Discipline Code Lists Violations, Sanctions
I THE CODE
A PREAMBLE
1 The University is dedicated not only to learning
and the advancement of knowledge but also to the
development of ethically sensitive ami responsible
persons. It is believed that these goals can best be
achieved through a sound educational program and
policies of student conduct that encourage indepen
dence and maturity.
2 The University distinguishes its responsibility for
student conduct from the control functions of the wider
community. When a student has been apprehended for
the violation of a law of the community, the state, or
the Nation, the University will not request or agree to
special consideration for the student because of his
status as a student. The University will cooperate
fully, however, with the courts in any program for the
rehabilitation of the student. Ordinarily, the Univer
sity will not impose further sanctions after law enforce
ment agencies or the courts have disposed of a case.
3 The University may apply sanctions or take other
appropriate action when student conduct directly and
significantly interferes with the University’s (a) pri
mary educational responsibility of ensuring the oppor
tunity of all members of the University community to
attain their educational objectives, and (b) subsidiary
responsibilities of protecting the health and safety of
students, maintaining and protecting property, keep
ing records, providing living accommodations and other
services, and sponsoring a wide range of non-class
room activities such as lectures, concerts, athletic
events, and social functions.
4 Procedural fairness is basic to the proper enforce
ment of all University rules In particular, no disciplin
ary sanction as serious as expulsion, suspension, dis
ciplinary probation or entry of an adverse notation on
any permanent record available to persons outside the
University shall be imposed unless the student has been
notified in writing of the charges against him and has
had an opportunity (a) to appear with counsel, if he so
desires, before an appropriate committee, court, or of
ficial; (b) to know the evidence against him and to
present evidence in his own behalf, and (c) to appeal
the initial decision to a higher authority.
5 Students shall have an opportunity to participate
fully in the formulation of all policies and rules per
taining to student conduct and in the enforcement of
all such rules.
(5 Rules and sanctions affecting the conduct of men
and women shall be based on general principles of
equity, including like penalties for like violations.
B. VIOLATIONS
1 No sanction or other disciplinary action shall be
Imposed on a student by or in the name of the Univer
sity except in accordance with this Code.
2 Expulsion or suspension from the University or
any other lesser sanction may result from the com
mission of any of the following offenses:
a) Academic cheating and plagiarism
b> Furnishing false* information to the University
with intent to deceive
c) Forgery, alteration, or misuse of University docu
ments, records, or identification cards
(I) Physical abuse of another person in the Univer
sity community
e) Malicious destruction, damage, misuse of Univer
sity property, including library materials, or of
private property on the campus
f) Theft
g) Vandalism or kidnapping committed pn other
campuses
h) Participating in hazing
i) Lewd or indecent conduct
j) Two or more (or the repetition of) offenses listed
in paragraph 3 below.
3 Probation or any lesser sanction may result from
the commission of any of the following offenses:
a) Possession or consumption or furnishing of alco
holic beverages on University owned or con
trolled property, in University related housing
for single students, or at University sponsored
or supervised functions
b) Disorderly conduct
c) Raiding of living units
d) Violation of closing hour restrictions
e) Violation of visiting hour rules
f) Violation of any University rule approved by the
Faculty-Student Conduct Committee for the in
fraction of which sanctions may be imposed un
der this Code.
4. All rules which are approved by the Faculty-Stu
dent Conduct Committee pursuant to paragraph 3(f)
shall be in writing and published and distributed or
posted in such a manner as to furnish adequate notice
of their contents to students affected by such rules.
Failure to comply with this requirement shall be a
complete defense by any student to any charge of vio
lation of a rule of which he has no actual knowledge.
C. SANCTIONS
1. Sanctions which may be imposed for the commis
sion of University offenses shall include the following:
a) Permanent expulsion from the University
b) Suspension from the University for a definite or
indefinite period of time
c) Probation with or without loss of designated pri
vileges for a definite period of time. The infrac
tion of any University rule or violation of pro
bation terms during the period of probation may
be grounds for suspension or expulsion from the
University The parents of any student under 21
years of age placed on probation shall be so
notified.
d) Loss of privileges:
1— "Campusing” (restriction) to living quarters
or library for purposes of study for a desig
nated time
2— Denial of use of an automobile for a desig
nated time
3— Removal from dormitory or other University
housing
4— Loss of such other privileges as may be con
sistent with the offense committed and the
rehabilitation of the student
e) Admonition and Warning
f) Such other sanctions as may be approved by the
Faculty-Student Conduct Committee
2. The sanctions of expulsion or suspension shall not
he imposed except upon proper determination by the
Student Court or the Faculty-Student Conduct Com
mittee,
3. The Preamble, Violations, and Sanctions shall be
printed and made readily available to all students. The
campus newspaper shall be requested by the Faculty
Student Conduct Committee to publish the same at the
beginning of each school year.
