Image provided by: Tillamook County Library
About Tillamook headlight. (Tillamook, Or.) 1888-1934 | View Entire Issue (May 5, 1892)
Vol. IV. No. 49. TILLAMOOK. OREGON. THURSDAY. MAY 5. 1892. $1.50 Per Yean PROFESSIONAL CARDS FAMOUS LIBEL SUITS» U V. V. JOHNSON, M. D. HOW VERY SELDOM THE PLAINTIFF Oflci on next door to Temperance Parlors. Tillamook, • Oregon. £ K »ELPH, L. HiSF.n, President. }' m. Hbermau, Vice President Wm. D. Stillwell, Treasurer I.. Crenshaw. Secretary. Wm. Barker, Superintendent. Tillanjoo^ Lumbering Company, ATTOR N E Y-AT-L A W. TILLAMOOK, OREGON. ------ *------- MANUFACTURERS OF AND DEALI'RS IN ALL KINDS 01»------- _____ ,, -S) J T. MAULSBY, Attorney-at-Law. Notary Public «nd Real Fatate Conveyancer. Rough and Dressed Merchantable Lumber W. SEVERANCE, I 1 D«rUTV-DlSTBICT-ATTO»NKY, 3rd Judicial District,for Tillamook County TILLAMOOK, - OREGON. ALL ORDERS gLAUDE THAYER, FILLED PROMPTLY Attorney-at-Law. TILLAMOOK, OREGON. TILLAMOOK, MISCELLANEOUS. (< & E. THAYER. BANKERS % General Banking and Exchange business. Interest paid on time deposits. Exchange on England, Belgium, Germany, Sweden and all foreign countries. TILLAMOOK, • - • OREGON. HE best investment you can. rnalce is to insure vow life, and thus pro vide your estate with, cash at your death, or if you live, give you a sum of money a few years later. T pjESS & TOEWS, W ood -Y ard . Woed delivered to any part of the the city. T hij M assachusetts M utual L ife I nsurance C o Write the best policy, guaranteeing you cash and paid up insurance every year, so you cannot lose your money in case of misfortune. Send ine your name and age and I will send you a sample policy. T illamook O rb . J F. LARSON, H. G. COLTON, Gun’l Ag’t, 33 Stark St, Portland, Ore. W. F. D. JONES, Local Agt. BLACKSMITH. Wagon making, aud all kinds of Wood work ■ nd General Illackamithing done. Mill Machinery Repaired. Horse-shoeing a Specialty. TILLAMOOK, ORE. N P. ROBERTS, CONTRACTOR AND BUILDER. Wa^on Shop in connection. done. Cabinet Work Shop opposite G. A. R. Hall. TILLAMOOK, ORE. Misa L. J. RUGOLES Mrs. J. JOHNSON RUGGLES & JOHNSON, They keep on liancls at their store in Hobsonville the largest stock of goods in Tillamook County. MILLINERY AND DRESS MAKING. Our stock consists of Dry Goods, Clothing, Doot» anti S'..>en, Hats, Caps and Notions. Groceries, Crockery, and Queensware. Doors, Windows, Lime, Hair, and Cement. Hardware and Nails. £#“.S|>ecial attention given to filling ordets for goods in jobbing lots. Hats, Drew Trlnimln«a «nd a General Auort- mentof Millinery Go.nl«. We always keep the lateat Myles. Near Court House, A gents for T illamook , O re . TILLAMOOK, SIN FRANCISCO AND WAY PORTS. Makes regular trips about every two weeks, the weather Permitting. TILLAMOOK LAUNDRY. The fast sailing S tb . T ruck E k lias been specially fitted up for carrying pas sengers. Following are the rates: . . $15. CABIN PASSAGE ................ .... $20. ROUND TRIP,...................... STEERAGE (one wav).......... ........ $0. ♦ I per ton Freight, (GeneralJMerchandi«e) LESTER HART, PROPRIETOR. Wishing gathered and delivered every *e«k. Work done on short notice when desired. Starched shirts ljcts each. Common Shirts and drawers, i to 10cta each. Family washing and ironing, 5©cts per dozen. Saits cleaned to order. TILLAMOOK, ORE. J. K. S ibley , Manager, Hobsonville, Ore QENTRAL MARKET, L. H. BROWN, P roprietor . The best Beef, Veal, Pork ami Mutton always on hand. Butter, Vegetable* and Chickens bought and sold. Satisfaction guaranteed to every one. Shop oppoeite the Grand Central. GAINS ANYTHING. Editor Godklti’a Mlahap—Funny Eapo* rleiice of GfuFgc Jone«, of the New York Tiiiie*—Ignatlu* Donnelly Gets Six Cent» and Mr. Malloy S2O.OOO. R. EDWIN L. GODKIN, of the ) New York Even- Ik ing Post, is a ■«constitutional re former and a vig orous assailant. Add that he is a ltorth of Ireland man and began his literary ca reer by writing a somewhat Orangcish history of tho re ligious discussions, aud the reader will i readily see why any little accident in his newspajier career affords much interest to friends and opponents alike. His re cent arrest was just bad enough to be funny. ; There is a politician