Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The Coast mail. (Marshfield, Or.) 187?-1902 | View Entire Issue (Dec. 20, 1879)
Kaewn .jC- wsmzsM JW. '"-"s 'v f 0 k ,& TUtnd. 89 I. THE COAST MAIL. & oi'i'K'Mii iajim:6 or coos vovxvw f t tVbl. 1. MARSHFIELD, OH., SjTTTJED A. Y5 DEC. 20, 1879. N No. 51. wjnimwwgal if 5W 1 vlnlo-i In tlm U. N. 'lrc!iilt Court, I'lcltl, 'iul-, .1. .1. 8. Clicull Court 1)11. of Orep;oii. Wkdnkmday, Dec. 10, 1871). ii Hear v. If. II. Lmo. Xo. MS. Hull in Ki-ulty for Injunction. Rl) Town Hitk TIiu occupation of ft- ". . . -. I ....I .. . . V . .. ii iraci oi mini ait ii iowii mio lor uur Mirotoa of buniiioor Inula, which In afterward abandoned, doc not iinprcnti Uiii t lie locality tlm char acter or (iiulity nf n town nlto, no llnit tlm hinuo cannot liu taken up mid held uiidt-r the duiiutloU not n unoccupied public land. (!!) HplTTOArTKCTA J'ATKXTKllllily doc not hmo 'uriiidlotlon to allocl a luUont except on tliu ground of an antecedent eniiity in tliu plain till' which wa (litTupirdcd in tliu irsuluj tlicrcof, nitl thorcforo a par ty who claim to liuve Hi-ltled iinon u tract of public land Miliit-ijtiont lo Ilia KeltlciiiiMit und Lntr' thereof liv unothcr who hu received n patent for tlio Kitnio, upon tliu ujounil that the K'tllcinont ii nd entry of tliu patentee wcio illegal and void, can not niiilutniu a niut toctiildoMiqh patent or I'liaro tliu palmilcu a hla trontee of tliu prominc. (a) (ji'KMinNNor Vm-r Dct'iritox ok Till" MM) IIKIMIIT'IKNT f jlWHt iultri of fact decided in the laud depart ment are not mibject to review liy the couit except for fraud or mix take other Hum uu error of judg ment; and where theio I a contest in Niieh dcp.utmcut between one who claim to hit n bottler upon :i pnition of the puhlie laml, lo can cel the entry of a piior pettier upon tne kiii i hi laud, (lie iIocihioii therein preclude further inquiry hv the purlieu into any (Hioatloii oi fuel which niiglit propci ly hnvo heeu inude in rueh content, the aiuo ai if it had heeu aetually n made and coiuidoiod. (J) Idbn Qi'MTiovoK Lvv. Wheth er a settler under the donntiun net upon uiiMinevd laud could com mute hiit ri'-idouoi.' theieou, under 1 of the act of February II, l.stti, mid July 17, l.-VW, hy the jiayinent of $1 L. an aeie therefor, in u ipio tiou of law, mid therefoie the de I'ioion of the laud denaitincul theieou may he reviewel hy thin eotirt ti(iou the unit of a pint hav ing an equity in (ho promt' prior lo hiicIi entry, hut not otherwise, ex cept iu a xuit hy the I'nitcd State lo eauccl the patent lulled upon Hiieh entry. Heroin: Jlu Jivtick Fikmi ash Dp.apv I)l!iTltCT Jl'iiui:. Dkaiiv, J., delivered the opinion nf the court. In the ftpriiig of 1877, 11. 11. Line commenced notion at law in the eir. cult court for the county of Covin ngalimt n number of person to re cover the pociou of certain lot in the town of Mandifiold. in paid conn I), the nimu bciii pari ollol ') mid 1 of nectiou 2(1, in T. 25 8., of H. 1:1 W. of the Wrdlamcl meridtiui. Kaeh of the defendant in theio tic" (loin filed a complaint in equity hi the nature of a chim hill, under ' .'177 of the Or. Civ. Code, tiitiiiftt Liino to Ktay the piocecdinj- therein, and praying that he ho unjoined fioni "axHertiiiK any riyht or title to tliu preinibCH" or "interfering with tlie plnintilVn in occupying and holding" the mime. Tudur until ;)"", tliu efleet of thin wan to ulny the proceeding" in the no iioiixnt law, until the llnul diiposltion of the MiiU in equity. On account of the disability of tho judge, tho ciuen wcro removed hy Htliiilntiou to the circuit com t of the county of Marlon. In