Tillamook headlight., November 07, 1907, Image 1

Jtobliobt
ILES
-«n Gl«m||
In the ty
’«Sitie, I
ound ii
■'I South
Fdl. XX
nd of
TILLAMOOK, OREGON, NOVEMBER 7
t Indies
ä th« bij
“rane» tu
Would You Invest $10.00
P
elonred
lcr» and
mtlon.
ralt of
little «
1». especlt
island«, ig¡
thing« 4
1er quality
’"’hen t
* beetle,
ac'knovlrtj
nldible li
perfectly
V foreats
"ir m y
or pub, b
nd 11 thft
looks Ufa,
conaldeM
ie(roee n|
lahee and
nuts,
mce, the
t powend
village« It
f these
tire hooatt
he lights
rompt
the wind
ng wltip,
rom the
iglne a
1 their
non« the
beetle
■asplng
lllke
F. ai th
a the horn
me la Hid
ÏTHS.
tury the
»
i double,
ailed
cloth n
the loot
hlch the
t had th
on It h
1
117
eplaced
folded h
of dm
windln«
le bm»
e fold!
ndutatM
* 1.50 per year
H. T Butts. F. G. Eby and G. C. Ful­ I
ton for plaintiff.
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com­
pany. a corporation, plaintiff, ve Her-
hert W. Cardwell el al, defendants.
Condemnation. Snow & MeCamant
and C. Thayer fur plaintiff.
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com.
pany, a corporation, plaintiff, vs Joseph
Kodad et al, defendants. Condemna­
tion. H. T. Botts, Wallace MeCamant
and C. B. Sternberg fur plaintiff.
M. D. Reading, plaintiff, vs George
W. Phelps.
defendant.
Transcript.
W. H. Cooper for plaintiff and Talmage
& Johnson for defendant.
Andy Nolan, plaintiff, vs B. O.
IT COURT DOCKET phi ini iff and King, Guerin & Kollock for Snuffer, defendant. Damages. Claude
defendants.
Thayer for plaintiff.
List of Cases with Five Astoria & Columbia Hirer Railroad Yellow Fir Lumber Curnpany, a cor­
Company, a corporation, plaintiff», vs poration, plaintiff, vs Alex Watt, de­
Divorce Suits.
Helen Watt and George Watt, her hus­ fendant. Action for money. Talmage
band, defendants. Condemnation. H. I & Johnson fur plaintiff and H. T. Botts
|t court will convene on Mondav T. Botts, F G. Eby and G. C. Fnltou fur defendant.
¡th Judge Geo. H. Burnett on the for plaintiffs and King, Guerin & Kol­
Connie Dye, plaintiff, vb G. B.
¡The docket is again long, there lock for defendants.
Hockett, defendant. Action fui money.
B cases, but as quite a nnmher of
Astoria & Columbia River Railroad VV. H. (.looper for plaintiff.
Ive been settled, especially in the
Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com­
Ration suits brought by the
:<fc Columbia River Railroad Co. John Watt and Sarah M. Watt, her pany, a corporation, plaintiff, vs George
t Pacific Railroad & Navigation hueband, defendants. Condemnation. II. Wililiams et ux. defendants. Condem­
H. T. Botts, F. G Eby and G. C. Fulton nation. Snow & MeCamant, C. That er
lere are five divorce cases. From
tor plaintiff and King, Guerm & Kol­ and Oak Nolah for plaintiff.
indications there are no criminal
lock for defendants.
Tillamook Lumbering Company, a
inless Deputy District Attorney
Astoria & Columbia River Kailroad corporation, plaintiff, vs W, J. Wood­
iss some violators of the law he
Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. side, defeudant. Action for mouey. H.
acking up.
George Watt et al, defendants. Con­ T. Botts for plaintiff.
DEPARTMENT NO. 1.
demnation. 11. 'I'. Botts, F. G. Eby and
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com.
& Columbia River Railroad G C. Fulton, for plaintiff
pany. a corporation, plaintiff, vs Alex
a corporation, plaintiff, vs
We earny just the line of goods that you require for uuinter
Astotia & Columbia River Railroad and Eluma Finlayson, defendants. Con.
Cl more and the Elmore Pack-
Wear—-goods that uuili stand Tillamook uieather.
pany, a corporation, defendant, Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs demuation. Suow & MeCamant, C.
lation. H, T. Botts and G. C. Robert Beeker, et al, defendants. Con­ Thayer and Oak Nolau for plaintiff.
AND THE prices ARE RIGHT.
demnation. H. T. Butts. F. G. Eby and
itorneys for plaintiffs.
