Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Cottage Grove sentinel. (Cottage Grove, Or.) 1909-current | View Entire Issue (Oct. 21, 1914)
DOWNWARD COURSE Geo. G. Gross Democratic Candidat* fur Fast I(«lim Heal! «ail by Dottali« (ItoVw Peupla. A littl« backache ut fir*t. Iluily iiicreualng till tli« b«ck i* Inni« timi weak. I ’ ri tin ry disorder* mu/ i|uirkly follow ; I (repay unii often Uriti lit '» di»i'u»«. Tlii* fr«i|ii«iitly lit tin* iloMiiwnnl «our*« of kidney ill*. don't tukii liti» «our*«, Cottage Orni« ri'Nidi'iit* nili>11 lil |irofit liy Hi« fol low iti|i •• * | 11'li II*. \V. Hrii|ili'toti, |iro|iri«tor l.lttl« Gem K«*Uliriint, Hli«riilnn Ht , Knselmrg, O r«, *111«: "Homi' month* ii|(o kidney litui lilni|il«r troulil« *t«rt«i| with in«. I limi awful fini tin throii|{li mi kidney* wtiii'h hurl tu« *o I roulil *• nrcely limi*. I hud to i|iiit work timi go liont« Bladder lioiilil« th«u rum« on f>rin>■ i luilly lit nittht, unii wlmt I »nffrrnd wu* «oiiii't Ii i ii ti firn'«. A frniiil recoin ini' mil'll donii'* Kidney I'ili* mol I trii'il tlirm uft«r other medicine I used limi fuili'il ni« Thry h•'11>> >I in« from th« fir*t nini nft«r finishing two l>ox«*, I w u (irurtti-ully cured of kuln«y nini lilmtitrr t rutilile. ’ ' Price 60c, nt nil iwulrr* l*o* 't *iin|ily n*k for n kidney remedy get dolin'* Kidney I'llla the *11111« thut Mr. Troxel hint. Koater Milliurn Co., Prop«., Huffulo, N. Y BUILDINGS S. L. GODARD PLANS ESTIMATES 43 SOUTH SIXTH ST. COTTAGE GROVE____ OREGON Your Pall Cold Need» Attention No uae to fua* nnd try to weur It oil! It will wear you out inetend. Tnk« dr Kinii'* New di»ro i«r y , relief fo llo w quickly. It rherk* your Cold nnd Moothea your Cough nwny. Plena in Antiseptic nnil Healing Children li*'i it. tirt u 6tlr t'ottlr of dr. Kinii 'a New Iliaruipfy nnd keep it in tin* bouae "ttu r family (loiigli nnd Cold d o r l ' n " write* l.ewia Chiimtirrlnin, Mnnrheater, Ohio. Moiiey l.nrk if not antialird, hut it tienrly nlwuya help*. PROPKHMIONAI> CARDS Telephone l.'tl F. W. ROBBINS, M. I). sin»n mul Hur^iHin Ollirrtf Kidhlptir«’; 104 H. 5 th f l l f j c r s tu ntl Coufta J* V r s i « ‘ »• i j t r n r i M f II. J. SHINN ATTORNEY AT l.AW lU«lrt Ilia I t«l NI ITA MV I T HI.1C t( Ihri Mrfaull Nh'iji COTTAGK fìROVK.ORK, •J. S. M EDLEY County Commissioner hu « innd« on th« 7th day of Oi-loli«r, 11*1 1. A. K. WIIKEI.KK, A L T A KINO, o7nlH Attorn«/* for I'lulntiff NO riO E O r EXEOUTOR 8 SALE OP R E A L PROPERTY. lu tha Gouuty Court of th# Stata et Oregon tur Lab* County. IN T I IE MATTEK OF THE ESTATE OP MARIA IIAKTCNG, Herruaeil Notile in hereby given, Ihut in pur sunne« tu un ordi i of thè County Court of t h•* State of I Iregoa, in and for Lane Colini y, Iliade oli thè tlth day of Hept 'in ber, A. D. 1114, ni tba mattar «i Ibi estate of MnriH Bartung, d«c«nsed, thè niideraigned, duly nppoiated, seti agami qiiulilled exeeotor of suid estate, vv ili »eli ut private »ale, 011 thè premine» ile .cribed Ixdow, «t Cottage Gruve, Oregon, for eaali in liuii.l unii nccordmg tu lavi, * Ite follo* ing deacribed reni propcrty !»