Image provided by: Friends of the Dallas Library; Dallas, OR
About Christian herald. (Portland ;) 1882-18?? | View Entire Issue (Feb. 29, 1884)
I 2 order them in quantities, they could readily dispose of them to their friends. Prices: Cabinet size 25 cents, Panel size 75 cents, sent by mail to any address. For large orders, tret-fop rates,, etc. Send money by postal note, postal order or in registered letter. Address ill communications to the artist, Prof. G. W. Sittier, Spring field, Missouri, who will give his prompt "attention -fo-Xlie Jibing.^ of your orders. Don’t fail to send for these fine photos at once. One of the greatest hindrances ie toTbuFwof*----- ” ' 1 ’ habit of many of oar sisters and brethren in connecting themselves with denominational churches and sending their children to their Sun day-schools. It is astonishing to us that good brethren can not see and feel the evil effect this habit is having on our plea for. primitive Christianity. Because there is no church where you may chance to locate which is satisfied to be known a? simply the church of Christ, is that any reason why you should commit spiritual adultery by re pudiating,.the authority of Christ and identifying yourself with a sectarian body ? Does that make you any more of a Christian than you are, or give you any advantages of working for Christ which you do not already possess ? But is it not true on the other hand that, by such an act you compromise your plea and lend your influence to the up-building of sectarianism and other unscriptural and injurious doctrine and practices—all of which you believe to be positively sinful ? No Christian man or woman has any right to thus forsake the Lord and the brethren. If all are right and it is simply a matter of choice i.i uniting with a church, then the sooner we abandon our plea and join some of the denominations, the better. Butif we are advocat iag and defending the doctrine of Christ and his apostles, then the Lord will hold us guilty for com promising these grand principles for the sake of sectarian affiliations or popularity. There is no neutral ground in this matter; it is to be on the Lord’s side, or against him. If any one is a child of God and is providentially deprived of the as sociation of his brethren, he is none the less a Christian and a member of the one body on that account, provided he does his duty as best he can under the circumstances. Let all such be true to their calling. As for sending our children to the ■» CHRISTIAN HERALD churches were thus properly bap tized is unquestionable. Besides, if this objection is worth any thing it may be urged with as much force against baptism itself, as against its design ; for if the apostle paid no attention to baptizing any one, DI to tic» In the first chapter of first Cor preach the gospel, a inthians, and in the seventeenth ist brother follows his example, verse the Apostle Paul says: “For why does he baptize at all ? Why Christ sent me not to baptize, but not argue that he is simply sent to When'iBFNeW "York 7w/*pc,n4L-.|lQ.preach _ the _ gospel,1 and this preach the gospel ! This w^uld ent in a lengthy article on the statement has beenused by some soon put an end to the unscriptural “ Power of the gospel,” argues that as an argument against the doc practice of infant sprinkliffg. We the successful ministry of our Sa- trine of baptism for the remission insist that he follow the example Vi £S-was largely of sins. We have before us a letter of Paul; and if he does so he will not only baptize the people, but he due to the influence of the Holy fronTaTjfotlrc'rm ( Spirits with which they were rich he says that in conversation with a will I>apUzeTlrcTn ly endued, it is evidently quite minister of the M. E. church, South, and in doing this he will bury right. But when it draws the con the position was taken that the them with their Lord in baptism • clusion from this fact that the gos apostle never baptized any one, be and raise them up to walk in new pel to be preached now, is a “ mes cause Christ sent him not to bap ness of life. Rom 6: 3, 4. sage that is to be accompanied with tize, but to preach the gospel. We But did Paul baptize ? He ex are asked for an explanation of the power, and that not natural power, pressly states that he baptized but the supernatural energy of the passage. We supposed that in this Crispus, Gaius and the household Holy Ghost working in and witlr enlightened age and country a of Stephanas. Hence that he did - I the minister of the gospel,” it Methodist preacher, nor one of any baptize is a settled fact unless we speaks without the evidence of other order, could hardly be found impeach the divine Spirit. Would either the Bible or of experience who would not be heartily ashamed the apostle raise his hand and in We had an idea that the apostles to still urge this objection to the the name of The Lord Jesus Christ were supernaturally endued with design of baptism; but it seems do that which he had not sent him the Holy spirit that they might that there is at least one who has to do ? That Paul fully knew the be able to reveal the will of God to made but little progress in biblical will of his Master in this matter is the world and fully demonstrate knowledge for the last thirty years. beyond doubt ; and if it was not their mission by the miracles they This preacher doubtless accepts the will of Christ that he should did; but since the gospel revela Paul’s language in the same con baptize all, why did he do it? tion has been completed and we nection in a literal sense, which While the apostle received a special have the same words that were says, “ God hath chosen the foolish call from the Lord, yet he was preached, heard, believed and obey things of this world to confound the laboring under the same great com ed in the days of these inspired wise.” But as in all probability mission as were the rest of the men, ive fail to see the evidence or foolish objections will be made to apostles. But that commission necessity for a supernatural energy the teaching of the Bible till the commanded them not only to of the Holy Ghost to accompany millennium, so we continue to ex- preach the gospel to the people, but the preaching of the modern pro plain. to baptize them also, and the pro Now suppose it should be ad- mise was, “ He that believeth and claimed Our contemporary furth er says: “Not only is the ministry mitted that Paul never baptizec is baptized shall be saved." Hence of Jesu& characterized by the pres any one, does it therefore follow Paul was only doing what the ence and power of the Holy GhostT thht baptism rs not for the remis- commission required him to do on but it is the purpose of God that all sion of sins ? So far as the record all proper occasions, eitTier Th peF----- the ministers of the gospel, who be goes, our Savior in person did not son or through some one else. So seech men as though God did be baptize any one during his minis when he says Christ sent him not seech by them, should be similarly try, for “Jesus himself baptized to baptize, but to preach the gospel, endowed with power. Therefore not, but his disciples,” John 4: 2, it is evident he does not mean that we find Jesus during his ministry yet the baptizing was done all the he was not to baptize at all, but training his disciples in the way of same; and this baptism was for tie that he was not sent to "baptize ministry and power, by sending remission of sins. See Mark 1:4; only, but to preach also. Or per them forth to preach the gospel and Luke 3:3. So we might argue in haps that his chief business was to giving them power over devils and reference to Paul. If the baptizing preach the gospel while others were disease.” was done, it was immaterial who to do the baptizing. Paul 'did not Now is it not a little strange if did it, and this transfer of the ad thank God that he had not baptized God intended that all his ministers ministration from Paul to some one any one, nor that baptism was a through all time should be endow else would not affect the design nor “ non-essential,” but that he had ed similarly to Jesus and his apos invalidate the act in the least. It baptized none of the Corinthians, tles that we d(f not occasionally see was necessary that the baptizing except those mentioned. And he some demonstrations of that “ pow be done, whether by the apostle gives as a reason for this, “ Lest er over devils and dis&Use ?” We himself or through some one else any should say that I had baptized. i * should remember that the day of di<l not matter ; and that the people own . . . in mine ' ...... 'hame. . The Cor- miracles has passed, and hence all where he preached and established inthian church was divided over denominational Sunday-schools, we are fully satisfied that in many places it is doing more to weaken and destroy our peculiar plea than the continued opposition of all the inations on the coast. While the children are sen it is useless to object to their be coming members.of their churches. When wilfdur brethren fully realize this fact ? the energy of the Holy Spirits'put forth in the conversion of sinners is to be found in the word of God, and that this gospel faithfully preached and accepted is God’s power unto the salvation of the world. i ST