Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The independent. (Vernonia, Or.) 1986-current | View Entire Issue (Jan. 17, 1996)
Page 2 The INDEPENDENT, Jan. 17, 1996 t UNDEPENDENT 4 Serving the upper Nehalem River valley. Published twice monthly on the first and third Wednesdays of each month, by Public Opinion Laboratory Ltd., 725 Bridge Street, Vernonia, OR 97064, as a free newspaper. Editors and Publishers, Dirk & Noni Andersen, (503) 429-9410. x €. A SUCH C ontrol oa / who T o vote for . . . . k /U Y D O THE M E D IA t nF T H £ It’s smart to keep the people informed HAVE T wö BAi> MöUTHefy £6bTiSTlCAL, HW eb-VP Sometimes, what government agencies point to as C A U b iM t e s . W H Y D M T lV e HEAR M b L E fy fa j proper or legal procedure, fails to address the pur z WORE ABOUT THE OTHER CMUM tes . . . LfH O pose and intent of the procedure. A case in point is the present impasse in Banks. In AUGHT B£ A SETTER CHOICE ? l r f 1994, when notice was published and/or posted an o nouncing a public hearing on a proposed subdivision, £ >0 r 0 everything regarding the announcement was done fh legally. The problem is that doing what was legal, ■7 /> simply wasn t sufficient. This was a subdivision that would add more than 300 homes in a town that had o 4 * about that same number of homes. Because the development would have a huge im pact on the residents of Banks, even on the residents in the su rro u n d in g co m m u n ity b eca u se of the schools, a lot of grief (and money) could have been avoided by going beyond the legal requirements of notice . This is one time when press releases should By Dale Webb, member ond is a sea-run, anadromous fish that goes have been sent to every newspaper in the area; when Izaak Walton League, Nehalem Valley Chapter to the ocean, then returns to the river to arge, noticeable flyers should have been posted all spawn, much like salmon and steelhead. Oth The O regon D epartm ent of Fish and aI 0U? ? J ° Wn; when the assistar*ce of the schools Wildlife is currently working on statewide fish er than maybe having some sea lice on them should have been solicited to have notices sent home ing regulations to see if they can be simplified after re-entering the Nehalem River, they look identical to the resident fish. I know a lot of with students. through consolidation, elimination or other ap fishermen are saying they can tell the differ Its true that “actual” notice requires more effort proaches, without harming long-term conser ence, that sea-runs are much brighter, which and sometimes more cost, than “legal” notice. It’s vation of fish populations or reducing angling may be true for a short period of time, but af also true that citizens should put more effort into pav opportunities. At the same time, each district ter the fish have been in the river for a while, reviewed its regulations to see whether they ing attention to the information that is available to biologists say you cannot tell them apart. are adequately protecting their respective them and should attend city council and school board The paradox for biologists is to protect the stocks. This is where we hit a snag. meetings. sea-run population and still provide a residen Earlier this year, biologists from California tial cutthroat fishery. The first regulation, elimi Nevertheless, when a potentially controversial sub to Alaska met in Reedsport for the first-ever nating the winter trout season, protects adult ject comes before a local governing board it’s far sea-run cutthroat trout conference. The con sea-run cutthroat while they are in the river to more sensible to bring it out into the open than it is to sensus of the participants is that sea-run cut spawn and on their way back to the ocean in throat trout are disappearing fast. The scien hope that no one notices. late winter (February and March), the second On a subject with far less impact than the Banks tists based their agreement on anecdotal evi regulation protects juvenile sea-run cutthroat dence such as creel surveys and dam counts. project, C olum bia C ounty C om m issioners have Creel surveys on the Columbia River have de during the summer fishery. Juvenile cutthroat trout do not smolt out of the Nehalem until turned their backs on a tradition that was used to clined from an average of about 5,000 sea-run they are about 10 inches in length. We have maintain some representation for citizens in the less cutthroat in the 1970s to about 50 currently. probably been catching a lot of sea-run smolts The Siuslaw is producing only about 10% of populated areas of the county. in the Spring-Summer trout fishery without its late 1960s harvests. Sea-run cutthroat For many years, the three lay members of the knowing it. The two-fish daily bag is to help have been m onitored at W inchester dam county budget com m ittee were a p p o in ted from protect any adult sea-runs that may be in the since 1946, showing a population of about among citize n s who lived in Rainier, Vernonia river in late summer by reducing fishing im 1000 per year until 1956; since then, the pop Clatskanie, Mist, etc., because of the population pact. ulation has declined to nearly nothing. It is the One of the biggest problems with trying to bulge that resulted in electing commissioners and consensus that all coastal populations are suf protect this fishery is that very little is known other officials from St. Helens and Scappooose Not fering from low population numbers. about sea-run cutthroat trout. We do not know Our district biologist, Walt Weber, concurs any more. In a unanimous vote, Sandy Dillard and how they are distributed in the Nehalem sys that the population in the Nehalem system has Bob Schmor, were appointed to vacancies on the tem, where they spawn, what the population is declined and he is now forced to propose re budget committee that were formerly held by people strictive fishing regulations to help protect this (exactly), how the juveniles move through the from Vernonia and Rainier. The two new members species. The district staff is proposing to river system and many more questions. The reality of the new fishing regulations is are both from St. Helens. "Eliminate winter trout season to protect juve that the fishery that many of us grew up with is This isn’t a complaint about the ability of either ap nile salmon/steelhead and sea-run cutthroat”. now history, fishing in the small streams and pointee to do a good job. This is simply another case Another staff proposal is that “Trout bag limit beaver ponds seldom produces fish longer when “legal” notice wasn’t the same as “actual” no in all NW zone streams be 2 per day and they than 12 inches. These sm all stream s and must be 12 inches in length. This is a conser tice. Posting a notice on the bulletin board at the ponds may not be sea-run habitat (nobody vation measure to protect sea-run cutthroat courthouse is of little use to people who have no rea trout”. Right now I’m hearing a lot of “Oh! No knows), but writing regulations so we could ish certain small streams or beaver ponds son to go to the courthouse. Publishing a notice in way!” would be a nightmare of regulations that not Many people are thinking “there are a lot of newspapers that don’t cover the county is legal but even my lawyer could decipher. cutthroat trout in the river” , and they are right. fails to give actual notice. The reality of this situation is that sea-run A little effort on the part of the com m issioners The problem is that there aren’t a lot of sea- cutthroat trout and coho salmon are in a race would have been appreciated. Incidentally, when was run cutthroat trout in the river and they look to be our next endangered species. If we take the same as all the other cutthroat trout in the the last time anyone saw a county commissioner in river. There are two kinds of cutthroat trout in corrective measures now, we may be able to Vernonia or Mist? help keep sea-run cutthroat trout off the list. the Nehalem River; one is a residential fish Fishing has most likely played a major role in Ah, yes, back to the good old days! that never leaves the river system. The sec 9 9 CMT I WK£ THE. R IG H T C H O IC E'? Please see page 3 * • 1' ■ J ■ 0 1 . < Hi