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com­
O. C. Fulton for plaintiff.
pany, a cot poration, plaintiff, vs Benoit
& Columbia River Railroad
Miriam Colvin, plaintiff, vs Charles Fruvost et al, defendant. Condemna
, plaintiffs, vs Bengtlia Byrum
&
Byrorn, defendants. Condeni- McKillip et al, defendants. Ejectment. tion. Snow & MeCamant, C. Thayer
II. T. Botts for plaintiff and R. R. Duu- and Oak Nolau for plaintiff.
H. T. Botts foi plaintiffs and
i-vay for defendants.
TIÜUAM00K, OREGON
& Johnson for defendants.
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com­
Ellen Daugherty, plaintiff, vs Anna pany, a corporation, plaintiff, vs L. H.
Railway & Navigation Com-
rporatioii, plaintiffs, vs Nilins Kunze and Gustav Kunze defendants. Bielenberg et ai, defendants. Condem­
and Sarah McMillan, defen Ejectment. H. T. Botts for plaintiff nation. Suow & MeCamant, C. Thayer
and Oak Nolan for plaintiff.
Claude Thaver as trustee, plaintiff, vs.
'ondeiunation.
Wallace Me-j and R. R. Duniway for defendants.
Ellen Daugherty, plaintiff, vs Jonas
fC. Thayer, C. B. Sternberg
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com Tillamook Opera House Company,« cor.
. Holmes for plaintiffs and H. Olsen and Alpha V. Olsen, defendants. pany. a corporation, plaintiff, vs. L. H. poration, defendant. Confirmation of
and G. C. Fulton for defen- Ejectment. H. T. Botts for plaintiff Riefeuberg et al, defendant. Condemna­ sale. W. H. Holmes and C. Thayer for
and R R. Duniway for defendants.
The netv Private Secretary Course of this
tion. Snow & MeCamant, C. Thayer and plaintiff.
College offers a University training to you
Western Oregon Trust Co., plaintiff,
Miriam L. Colvin, plaintiff, vs Grant Oak Nolan tor pluintiff.
& Columbia River Railroad
in one year. Better still, it insures you a
, a corporation, plaintiff, vs Milla and Morrison Mills, defendants
Pacific Railway & Navigation Co , a vs Wm. West et al, defendants. For
high class business position when you have
completed the course,
nard and John L. Barnard. Ejictment. H. T. Botts for plaintiff corporation, plaintiff, vs. Gus Nelson et deed and to quiet title. Snow & Mc-
H'e have more calls from firm willing to
. Condemnation. G. C. Fill- and R. R. Duniway for defendants.
al, defendant. Condemnation. Snow & t’amant for plaintiff and H. T. Botts
pay SIOO per month than from those pay­
Botts and F. G. Eby for plain
Ellen Daugherty, plaintiff, vs Grant MeCamant, C. Thayer am) Oak Nolan and A. \V. Severance for defendant.
ing S6O per month. Hut these firm wish
Claude Thaver, plaintiff, vs. II.
1 K. Adams and Roger B. Sin- Mills and Morneon Mills, defendant», for plaintiff.
better trained office assistants.
Write for full information about this new
fendants,
Ejectment. H. T. Botts for plaintiff
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com­ Cooper, defendant. Tn quiet title.
course, as well as about the othet business
Thayer
for
plaintiff.
and
R,
R
Duniway
for
defendants.
pany,
a
corporation,
plaintiff,
vs.
Sam
Railway & Navigation Com-
courses taught in the Day and Kight de­
Frank Ekroth. plaintiff, vs. Tlios.
: corporation, plaintiffs, vs
Miriam L. Colvin, plaintiff, vs Jonas Elmoreet al, defendants. Condemnation
partments of this College.
luiore, Mary Eluiore and Olsen and Alpha V. Olsen, defendants. H. T. Botts, W. MeCamant. C. Thayer Harrison et al, defendants. To reform
T WASHINGTON * TENTH STS., PORTLAND, ONe.
contract. H. T. Botts for plaintiff and
eking Company, a corpora- Ejectment. H. T. Botts for plaintiff andC. B. Sternberg tor plaintiff.
Tillamook Lumbering Company n Talmage & Johnson for defendants.
ants. Condemnation. Wal- anti R. R. Duniway for defendants.
In the matter of the estate of Eli Good
lant, C. B. Sternberg and G.
