achieved through a sound educational program and policies of student conduct that encourage indepen dence and maturity. 2 The University distinguishes its responsibility for student conduct from the control functions of the wider community. When a student has been apprehended for the violation of a law of the community, the state, or the Nation, the University will not request or agree to special consideration for the student because of his status as a student. The University will cooperate fully, however, with the courts in any program for the rehabilitation of the student. Ordinarily, the Univer sity will not impose further sanctions after law enforce ment agencies or the courts have disposed of a case. 3 The University may apply sanctions or take other appropriate action when student conduct directly and significantly interferes with the University’s (a) pri mary educational responsibility of ensuring the oppor tunity of all members of the University community to attain their educational objectives, and (b) subsidiary responsibilities of protecting the health and safety of students, maintaining and protecting property, keep ing records, providing living accommodations and other services, and sponsoring a wide range of non-class room activities such as lectures, concerts, athletic events, and social functions. 4 Procedural fairness is basic to the proper enforce ment of all University rules In particular, no disciplin ary sanction as serious as expulsion, suspension, dis ciplinary probation or entry of an adverse notation on any permanent record available to persons outside the University shall be imposed unless the student has been notified in writing of the charges against him and has had an opportunity (a) to appear with counsel, if he so desires, before an appropriate committee, court, or of ficial; (b) to know the evidence against him and to present evidence in his own behalf, and (c) to appeal the initial decision to a higher authority. 5 Students shall have an opportunity to participate fully in the formulation of all policies and rules per taining to student conduct and in the enforcement of all such rules. (5 Rules and sanctions affecting the conduct of men and women shall be based on general principles of equity, including like penalties for like violations. B. VIOLATIONS 1 No sanction or other disciplinary action shall be Imposed on a student by or in the name of the Univer sity except in accordance with this Code. 2 Expulsion or suspension from the University or any other lesser sanction may result from the com mission of any of the following offenses: a) Academic cheating and plagiarism b> Furnishing false* information to the University with intent to deceive c) Forgery, alteration, or misuse of University docu ments, records, or identification cards (I) Physical abuse of another person in the Univer sity community e) Malicious destruction, damage, misuse of Univer sity property, including library materials, or of private property on the campus f) Theft g) Vandalism or kidnapping committed pn other campuses h) Participating in hazing i) Lewd or indecent conduct j) Two or more (or the repetition of) offenses listed in paragraph 3 below. 3 Probation or any lesser sanction may result from the commission of any of the following offenses: a) Possession or consumption or furnishing of alco holic beverages on University owned or con trolled property, in University related housing for single students, or at University sponsored or supervised functions b) Disorderly conduct c) Raiding of living units d) Violation of closing hour restrictions e) Violation of visiting hour rules f) Violation of any University rule approved by the Faculty-Student Conduct Committee for the in fraction of which sanctions may be imposed un der this Code. 4. All rules which are approved by the Faculty-Stu dent Conduct Committee pursuant to paragraph 3(f) shall be in writing and published and distributed or posted in such a manner as