FOUR MEDFORD (OREGON)
MEDFORIvitt&wTHIBCNI
TveryDoay in auoiern uretfoa
Reaaa The Mail fTibune"
Published Daily Except Saturday by
MEDFOHD f"rUNTtt.G CO.
27-23 North Fir St Prion 2-9H1
HERB CKLY Advertiainf Manager
GERALD LATHAM Business Manager
ERIC ALLE.N JR. Managing Kailol
JJAHL H ADAMS. City Editor
HARRY CHirWlAN Telegraph Editor
RICHARD JKWETT Sports Editor
OLIVE ST ARCHER Society Editor
PALE ERICKSON Clrculauon Mgr.
An independent Jewspaper
Entered second clan matter at
Mediord Orejfon under Act ot
March J. lam
SUBSCRIPTION RATES
Ey Mall In Advance Per Copy 10c
Daily and Sunday One veal 12 00
Daily and Sunday Si month 6.50
Dally and Sunday Three moa 3.50
Sunday Only One year 3J0
By Carrier In Advance Medlord.
Aahland Central Point Eagle Point.
Jacksonville Cold Hill Phoenix.
Shady Cove Rogue River. Talent,
an 1 on motol routel.
Daily and Sunday One year $15 00
Daily and Sunday One month 1.25
Carr'er and Dealers- -5c pel copy .
All Terme Casli in Advance
Official Piper of the Clt? of Bedford
QKf-lal Paper ol Jackson County
United "Press ruil Leaied Wire
MEMBER OF AUDIT BUREAU
Of CIRCULATION
Advertlflnc Representative
WEST-HOLLIDAY COMPANY INC
Offices In New York Chicago De
troit San Francisco Los Angeles
Seattle Portland St Louis Atlanta
Vancouver B C
NAIIONA I EDITORIAL
v' I asTocCatlon
lO" NEWS PA PER
PUBLISHERS
ASSOCIATION
Flight o' Time
Medford and Jackson County
History from the files of The
Mail Tribune 10, 20, 30 and
40 years ago.
10 YEARS AGO
Aug. 16, 1946
(It was Friday)
Wild blackberries . are now
ripe in the county, particularly
in Upper Applegate and Old
Stage rd. district.
From Arthur Perry'i Ye
Smudge Pot column: The dog
days have arrived here. They
bring out the painful fact shade
Is more unevenly distributed
than wealth.
20 YEARS AGO
Aug. 16, 1936
(It was Sunday)
Maj. H. D.-bagnall. district
recruiting officer at Portland,
confers with Sgt. Charley R.
Hill, local recruiter.
Steps taken to procure an en
larged federal building so that
all permanent agencies here
might be centralized In one
structure.
30 YEARS AGO
Aug. 16, 1926
(It was Monday)
Dick Isaacs, son of William F.
Isaacs, calches large salmon bare
handed in a shallow hole while
fishing.
Faster trains to the east, plat
ing in service millions of dol
lars worth of new railroad equip
ment, are all part of the South
ern Pacific's program this year,
according to A. S. Rosenbaum,
Southern Pacific official.
40 YEARS AGO
Aug. 16, 1916
(It was Wednesday)
The city council last night ad
journs without taking action be
cause several members were ab
sent. From Local and Personal col
umn: Fred Lewis left Wednesday
morning for San Francisco.
What's the Answer?
Can You Get 4 of the 7?
Copr. 1955 Editorial Research
Report
1. Adlai E. Stevenson is or
isn't the only grandson of a
former Vice President to get a
major-party presidential nomi
nation?
2. Average amount of life in
surance per family is around
S700. Sl.TQp. $7,000, $11,700 or
$17,000?
3. Prince Rainier of Monaco
is the same age as his wife, the
former Grace Kelly, or two years
younger, or three, six or nine
years older?
4. The U.S. farm population
over the last six years fell by
500.000. three million or 7,500,
000, or rose by 75.000?
5. The Democratic party has
never yet nominated a Catholic
for Vice President; true or fake?
6. Sun Valley is in California,
Colorado. Idaho, North Carolina,
Texas. Wyoming or the Canadian
Rockies?
7. Which Southern state has
the most votes at the Democratic
national convention?
The answers: 1. Is. 2. $7,000
per family. 3. Six years older. 4.
Fell by three million. 5. True. 6.