November, 1878, they woro removed hy Liimo to thin court upon the ground that ho wan u citixen of California, mid that tho controversy therein urine under tho donation and town silo autn of the United States, and wore entered hero, on January 0, 1870. y Ktipulatinn, tho evidence taken In thin ciiko was to ho counidered an taken in tliu others; and on Augunt 'Jl.Ht'Wii argued nud Huhmitted upon the uuderMtaiidiug that tho final do lermiuntion therein hIiouIiI ho follow cd in tho other canon. Thu material facts of (ho caxo are in follows : On Maieh '21, 1877, tho land olllce nt Ilocehurg isriiud n patent ceitillcute Xo. Will, In favor of Wilkins War wick, for r. donation of 100 iiuics un der tho douiiti on ncv of .September 127, 1850, (OHtiut. 'Ill") upon u letdiloiiee thereon fiom August -1,1851, to Ma'ch 10, 18.")tl, and tho payment on Hep (ember HI, 185(1, of $1 '25 pur aeio un der the nets of Kuhrna.y II, 185:1, (10 Ktrat. 158) nud of July lil, 1851 (Id :t(KI,) iimeudntory of said donation aeti iu lieu of tho remainder of the four years' icidileneo thereby required, tliu same being lots ii und -1 of seuliou -H the X. a of tliu 8. K. 4 of wiotlou 27, nil in T. 25 H., of It. lil W. of Hi" Wnlhimnt murldiaii' tipou which' certilleiitu a patent for said pieiulHua mis, on May 0, 187tl, issued In snld Wnrwiek, and tho defendant l.ucu on mill hofoic tljcconiinoncciiient of r-aitl Hcllous at IaV, had, hy mentis of nulll. dent eonvcyaiiccs, acquired all the Inteiestof said Warwick iu tho prom ises. In 1809, proceedings were Insti tuted in thu local laud olllce in thu in terest of thu inhabitants of Mnrshfiold, and with a view of untorlng thu samo for their henollt as a town site, lo can cel and set asido Warwick's notifica tion and entry upon thu charge of " ahandonmoiit." Thu ground of this chnrgo was that thu, commutation entry of September 10,18(50, was void the land being then tiusurvoyed, and therefore thu failuro to lesido thereon, thenceforth amounted to nu abandon ment. That olllce and thu commissioner of the general land olllce decided thu question against Wnrwiek, holding that 1 of the net of February Hi 1853, and of July 17, 1851, providing for tho payment of $1 25 per neru in Doll of tho lust throe yours' resi dence upon (ho donation lOquired hy tho act of September 27, 1850, did not apply to uusiirveyed lands. Upon nn appeal to the Secretary of tho Interi or, that odicer, on May 21), 1871, re versed such decision, saying: "Tho language of said 1 is somewhat ambiguous, but it is undoubtedly sus ceptible of a eoustructioii to include uusiirveyed land, and such a con struction seems lo bo in stric: con formity with tho spirit of tho act, and the objects intended to bo accomplish ed hy its passage. The construction adopted is extremely teehniunl, and I think contrary to tho policy of the act, which was a huuovoleut statute, and as such, had received iu nil udju dicated cases arising under it, and ex ceptionally liboral interpretation! (Staik v. Hlarr, (I Wall, -102; Silver v. l.add.O Wall, 210.") Tho secretary iiImi held that the en try of Warwick boing prima facia, regular and Mtlid, the contestants, who had neither alleged nor claimed nny prior iuteiest iu tho hind could not nin'iitain a proceeding to set it aside. The proisjyljujt. i nought to ho. maintuiiieii not omy upon, uiu ground pitKHuil upon in thu laud department, namely, tho abandonment hy War wick of his residence upon tho piein n hefoio ho had complied with the reqiiiiemeuts of thu law, hut also iimiii ihu ground that thu prumses included iu tliu patent to Warwick uiu n part of thu town site of Marsh