D. THE FACULTY STUDENT CONDUCT
COMMITTEE
1. The Faculty-Student Conduct Committee, by fac
ulty legislation and by delegation of the President of
the University, is designated as the agency within the
University which has primary responsibility for the
student conduct program. The Committee shall be re
sponsible to the faculty and the President of the Uni
versity for recommending policies relating to student
conduct, for formulating or approving rules and en
forcement procedures within the framework of exist
ing policies, for disposing of such individual cases as
may properly come before it, and for recommending
to the President of the University changes in the ad
ministration of any aspect of the student-conduct pro
gram.
2. All regulations or rules relating to student con
duct that are established by any University official,
committee or student group and for which sanctions
may be imposed in the name of the University must be
submitted to the Committee for approval. Such written
regulations or rules shall be effective fifteen days after
filing with the Secretary of the Committee unless dis
approved, within this period, by the Committee. Frater
nity, sorority or Co-op “housekeeping” rules adopted
by members for the internal management of the living
unit are not considered University rules for the pur
pose of this Code.
3. The Committee shall consist of four faculty mem
bers and three student members, each appointed by the
President of the University. Each student member shall
serve for a period of one year with one member retiring
at the end of each academic term (Fall, Winter,
Spring). Members of the Committee may be reappoint
ed. The President may appoint temporary members
of the Committee to serve during a summer session or
such other times as is necessary to assure full member
ship of the Committee.
4. The President of the University shall designate an
Associate Dean of Students who shall serve as Secre
tary of the Committee and assist the Committee in the
discharge of its responsibilities. He shall coordinate
the activities of all officials, committees, student groups,
and judicial tribunals responsible for student conduct.
5. The Committee may delegate jurisdiction to han
dle infractions of University rules to the Student Court
and such other judicial tribunals as may be established.
With the consent of the President of the University, the
Committee may also delegate such jurisdiction to ap
propriate University officials. In all instances such jur
isdiction shall be defined by the Committee, ordinarily
in terms of specified offenses, maximum sanctions, or
designated living units. The Committee may at its
(Continued on page 4)
I/O Fraternities Pledge 250 This Term
Men pledged by fraternities at
the end of formal rush last week
are as follows:
Alpha Tau Omega
Robert Edwards, Patrick Hod
ges, Thomas Marley, Robert Scan
lon, Stephen Youngbluth. Port
land: Robert Craven, Eugene:
Richard Ross, McMinnville; Rob
ert Withers, Jr., Milwaukee; James
Fambrough, Yuma, Ariz.
Beta Theta PI
Ralph Amato. Robert Armour,
Richard Brace, Bruce Byerly, Bri
an Crockwell, Richard Eberhart,
Mark Groening, James Hibbard,
Craig Iverson, Kinney Lynch,
David McClung, James McKclli
gon, Thomas Ogan, David Peccie,
Robb Siegenthaler, Edward Was
ser, James Wernsing, all Portland;
William Thomas, Eugene; John
Allen, Woodsidc, Calif.; Spender
Brush, and George Church, Jr.,
Piedmont, Calif.; Charles David
son, Jr., Seattle, Wash.; Dennis
Howard, Piedmont, Calif.; Mark
Odell, Seattle, Wash.; Richard
Potter, San Diego, Calif.
Chi Phi
Earl Blackaby, Ontario; Charles
Calhoun, Ashland; Lance Hall,
Astoria; Jay Malmquist, Milwau
kie; Kerry Tyler, Sweet Home.
Chi Psi
Joseph Balias, Jr., William Sav
age, Robert Smith, all Portland;
Windsor Calkins, Eugene; Joseph
Barnrs, Medford; Gregory Clem
mons, Hood River; Gordon Lar
son, Banks; Steve Londahl, Mil
waukee; John Merriss, The Dalles;
George Richardson, Baker; Rie
key Richey, Medford; Harry Rine
hart, Manzanita; Daniel Fceley
Palo Alto. Calif.; George Harring
ton, Pacific Palisades, Calif.; John
Holland, N. Hollywood, Calif.;
Gregory Stubbs, Tehran, Iran
Milton Waters, San Anselmo
Calif.