Miriam L. Colvin, plaintiff, vs Anna corporation, plaintiff, vs. W. J. Wood­
plaintiffs and O. C. Fultuu Kunze and Gustav Kunze, tiefendants. side et al, defendant. Action lor money. speed, deceased. Probate W. II. Cooper
attorney.
Butts for defendants.
Ejectment. II. T. Botts for plaintiff H. T. Botts for plaintiff.
Samuel G. Reed et al, plaintiffs, vs.
Eli Sleinon, plaintiff, vs. H. B. John­
Railway & Navigation Com- and R. R. Duniway for defendants.
son et al, defendants. Damages and Joseph O. Briggs et al, defendants. To
rporatioti, plaintiffs, vs Irene
Ellen Daugherty,'plaintiff, vs Charles
et al. defendants. C-mdem- McKillip et al, defendants. Ejectment, action for money. W. H, Cooper for quiet title. Weatherford & Wyatt for
Have you ever gone through a ten cent store and
’allace
MeCamant. C. B. il. T. Botts for plaintiff and R. R. Dun. plaintiff and Talmage A Johnson and plaintiff.
Hadley Lumber Company, plaintiff,
T. H. Goyne lor defendant.
found
men and women buying eyeglasses at a counter
nd 0. Thayer for plaintiffs.
iway fur defendants.
William G Dwight et al, plaintiff», vs. vs. Miami Lumber Company, defendant
where they could pick up a pair of glasses which
Columbia River Railroad
Claude Thayer and Estella Thayer, Tillamook Lumbering Company, a cor­ Injunction and to render accounting. C
magnified the letter printed on a newspaper ? How
a corporation, plaintiffs, vs plaintiff», vs J. W. Maxwell, defendant.
poration, defendant. Action for money. Thayer for plaintiff a’id H. T. Botts for
much are your eyes worth to you ? You would not
Land Company et al. defen­ Action for money. Claude Thayer for
defendant.
Oak Nolan and Talmage & Johnson tor
demnation. It. T. Botts, F. plaintiffs.
give them up for a million dollars (<1,000,000) and
M .1. McMahon. plaintifT, vs Francis
plaintiff and H. T. Botts for defendant.
d G U. Fulton for plaintiff».
spend the rest of your days in darkness. Yet you
Miriam L. Colvin, plaintiff, vs C. L.
Charles E. Reynolds et al,plaintiffs, vs. Trevor et al, defendants. Foreclosure
are willing to put 10c. spectacles on million dollar
Columbia River Railroad, a Roberts defendant. Ejectment. H T. J, \V. Beaty, defendant. Action for H. T. Botts for plaintiff, Talmage &
, plaintiffs, ts Thomas Coates Bolts for plaintiff and K R. Duniway money. Talmage & Johnson for plain­ Johnson for Agnes Reid. Oak Nolan for
eyes ! It is one of the most dangerous things you
Coatee, defendants. Con­ for defendant.
E. D. Dewey, and T. & K. Sargent for L.
could do, for the eyes are not able to stand such a
tiff.
ti. T Butts. F. G. Eby and
fuse. It may be expensive to have your eyes care­
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com­ 0. McMahon.
Ellen Daugheity, plaintiff, vs C. L-
n for plaintiffs.
H E. Noble, plaintiff, vs. Floyd W.
fully examined and fitted with proper glasses, but it
Robe its. defendant. Ejectment. 11. T pany, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Wil-
Columbia River Railroad Botts for plaintiff and R. R. Duniway liain L. Riefenberg, defendant. Condem King, defendant. Forclosure. H. T.
may save your vision and even your health.
a corporation, plaintiff, vs for defendant.
nation. Snow & MeCamant, C. Thayer Botts for plaintiff.
It is not economy for all to make a purchase of ten
Kate A. White, plaintiff, vs. Andrew
•y, defendant. Condemns
cent
glasses. You cau economize in a.wonderful
Miriam L. Colvin, plaintiff, vs Riley and Oak Nolan for plaintiff.
. Botts, F. G. Eby and G. C.
Anna Kunze,plaintiff, vs. Hadley Lum­ T. White, defendant Divorce Ta Image
manner in a ten cent store, but not when eyes are a
Maxwell, defendant. Ejectment. H.
&
Johnson
for
plaintiff.
plaintiff and Talmage &
T Botts for plaintiff and R. R. Duni­ ber Company el al. defendants Damages.
consideration.
defendant.
J. E. Fildew, plaintiff, vs. J. T. Milne,
Talmage & Johnson for plaintiff, and C.
way fol defendant.
I guarantee to fit you correctly and at a price
et
el,
defendants.
