Image provided by: Friends of the Dallas Library; Dallas, OR
About Christian herald. (Portland ;) 1882-18?? | View Entire Issue (Feb. 15, 1884)
CHRISTIAN HERALD I In the direct line with the testi- iqony of Dr. Phillipfl Ri w^V w -^mrmT- in another column respecting the influence of sectarianisms in India, we wish to add another evidence. The Rt Hon. W. E. Baxter, M. P., spent the winter of 1881 traveling in India. He has given the public the benefit of his observations in a book of 154 pages; and of sectarian he says: “ Hence let me say that nothing so much impedes the pro- gress of Christianity in that country proceedingsoF"certain High Church dignitaries, \vho so thor oughly mistake the doctrines of our most holy faith, and misrepresent the teachings of their Divine Master, as to treat clergymen of other de- inatium • very much on jgi level with the heathen. Hindoo inquirers ask if it is not true that a certain bishop says that the difference between Presbyterians and Episcopalians is fundamental; and ) that another bishop withdrew the licenses of twenty-three clergymen because they would not conform to his ritualistic practices. Every one I meet deplores the mischief done by bigots of this kind.” The troble with most of these bigots is that they have never been converted to Jesua Christ themselves, and how oan they carry the pure bread of life to the heathen ? Apostolic Christianity and its consequent brotherly love and union must be taught at home. For those iVho have not thus been taught to be sent to the heathen is only adding sin to iniquity. PERSONAL MENTION. Bro. J. Durham writes us very encouragingly of his new home and his work in Washington college. It would seem that our brethren have there a splendid location for a col lege and we hope they will make it a power for good on this coast, especially in California.. has been lecturing in our State in theInterest of temperance. He gave us a call and spoke two or three evenings in Albany. After coming from Australia some years since, Bro. Webb united with the Baptists; but since coming to Oregon and be coming better acquainted with the bitter fruits of sectarianism and thus made to feel the full force of our noble plea for the union of all God’s people on the Bible alone, he pnblinnlly rlrnpn hi« liiiiiuni and returns to the Church of Christ. We hope he may prove a valuable accession to our ranks. Our readers will remember that a few weeks aero we wr ur bachelor editor, Bro. J. M. Shepherd, of the Faithful Witness, has anded a f Sisters’ De partment’ to his paper, a young sister at that. One more step is yet necessary tocomplete the prosperity of that paper, and we shall hold our slipper in readiness.” By the reading of the following card it will be seen that we were not far wrong after all, in our prediction. It now turns out that there has been a con solidation of the departments. E. pluribus unum. ~ Esto perpétua. Thé card says : “ J. M. Shepherd, Topeka, Kansas, Ella B. Boyd, Kansas City, Mo., Married, at Man hattan, Kansas, February 5, 1884. Mr. and Mrs. J. M. Shepherd, at hoiifC, at their residence, Fair view Place, Topeka, after February sev enth, 1884.” So here goes our slip per. We only wish we could go with it, for it. would be a feast to us beyond expression ; but as it is we can only extend our hand over their way and give him and his happy bride a long shake of the hand with our hearty congratula tions and best wishes for their fu ture happiness and prosperity. We now expect better things of the Faithful Witness. Una Ecopa nuova spazza bene. ■■ We heartily commend the article in last week’s H erald on “New Wine,” by Bro. Jas. W. Lowber. Hie view of gleukos in Acts 2 : 13 is the one we have always held, and we believe it to be the only correct interpretation of the passage. Bro. Lowber is one of the editors of the Apostolic Church published in Louisville, Ky., and is a good scholar and a pointed writer. We hope to hear from him often. ♦ - We have recently formed the ac- quaintence of Bro. J. W. Webb, of California,who for some months past IBLITHT ■ ■ ■ THE GOSPEL IN THE SYNAGOGUES. Our Savior often taught in the Jewish synagogues, and a good portion of the preaching of the missionaries, especially that of the Apostle Paul and his companions, was done in the synagogues. These facts have been held by the Seventh Day Adventists and others who believe in keeping the Sabbath, as proof that the seventh day, instead of the first, is still binding on the people. But we think this is a mistake growing out of the miscon ception of tliepurposaihesa—teaeh- ers and preachers had in view in entering the Jewish synagogues. In the first place, we must re member that the public ministry of our Savior was under the law of Moses, and that he came not to de stroy that law, but. to fulfill it. Hence it was but proper that he should, while himself subject to the law, conform as far as consistent to the customs of those under the law. "Yet the Savior did not by any means confine his teaching and worship to the synagogue; neither did he let any opportunity pass to point out to his own people the more perfect way. In all that uringhis ministry he did not give the leas^vidence to the Jews that the Sabbath was to be continued under his meditorial reign; but quite to the contrary, every thing pointed to the fast de veloping fact that the Sabbath, in connection with the rest of the Mosaic institution, was to be nailed to the croSs in his death. But as for Paul and the other missionaries under the last com mission of Jesus, we prefer to let the apostle give the reason for his course in his own language. He says : “ Fol* though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews ; to them that are under the law as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law. * * * To the weak be came l as weak, that I might gain the weak ; I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some; And this I do for the gospel’s sake, that I might be par taker thereof with you.” 1 Cor. 9: 19-23. Notwithstanding the fact that the law had been fulfilled and abolished in the death of Christ, the Jews, regarding Christ as an imposter, were still keeping it. The Sabbath was their day of worship, and hence Paul and his companions went into their synagogue on that day, not to keep the Sabbath, nor to teach the Jews to do so, but for the gospel’s sake—that they might have an opportunity of showing them the better way, and thus gain them from their erroneous and use less custom and save them. It was immaterial with tho apostle on which day he preached the gospel to them ; it was his business to preach it every day he had an op portunity. Hence he went into the synagogue on that day, on the same "principle Thaiwe would go into a church of our Seventh l^ay Adventists on their day of worship that we might have an opportunity of gaining them from the error of their way—that we might teach them to observe the first day, as did the apostles and primitive posties ana Christians, i instead of the Jewish Sabbath. | ( 01 MINISTERIAL AEEILLA------ > TION‘ It is as amusing some times as it is humiliating to witness how some preachers allow themselves to be come entangled in the denomina- ose preachers who understand and openly teach that the Church of Christ is the vine and the different denominations arc only so many branches bearing fruit to the honor and the glory of God, and whose views and creeds on all matters essential to membership are sub stantially the same, can consistently organize their preachers’ associa tions and meet together on a com mon plane for the purpose of pro moting the interests of their res pective churches. But how any one who believes in the absolute overthrow of all sectarianism and denominationalism and in a com plete restoration of primitive Chris tianity can conscientiously affiliate with these preachers, most of whom perhaps have never been baptized into Jesus Christ, and work har moniously with them in their associations for the advancement of sectarianism, is, we confess, more than we can comprehend. Imagine such a brother working harmoni ously with six or eight unimmersed and avowed denominational preach ers ! Here are six clergymen who have not obeyed that positive com mand, and hence our brother does not believe they have been baptized into Jesus Christ, that they are not members of the Church of Christ, in short, that they are not Chris tians at all, and yet he can work harmoniously with them and thus give his influence to the teaching and practicing of their unscriptural and injurious things. It seems to us that the relation our brethren sustain to the denominational clergy and their respective religious societies plainly forbids such an alliance with them; for it is a noticeable fact that those things which we understand to lie at the basis of our plea for the restoration of the ancient order of things are the very things which they hold as