Delta Chi
Charles Matthies, and Richard
Wyrick, Portland; Walter Her
ring, Eugene; Rodney Fouts, Sea
side; Roland Johnson. Enterprise;
Oliver Pardo, Lake Oswego: Eu
gene Schaffer, Jr., Grants Pass;
Roger Kohler, Palo Alto, Calif.
Delta Tau Delta
None.
Delta Upsilon
Jim Papas, Portland; Bobby
Hendricks. Nyssa; Philip Duke,
Oakland Calif.; Richard Ellers,
Menlo Park, Calif.; William Has
lacher, and Paul Huston, Jr., Palo
Alto, Calif.; Michael Norman, Mis
soula. Montana; Richard Reeder,
Palo Alto, Calif.; Jonathan Rees,
Mt. Shasta, Calif; Gary Ronning.
Oakland, Calif.; Rex Sorenson,
Whittier, Calif.
Kappa Sigma
John Richter, and Wayne Sal
vo, Portland; Robert Carlson, Cor
vallis; William Carver, Baker;
Arthur English, Sherwood; Larry
Gelbrich, Bend; Larry Niemi,
Klamath Falls; Herbert Pollard,
Lakeview; John Cochran, Arca
dia, Calif.: Charles Corbitt, Ber
keley, Calif.; Robert Hale, Onta
rio, Calif: David Kincaid, Oak
land, Calif; Harry Whitaker, San
ta Barbara, Calif.
Lambda Chi Alpha
Dave Prescott, Eugene; Carl
Koch, North Bend; Richard
Youde, Grants Pass; Philip Christ,
New York City, Basil Rooney,
Ona, Florida.
Phi Delta Theta
Walter Novak, Portland; Rod
ney Taylor and Michael Woodin,
Eugene; Douglas Giles, Bandon;
Lloyd Hammons, Medford; War
ren Brown, El Cerrito, Calif.; Ar
lis Loe, Walnut Creek, Calif.;
Lowell Peters, Lafayette, Calif.;
Ken Shortridge, Jr., Concord,
Calif.; James Stauffer, Newport
Beach, Calif.
Phi Gamma Delta
Doug Devers, Robert Lovejoy,
John MacDougall, Daniel Pollack,
Marshall Weiss, all Portland;
George Clark, Hugh Hassell, Ches
ter Welchman, all Beaverton;
Fred Krug, San Francisco. Calif.;
Michael Liebhold, Los Angeles,
Calif.; James Moore, Culver City,
Calif.; Randv Schrader, Auburn,
Calif.
Phi Kappa Psi
John Chirgwin, Gregg Enfield.
Richard Fulmer, James Hauck,
Kurt Larson, David Noall, Port
land; Ward Beck, Jr.. Joseph
Palanuk, Randall Thwing, Eu
gene; Frederick Ehlers, Klamath
Falls: Randell Guyer, Jr., Baker;
Stanley Peterson, Jr., Milwaukie;
Philip Bilanko, Jr., Tacoma,
Wash.; Stephen Cole, Altadena,
Calif.; Richard Hammond, Lafay
ette, Calif.; Hartley Hansen, Sac
ramento, Calif.; Thomas Jacobus,
Berkeley, Calif.; Robert Reid,
Sacramento, Calif.; Thomas
Wicks, Tacoma, Wash.
Phi Kappa Sigma
Howard Dixon, Glendale.
Phi Sigma Kappa
William Blake, Stephen Mc
Laughlin, both Portland: David
Ragland, Klamath Falls; Marshall
Chang, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Pi Kappa Alpha
Mitchell Cloninger, James
Eyres, both Eugene; Barry Mauld
ing, McMinnville; John Folawn,
Daly City, Calif.; Rodney Shipley,
Reno, Nevada.