He'd, which "win. settled upon for the purposes of business and trade and not agiicultiire long prior lo tho datu of the protended settlement or occu pation hy Warwick," and that relying upon this fact, tliu plnintiiF settler upon tho lot in controversy, espucting "that the title thereto would be duly obtained in iiccordanco" with the laws of thu Unitod States. Urielly, it appears from tho evi donca thatin March, 1851, Mr. J. 0. Toluiau, now surveyor genor.il ot this Slate, wont upon tho ground witli his family, and nuirkodoilt n claim of 320 acres, to which ho givo tho naino of Maishlield, nud built n double log house thereon, with the intention of acquiring tliu samo as n donation, undur thu net of Sept. 27, 1850, and building a town thoieou. About Auirust 1. Tolninn romoved to Jnek- soli county, whero ho settled upon .120 acres of the public laud and acquired 'the title to thu samo I'nder tho dona tion nut, nud never returned to Cooj county. When he loft hu made un arrangement with one A.J. Davis to hold tho claim thereafter together Davis procuring Wnrwiek to hold tho ninth end of tho claim for him, and one A. J. Oaskoll tho south und for Toluiau. Just prior to leaving, Toluiau gavo Captains Crosby and Williams, who woro iu tho hay with a vussol,twolois on tho marsh near tho water, on con dition that they would build a store ami wnieltouso theieou, and occupy thu samo as a place of businesi, Dur ing tho summer, they unused a small fruuiu house to ho erected there, hut uovor occupied or returned to tho phieo. On August !, 1S5I, Warwick went Into tho log ho no built hy Tol uiau, nud resided there for ovoi ' a year, elaining to bo iv Hottlor undur tho donation act, during which time, on March 10, 185(1, ho tiled u donation under tho notification net for 100 noros, including s'uuhdwulling houso and on Sopt. 10. 1850, pur said Davis, madu proof of such residence and cul tivation, und eiitoied thu samo nt ifl 25 per ncie, under tho donation not nud ) 1 of the nets of February M, IKO.'I, and July 17, 1801. In thu full of 185(1, Wnrwiek and Davis loft tho coun try and hnvo not returned to it, and at tlm samo time, James T. Jordan, by tho permission ol Davie, occupied tho liouso built hy Cioshy and Williams as a store. Davis gavo Jordan iuatrno- lions to look after tho ulnim nud pay i ( thctiuoaon it, which ho did for about 5 years, whon Luso nssumed nn over night of tho plnco ns tho agent of Davis, nnd within n year thereafter ns thoownorof tho same. ,' 0 Juno 10, 1855, Tolninn sold his Uiupposcd intorest in tho Mnrshfiold clninito J, 8. Hatch, who soon nftcr took Oeorgo C. l'urhor into the spoon lution ns a partner. Iu thu full of 185G, Soelates Bchollold, under tho dlrcc. tionof said Hatch, Furber and Dnvir laid oirn village upon tho claim ocou piod hy Tolninn, tho ftinallor portion of which was upon tho tract patented to Warwick, nnd miido plats thoreof, which was tho first attempt lo lay off a town on the premises. Tho first houso built upon tho Marshfleld claim nftor the two built in 1857, and occupied as n dwelling houso by ii man named Hamilton. Tho noxt house wain saloon, hu'lt in 1805, and ..