to furnish adequate notice of their contents to students affected by such rules. Failure to comply with this requirement shall be a complete defense by any student to any charge of vio lation of a rule of which he has no actual knowledge. C. SANCTIONS 1. Sanctions which may be imposed for the commis sion of University offenses shall include the following: a) Permanent expulsion from the University b) Suspension from the University for a definite or indefinite period of time c) Probation with or without loss of designated pri vileges for a definite period of time. The infrac tion of any University rule or violation of pro bation terms during the period of probation may be grounds for suspension or expulsion from the University The parents of any student under 21 years of age placed on probation shall be so notified. d) Loss of privileges: 1— "Campusing” (restriction) to living quarters or library for purposes of study for a desig nated time 2— Denial of use of an automobile for a desig nated time 3— Removal from dormitory or other University housing 4— Loss of such other privileges as may be con sistent with the offense committed and the rehabilitation of the student e) Admonition and Warning f) Such other sanctions as may be approved by the Faculty-Student Conduct Committee 2. The sanctions of expulsion or suspension shall not he imposed except upon proper determination by the Student Court or the Faculty-Student Conduct Com mittee, 3. The Preamble, Violations, and Sanctions shall be printed and made readily available to all students. The campus newspaper shall be requested by the Faculty Student Conduct Committee to publish the same at the beginning of each school year. D. THE FACULTY STUDENT CONDUCT COMMITTEE 1. The Faculty-Student Conduct Committee, by fac ulty legislation and by delegation of the President of the University, is designated as the agency within the University which has primary responsibility for the student conduct program. The Committee shall be re sponsible to the faculty and the President of the Uni versity for recommending policies relating to student conduct, for formulating or approving rules and en forcement procedures within the framework of exist ing policies, for disposing of such individual cases as may properly come before it, and for recommending to the President of the University changes in the ad ministration of any aspect of the student-conduct pro gram. 2. All regulations or rules relating to student con duct that are established by any University official, committee or student group and for which sanctions may be imposed in the name of the University must be submitted to the Committee for approval. Such written regulations or rules shall be effective fifteen days after filing with the Secretary of the Committee unless dis approved, within this period, by the Committee. Frater nity, sorority or Co-op “housekeeping” rules adopted by members for the internal management of the living unit are not considered University rules for the pur pose of this Code. 3. The Committee shall consist of four faculty mem bers and three student members, each appointed by the President of the University. Each student member shall serve for a period of one year with one member retiring at the end of each academic term (Fall, Winter, Spring). Members of the Committee may be reappoint ed. The President may appoint temporary members of the Committee to serve during a summer session or such other times as is necessary to assure full member ship of the Committee. 4. The President of the University shall designate an Associate Dean of Students who shall serve as Secre tary of the Committee and assist the Committee in the discharge of its responsibilities. He shall coordinate the activities of all officials, committees, student groups, and judicial tribunals responsible for student conduct. 