Pi Kappa Phi
Ronald Nugent, Portland; Stacy
Goff, The Dalles.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon
William DeBellis, Charles
Ernst, Bruce Forcum, Richard
Holcumb, all Portland; Jeffrey
Johnsen, Guy Lutz, King Martin,
Wayne Smith, Robert Spicker,
Thomas Westfall, all Eugene;
Gordon Empey, Woodburn; Roy
Feiring, Salem; Michael Haydon,
Milwaukie; Charles Niemi, Sea
side; James Wood, Corvallis; Rob
ert Blackburn, San Marino, Calif.;
Robert Brooks and Byron Brown,
Sacramento, Calif.; Robert Bur
nett, Atherton, Calif.; Thomas
Chapman, Bellevue, Wash.; Fred
erick Eppinger, Belvedere, Calif.;
Thomas Hofmann and James
Johnson, Berkeley, Calif.; Kevin
O’Donnell, Los Angeles, Calif.;
Bruce Orness, Puyallup, Wash.;
David Puder, Bakersfield, Calif.;
Howard Worcester, Bellevue,
Wash.
Sigma Chi
Roy Benward, Hayes Johnson,
Steven Weber, Bill Wolff, all
Portland; Steven Crittenden, Lake
Oswego; William Dyer, Salem;
Joseph McKeown. Coos Bay; Dan
iel Glenn, Pendleton; Richard
Sanders, Salem; Larry Moore, As
toria; Steven Aced, Menlo Park,
Calif.; Thomas Bailey. Palo Alto,
Calif.; Robert DeBussey, Alta
dena, Calif.; Mike Dye. Arcadia,
Calif.; Robert Hack, and Robert
Matheny, Piedmont. Calif.
Sigma Nu
Michael Keenan, Portland;
Chris Prescott, Eugene; Richard
Barger, Milton-Freewater; Benja
min Blount, The Dalles; William
Cunningham, Astoria; Donald Jo
hannesen, North Bend; Ronald
Jones. Sheridan; David Agnew,
San Mateo, Calif.; Charles Cheat
ham, Menlo Park, Calif.; Phillip
Cook, Cheyenne, Wyoming;
Charles Funk, Puyallup, Wash.;
James Laursen, Gilroy, Calif.;
Stanley Murphy, San Francisco,
Calif.; John Sheridan, Longview.
Wash.; Douglas Tinker, Lafayette,
Calif.
Sigma Phi Epsilon
Scott Barde, Steven Young,
both of Portland; Stewart Mey
ers, Eugene; Robert Blucher, Red
mond; Richard Bonniksen, Ore
gon Ctiy; Stephen Buel, Tilla
mook; Terrell Clarke and Don
Dickey, Coquille; Peter Davis,
Wilsonville; Gary Harris, Madras;
Arthur Rrauss, Lake Oswego;
William Larsson, Gold Beach;
Roy Marvin, Klamath Falls: Dar
rell Maxwell, Madras; Darth Mil
ler, Roseburg; Mark Miller, Bend:
Michael Miller, Medford: David
Shelton, Bend; Kent Studebaker,
Lake Oswego: James Yoder. Med
ford; Thomas Huston, Menlo
Park, Calif.; Samuel McClure,
Los Angeles, Calif.: Ralph Schaf
er, Aberdeen, Wash.; Christopher
Wheeler, Porterville, Calif.
Tail Kappa Epsilon
Michael Sweeney, Portland: Al
anson Crafts, Robert Leedy, Ste
phen Summers, all Eugene; Rich
ard Coppin, Puyallup, Wash.;
Alan Johnson, Houston, Texas;
Warren Miller, Las Vegas, Nev.;
Larry Simpson. Kalispell, Mont.;
Robert Stoddard, Northridge,
Calif.
Theta Chi
Kenneth Fraundorf and Steph
en Grace, both of Portland; Wil
liam Luvaas, Eugene; Ernest
Coltman, Lake Oswego; Tom
Jernstedt, Carlton; William, John
son. Milwaukie; Frank Lord, Lake
Oswego; John Meyer, Astoria;
Caruel Nelson and Mike Nelson,
Beaverton; Roger Neu, Hillsboro;
Roy Shaw, Medford; Ranee Sopko,
Seaside; John Taylor, Hood River;
John Turchi, Lake Oswego; and
Ed Wells, Hood River.
Advertisement
As I was brilliantly hunkering on
top of a coffee and ashtray clut
tered SU table the other evening,
I spied two freshmen co-eds each
skipping along with a D.Q.
clutched in her hand. As they
stopped and gaped at me I
grabbed their D.Q.’s and ran. No
one should have to go to so much
trouble just to get a D.Q. If you
have just one thin dime (a thiek
one will do) stop in at the D.Q.
for some delicious ice cream. If
you'd like, they’U let you hunker
in the street in front of their
store.