& -J.I..I i... .,.yi ...i, ... now occupied hy 'ho plaliiliir. Hoon after this, in 1800-7, n saw mill was built nt Marshfleld, and pcop'o com'J moneed to occupy thoplrco ns fi towiTr'u'ction to nfled or set nsido n patent, und nt tho commencement of those notions at law there woro .from 50 to 75 houses on tho portion included in Warwick's donation. On October 21,1871, the town of Marshfleld was duly incorporated with the following boundaries "com mencing at n point on the ship chan nel on Isthmus slough, 10 chains north of the S. K. oornur of lot 2 iu section 20 of T. 25 S. of It. 13 W.J Mienco west to tho cast lino of section 27 of said township; thoiien north along said line -10 chains; thenco uust to tho insido channel of Coos bay; and thoncu frouthurly along said chtiunol to the place of begin ning." (Saw. Laws, 102.) Those boun daries inciuiiu tnu tots involved iu this litigation. In Xovomber, 1873, nnd befoic tho incorporation of enid town, an appli cation was madu by (. Wolwtpr, act ing on behalf of the inhabitants of thu plnco, to outer laud as a townsito, including a portion of tho Wii-vicl: uonatibU Thocontosl tocaneol War wick's entry being then ponding iu thu land department at Washington, tho application and nionoy wcro mere ly received by thu oflicers as a deposit to await thu result of such contest, and woru leturued to Wobster in the amu month. On Fohrunry 10. 1877, tho truxtficii of tho town of Mnrshfluld applied at tho land ollice to make the sainu entry, hut the application was lejected, on the ground that it was not oiou to entry. Upon this stnto of faots thw suit cauiioi ho maintuiuud. Tho place called Marshfleld was not, as n mutter of fact, occupied ns n townsito or ct!lcil upon for tho purpose of business or trade prior to the survey of the Mime into lots and blocks iu the fnll of 1850, nnd probably not until 180(1, nnd nrirr within tho meaning of tho townsito net of May 23, IS 14, (5 Stat. 057) nnd 1 of tho act of July 17, 1851, (10 Stat. 305). The net of July 17, 1S51, supra, first uxtunded thu townsito act of May 23, 1841, over Oregon, and they aro o far in puru materia, and therefore should bo construed ns one. Tnkou lUguinui, uiuj uutiuu mm iuuiuiiiii-i i 11 donation chum MuUl not be survey-1 cd so as to include hud ncUled upon and occupied an a townite. lint this settlement and occupation must have taken plnco beforo tho set tlement under tho donation act nnd not been triveu un or Abandoned. If any number of people had settled up on tho Marshlluld claim in 1851, as a town situ, for tho purposes of businobs or tradu, nnd thereafter and before tho entry of the same, had loft tho siihiu, had loft thu place abandoned it tho land would not theioby hao had tho character or quality of n town site indelibly impressed upon it, so that it could not afterwaids hu taken and hold undor the donation not. On tho contrary so soon as it was not oc cupied as a townsito it wasabaudouod and was open to settlement undor thu donation nut, us though it had uovor been occupied for any purposo. Lownsdalo v Portland, 1 Deady, 11. Mr. 'Column's interest in thu laud ns a townsito or otherwise, ooasod with his occupation of it on August 1, 1SJW. and tho next comer took it uiiatlbotod hy tho fact or purpose of such occupa tion. Tho agreements hy which it was attomptod to piolong his intorest iu tho claim after hoeonsod to occupy it tluough tho ocuupaiioy of oiUurs woro dourly illegal and could not af fuel tho rights of any ono. ( 12, Do nation net). When Warwick 4 t-yttlomont coin inonood upon tho Mnrshfluld ulnim August 4, 1851 "It was vnuant land. Thoro was no ono elso living upon it or claiming to, nnd it wm clearly oj.ou wttloinent undor tho donation act . nnd if any number of porsons settled on it therenftor for tho purpose of bus iness or trade, that did not make the plnco ii townsito within thu meaning of tho statute, but such porsons wcro either trespassers or occupants under the owner Wnrwiek. A sotller un der tho donation net has the legal os tiito in his donation from tho ditto of his settlement nnd no number of peo ple can doprlvo him of it hy