Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The independent. (Vernonia, Or.) 1986-current | View Entire Issue (March 22, 1995)
Page 2 The INDEPENDENT, March 22,1995 The u,s. INDEPENDENT Serving the upper Nehalem River valley. Published twice monthly on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month, by Public Opinion Laboratory Ltd., 1206 S tate A venue, V ernonia, OR 97064, as a fre e new spaper. E ditors and P ublishers, Dirk & Noni Andersen, (503) 429-9410. coapT ^HNQÜIST-HEHMUIST RAH RAH RAH 7 Supreme Court just another sport event? Everyone who has been following the story of mandatory drug testing in the Vernonia School Dis trict knows the lie, oops..., line about “protecting our athletes.” The district has managed to hit a new low, however, with envelopes emblazoned with the Stars and Stripes flying above a slogan saying “U.S. Supreme Court, here we come!” Instead of using this opportunity to educate, the district has spent more than four years brainwashing students, trivializing the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and, now, equates a hearing in the U.S. Supreme Court with an athletic contest! This is disgusting and degrading but, unfortunately, not surprising. It’s not surprising because this district has already said Vernonia students use drugs; it has already said that drugs are openly available in town; it has already said that students smoke marijuana in the restaurant across from the school. If you think they haven’t made these claims, you need to read the district’s re sponses to the lawsuit filed by the Acton family, and the transcript of trial testimony. Instead of educating, this school district trivializes the foundations of our country. It’s obvious they are willing to destroy those foundations in favor of a world of blind, unquestioning conformity and, no, it’s not be cause some students used drugs; there are ways to deal with that, as other school districts have shown. This district’s mandatory, suspicionless drug testing policy was started because a few high school teach ers couldn’t maintain discipline and the administration didn’t support those who tried. There was no concern for athletes. If there had been, the tests would have included steroids, but they didn’t. If there was real concern for the students, the tests would have included alcohol, but they didn’t. How many thousands of dollars that could have been used for education, have been wasted on this policy? What if that money had been used to beef up instruction in some neglected course—like the Con stitution? And how much is it going to cost the tax payers when the district’s insurance rates jump be cause the insurance company has been taking care of this legal defense? Why are some students going to Washington, D.C.? Not because it’s educational, no. The superin tendent has openly said it’s great “propaganda” . That’s why only those who support drug testing were selected. Independent thinkers need not apply. Sadly, this whole situation came about not to pro tect athletes or any other students, but to protect a few teachers and administrators who lacked the courage to tell students that inappropriate behavior would not be accepted. These few teachers and administrators would rather lie and subvert the foundations of our demo cratic way of life, than accept responsibility for doing the job they were, and in some cases still are, paid to do. No matter what the eventual outcome, their be havior is worse than any of the students. t > z z I z The Josi Report By Rep. TimJosi Oregon Representative, District 2 Last Monday [March 13,1995], hundreds of opponents and proponents of Ballot Measure 18, the provision passed last November that bans certain hunting practices in the taking of bear and cougar, descended on the Capitol. In an emotional afternoon of testimony before the Subcommittee on Agriculture and Forestry on HB 2584, which repeals the new law, com mittee members heard three solid hours of testimony supporting HB 2584. Instead of using one of the customary ways of calling on witnesses, first come, first heard; those that traveled the farthest speak first; or a balanced approach of one pro, then one con argument; the committee chairman “stacked” the list of witnesses by first listing the names of people he had contacted before the meet ing to testify. During the three hours of this one-sided testimony, the chairman constantly chided the opposition for their requests to be heard. Reluctantly, during the last two hours, he allowed some opponents who had traveled great distances to speak. Regardless of how one feels about this issue, this kind of treat ment at the hands of elected officials is uncon scionable. I truly believe that if we, as a nation, are to survive long-term, we must be willing to listen to each other in a respectful manner. If we cannot do that how can we hope to agree on a long term public policy rather than one that swings wildly from one extreme to the other depending on who has the momentary majori ty? I By Dale Webb, member Izaak Walton League, Nehalem Valley Chapter In this column I would like to lay out what is on the agenda for the Nehalem Valley “Ikes” for the upcoming year. Our first major undertaking of the year in volves riparian-area tree-planting projects. We have five project sites slated for planting this year, which will encompass 11,300 feet of ri parian area. This program is just getting start ed and is likely to get bigger on an annual ba sis. Aproximately 2650 trees will be planted. The trees were purchased by the Izaak Wal Take Measure 18, for example; I did not vote for it. We hire competent professionals to staff the Department of Fish and Wildlife to de termine a sound wildlife management policy; I do not believe they would institute a policy that was inhumane to animals. Also, one of the Departm ent’s goals is to “m aintain all species at an optimum level” which would pre clude over-hunting. However, at the polls last November, the majority of Oregonians decid ed to take control of certain wildlife manage ment practices by limiting the use of bait in hunting bears and the hunting of bear and cougar with hounds. Now, some people who opposed this mea sure are claiming it should be repealed for a variety of reasons. They run the gamut from public safety, to hunting with hounds keeps kids out of gangs and teaches responsibility, to it’s city vs. rural dwellers, to the voters were fed lies by out-of-state interests during the election, to this is the first step in an attempt too stop all hunting. The bottom line is, even if all of this is true-and we do not know that for sure— we cannot ignore the vote in November. Even if the majority of Legislators may wish to over turn this new law, we must not; for if we do, we will be destroying the initiative process. Then why stop with Measure 18? What other initiative results do “we” dislike? Re! Salem, OR 97310 Phone; (503)986-1402 FAX: (503)986-1575 ton League, but we hope to secure a grant to recover our costs and finance future projects since our chapter is not able to fund this pro ject on an ongoing basis. The purpose of the project is to reestablish a conifer component to the existing hardwood riparian area, which is in a d e q u a te to p ro v id e shade fo r the streams. This, obviously, is a tong term project with a tong term goal. Our biggest project this year is going to be at Cedar Ridge on Rock Creek. It is located at the former Perry’s Sport camp now owned by Larry Steele. This project will involve using en- Please see page 3