5. The Committee may delegate jurisdiction to han dle infractions of University rules to the Student Court and such other judicial tribunals as may be established. With the consent of the President of the University, the Committee may also delegate such jurisdiction to ap propriate University officials. In all instances such jur isdiction shall be defined by the Committee, ordinarily in terms of specified offenses, maximum sanctions, or designated living units. The Committee may at its (Continued on page 4) I/O Fraternities Pledge 250 This Term Men pledged by fraternities at the end of formal rush last week are as follows: Alpha Tau Omega Robert Edwards, Patrick Hod ges, Thomas Marley, Robert Scan lon, Stephen Youngbluth. Port land: Robert Craven, Eugene: Richard Ross, McMinnville; Rob ert Withers, Jr., Milwaukee; James Fambrough, Yuma, Ariz. Beta Theta PI Ralph Amato. Robert Armour, Richard Brace, Bruce Byerly, Bri an Crockwell, Richard Eberhart, Mark Groening, James Hibbard, Craig Iverson, Kinney Lynch, David McClung, James McKclli gon, Thomas Ogan, David Peccie, Robb Siegenthaler, Edward Was ser, James Wernsing, all Portland; William Thomas, Eugene; John Allen, Woodsidc, Calif.; Spender Brush, and George Church, Jr., Piedmont, Calif.; Charles David son, Jr., Seattle, Wash.; Dennis Howard, Piedmont, Calif.; Mark Odell, Seattle, Wash.; Richard Potter, San Diego, Calif. Chi Phi Earl Blackaby, Ontario; Charles Calhoun, Ashland; Lance Hall, Astoria; Jay Malmquist, Milwau kie; Kerry Tyler, Sweet Home. Chi Psi Joseph Balias, Jr., William Sav age, Robert Smith, all Portland; Windsor Calkins, Eugene; Joseph Barnrs, Medford; Gregory Clem mons, Hood River; Gordon Lar son, Banks; Steve Londahl, Mil waukee; John Merriss, The Dalles; George Richardson, Baker; Rie key Richey, Medford; Harry Rine hart, Manzanita; Daniel Fceley Palo Alto. Calif.; George Harring ton, Pacific Palisades, Calif.; John Holland, N. Hollywood, Calif.; Gregory Stubbs, Tehran, Iran Milton Waters, San Anselmo Calif. Delta Chi Charles Matthies, and Richard Wyrick, Portland; Walter Her ring, Eugene; Rodney Fouts, Sea side; Roland Johnson. Enterprise; Oliver Pardo, Lake Oswego: Eu gene Schaffer, Jr., Grants Pass; Roger Kohler, Palo Alto, Calif. Delta Tau Delta None. Delta Upsilon Jim Papas, Portland; Bobby Hendricks. Nyssa; Philip Duke, Oakland Calif.; Richard Ellers, Menlo Park, Calif.; William Has lacher, and Paul Huston, Jr., Palo Alto, Calif.; Michael Norman, Mis soula. Montana; Richard Reeder, Palo Alto, Calif.; Jonathan Rees, Mt. Shasta, Calif; Gary Ronning. Oakland, Calif.; Rex Sorenson, Whittier, Calif. Kappa Sigma John Richter, and Wayne Sal vo, Portland; Robert Carlson, Cor vallis; William Carver, Baker; Arthur English, Sherwood; Larry Gelbrich, Bend; Larry Niemi, Klamath Falls; Herbert Pollard, Lakeview; John Cochran, Arca dia, Calif.: Charles Corbitt, Ber keley, Calif.; Robert Hale, Onta rio, Calif: David Kincaid, Oak land, Calif; Harry Whitaker, San ta Barbara, Calif. Lambda Chi Alpha Dave Prescott, Eugene; Carl Koch, North Bend; Richard Youde, Grants Pass; Philip Christ, New York City, Basil Rooney, Ona, Florida. Phi Delta Theta Walter Novak, Portland; Rod ney Taylor and Michael Woodin, Eugene; Douglas Giles, Bandon; Lloyd Hammons, Medford; War ren Brown, El Cerrito, Calif.; Ar lis Loe, Walnut Creek, Calif.; Lowell Peters, Lafayette, Calif.; Ken Shortridge, Jr., Concord, Calif.; James Stauffer, Newport Beach, Calif. Phi Gamma Delta Doug Devers, Robert Lovejoy, John MacDougall, Daniel Pollack, Marshall Weiss, all Portland; George Clark, Hugh Hassell, Ches ter Welchman, all Beaverton; Fred Krug, San Francisco. Calif.; Michael Liebhold, Los Angeles, Calif.; James Moore, Culver City, Calif.; Randv Schrader, Auburn, Calif. Phi Kappa Psi John Chirgwin, Gregg Enfield. Richard Fulmer, James Hauck, Kurt Larson, David Noall, Port land; Ward Beck, Jr.. Joseph Palanuk, Randall Thwing, Eu gene; Frederick Ehlers, Klamath Falls: Randell Guyer, Jr., Baker; Stanley Peterson, Jr., Milwaukie; Philip Bilanko, Jr., Tacoma, Wash.; Stephen Cole, Altadena, Calif.; Richard Hammond, Lafay