To
quit
title
Claude
Thayer and Oak Nolan for defendant.
ens, plaintiff, vs Tillamook
that
is reasonable. Examination free.
Ellen
Daugherty,
plaintiff,
vs
Riley
Prank Ekroth, plaintiff, vs Tlios. F Thayer and Oak Nolan for plaintiff
nicipal corporation, defen-
Maxwell,
defendant.
Ejectment.
11.
Ida
Auderson.
plaintiff,
vs.
Andrew
Harrison,
defendant.
Action
for
money
ge». Talmage & Johnson
and Carl Haberlacli and T. Botts fur plaintiff and R R. Duni. and possession ofland. II. T. Bolts for Anderson, defendant. Di voice. C. M.
way for defendant.
plaintiff and Talmage Sc Johnson for Idleman and H. T. Botts for plaintiff
for defendant.
and Talmage & Johnson for defendant
Pacific Railway & Navigation Com- defendant.
unze, plaintiff, vs K. Rol>in-
Martha L Mathewson, plaintiff, vs
W, II Cooper, plaintiff, vs W. S.
ant.
Action for money. pany, a corporation, plaintiff, vs Fred­
George
S. Mathewson, defendant. Di­
Cone,
defendant.
Action
for
money.
rick
Bardon,
defendant.
Condemna
­
He Fought at Gettysburg
J"hu«>n fur plaintiff.
A Heliabln Remedy f r Croup,
vorce. Talmage & Johnson for plaintiff
Talmage A Johnson for plaintiff.
I>avid Parker, of Fayette, N.Y,, h —
itb the <iry cohl aratl»er <»f the e«rly
Columbia Hirer Railroad tion. 11. T Botts, C. Thayer and Wal­
lost
a foot at G*4 tty burg, u rites. ■ Elec­
winder
month",
pi
rent«
of
cron
py
chil
­
Hadley Lumber Company, acorpoia-
Mors H Larson, plaintiff, vs Mars­
I corporation, plaintiff, vs lace MeCamant fur plaintiff and Me
dren should I m * oii til»* »Intt (or o»uinoiiH tric Butera have dona me more good
lion.
plaintiff,
vs
Emme<t
Jenkins,
de
­
ton
Bush
et
cl.
defendant.
To
restore
NyntpioiHB.
There in no cmui * lor than any medicine I ever look. For
t et al, defendants. Co i Faddeii & Bryson for defendant.
fendant. Action for money. Talmage deed. Claude Thayet and Oak Nolan for n«ixiety, however, when (?hanib»*r Iain's a^veral years I ha<l "U>iutu'h trouble, and
’ H T. Botts, F. G. Eby and
K. G. Staples, plaintiff, vs W. H. 4 Johnson for plaintiff.
plaintiff and Talmage & Johnson for (Jough Remedy 1* kept in the houne. If tmid out much money for medicine to
>n for plaintiff and King, West. defendant. Action for money.
tbi« ine^hciop in gitenuA suori aw the little piir|Nk«e. until I la*gaii taking Elec,
C. V. Preston, plaintiff, vs L. L. dt fen da nt.
lock for defendants.
C. M. Idlein'an and Talmage St. Johnson Smith, defendant. Confirmation. Tal­
child become* I mmmw or even after the trie Bitters. I would not take $500 fur
vs.
Ruhv
Elmer G. Baker, plaintiff,
I C 'luinbia River Railroad for plaintiff and A. W. Severance an<l H. mage Ar Johnson for plaintiff and A. W. Baker, defendant. Divorce. Talmage & croupy cough haw Ap^xar»-<i, the at tie:k what Ili**y have done for me.” Grand
inav be warded off. M ia . S. RoHiiithai, tunic f<«r • he aged and for female weak«
Ici-rporstion. plaintiff, vs T. Botts fur defendant.
of Turner, Michigan, say» “We hate mwwes, On at alterative and body build,
Severance fur defendant.
Johnson for plaintiff
Band Helen Walt, hi» wife,
Astoria & Columbia River Railroad
Chas. H Blake, plaintiff, vs. Ruby L u*ed Chamberlain's O»iigh medicine for er, beat of ail for lame back sod wei k
DXPARTMSNT NO. 3.
uurnelveM and children for «ereral years kidneys. Guarani»*« d by Chas. I Cough,
Condemnation.
II. T. Company, a corporation, plaintiff, v«
Lyle,
defendant. To quit title. II. T. and like it verv much. 1 Clunk it iw >he drug^i»-t. 50c.
Tillamook Lum tier Company, a cor­
Eby and G C. Fulton for | Louis Ol»en, defendant. Condemnation.