Idaho. 7. Texas.
McCANN ON VACATION
Charles M. McCann is on
vacation. His weekly newt out
look and daily foreign news
commentary columns will be
resumed upon his return.
I
MAIL TRIBUNE
How A bout Key-Noters?
The key-note speech of Governor Clement of
Tennessee must have been better than we thought, or
Chairman Leonard Hall of the Republican National
Committee would not have called a special press con
ference to condemn it.
Key-note speeches are always extreme, extrava
gantly partisan and over-declamatory. For years this
fact has been taken in stride by the opposition, as a
part of the time-honored pattern of "pointing with
pride" and "viewing with alarm."
In the tradition of the "Boy orator of the Platte"
William Jennings Bryan, and the late and lamented
Billy Sunday, we thought the youthful Governor of
Tennessee did a good enough job, but we couldn't
take it very seriously.
The Republican chairman, however, did.
He apparently viewed the table-thumping revival
of the "cross of gold" technique, as mendacious, in
flamatory and demagogic, unworthy of the governor
of a great state, and of the party of Jefferson, Jack
son and Roosevelt, etc., etc.
ALL of which is rather silly.
Of course the Chairman of the Republican nation
al committee would not like the "key-note" speech of
the Democratic party, whoever delivered it, any more
than the chairman of the Democratic National Com
mittee will LIKE the "key-note" speech of the Repub
lican party, such allergies are, or should be, tak
en for granted.
But to take the time and trouble to answer them
publicly on the part of either party chairman, seems
to this department, to be what Woodrow Wilson
liked to call "supererogation" that is going beyond
the call of duty, in a decidedly childish and petulant
fashion, giving an importance to a purely routine
partisan performance, which it in no way merited.
The speech has also been termed intemperate and
irresponsible, well from the standpoint of the politi
cal opposition all key-note speeches are, and there
will be plenty of Democratic leaders who will curse
with vehemence and writhe in their seats with pain
when they listen to the GOP "key-noter" a few days
hence.
"UR objection to the key-note type of declamation
is not on the moral grounds of intemperance or
inaccuracy, such attributes are to be expected for
their object is not to inform the people but to arouse
the fighting spirit and enthusiasms of the party mem
bers. Our objection as has often been stated in this
department, is their political ineffectiveness.
They do pep-up, arouse and delight the 100 per
cent partisans, but they are "safe for Democracy"
or Republicanism as the case may be, anyway.
The aim of campaign speeches should be not to
stir up the animals who are in the cage, but to go out,
and get new recruits not by overwrought partisan ap
peals, but by presenting the facts in their favor in a
clear and convincing way. In other words as Adlai
Stevenson has so often remarked, to "talk sense."
A ND here we come to the parting of the ways with
former Pesident Truman, and his school of "give
'em hell."
We grant that in 1948 the "give 'em hell" tech
nique won. But we have never been convinced, how
ever, that HST was victorious so much because he
"gave 'em hell" as that his opponent Governor Dewey
didn't give the voters anything. Mr. Dewey wras so
sure of himself and of victory that he thought all he
had to do was to pass out pleasing platitudes and a
few inoffensive generalities, and ride silently and
majestically with the tide to an overwhelming victory.
In other words the American voters did not vote so
much FOR Harry Truman and his "give 'em hell"
oratory, as they voted against the complacent, confi
dent Tom Dewey, who gave them nothing.
That we grant is merely a matter of personal op
inion. So what? That is all editorials are anyway!
R.W.R.
More A I Sarena
' We are rather fed up with the Al Sarena case.
We believe most of the people are too.
But the enthusiastic supporters of ex-Secretary of
the Interior McKay apparently want to keep the issue
alive. Their favorite method of resuscitation is to con
vert the controversy into a straw man and then tear
it down, and down and down.
The straw man adds up to something like this :
The critics of the Al Sarena deal claim it was against
the law, that the owners of the mine were cheats and
crooks, and that Secretary McKay was little better than a
second Albert Fall of Tea Pot dome infamy, in granting
the mining patents.
They then with great care demonstrate no laws
in force at the TIME of the "give-away" were violat
ed, that the owners of the mine are and were at the
time respected and law abiding citizens, of Alabama,
and instead of being criticized for this action Mr.
McKay could not have done otherwise and should
be praised for it.