in New York who married a sister of tho noted Victoria Woodhull and Tcnnie Claflin and is I otherwise locally celebrated. Of him The Post recently spoke as an "ex-keeper of a dive." He straightway employed a lawyer who had various reasons for not loving Mr. Godkin, and tho next Sunday morning the latter was aroused from a i sound sleep by an officer with a warrant ! for his arrest on information for a criuii- I nal libel. But ho did not go behind bars. . Friends gathered rapidly, bail was I givon, and so "I.arry," as j<x-ular rivals call him, got away from court in timo ‘o attend church. This incident has once more started tho discussion as to lilxd laws, and they aro found to bp in even worso confusion than ever. In a similar case a friend once con doled witli tlie late George Jones, of the New York Times, who replied: “Oh, is | that all? Why there are only six suits now pending against The Times. This is a bad year for ’em. I’ve been in the | newspaper business thirty-five years and ; have always had from four to sixteen libel suits on baud and have never yet paid one cent damages.” Mr. Matthews, . of the Buffalo Express, gave similar ’ testimony. Out of a dozen heavy suits , but one went against him, and in that ■ case tlie verdict was for $1,000. I Other papers have not been Ro for- I tunate. The New York Herald paid a : Mr. Malloy, of South Carolina. $20,000 1 merely for making this little statement: “Tho leading citizens of Edgefield think that one Malloy, a white man who some tiuo ago was suspected of burning liis I own store for the purpose of obtaining tho insurance, kindled the fire which re- ■ suited so disastrously.” This is the case in which Judge William Janies Wallace, of tho United States circuit court, made the remarkable decision that The Her ald had told so big and pulpaolc a lie , that it did no harm! This is not a burlesque. Here is the exact language of the judge: “The orig inal publication, although its sensational character and flagrant mendacity were well calculated to outrage the feelings of tho plaintiff, was so destitute of a I 1 color of truth that it could not seriously i • injure him in tho estimation of the im mediate community in which ho lived." To a good many persons this Bounded like a polite way of saying that Tho Her ald (or its correspondent) was such a liar that its word could injure no one. And strangely' enough, somo peoplo have nn idea that this is law. But it isn't. No man can take advantage of liis own wrong, and the biggest liar in the com munity is as responsible for his words as a George Washington. There’s lots of flin in a libel suit—for all except the parties—and by a curious but not well understoixl law they seem to run in groups. About five years ago an article appeared in the New York Mail and Ex press with these scare heads: SfIB MAHIllCIl A NKatlO. A «harmins' and l-itvili;:, rit jeinur woman weds an llllt err te blin k mnn! Tlie date was at a New Jersey town, the names were given in full and tho local correspondent was known to lie re liable. A savage letter soon arrived from nn indignant father, then a notice of a libel suit nn<l next a r.draction and very humble apology. A letter to tho correspondent notified him that if he ever entered the Mail and Express office ho would encounter an ublebodied i janitor with a fair sized club. Scarcely TILLAMOOK, ORE. •plLLAMOOK LIVERY STABLE, JONES B ros , proprietors . AND SUSPENSORY FOR. Flrat-daaa ainsi« «nd doubt« turn-oat« kept on hand. Baardin« and tnttsrtcat stork cared for. T illamook , oar.. t*^WEAI)NES5®ME| T own L ots . Nor sale at reasonable prices and on fovnralJe termo. Locatici» boat in th« city of Tilla* Carr »'«. D STI liwzll , we have • relief «nd cure In your ignorance of effect» and vitality— which in system the element» thus strength and vigor will fol- cure or money refunded. Dr. Sanden's Electric after all other treatment« testify, «nd from many of THE THE S™ AUGUSTA. Wtfl make regular trips, the weather per«« I from N ervous D ebility * S eminal W eak ness ; L osses D rains I mpotency ofc L ost M anhood .R heumatism , L ame B ack K dney T roubles . N ervousness J^^SLEEPLESSNE5sFb0RMEM0RV&GENERAL : ssne 5 s R dor M emor