Botts
for
plaintiff.
only
remedy for croup and can highly
poration, plaintiff, vs. Annie Eastham et
D. F Trowbridge, plaintiff, ve Miami r<-<-ofiifiiefid it.” F«»r sale by Cloughs
al. defendant. Partition suit. Claude
l>rug Store.____
___
Lumber Company, a curpovatiou, de
Thayer lor plaintiff
A
Hard
Debt
to
Pay.
A
W.
Severance
Used in Most Home
Robmsou Cheert Company, plaintiff. lendant. Injunction,
*' | owe a d-bt of gratitude that ( tin
va. R. Robinson, defendant. Accounting and Talmage & lohnaou for plaintiff and never I m * paid off.” writes G 8 Ciark. of
Wettfleld. Iowa. ’* f«»r my rewue fiom
W. H. Holmes. C. Thayer and 8. 8. John­ H T Lotts for defendant
F. R. Beals et el, plaintiff, vs. Stephen d»*a'h. by Dr. Kingne New Discovery.
son for plaintiff aud R R. Duniway for
Capital Stock..................
$25,000.
Sc ore 11 et al. defendants. Partition. H B<eh lunua «eie «*» »erkHi«ly affe<-ird
it’s the biggest seller in the west to-day, defendant.
that deaih aaetned imminent, when I Olfrre every facility for aefe banking,
there’s mere bread made from it than from
Portland Coal and Development Com T. Botts for plaintiff.
commenced «king N»*w lh*< overy. The
and solicits your buamesa.
quit Itefure
any other two or three brands combined. panv, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. A. T. I Oak N-»|an, plaintiff, yt, Frank Ekroth oodnoiia dry, h,»ckiog
the Hist hottie was used, an<l t*o more
Commercial, havings and Trust De­
et
al.
defendant.
To
quit
title
Oak
Lewis
et
al.
defendants.
Torelorm
leases.
I
Enough proof that it's the best flour made—
b It lee iriM'lr a <:ornpl»*t*J cure.'* Noth, partments.
H. T. Bolls and Piggott & Finch lor Nolan for plaintiff,
ing ha*» ever eq.jslwi New D iaco very for
isn’t it ?
Interest at current rates on checking
Erich Bergstrom, plaintiff, vs. Helen eoUfftM. «’ulds and all throat and lung
plaintiff
and
Talmage
dt
Johnson
for
de-
|
accounts.
YOUR GROCER CAN SUPPLY YOU.
E.
Bergstrom,
defendant.
Divorce.
c<
mpl
into.
GusranltAt<l
by
Chaa.
1
L-
—
--
----
-
—
--
------
—
fendant A. T. Lewis, and T. H. Gov we.
O*ir little book,' Helpful Hints on
BE SURE THAT YOU GET IT.
Clougti’« druggist. 50c and 11.00. Trial linking,’’ esplaining how to do your
N. P. Hanven, plaintiff. VS. Lonis Pieck Talmage 4 Johnson for plaintiff.
I m » Ur frra.
_________
Imhking by mail is ready,
P. S Murphv. plsintii. vs. Jacob
et al. defendants. To set aside deed H
Hrnd for a copy. It's free f«< (be
T.Botts for plainjiff andTalmage A Joi n- Mand.henk, et al, attendants Confirm*
aekicg.
* trae. V. Tbayev fur plaiatttf.
sou for defendants.
A month for a short time for a choice lot in
Tillamook City, we have just a few more to
sell on these terms at prices that is sure to
double within 12 months.
If interested call or write to-day as we are
selling these lots daily.
•
Address,
RALPH
ACKLEY,
Tillamook, Ore.
The STORE that MAKE GOODS!
Men’s Dress Shoes.
Boy's Dress Shoes
Men’s Heavy Shoes.
Boy's Heavy Shoes
Men’s Rubber Boots.
Boy's Rubber Boots
Men’s Oil Clothing.
Boy’s
Hats and Caps
Men’s Hats of all Kinds.
MEN’S CLOTHING, OVERCOATS and FURNISHING GOODS.
Railroad Men and Farmers, Attention !
TODD & CO., One Price Clothiers,
^HOLMES
[BUSINESS
XCOLLEGE
Chance for
You
10c. EYEGLASSES.
DR. HENRY E- MORRIS
First Bank & Trust
Company,
OüYMPICFüOUR
THE PORTLAND FLOURING MILLS
COMPANY
BAY CITY. ORE.
The Headlight and the
Weekly Oregonian, $2.25