occupy ing it its ri townslte or otherwise. (Chnpman v School District, 1 Deady 113; Fields v Squires, Id. 378; Moz- JtiGAv Viiughaii, 2 Saw,, 272; Adams jiiiinu, tioinv,, 'io; mil ii is niicgeii, ana tiioro is evi dence tending lo prove tho allegation, that Warwick's setllomoUt under thu donation net was fraudulent nnd void beenuso not inurlo for himself bit I for Davis or Tolninn. Uut tho plniutitr is not inn condition to question the le gality of Warwick's settlement and occupation nnd thu patont to him thereon. Equity does not have itiris- or lo hold the patentee as atrusteofor nnolher, except upon tho ground of nn antecedent equity iu the plain tin which was disregarded or overlooked in tho issuing of such patent.. (Stark V Starrs.G Wall., 410; I'nsbiov Whit ney, Wall., 100). The.intcrcst of tho plntntih", if any, is sulwcquont to the ettloment, occu pation proof and entry of Warwick. Prima facia, the promiius hnd become flic property of Wnrwiek before tho plaintiff-) occupation began. The le gality of Wmwiek's settlement and Occupation was then exclusively a miostion between him nnd tho United $tnto; nnd until such entry wa can- led hy thu lattur, neithortho iuhab- ttints of Marshfleld nor nuv one for them was outitled to enter the- land i4 n town situ. Rightfully or wrong fully, the land had been granted to another beforo thoro wore any occu- -ihiits of lots in Mnrshlicld other than the. donee thereof. Tho pUintill is UfpVoforo without any established in 'tcro.'fTifOr right to tho pftrhlUiw.'Anll' thereforo has no standing in a court of equit" to question tho legality of the p.nent to Warwick or the sufli cionoy of the grounds upon which it ii issued. Hut a contest was had in tho land ilcpartinont between tho inhabitants of Mnrshfield and Warwick upon tho quotum of tho validity of his entry which was decided in favor thereof. In that contest, tho only objection made to the donation entry wn, that being upon unsiirvoyed hinds tho pet tier will not entitled to commute the rupiired icsidonco thoreonhv paying for the land at the end of one year's residence, at tho rate of $1 25 por licit. And that question being ono of law merely, depending for its solution upon the propor construction of 1 of tho art of February 14, 1853, wh'ch provides that settlors undor the dona tion net, "who have loented or may hereafter locate" public land "of which survoy shnll have been mado ov'tnay hrreajler be had, shall, after ono year's occupation, in lieu of tho residonro required by thnt net. ho pormitted to pay '$1 25 per aoro for tho lands o roiiii if, lint led and surveyed ait afore- $aUl" thi court might now, if tho plninlilf had any intorest in or right to tho promises, voviu.v tho action of tho land depar.iuent thoreon and an nul it, if erroneous. Hut ns it is, that action can only bo reviewed in a suit by the United Statos to cancol and set aside the patent on tho ground that it was illegally issued. Uut even if tho plaintiff could main tain a suit to affect this patent yot no nioro question of fact decided byUio land department in tho progress of tho matter or which might have hem mndo theroincan now bo rovlowod by this court except Corf and or mistake oth orthan nnoiroriit judgment in esti mating tho valuoorol"oct of evidence. (Johnson v Townsloy 13, Wall., S3; Shiplov vCowen, 1 Otto 310; Aiken v Furry, C. C. Dis. of O-., Nov. 7,1870; Stopho-ia v Crnie, Id. Nov. 2, 3879). Thoiofoie tho questions whether Waiwick 8f0tiloniont,ooevp.iiion and entry wero in fact for himsolf or for Davis or Tolninn, or whether the Marshfleld claim was occupied ns n towif sito'or settled upon for tho