V&G eneral ILL I ll H ealth ACRE tracts and T illa M ook . oaa. WHOARE DEBILITATED. AND SUFFERING IwwU the effects of abuses, excesses, worry and expotare. For such sufferers in our marvelous invention, which requires but a trial to convince the most skeptical, or by excesses, or exposure, you may have unduly drained your svstem of nerve force electricity—and thus caused your weakness or lack of force. If you replace into your drained, which are required for vigorous strength, you sri.l remove the cause, and health, low at once and in a natural way. This is our plan and treatment, and we guarantee a Send for our Illustrated Pamphlets, free; »«nt by mill, sc», -d. Belt is no experiment, as we have restored thousands to robust health and vigor, failed, as can be shown by hundreds of cases throughout this State, who would g’adly whom’ we ha 3 strong letters bearing testimony to their recovery after using our Belt. DR. SRNDEN ELECTRIC BELT . . «Irani« battery, made into a belt so as to be easily worn durin J work or at red. »'“'JU"! t soothing, prolonged currents isaremplriaplvan’cnatry. we forfeit $5 OQO n haJ gn Ia?ro<e l l _____ Improved Electric Suspensory, the «Meh are intoaatly felt ■ • warrant It to cure any of the above weak news. and tn enlarge shrunken lim.m, er partr, or greate-t boon ever given tatabandw« waram i j . io yni-nv. mi-lxUrword * rcar’Jl to meet *11 stave* of weak nr« v io jmrnv- aúdxflr-e'r'’ or " nM /',J r,- «na n sod imi adii E. L. OODKIN. ■nailed when a still more savage letter arrived from him with pointed references to his lawyer and a demand for his original manuscript. It was pro duced. an<l behold there was not a word in it to the effect that any white girl had married a negro. Then the printed article was scanned, and all parties wire iimased to find that in it also thero was no such statement. Yet every one who read it had got the impression that there was. Tho scare heads had done the mischief. In the text the newly made hitslntud wm de scribed as “a very illiterate fellow, but a prosivrons grocer in a negro settle- it hastily, got a falsa impression and the tesnlt was the misleading lieada, Woraa followed. West and south the item waa widely copied, the retraction apparently overlooked, and so millions of readers have it in their minds as an actual and very bad case of New Jersey miscegena tion. Tlie lnrnagiug editor of Tito Mail and Express was just beginning to breathe freely when The Evening Telegram was sued by Anthony Comstock, The Times t>y a publishing firm, The Herald by a mining firm and The Sun by Fred Geb hard and Pierre Lorillard, the last two asking for $50,900 each. At the close of the week Foster Coates, who recently left The Mail and Express for The Press, declared that thero was but ono paper in New York not sued or other wise in trouble, and that was The Ban ner of Zion. The Sun had published that Pierre Lorillard lost $225,000 at baccarat and had spoken of Fred Geb hard as a blackguard. None of the suits amounted to much. The Chicago Times has probably sjient more money on libel suits than tiny other American journal. And a strange fea ture is that its worst losses were in cases where it had been artistically deceived. Several years ago Tho Times received an elaborate account of a fearful scan dal at Rockford, Ills,, involving one prominent politician and tho daughter of another. The editor hesitated, but the next day several letters came, all in different hand writings, giving details as if from different standpoints, and so next morning an article appeared. There was not a word of truth in the story. It was a most ingenious fraud and tho author was never certainly discovered. Of the many resulting suits s mo were tried five times. The final payment of damages was very small, but Mr. Storey admitted that lie had paid out many thousands of dollars in lawyers’ fees and hunting evidence. A still more curious caso convulsed an eastern city some years agp. An even ing paper gave a thrilling account of four attempts to murder a young mar ried woman by connivance of her hus band. When suit was brought and tho reporter was called on for his proof, it was discovered that his main witness was in the