Image provided by: Friends of the Dallas Library; Dallas, OR
About Christian herald. (Portland ;) 1882-18?? | View Entire Issue (Feb. 8, 1884)
H ■ 2 CHRISTIAN HERALD - time enough for us to obey it. This < it has not yet done, and this it can never do. The day of Moses and of Israel has passed, and so we prefer to follow Christ. On the mount of transfiguration the Lord summoned Moses and Elijah from the unseen the Christ that He might show to such blind guides as the Signs of the Times that the time had fully come that these representative men of the law and the prophets should -e feet of the Son of God. Hence the voice from heaven, “ This is my be loved Son in whom I am well pleas ed ; hear ye him.” PERSONAL MENTION Bro. Isaac Errett,of the Christian Standard, who has been sick, is again able to resume his usual amount of labor on his paper. We are sorry to note that Bro. H. T. Morrison.has returned to his , home in Waupun, Wisconsin. He will still write for the H erald . We are glad to note that while Bro. F. G. Allen of the Old Path Guide is still confined to his room, his general health is improving. The pen af Bro. Allen is much need ed in these unstable times, and we _ ___ hope he will yet be spared to do much good for the cause of Christ. " THOU SHALT LAY IT ON THE TABLE.” This positive command refers to the contribution that is taken up by the churches on the first day of the week. This command is found in the same chapter and verse where it is said, “ The deacons, after the administration of the Lord’s supper shall carry around some nice little silk lined contribution baskets and wait on the audience.” They are both found in the first chapter and the first verse of Expedients, and the one is just as binding on the churches of Christ as the other. Although, commands highly esteem ed and faithfully observed by many, yet the Lord never intended that either of them should become a test ôf fellowship or an occasion of dis cord among his people. Unlike most commands, the one may be obeyed to the exclusion or neglect of the other. Indeed, as they are somewhat antagonistic in their form of expression, it would be diffi cult to see how both of them Could be obe/ed at the same time in the same congregation. It is the spirit of of the command rather than the letter that is to be observed. Seeing then that the two are equally bind ing, and that the letter of neither is necessary in performing the de sired act, it follows that the manner of the whole thing is left to be gov- th e oi reum stances and'- t h er sound judgment of the churches. Whatever therefore is in harmony with the law of the Lord and will be for the greatest good to the greatest number in carrying for- BEING BORN AGAIN. A Baptist minister has recently preached a sermon on the above subject in the Central Baptist church, Atlanta, Ga., and by the re quest of the church the sermon has Index. The following is an extract we take from it: Neither has Christian* baptism any part in, or essential relation to, the new birth whatever, though a misconstruction of the phrase "born 111 of water " in John 3! 3 !wt Lord’s work is the manner of giv many to imagine -that baptism is ing that should pe adopted on the closely allied to the new birth. The most pains taking study of that Lord’s day. part of the Scriptures has convinc- Now that all Christians are re^ qttfred to give something oftheir that phrase is supposed to mean temporal goods to the Lord’s cause; baptism, is that the word “ water ” and that the laying by in store for is used. To reasoning people that this purpose is to be done on the is not reason enough. The intro duction of the idea of baptism is first day of every week, we think not at all essential to the topic, or is expressly taught in the Scrip the spirit of the conversation, nor tures. And that each one is to give would it serve, in any way, to make willingly and according to his or the Lord’s words contain a sensible her ability is equally plain. The answer to the question which burst from the amazed and wondering apostle Paul says : " Now concern Nicodemus. In fact, it would only ing the collection for the saints, as serve to still further mystify him, I have given order to the churches while it was the Lord’s' purpose to of Galatia, even .so f do ye. Upon make clear that which he had said the first day of the week let every already, and which had not been understoood. Observe the relation one of you lay by him in store, as of the two parties. N icodemus had God hath prospered him, that there come to the Lord Jesus for instruc be no gatherings when I come.” 1 tion. It was. one great part of the Cor. 16 : 1, 2. Here is the example Lord’s gracious work to make of the primitive Ch torches, and we things plain to our understanding. During the conversation the Lord fully believe that it ought to be suddenly