We can only speak for the Mail Tribune of course
but this paper has repeatedly stated the deal was un
doubtedly "within the law." We have never directly
or indirectly reflected upon the private characters
of any individuals involved, for all we know they
may all be paragons of virtue, and pure as the driven
snow.
DUT we did criticize and will continue to criti
cize the policy adopted by the Secretary of the
Interior and upheld by the present administration
that the practice of -"mining timber" on the TJ.S.
Forest reserves at a cost of
dealers have to pay twenty
Thursday. August is. 195$
$5 an acre when timber
or thirty times as much
in the open market, is wrong, and should be stopped!
TT IS true that Congressman Ellsworth secured the
passage of a law that would make some of what the
Al Sarena owners did, illegal today. But the law is
so worded that it works a hardship on the small
miner, and gives a great advantage to the large one.
Also assuming the Al Sarena practice of disregard
ing the rulings of the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau
of Land Management and going to the Bureau of
Mines as well as to the owners' special assaying
office, for the judgments desired are followed, there
would seem to be little difficulty in evading it.
FINALLY the Al Sarena case is not so important
in itself, but is important as a symbol of basic
GOP doctrine, whenever the issue is drawn between
private profit and the public welfare.
After all, the timber on these mining claims was
not private property but a part of the U.S. Forest
reserve, it belonged to the people and should have
been under the control of the U.S. Forest Service
not the Bureau of mines or the A. W. Williams In
spection company of far off Alabama.
As has so often been
it is not a question of stealing anything from the
government, but giving it away, it is not a question
of moral turpitude but improper and destructive
and undemocratic public policy. R.W.R.
Today and
By Walter
TRUMAN AND STEVENSON
Mr. Truman, for all his leg
endary reputation as a practical
politician, has got himself into
a strange pre
dicament.
If he loses
his fight to
stop Steven
son, he will
have made a
very sizeable
contribution to
S t e venson's
chances in run-
waiter Uppmann n i n g against
Eisenhower. For Stevenson is
now free of the charge that his
election would mean a restora
tion and continuation of the Tru
man administration. It is against
the Truman administration's
record that Eisenhower won a
landslide victory in 1952.
If, on the other hand, Mr. Tru
man wins his fight in Chicago and
is able to stop Stevenson, he will
have made it as certain as such
things can be that no Democrat
can win the election. It is hard
to imagine the convention nom
inating Harriman. But if it did
do so after a violent and divisive
struggle, it is still harder to
imagine how Harriman could
win the election. Not only is he
unacceptable to a very large
number of Democratic politicians
and voters he would be identi
fied with sectional and class con
flicts, and he would be the per
fect foil for the image of Eisen
hower as a unifier and healer
and a man of peace.
e
Tlf R. TRUMAN'S legendary
reputation as the smartest
of them all is based on his victory
in 1948 -a victory won despite
all the politicians and prophets
and the pollsters. This was such
a spectacular performance that
it has become impossible for Mr.
Truman, and difficult even for
many professional observers, to
remember that after 1948 came
1952, and that in 1952 the issue
was the Truman record. Because
of what the country had come to
think of that record, no Dem
ocrat could in 1952 hope to be
elected. For there was a great
majority, including a large num
ber of Democrats, who had made
up their minds that no Dem
ocrat, not even Stevenson, could
make a clean break with the Tru
man administration.
Mr. Truman seems to believe
that 1948 provides a formula of
victory which he, or someone he
prompts and manages, can apply
again and again. Thus he com
plains in his memories that in
1952 Stevenson avoided as best
he could letting him run the
camoaign and be the main speak
er. He seems to think that he
could have won in 1952. Now he
would like to apply the same
formula in 1956.
What reason is there for think
ing that the formula which work
ed in 1948 just worked by a
freak of circumstances would
have worked in 1952, and would
now work in 1956? It was one
thing for the heir of Roosevelt
after the victory of World War II
and before the Korean war to
give hell to the Republican gov
ernor of New York. It is auite
a different thing for the Dem
ocratic governor of New York
to give hell to the President of
the United States who is Gen.
Eisenhower.
a
TIHE main difference, it seems
to me, between Stevenson
and Truman is that the one is
living in the present while the
other is living in the past. This
applies not only to election strat
egy but also to the issues. Mr.