penitentiary at Joliet, Ills., tho next in importance in the New York penitentiary at Auburn, and tho third was a police sergeant, who declared ho had tolil tlie reporter no such tiling. Ruin to tlie publishers seemed certain. IS IT A TAX? |OES THE TARIFÉ INCREASE TH# COST OF GOODS! It Depends Upon the Kind of 1'nHflT— RoiMP Duties Are raid by the Consitmeh Protective Dulles by the Foreigner— Kt- erything Cheaper Undei* PrdtettlBM. duo If a revenue or Free-trade tariff. sncH is the former duty on sugar or tin plate. We pay it all; if a protective tariff, art tnoy pay a part of the duty at first, Uhl eventually the foreigner pays nearly if not quite all of it on goods wtnally lap ported, if we prefer to buy EngltoH goods, however, even though the Ameri can goods are better and cheaper, then, of course, we [my the duty. This is a tax on anglomania, but on ordinary |irod- uets. brought in to compete witli domestd products made on a large «rale and al- readv ia practical possession of the <1<F meslic market, the importer, the foreigfi manufacturer and the foreign lalxirers pay the duty. In this connection we quote tho fob lowing from a recont numlier of Lomlori Fair-Trade: “If we are to retain a liold <ln foreigti market«, alight though it may be, wage« must be kept down that the high foreign tariffs tuny be overcome. One of the greatest arguments against the theory that tho consumer pays the import dntjf is to be found in the fact that when it foreign nation increase« the tariff on a British product, the establishment charges as well as the wages on this side of the water are lowered, in order W give the manufacturer or the merchant a chance to deal successfully with the change. If the consumer paid the dntjf there would bo little cause for onr ex porter to grumble. But our mrtiihfaC- turera and work people do tbitke sacri fices to meet the extra duty, and We acs cordingly hoar grumbling from both.1’ This is plain enough certainly, and need only bo verified by actual facta. Ask tho Canadian farmer who pay« the American duty. Ask the Sheffield man ufacturer, the Chemnitz workmen, th* pearl button makers of Vienna, the titt plate makers of Walds, the foreign man ufacturer« of silk and linen and cutlery, and scores of other articles. They will all admit that they |«y tbedtity if they put their goods on our market Here is an admission from tho New York Times of Feb. 3, 1691. We produce it as be ing good Free-trade testimony indorsing our own assertions: “A statement Issued by the depart ment of agriculture, giving tlie exporta to the United States from Canada for the year 1HU0, shows that the Dominion exported $11,219,0-13 worth of agricul tural products to the United State* I m I year. The averngo rate of duty collect ed by the United State« emtouw upon agricultural product« is abont 20 per cent., and it is easy to prove trmu th« apeecho« of Sir John Macdonald and other Conservative leader« that the duties imposed by the Americans iqion Canadian products ex port od to the Unit ed States couie out of the pocketa of th« ' Cnmidian fanner. Ileuce we find that during the fiscal year 1VM) no less Hum $2.2-i;i,b00—that ia, 20 per cent, of $11.- STOREY. 21ifoU13 — went into tlie Washington At tliis juncture a statesman of otni- treasury, which would have gon« into nonce who owed much to tho paper the pockets of Canadian farmers if the caino to tho rescue. Ho had lieen pub Dominion enjoyed unrestricted recip lic prosecutor for years, knew the record rocity." It seem« useless to pursue the matter of every crook mid criminal in the coun ty an<l held in his bunds the power to further, lu the face of the many ar crush many of them. He summoned ticles selling for less than the duty, the them ono by ono to his ofHco aud made Free-trader still cries “tlie tariff 1« the each detail his knowledge of the plaint tax." is tbo tariff on wire tiiuia a tax, iffs. Tlie result was a record which selliug at $1.80 • keg while the duty to cam cd the judge to declare that during two dollars? Is the tariff on a yard of the progress of the trial lie had to pinch calico a tax. selling at 4U reals while himself to be mre lie was not dreaming. the duty ia live cent«? Ia tlie tariff