ette, Calif.; Hartley Hansen, Sac ramento, Calif.; Thomas Jacobus, Berkeley, Calif.; Robert Reid, Sacramento, Calif.; Thomas Wicks, Tacoma, Wash. Phi Kappa Sigma Howard Dixon, Glendale. Phi Sigma Kappa William Blake, Stephen Mc Laughlin, both Portland: David Ragland, Klamath Falls; Marshall Chang, Honolulu, Hawaii. Pi Kappa Alpha Mitchell Cloninger, James Eyres, both Eugene; Barry Mauld ing, McMinnville; John Folawn, Daly City, Calif.; Rodney Shipley, Reno, Nevada. Pi Kappa Phi Ronald Nugent, Portland; Stacy Goff, The Dalles. Sigma Alpha Epsilon William DeBellis, Charles Ernst, Bruce Forcum, Richard Holcumb, all Portland; Jeffrey Johnsen, Guy Lutz, King Martin, Wayne Smith, Robert Spicker, Thomas Westfall, all Eugene; Gordon Empey, Woodburn; Roy Feiring, Salem; Michael Haydon, Milwaukie; Charles Niemi, Sea side; James Wood, Corvallis; Rob ert Blackburn, San Marino, Calif.; Robert Brooks and Byron Brown, Sacramento, Calif.; Robert Bur nett, Atherton, Calif.; Thomas Chapman, Bellevue, Wash.; Fred erick Eppinger, Belvedere, Calif.; Thomas Hofmann and James Johnson, Berkeley, Calif.; Kevin O’Donnell, Los Angeles, Calif.; Bruce Orness, Puyallup, Wash.; David Puder, Bakersfield, Calif.; Howard Worcester, Bellevue, Wash. Sigma Chi Roy Benward, Hayes Johnson, Steven Weber, Bill Wolff, all Portland; Steven Crittenden, Lake Oswego; William Dyer, Salem; Joseph McKeown. Coos Bay; Dan iel Glenn, Pendleton; Richard Sanders, Salem; Larry Moore, As toria; Steven Aced, Menlo Park, Calif.; Thomas Bailey. Palo Alto, Calif.; Robert DeBussey, Alta dena, Calif.; Mike Dye. Arcadia, Calif.; Robert Hack, and Robert Matheny, Piedmont. Calif. Sigma Nu Michael Keenan, Portland; Chris Prescott, Eugene; Richard Barger, Milton-Freewater; Benja min Blount, The Dalles; William Cunningham, Astoria; Donald Jo hannesen, North Bend; Ronald Jones. Sheridan; David Agnew, San Mateo, Calif.; Charles Cheat ham, Menlo Park, Calif.; Phillip Cook, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Charles Funk, Puyallup, Wash.; James Laursen, Gilroy, Calif.; Stanley Murphy, San Francisco, Calif.; John Sheridan, Longview. Wash.; Douglas Tinker, Lafayette, Calif. Sigma Phi Epsilon Scott Barde, Steven Young, both of Portland; Stewart Mey ers, Eugene; Robert Blucher, Red mond; Richard Bonniksen, Ore gon Ctiy; Stephen Buel, Tilla mook; Terrell Clarke and Don Dickey, Coquille; Peter Davis, Wilsonville; Gary Harris, Madras; Arthur Rrauss, Lake Oswego; William Larsson, Gold Beach; Roy Marvin, Klamath Falls: Dar rell Maxwell, Madras; Darth Mil ler, Roseburg; Mark Miller, Bend: Michael Miller, Medford: David Shelton, Bend; Kent Studebaker, Lake Oswego: James Yoder. Med ford; Thomas Huston, Menlo Park, Calif.; Samuel McClure, Los Angeles, Calif.: Ralph Schaf er, Aberdeen, Wash.; Christopher Wheeler, Porterville, Calif. Tail Kappa Epsilon Michael Sweeney, Portland: Al anson Crafts, Robert Leedy, Ste phen Summers, all Eugene; Rich ard Coppin, Puyallup, Wash.; Alan Johnson, Houston, Texas; Warren Miller, Las Vegas, Nev.; Larry Simpson. Kalispell, Mont.; Robert Stoddard, Northridge, Calif. Theta Chi Kenneth Fraundorf and Steph en Grace, both of Portland; Wil liam Luvaas, Eugene; Ernest Coltman, Lake Oswego; Tom Jernstedt, Carlton; William, John son. Milwaukie; Frank Lord, Lake Oswego; John Meyer, Astoria; Caruel Nelson and Mike Nelson, Beaverton; Roger Neu, Hillsboro; Roy Shaw, Medford; Ranee Sopko, Seaside; John Taylor, Hood River; John Turchi, Lake Oswego; and Ed Wells, Hood River. Advertisement As I was brilliantly hunkering on top of a coffee and ashtray clut tered SU table the other evening, I spied two freshmen co-eds each skipping along with a D.Q. clutched in her hand. As they stopped and gaped at me I grabbed their D.Q.’s and ran. No one should have to go to so much trouble just to get a D.Q. If you have just one thin dime (a thiek one will do) stop in at the D.Q. for some delicious ice cream. If you'd like, they’U let you hunker in the street in front of their store.