Truman is forever wanting to
fight again the old battles of the
New Deal and of the Fair Deal
and of the Stalinist era of the
cold war. When- he talks about
a "fighting" candidate, he is
thinking of his own fighting
days.
But those were the days be
fore Eisenhower took over the
welfare state, before the Su
preme Court had made deseg
regation in' the public schools
the law of the land, before the
Ljj5st!itej
stated in this department
Tomorrow
Lippmann
death and degradation of Stalin,
before Geneva and the atomic
stalemate, before the epochal
challenge and competition which
the western world must now
meet. The dominant issues can
not now be solved by the old
formulae of the New Deal and
the foreign issues cannot be dealt
with by the old formulae and
slogans of the cold war. The one
thing that can be said with cer
tainty about the next four years
is that it will be a period when
old policies will have to reap
praised, revised, and reformul
ated.
e
rpHE great virtue of Stevenson,
- as compared with the other
candidates, it that he is a man
used to think deliberately, care
fully, and thoroughly, not one
to flip a coin, not one to leap to
a conclusion, not one to be
satisfied with a rubber stamp
opinion. To one of Mr. Truman's
temperament this capacity for
deliberating seems like indeci
sion. But Stevenson is not an in
decisive man. In 1952 he was
bolder and more decisive on
more hot issues than almost any
one it would be possible to name
who ever got within sight of the
White House.
This capacity for- taking
thought has never yet been con
sidered a fault in a statesman,
and it is no fault 'in 1956. The
times we live in are very dif
ficult, and we cannot hope to
come through them successfully
unless we think our way through
them. The fact that Stevenson
has brains, and that he knows
how to use them, will since
he is so thoroughly available
on all other counts that matter
count heavily in his favor.
(C) 1956. New York
Herald Tribune, Inc.
Editorial Comment
LODGEPOLE PINE
To date, no one knows very
much about lodgepole pine. We
don t know much about the way
it reproduces. We don't know the
growth cycle. We don't know the
best methods of logging to as
sure regeneration. Nor have we
developed any new and efficient
methods of logging this small
timber.
Plus the fact that almost all
legislation aimed at timber utili
zation in the west is based on
either Douglas fir or Ponderosa
pine. We'll not only have to
overhaul our logging methods,
but it is becoming increasingly
evident that we'll have to over
haul our legislation concerning
timber practices, not only in
Oregon but in all the western
states.
Of one thing we can be sure.
There is a vast practically virgin
stand of lodgepole pine lying
within a 200 mile radius of
Klamath Falls. Someone is going
to come in and harvest that
timber.
And with transportation costs
being what they are today, it's
probably going to be cheaper to
manufacture pulp products in
the area rather than shipping
the pulp chips or logs, whichever
they do, out.
The pulp industry in the west
today is so infinitesimally smaU
that it's hard to visualize the
booming progress which is sure
to come in the next decade. It
won't be as glamorous as it was
in the taU timber days, but eco
nomically it will dwarf anything
we've seen in the past. Bill
Jenkins in Klamath Falls Herald
and News.
For Food
That's
Right
At Any
Time
Shop at . . .
Reuther Emerges as Michigan's
Top Demo in Stevenson Swing
By LYLE C. WILSON
United Press Correspondent
Chicago (U.R) The time
comes in any political drama
such as this Democratic Nation
al Convention
when some
thing has to
break or give,
one way or the
other.
The pres
sures pile up.
Tempers warm
up to ho t.
There is sus-
Lyie c uuson p e n s e. Ana
then, crra-a-a-a-ack! Something
gives and it's all over. Some
formalities still to come, perhaps.
But the big decision has been
made.
That's how it was here in the
small hours of Wednesday mor
ning. Gov. Averell Harriman of
New York, backed by former
President Harry S. Truman, was
giving Adlai E. Stevenson a
tussle for the Democratic presi
dential nomination.
Delegates were fleeing by the
scores from the coop to the fence
for a safety perch from which
they could flutter to one side or
the other as the identity of the
winner might emerge.
A few minutes after 3 a.m.,
(EDT), Wednesday morning, the
weary Michigan delegation to
this convention was called into
surprise caucus to consider what
to do. Michigan had a favorite
son, Gov. G. Mennen (Soapy)
Williams and to him the delega
tion was pledged. This same Wil
liams back there in February
was the first to call 'a foul on
Stevenson, charging him with a
program of political moderation
that would not do for the Dem
ocratic Party in 1956. Williams
was way out in front among the
stop-Stevenson brigade.