on a Tho original case was practically ig yard of cloth a tax, selling at neventy- nored. it was shown that tlio plaintiffs live cents while the duty 1« H7‘j centaf were of u family of professional crimi We deny that tho tariff is ever a tax— nals, ono that hud been such for four that is, a burden. In cases where the generations. Judge and jury agreed tariff has 1« en increased with « view to that such 1» ople could not be libeled. creute and develop a new industry, even And it turned out after all that the orig if prices are temporarily enhanced, it is inal publication was true, though it WM «imply an investment which will be re paid many fold as wsm as the industry not proved on the trial. Th« last affair Io interest the whole is established. The farmer does not be English speaking world wus that of Far- grudge the price of the seed in the spring nell and the London Times, in which which will pay him bnshela of grain in Parnell won. Other recent and familiar the fall. There remains, then, but one point, cases aro more amusing than serious. Hon. Ignatius Donnelly sued for$l<M),- namely, Does tho consumer pny » 000 and got six cents. At least nine greuter price for any domestic product times out of ten these suits end in much because of the tariff? To tlii« wo answer. tlie same way. Historically the subject No. We do not moan to say that the is of intense interest. In England and duty is not in some instances added to America alike tho press has lieen grow the price paid in the for.-ign market. ing freer for two centuries, ami in read We do maintain, however, that if the ing I ho old cases ono wonders how men tariff were abolished we would have to l«y un equal if nut n greater price than could have published pajs-rs at all. British law has always laid groat wo now pay for the protected article. stress upon any feature in a libel calcu Imagine the tariff on woolen goods abol lated to stir up strife, whether between ished tomorrow. Foreign woolen mills individuals or nations, and under ibis would find for their output a new market law the notorious Lord George Gordon, wider and richer titan «11 their other ••Protestant Champion,” was, in 17bfi, foreign markets combined. The capac sent to Newgate for seven years for an ity for producing would remain the atrocious libel on the queen of Fiance. name, while the demand would bo large He profeized conversion to Judaism ly increased Under snch conditions and died in prison Nov. 1, 1793. Sim must not prices rise? That ia to say. if ilarly Toni Paine was indicted in Lon the tariff were abolished we could not don for publishing his “Rights of Man," buy in tho foreign market at present fled to France and was outlawed. Tlie prices under existent tariff conditions. only attempt ait that sort of thing in the That counties» American products are United States took form in the famous cheaper uow than foreign products “Alien and Sedition Laws." Since they .Would lie under Free-trade wonid hardly expired an American can libel foreigners admit of a ilonbt. Ill these cases the ad libitum, ns witness the “war editori foreigner pays all the tariff. We have had many coses of this kind als" and speeches at various public meet ings. The American press is free in in onr history, aud in every instance deed, but where all are free some will where the tariff baa been reaaovod or lie licentious, and that the whole law of reduced below a Protective basis the libel is in an unsatisfactory condition foreigner baa put up the price and w« none are freer to admit than the editors have had to pay it; therefore we con clude that while denying in tvto that tbeiuselvcs. J. H. B ladlk . the tariff on imported gosls is a tai on domestic products, as the Honorable A Thermometer. Tlie Johns Hopkins university lias a Grover Cleveland contends, we are very good deal of money invested in weather. far from admitting that it ia always a It owns a thermometer which is »aid to tax even oti imported goods. Foreign bo worth $10,000. A powerful magnify mill owners would be the greater gaii- ing glaM is required to real tho gradua cre by Free-trade. Their eagerness to tions on the scale. With this iustru- break down our tariff walla ought to I m