Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The independent. (Vernonia, Or.) 1986-current | View Entire Issue (June 5, 2003)
Page 2 The INDEPENDENT, June 5, 2003 IT Leri ByTFe TV. uVic^K P»r iSo C6.A f*-y A |T : ?••!' λ Ed. Note: The following, from Roger Grimsrud of Vernonia, about Colum bia County's land use and Goal 5 process is so well expressed that we felt it should be placed in this opinion column. It has been minimally edit ed for brevity, but is too long for this small space and is continued on page 4. The opinions expressed are those of Mr. Grimsrud. WHÔS J5.ET ? ir »*■ You ! 4— Enough is Enough! The Columbia County Land Use Board had a special hearing at St. Helens High School auditorium, May 19, at which it heard tes timony from landowners from unincorporated areas of Columbia County. This hearing concerned proposed changes to the Coun ty’s land use zoning regulations by the Board in its efforts to com ply with Goal 5 of the State of O regon’s sensitive land use plan ning requirements. The auditorium was half-filled by landowners from all areas of Columbia County who, in short, wanted to tell the Board that current land use regulations were already excessive as well as expensive, and that the proposed additional regulations and requirements were not in the best interests of the County’s taxpayers. The message the Board received from attending landowners, without exception, was "Enough is Enough!” The Land Use Board is considering changes to land use regu lations in keeping with a State of Oregon mandated study per formed every 10 years. The “Report, Sensitive Lands Update, Co lumbia County” was prepared for Columbia County Department of Land Development Services by Beak Consultants Incorporated in June, 1995. This eight year-oid study is the newest data used by the Department of Land Development for its’ recommendations. Notice of the proposed changes and the Board’s request for pub lic input due to potential impact on property values in unincorpo rated areas of the County, were sent out in March, and a question- and-answer meeting was held at the regular planning meeting April 6. It started at 6:30 p.m. and discussions continued for one hour then, due to the response from County landowners, the sec ond meeting was scheduled for May 19, and the location was changed to the St. Helens High School Auditorium. May 19 testimony regarding big-game regulations was re ceived from some of the more elderly landowners. They stated the proposed changes were nonsense since, during the 1880s through the 1930s, elk and deer were rare in the County due to large stands of old growth timber, and that it made no sense to protect an animal that was not natural to the area in large num bers. They further stated that it was only after Crown Zellerbach and other large timber companies had massive clearcuts in the County that the deer and elk populations began to increase. Proposed changes would also affect setbacks from fish bearing waterways. Currently, if a fish-bearing waterway has a flow of less than 1000 cubic feet per minute, then activities surrounding use of land on either side are restricted up to 25 feet away from the high water mark. The proposed regulated use would change that to 75 feet away from the high water mark. No time frame was specified for when the high water mark or flow measurement was deter mined (i.e.: summer flow from July through September vs. winter flow November-December through April). In my family's case, we own over 23 acres straddling the Nehalem approximately 1 mile southeast of Pittsburg. There, the Nehalem forms a lazy-S in a East-to-Northwest pattern. During summer months, a person can easily wade across the water to the abandoned railroad bed op posite the highway side. During w inter months, from from 2-to-4 Please see page 4 Csutû M THAT &I6 SPORTS CozftPA/ÿ y who ÔMiR-PRlCé |T5 SHoéS... PAY5 Ab»uT Bucks GOI a JS T o A ùftV TO ITS 0 FF SHoRP éwPkOYé« ? tty Our I ceo. I TvJo ( VVHo P aco A moti U m A/étùi To M tiery out ove/t ? HtfrtoftiC? AAIIMOM £>»11 A i s T * A DOLLARS THoilSMb’ B '6 V»0f» CrtAiU STflRC O oliak S JUST f»R THf LATf To THeiR O O H !.1? 7 s Po K f j PsftSov! ft V f AH' Y«U CHOôSÉ- TO ftACf YeoA VoT< P H W f- ! « « > ' —.1 Ike Says. ......... By Date Webb, Member Nehalem Valley Chapter, Izaak Walton League (In the May 1 INDEPENDENT, Dale Webb told of an 1884 boat trip down the Nehalem River, and how it inspired Webb, Troy Horton, Dennis Nelson and Stan Horton to emulate that journey by kayaking 100 river miles, from Clear Creek to Nehalem Bay. In this column, Webb tells about the rest of the journey.) Day two of our Great Nehalem Challenge dawned bright, with blue skies and the warmth of a yellow orb in the sky. After washing the sleep off, I went to check on the kayaks, which we had left on the stream bank, and noticed Dennis Nel son standing next to the kayaks, looking down stream. I hollered a greeting down to him, and he motioned there were visitors. I eased on down to Dennis and saw his fixation. A herd of elk was grazing along the riverbank only a hundred yards from us. Of course my commotion had spooked them and they were soon splashing into and across the river. We returned to camp and soon enjoyed a filling meal of hash browns, eggs, bacon and lamb sausage. The last chore before taking off on our day of paddling was to break camp. I queried our group about how they felt as we climbed back into our boats, amazingly, we all felt pretty good. We slipped gradually back on the swirling waters of the Nehalem and started to stretch our muscles as we waited for the last boater to get ready. It was a beautiful morning to be on the water, with blue skies overhead and morning songs from all the birds to lift our spirits. Our goal this day was to make it (from our Natal campground) to a point just upstream from Jew ell, a 26-mile paddle. This segment of water con sisted of a lot of slow water, which makes for a lot more work. We continued to see abundant wildlife, including ducks, herons, beavers, deer, muskrats and, to our surprise, two bald eagles. The sunshine remained with us while we ate lunch just downstream from the Vesper Bridge, but soon disappeared behind a screen of clouds as we continued our journey. The river makes a large bend in the Northrup Creek area and it • seemed as though it took forever to make much headway toward our campsite. We stopped again for a short break just upstream from the v Northrup Bridge. We had found that short breaks, even just floating down the river in our boats, had a rejuvenating effect upon our bodies. The clouds started getting thicker and one could sense that rain was not far behind. Dad (Don Webb, who was driving a support vehicle.) had gone ahead and had to do some bushwhacking down to the river from our campsite. His mission was to find a good takeout and to mark it with some ribbon. As soon as we found the ribbon, we followed his trail through a reprod patch to our camp on State Forestry land. Dinner tonight was salad, garlic bread, wine and fresh spring Chinook Salmon. We were hop ing that the spirit of the salmon would provide us with guidance down the river the next day. Day three would provide a change in scenery and riv er flow, would we be up to it? We could hear thunder off in the distance and soon we had a steady rainfall; it was time for bed and the patter of raindrops soon gave way to steady snores. Please see page 22