Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Heppner gazette-times. (Heppner, Or.) 1925-current | View Entire Issue (Oct. 16, 2024)
EIGHT - Heppner Gazette-Times, Heppner, Oregon Wednesday, October 16, 2024 Port of Morrow replaces commissioner on CDA board -Continued from PAGE ONE Everyone,” she added. Peterson said he didn’t think Doherty’s anger was helping the situation. “You really go after people,” he said. “Everything on the CDA board is nothing but tension,” Taylor said. “Just the way that meeting went….” Doherty said that ten- sion would not go away with her removal. “I mean, we’re in liti- gation with our partners,” she said, referring to a law- suit Umatilla County and CTUIR had filed against the other three entities. “You bring up some is- sues that need to be correct- ed but, my gosh, this way of doing it…this attack,” said Peterson. “I’m sorry, it’s self-righteous.” “That’s because I’m right,” said Doherty. Doherty also said that when she had indicated that they should tell the grantor that the grant was not ap- proved, she was “taken to the woodshed” by the Port of Morrow board. “I was threatened with removal from the CDA from this board,” she said. POM secretary/treasur- er Rick Stokoe said he had commented that removing POM Executive Direc- tor Lisa Mittelsdorf as the Port’s CDA representative had been a mistake. Mit- telsdorf had served on the CDA board for more than 30 years. “I did not call for your removal,” he said. Doherty said she didn’t see it that way. She also said that she had recently sought legal counsel. “I had to, because I knew this retaliation was coming,” she said. “I’m being removed from my position. That’s retaliation.” “If we don’t stand up for someone that does something right and speaks out, who do we stand up for?” she asked. Commissioner vice-president John Mur- ray echoed that sentiment, saying the Port was on record as saying it would do a better job of moni- toring whether the CDA followed its own rules but that it hadn’t. He said he felt uncomfortable silenc- ing somebody who spoke up now. “Maybe I would have spoke up differently, in a different way. Maybe not,” Murray said. “I have a hard time with it.” “I think there’s a right way to speak out,” said Stokoe. “As an elected offi- cial who represents the Port of Morrow on that board, I would expect a little more profession.” Doherty accused the POM board of not wanting her to expose corruption, but Stokoe said it was the fact that she acted without input from the rest of the Port board that did not sit well. “You represent the Port of Morrow on a CDA board,” he said. “That means you speak for me and everybody sitting here.” Doherty responded that she didn’t see the need for approval from the rest of the Port board, and that she felt she did what was best for the CDA board. “The only authority you have on the CDA board is granted to you by this board,” Stokoe said. “No,” said Doherty. Peterson said he didn’t disagree with her stance on Smith, but he disagreed with her tone and the impli- cation that it was some kind of “conspiracy.” “They’ve done wrong,” he said, holding up the minutes from the June 25 CDA meeting, “but if they were trying to be secret… my gosh, here it is.” “I feel that the CDA board would at least go along a little better without all the tension on it and without you there,” said Taylor. “You bring a lot of it.” Taylor also brought up Smith’s upcoming evalu- ation by the CDA board, hinting that Doherty should not be involved in the pro- cess. “It just looks like you have an ax to grind,” he said. “I don’t have any ax to grind with anybody except for someone who didn’t do things properly,” Doherty replied. “The tone might have not been well. I admit it,” she added. “When you ask questions, and the answers are so snide.” The board voted 3-2 to remove Doherty from the CDA board, with Taylor, Stokoe and Peterson ap- proving and Doherty and Murray dissenting. The board asked Mit- telsdorf if she would be willing to take the CDA position, but she declined. In another 3-2 split vote, the board selected Taylor as the Port’s representative to the CDA, with Peterson as the alternate. “So, let’s put on the agenda for next week the new litigation that’s com- ing for retaliation,” said Doherty. The Question of Ap- proval Part of the conflict, both at the CDA meet- ing and within the Port, seemed to stem from the fact that the CDA board had approved the OLDCC grant application but that the compensation package within the application had not been approved by the CDA board prior to sub- mission. In fact, Doherty said the raise had been denied at the CDA’s Dec. 11 meeting. However, several Port com- missioners pointed out at the POM meeting last week that the CDA had approved the grant, which did include the compensation package. Peterson also questioned the idea that the CDA de- nied the salary outright, since no action was taken. “You keep saying ‘de- nied.’” That’s quite differ- ent from ‘never approved,’” said Peterson. “I’m saying it was an oversight and they didn’t get that done.” Peterson told Doherty she was “really overblow- ing this.” “Am I? This is a federal offense. Am I overblowing it?” Doherty shot back, say- ing that the FBI was already investigating. Taylor also pointed out that she was talking as if Smith had purposefully deceived the CDA board, while all he heard Smith say was that he “owned” the error and should have looked at it more carefully. “Greg knew exactly what was in it. It wasn’t an error. He negotiated it,” Doherty said. According to Doherty, Eileen Hendricks, Port of Morrow Chief Financial Officer, signed the applica- tion May 2 and the federal government approved it May 16. The CDA board didn’t meet in May, and Doherty said she didn’t see the grant until the day of the June 25 meeting at which the grant was approved. Doherty said she thought the grant was “a done deal” by the time they saw it and couldn’t be changed. She added that left the five CDA partners “on the hook” for the cost. Peterson and Taylor countered that it could have been changed at any time, although it might have been more complicated. Meanwhile, Hendricks said she had received a call from Tim Robert, the CDA’s federal represen- tative regarding the grant, after the Sept. 20 CDA meeting. Robert asked if there had been a pay re- duction and told her that, if that was the case, the grant amount would be adjusted lower. According to Hen- dricks, Robert said the federal government had planned to ratchet down federal participation after the land transfer. Howev- er, because the CDA was proposing an increase in costs—including the pay raise in question—they had decided to keep the grant at previous levels. Either way, Hendricks said, she understood that the amount paid by the CDA partners would be the same. Port of Morrow attor- ney Sam Tucker was also present at the Port’s Oct. 11 meeting and clarified that, while there were rumors of the wages being rescinded retroactively, he had not received orders to do that at that time and didn’t know if he would. The wage in- crease had been rescinded going forward, he said. “There’s a lot of in- dication that there was a motion that said it should be retroactively done,” he said. “We don’t know for sure. We don’t have the minutes.” YOUR AD COULD BE HERE! Call 541-676-9228 Or Email graphics@rapidserve.net We also offer design and printing services Heppner Gazette-Times Sykes Printing ELECT JOHN L. BALLARD With 25 years of experience serving Umatilla and Morrow Counties, I stand independent and accountable to the people - not appointed by the governor, not run from Portland, and with zero campaign funds from outside the state. In fact, I’ve accepted no funds from anyone. I appreciate your support and vote on November 5, 2024 - John Ballard PAID FOR BY THE COMMITTEE TO ELECT JOHN L. BALLARD CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE FOR CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE COLUMBIA BASIN ELECTRIC ANNUAL MEETING and LUNCHEON Thursday, November 7, 2024 Condon Elks Lodge – Condon, OR Registration 11:15 a.m. Lunch 12:00 p.m Meeting to Follow - Door Prizes Free to all members in our service territory