unfolds the necessity of followed by all our churches. But being born again. His amazed list it is not stated whether this contri ener most naturally supposes this bution ia to be laid on ♦ the table or to mean a repeating of the processes whether some one is to take it up of nature in the birth of the flesh, and says so, while he demands an from the audience. But as either explanation. It being the Savior’s is Scriptural, we decidedly prefer object to explain a mystery by an the latter for several reasons. In swering and removing this false im the first place, but few will go for pression, how could he accomplish ward and lay theirmoney on a table. this object by repeating the very words which he had already used, There will always be some in an and then only adding to it another audience who have but little to give, new condition ? The man would and they do not care to make a have been left still amazed and still public demonstration of it by going clinging to his own error. The forward and laying it on a table Lord’s answer must be explainable before so many observing eyes, as beirig directed to remove the difficulty under which Nicodemus whereas they would be free in a labored, for, on concluding it, he quiet and unobserved way to drop says, in effect, " Now, marvel no this amount, however small, into a longer.” Therefore, if paraphrased, basket presented to them. Besides, his answer would be, "Nicodemus, some are too diffident to go to a it is not a mere repeating of the na tural birth, for except a man be born tableeven with a large sum. Strang of the flesh, and also of the Spirit, ers by this plan will, as a rule, give he cannot enter into the kingdom nothing. In the second place, it is of God. It is needful that a man more orderly in the house of God. be born* of the flesh in order to be Let our churches give the basket a man, but if this were repeated it would only be still the same, for system a fair trial, and we venture nothing but flesh, with all of its the statement- that they will not evil propensities can be born of the soon abandon it. But we believe flesh. Only that which is bom from the table plan will result in only a above is of the spirit and fitted to few of the more able doing all the see and enter into the Kingdom.” giving, and will invariably cripple This is the only construction of our the financial ability of the churches. Lord’s answer, which relievos the mind of Nicodemus of its insoluble problem, and after speaking it, the Lord, as though he had really re lieved him, says, “ Marvel not that I said unto thee, ye must be born again.” Then he proceeds to speak of the real mystery, and assures Nicodemus that it will rlways re- mystery so farn w 4te meth»““ ods are concerned: •" The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, nor whither it goeth. So is every ■y one that is born of the Spirit. T> ” rn„ To construction of the phrase “ born of water,” it is only necessary to re member that, in the language oi\ the Bible, this is very common form / of expressing the idea of the natural but rather a technical form of ex pression for the birth of the flesh, and as such will be readily recog nized by all who are even tolerably familiar with the science of human physiology. For instance, examine the first verse of the forty-eighth chapter of Isaiah; the tenth verse ofthe-nineteenth chapter of Ezekiel, and many others easily found by aid of a concordance. REMARKS. As this sermon was published by the request of a leading Baptist church, it is to be supposed that its views and criticisms are fully in dorsed by the Baptists in that sec tion of country. Hence we notice it briefly. ...... ........................ .. . 1. The speaker thinks the phrase " born of water ” does not refer to baptism for two reasons; first, be cause its " introduction is not essen tial to the topic, or the spirit of the conversation,” and second, because it would have only served to fur ther ".mystify ” Nicodemus. But we answer that this depends alto gether on the idea one has of the design of baptism. If we are will ing to accept the Scriptural doctrine of baptism, along with faith and repentance, for the remission of sins, then it will be seen that its intro duction is as essential to the topic as that of the Holy Spirit. But when one wishes to get rid of this idea, of course it is easy to see.that it is not necessary. But how could the introduction of baptism mystify • Nicodemus any more than he was already mystified / It was not the mention of baptism that mystified him, but the simple declamation, stated in the third verse, that “ ex cept a man be born again he can not see the kingdom of God.” It was the fact itself and not the statement, of the means through which it was to be accomplished, that mystified and astonished him. Besides, how i , could the mention of baptism mys-