And now a more logically fa
vorite son of Michigan Demo
crats took over the early morn
ing show. He is Walter P. Reu
ther, big boss of the Auto Work
ers and the ambitious vice presi
dent of AFL-CIO. Reuther is a
Michigan delegate to this con
vention. The Michigan caucus
had no official status so far as
the convention was concerned.
He had his hands on the dele
gation controls.
The United Press bulletin on
what happened was timed off at
3:39 a.m.(EDT) an early hour,
but fatal to the hopes of the
governor of New York and to
the hopes of the governor of
Michigan, too. He- had been
thinking he might gamble con
trol of a big favorite son delega
tion into something like the vice
presidential nomination. Per
haps Williams might have
brought it off, at that, if he had
really been in control. He
wasn't, however, because what
that UP bulletin said was this:
"Gov. G. Mennen Williams
said early today he will urge
Michigan's delegation to throw
its 44 votes to Adlai E. Steven
son."
That was the big, determining
break in this convention. Ohio,
Michigan and New Jersey, big
delegation states, were uncom
mitted to either leading contend
er. Each was in a position to
break the back of the Harriman
campaign for the presidential
nomination or to put Harriman
on the way to win.
But it was the Michigan dele
gation, under Reuther's pressure,
caucusing in the lake front Con
gress hotel that actually brought
it off. The decision was against
Harriman. From that moment,
Harriman was dead politically,
and all hands knew it.
In a matter of hours Williams
was at Stevenson headquarters
tendering his delegation's votes.
New Jersey was not far behind.
The Ohio delegation, pledged to
favorite son Gov. Frank J.
Lausche, was crumbling away,
to Lausche's astonishment and
acute discomfort. His delegates
were traipsing to the Stevenson
corral. The stampede was on and
it continues.
Congressional
Quiz
(Copyright. 195
Congressional Quarterly) '
Q The Democrats set a rec
ford1 for convention baUoting in
1924 when they nominated John
W. Davis on the 103rd ballot.
The Republican record was 36
ballots in 1880. About how many
Presidential candidates have
been nominated on the first bal
lot? (a) one-half; (b) one-fourth;
(c) one-fifth.
A (a) is mostly nearly cor
rect. Since 1856, the Republi
cans have nominated three
fourth of their Presidential
candidates on the first ballot.
Democrats about one-half.
f MARKET
I 1202 North Kireniil
, OPEN EVERY L
NIGHT TIL M
5&5v MIDNIGHT y&Z
WTiat took place before Wil
liams' 3:39 a.m., announcement
was a caucus poll of the Michi
gan delegation which tallied:
Stevenson votes; Harriman
IIV2 votes; Sen. Stuart Syming
ton, Mo., Vi vote. But what hap
pened a couple of days before
that was an announcement by
Reuther that he was a Stevenson
man.
Williams countered then that
Reuther was a nice fellow but
that the Michigan delegation
would make up its own mind.
Reuther may or may not be nice.
He is undoubtedly powerful
more powerful in the councils
of the Democratic party in the
state of Michigan than is Wil
liams who has been elected gov
ernor four times running.
Discloses Head Man
The switch of the Michigan
delegation not only ended the
presidential contest here with
Stevenson the winner, it also
disclosed who is Michigan head
Matter of Fact
LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON
Chicago "What will Lyndon
do? What does Lyndon want?
What happened between Lyndon
and Truman
between Lyn
don and Adlai
between Lyn
don and Ave
rell?"
These varia
tions on the
single theme
of the inten
tions of Lyn
don Johnson of Texas are the
loudest noises in the rising roar
of anxious speculation that is
the characteristic sound of every
national convention. Thus far, in
fact, the chief visible effect of
Harry S. Truman's bold indorse
ment of Averell Harriman has
been to transform Lyndon Jonn-
son from a mere Texas favorite
son into the potentially com
mandine figure of this Demo
cratic Convention.
From Truman, Harriman and
Adlai Stevenson on down, every
one is courv
i n g Johnson.
Every one is
def err i n g to
his wishes, try
ing to ascer
tain his Inten
tions, angling
to discover
his price. It is
a wonderful
3.