pu. Ijoso of business or trndo nt or prior to Warwick's wittloniont thoreon, cannot hu enquired of in this suit. For al though thosu questions wovi speeill eally made u tho contest in the land depart muutlhoy wcio plainly within tho scope of tho enquiry, and might hnvo boon raised nnd decided if tho opntostnnts had desired, .mpliodly, tho decision of (hu boerotavy of the in tuiior that tho Wnrwiuk entry was valid ami lawful jnuludod every question of fact that might properly ii,ve been ruisod nnd doeldod in -tho progress of tho contest concerning it. If tho rules woro othcrwiso, this case is a good illustration of tho intolerable voxution and doiny which would at tend tho procuring of titles hy settlors on tho public lands. As has been stat ed, thoconlost in tho land department wan made upon tho single proposition that tho Warwick donation being tin surveyed could not bo purchased, nnd that Warwick's removal from it after a residence there on of less than two ycarA.juid the payment of $1 25 there for, was, in effect, an abandonment of J his Bcttloment' a fuiluro to perform' tho" condition? subsequent of tho grant, whereby tho premises reverted to tho United Stales and were open to scttlomcnt under the town site law The proposition thnt Warwick's set tlement was for tho benefit of another or that the place Wasoccupied asntown at nnd beforo Warwick's settlement, doos not then seem to have been thought of, but are brought forward nt this late day, and in this form to defeat and nullify tho action of the land department in that contest. But itappoars that oven these ques tions were brought before tho depart ment piiorto the issue of tho patent nnd considered by it as upon a. motion for a new trial. On May 11, 1875, the register and receiver forwarded tho principal evi dence relied on bo the plniutitr upon thoee points, lo tho commissioner' who, on May 29. 1875, (submitted the samo to tho secrelnry with a recom mendation that the case be oponcd which on September 30, 1875, was re fused by tho acting secrotnry. Upon the whole, there is no equity in this hill, or any ground upon which it can be maintained. It is therefore dismissed with costs. The same de cree will be interod in the cases of the following named plaintiffs against the snnfo dofendant: W. F. Deubncr, Xos. 4S!, 490; John Hear, Xo. 491; George Wolf, Xo-402; Frederick Tim mormnn, Xo. 493 ; Willinm U. Web ster. Xo. 494: A. ISobree. Xo. 495: Orll.-'Oolden, 4flfr; VlasitTeniple, Xo. 497. Wallr,- W. Thayer and William G Wtl.icr, for the plaintiif. John Jiurnett nnd JR. S. Strahan tor tho defendant. Oratorical Sn.ccc. The purpose ol a great speech is to persuade men. It may bo brilliant and oloqueut, so much so that nion will say of it, "that is oratory," and go on about their business. When men act as if they had not heard a woitl of a speech, it is a failure, oven if it is thought worthy of a place among specimens of oloquence." "A great speech," said O'Connoll, spoukine; of addrosaes to a jury, "is a very fine thing ; but, aitqr all, the ver dict is the thing." Professor Mathews, from whose book on "Oratory and Orators" we quote O'Conncll's remark, insists that no one would discover tho perfect or ator, if suoli there could be, while ho was speaking. Ho tolls two tpiecdotesto illustrate his usscitiou : When Chiof Justice 1'araons, o Ma-s.icluisotts. was practicing at the bar, a farmer, who had ofton heard him spunk, was asked what sort ot a pleader ho was. "Oh, he is a good lawyer nnd an ex celhtnt counsellor, but a poor plead er," wnstho reply. "Uut does ho not win most of his causoa?" "Yes, but that's bocauso ho knows tho law, and can arguo woll ; but he's no orato.." A hard-headed bank prosidont once cpngrntuhitcjl himsolf, in tho presence of Mi Miithow,onrositing, as foro man of a jury, tho oratorical bland ishments of Mr. Choate. "Knowing his skill," otiid tho hard headed man, in ninking white appeal black nnd black white, 1 mndo up in mind at tho outset that ho should not fool me. Hu tried nil his arts, but it was of nou&o, I just decided accord ing to tho lnw and evidence." "Of coumo," answered Mr. Muthew.