Stewart Alsop
triumph of the waiting game at
which Johnson has always been
so expert. ,
HPHE question is, of course,
-- whether Lyndon Johnson wiU
be the first casualty of his own
triumph. There is an intoxi-
ozone in the very air of a na
tional political convention, parti
cularly when you stand at the
head of a large bloc of delegates
and are the object of universal
courtship.
Only four years ago, one of
the wisest men in American
politics, Senator Richard Russell
of Georgia, reluctantly con
sented to become the candidate
of the South. He only, wanted to
reinforce the convention-time
bargaining power of the South
ern delegations. But he breathed
the dread convention-ozone. And
before you could say Jack Rob
inson, Russell was. stultifying his
own record and convictions by a
vain attempt to conciliate the
labor leaders and so get North
ern votes.
In Johnson's case the danger
is even greater, for he has more
to lose than Russell had in 1952.
Russell could not have become
a nationally acceptable Demo
cratic candidate. Johnson, on
the other hand, can quite pos
sibly become a very serious lead
ing contender in 1960. If he
handles himself well in the next
four years, he will have an ex
cellent chance in 1960.
a
THE one. thing that could ruin
this chance (for which John-
Frank Morgin
I fj
CHAPEL MORTUARY
' Funeral Directors
PHONE 2-8030 1 K'N STREET
MEDFORD
man of the Democratic party.
some shine has gone from Wil
liams' prestige.
It was 9 hours and 48 min
utes after Williams' small hours
announcement that the Harriman
camp tossed in the towel. A
Harriman manager spoke briefly
with a UP reporter. At 1:17 p.m..
(EDT) the United Press bullet
ined: "Gov. AvereU Harriman's bid
for the Democratic presidential
nomination collapsed today.
"The governor's campaign
managers privately admitted
that Adlai E. Stevenson 'appar
enUy has' enough votes' to win
the presidential nomination."
Harriman indignantly denied
that bulletin. But facts are facts.
There may be the formality of
a presidential roll call here to
night. The roll call which did
the business, however, was that
one in the Michigan caucus early
Wednesday morning in the Con
gress hotel.
Jo and Stewart Alsop
son has been consciously prepar
ing for some time) would be a
mistake now. If Lyndon Johnson
makes an all-out try for the
nomination at the present con
vention, he can only do so as the
candidate of the South and of no
one else. After that he will be in
the category of Russell, univer
sally admired, universaUy re
spected, but almost universally
acknowledged to be unavailable
as a Presidential candidate be
cause of his extreme Southern
commitment.
Johnson is playing his cards
very close to his chest. Part of
the bargaining power of every
man in his position is the possi
bility that he really may suc
cumb to the convention-ozone. So
this possibility is being strongly
hinted at.
OUT as a politician, Johnson
is not only tough and wise
and long-headed. He is above all
notable for his realism and self
control. So it is a very good bet
that he will not succumb to the
convention - ozone, although he
will keep everyone on tenter
hooks of uncertainty for as long
as possible. He will seem to want
.the top spot, but he will not seek
it in deadly earnest.
If this is a sound forecast, it
tells a good deal, at least in a
negative way, about what John
son wants and will do. What he
wants is to get a platform and
a ticket that he can approve, and
that will not split the party. This
means, very obviously, that his
great influence will be used for
a moderate civil rights plank.
This also means, quite probably,
that any candidate wanting his
support for first place will have
to promise not to put any person
abhorrent to Johnson, such as
Senator Estes Kefauver, in the
second place on the ticket.
BUT what candidates can John
son support? Plainly, because
of the feeling in Texas, he can
not support Averell Harriman.
He can help Harriman by with
holding Southern votes from
Adlai Stevenson, but he hardly
seems too likely to continue this
sort of indirect aid if it begins
to look like causing the nomina
tion of Harriman. He can also
play for the nomination of a com
promise candidate, such as Sena
tor Stuart Symington. But there
are very grave risks in that
game, too. And finally, after re
ceiving the appropriate assur
ances, he can remove the ob
stacles to the nomination of
Adlai Stevenson, not perhaps by
taking Texas into the Stevenson
column, but by encouraging
other Southern friends to go
that way.
Whatever his final choice
and it can be said authoritatively
that he has made no choice as
these words are written Lyn
don Johnson is probably the
most interesting man to watch.
(Copyright 1956, New York
Herald Tribune, Inc.
Harold Snodgrass
1