-, 'you gnvo your verdict agaiusi Mr Choato'u client?,' 'Why, no ; wo gavo a verdict foi his client ; but then "wo couldn't help it : ho had thu law and thoevidencoon his sido," It uovor occuned it tho hank pre-i-(lout or to the fanner that Cho.Ho and rnrson woto after vordioW, not ndnn nition, And they got thorn, Iiouiium they sunk tho orator into the ado uato, "Thou mndeit people say, 'How well ho siKiaks!' " said Deniiwthunes to Cic ero, iu c'onelau'u "D:nlogues ol the Dead'" 'hut I iu.il. ilieiuiy. 'lt u murohaguin-t I'luli"'" That wn u t "in u it i uu iiui.ij personate nppi nl 1. fin ttn- piuue t orators be fur the Athenians ut'oretl that i j j THE NEW DRUG STORE, iTARSFlliLD, Oil. ximct noon to uAinomcE. JA)UIH MUXJIOK, 1'roprlctoi: FULL STOCK OF DnigSof TilC-dicmes,' COXSTANTLY OX HAXI)." ei a: r it:cAM ciuakm Prescription Carefully Coa-pon uit4 by Competent I'liysleUn. i' Ann to BE.vr. A SMALL FAUMSITUATP:nOX the bank of the Coquille Ilivcr, containing 28 acres RICH BOTTOM LAND, With House nnd Orchard. Can Ikj Jtcntcd nt a Reasonable Kate. For narticuhirt apply to IIksuv Skxcwtackks", Empire City, Oregon. mmi O'OONHELL IIKALIX IN Stoves & Eanges. Latebt Improved Hardwarejools, -AX- I raplements. GUNS, RIFLES, PISTILS AN Q AMMUNiTiOi. - LAMPS to OILS, WOOD & WILLOW WARE, Steam.Water Pipe and Fittings, Gran ite and Plated Wares. E si ii it lac tare r of COPPER & SHEETIROMWARf. TIN JSOtl WORK if, EXKCTTKl WITH DISPATCH. Cffi-KXTKA.S for Stoves. t Plow Moiyers and Reapers furnished . at i-lioit notice. COOS BAT d JL MAIlltslIKir.U), onERON, U. F. Ross, V. U. S01P-.0.N D. IfoLi.tico Projirieturs. MEAT s and jirnvihio'iH of all kinds Mild at t e lowest living rates nnd M-:r,m:i:El nlMiv point de-ind sttp5: uXHSS foi: VESSELS, LOUOIXO CAMPS AND FAMILIES, ALWAYSffiADY. 6SWe keep nothing but thebestt and inure satisfaction. l-l-tt HIGHEST HONORS! Centennial World's Ftir, ffJW m SEONINGER ORIJAIS mosocnicso vsuouoeaLT it BEST INSTRUMENTS, TtMrcomptrtTa exceUtae 1 rtcofsUtt Vf tltt JuitKea lu thlr IteyorC. iista wUoh tfca felluwluK U an txiruot: "Tb D. EUOXINOKa ORGAf COS exhibit ni tlio best XnitcaweaU at prlf recacrlcs tnea poieibi v iuk tun ci parcauers. u en. bavlsjt oe-cututUOB u Rami tad Colli tiaiin, prouDcin i noru an puuing totcii t. contUntiiK Dur dt-'rabls lmpreTtneutt, win llonnrl to cct out of orurr.lU tto Ijor0blnii3dft -una ionrar ia cry or timp cucutie, i ta cct oat of orurr. all tha boarOa bi thrtM-plr.pnt tcsntier aa it U Itapowlbla foe tb ra to eltUor shrink, avail or apllu- THU OMY OilU.Vi"a AWAMDtLO THt UA.Mt. TUU M.Ut ana Awari -raa nan tad aflar aa moat aatvca ci'upatutou of tba bt xnaiana, bafota cue of ti uioat comitatt Jurlaa tint aaoiblaJ. Hew StyKa andprlraa Ittat t-ri4, wttiOt M lo aooiirJaoca wiia oar rule, tba HfeMT MU a Ali far tbo Uaat mouar. Wa ara preparad to appoint ( fcw nav Afvatav ntnttrattd Catalogue uallad, paatfatC at) efvUoaUea to C SH0N1NGER OKtUR ftt, ej t us ciis8Tvtrt Frw nT-nr, Oont. , ii lL . - 4 "tos- ,?' a which V Bftrfoctf1 lA. i lira : m l-f ',ijg ii i v- "-. - -ay "l WWIW llaWtWy-Wi Oi- -A !,, m&wimiwnmntmt ,1fc4 ; ;h ii. jnttieiimh