■ longiiig tu »uid celate, tu wit: liegin iimg ut a pomi U 6 link» »outh and 1116 link» euat of thè northciiat corner of O. I’ . Aduni»' land; tbenie ca** LV feet ; t he lice »outh 100 feet; tlicnci we»l I60 feet; thence nurth 100 feet to thè place of begmning. Alao begin ning nt a point 41 link» nonlh from thè •oulbeaat corner of county »urvey No 171); thence west li 12 link» to u point 41 link» »outh of thè aoutbweat corner of *uid county attricy No. ITI*; thence »outh lll.'l link*; thence cn»t mi.' link»; thence north MMI feet; thence eaat 2*17 link*; thence north .IH link» to thè place of bcginniiig, all in Cottage Gruve, Lune County, Oregon. Stive and excepl u traci of land de «cribed 11» frillow«: Itcginning ut a point 2.'S7 link» »outh of thè northcaat corner of O. P. Aduni»' land, »uid Ite gì li a i 11 g point beili?; thè a«uthwe»t cor ner of thè lumi uwned nt thè date bere •f liy Manu llnrtung. »nd thè north ve»t corner of lumi owned ut date bere if by II II Vratoh; U s i» «u t B J I halli»; thence north two feet; thence n a »oulhwealerly direction 5.1*2 ehain» '0 thè place uf begmning, de»cribing n I r 111 ligular piece of lami 5 1*2 cimili» eu»t ■ mi west, two feet wide nt cn»t end, running to n point ut wc»t end. *11 of ■nid land »ituuted in Hertion .12, Town- •hip 20 S., K. .'t Wcat, in Lane County, Oregon. Sniil aule will conimene« un he I2th day of November, 1HI4, nt thè hour o f ten oVIiM-k a. in. of anid day, md continue until all of anid propcrty is aold. W A. IIAKTCNG, Kxeoutor. Statement and Platform Home aix mon t ti » ngo when I wna nominali'd for the office of County Com miaxioner I felt thut It wax about'time to rnll n hull on our Cuunty expelí*«* At till* tune I renila« it more thun ever. Ueitli/iug the fnrt thut Lnne County Tuxra nre entirely too high, If elected to otite« of County Couinnaaioner, I • hull u*e every eudvnvor, eon*i*tent with good (iuvernnient, to lt'**«n the liurden nnd rute of tuxution. I uni in favor of atrii t economy in every ho*i lie** i*aue coming before the County 1 Court nnd will adhere to the poliry ot economy flrat, Inal nnd ulwnya. I bollavo in good roud* over nil tin County nnd not in Hrenic highway» in piirt* of the County and bullonile»* roud* elaewbere. I believe in atrict economy in the building of roud* and thut u County the «nule u* any indiiid u 111 should receive u dollur'a worth ol work for each dollnr expended. Realizing the fuel thut ninny commi* • 1011» enrrying with them high anlurie* lire uae te**. I mu in fuvor of doing nwny with anid cominiaaluna nnd thereliy tuck ing luxe* lea*. Believing that the Funner* of I..1111* County arc competent to do thrir fnrm work, nnd thnt the |lou»ewiic* nre com potent to do their hou*ework nnd run their fruit without oulaide expert ui.l I mil in favor of doing nwny with the (utility Faun Expert, thereby »living the County fonilo aulnry per nnnum paid him. Believing the average »rh.Mil te ichei i-inployed by hi» »chool director* nnd aaaiatancr of the County School Huper inteodent, ia able to hundb* the Hchi«*l iilTuir» of hi* achiMil diatrict, I favor uboliahilig the four County School Nup erviaor» of the County, thereliy aaving (ft,(HI) mutually to the tuxpuyer. The County Pour Fnrm mid Building* coat Lane County 120,126. To rnre foi th« County poor in ISLA coat $I5,H()7.02 I believe the County |«M>r lire mating too much for mnintuinenr«, much ol which ia doe tu poor management nnd nnbuain.'Kalik« method*. We moat rare for the County poor, however, I tielievi in doing *0 along more «monticai line* than heretofore hnve been pureued. The mnount» of tax«* collected in II .1 8 H IN N , Attera*} «lini 1 l.nne County during the pant »even year« nnd for enrh year wn» n» follow*, Eaat Maio Street Assessment to w it : Notice i* hereby given, thnt un a* ........ 0 3 . 1 * 1 ,U 74 ..K I BMW...... essuient in the «um of 042.2U for the luw...... ........ 4 t:i, 50 tl 1 U ■oprovement of Ka»t Muin Street, Cot litio ..... ........ 41 MI. 00 . 1 .U 3 age Grove, Oregon, wn* levied on the i BMI...... ........ Il.ll), 4 H 4 . HI property hereinafter deaeribed, bv Or 1 U 12 ..... ........ 7 U 5 . 7 . 17.22 Imune« No. .IgiI, passed by the Common 1 UL 1 ..... Council of »aid City and approved by lull ..... ........ I.IMW. I 27 . 2 M the Mayor on the I HI h d n v of Hcptem Th»» I believe too rapid n atride even ber, 11*1 1 , ami that the anid amount was for progressive Oregon, nnd I believe entered in the l>ocket of City Lien* of in cutting ixpenditure» ao thut taxi" snid City on the 1Mb dny of September, will herruft«r derreuae rather thun in Bill, nt page No. 44 of anid Docket, erenae. which »aid property i» described u* fol I f elected to the «(lire I acek, I will Iowa: ever atund ready to liatm and ciircfuilv Begin nt the S. K. corner of D. L. C. consider nil petition» and recommend» No. 5», thence North 25 feet, to place tiona coming from the Farmer*, lluai of beginning; run thence North 21 feet; n o » men nnd taxpayer« of LmicCounty t h e n c e S o u t h 2 * 1 . j t g W t l W e s t 22 fe e t Kcnpert fully auhiuitted, more or lea» nnd thence Kuat to the GEORGE G. (lltoMH point o f beginning. (Paid Adv) That the name» o f the owner* or re puted owner» o f the above deaeribed lu the Circuit Court of th« State of property are I). O. McFarland nnd other unknowu heir» of Jnmcs II. McKnrlund, Orngon for the County of Lana. decenaed, who*« reaidenre» are tin known; thnt »aid a nensment in due and JOHN BADF.K, Plaintiff, V unpaid, and that the »ame i» required to lie paid to the Trea*urer of the City AOAINHT: of Cottage Grove within ten day* from Bnttie MuiiMin, Nellie Ir the date of the Ann) publication of thi» win, Mnry Chamber«, II. II. not ire. Ilurclton, C C. Iluxeltun, J. Unteli thi» 7th dny of October, 1U14. J. E. YOUNG, City Recorder. M. It axel ton, A. I.. Haze l ATTORNEY AT LAW Hperinl Attention (liven to Mining nnd Cor|Mirntion l.nw OPPICK: WOODWARD I l l ’ ll.d IN U ton, J. W, llnzelton, George West Main Street Assessment. Hoxelton. Roynl lluxelton, Notice ia herby given, thnt an nan«*»* the unknown heir* at luw of A K. M E C K ment in the aiim of 0155.20 for the im P. M. lluxelton, deceased, provement of Weat Muin Street, Cot A tto rn ey at Law the uni nown heir* nt luw \ Summon* tnge Grove. Oregon, wua levied on Lot EUOP.NE COTTACI E OROVE uf Royal II lluxelton, de No. 1, o f Block No. 2, of liaxleton ’* Second Addition to Cottage Grove, by cenaed, M. I>. Kedford, — B olli OfTicvs A lw a y a Open Ordiniinre No. 201, puaacd by the Com Itedford, her liuabnnd, or ■mm Council and approved by the Mayor the unknown licit* at law of ••hour O ther 47 . . * ^ 1 I.NWaon H in d i *11 id M. D. Kedford if de on the 25th dny of November, 1U12, and ° m~ | Main IM. thnt anid naaeasment wna entered in the cenaed, and all other per o ffit c H o u r* t to 6 p. m. I locket of City Lien* un page 4D thereof »on* or pnrtie* link nown DR C. E. FROST nn the second day of December, 1U12; claiming any right, title, O*t*ot>*thlc and M e d ica l P h y a lc la n Thnt the nume* of the owner* or re ■■»tntc, lien or intereat in C h ru n tc a n d N a rv o u a U lae a *«» a l i a t i a l t y . puted owner* of »nid property nre Mrs. the renl eatntc ileneribed Modern Electrical Treatment*. G. W. Hcctntin, Addie Nicholas und Wil in the eomplnint herein. X Rny Applinnre. linin Steven», none o f whom nre to be DEFENDANTS. ! found in the City of Cottage Grove, the C O T T A O K QM OVK • • OKAGON To Bnttie Munaon, Nellie Irwin, residence o f Mr*. G. W. Beemnn, being Mnry Chamber*, II. 11. lluxelton, C. C. Eugene, Oregon, nnd the reaidenee and 011,1 r p h o iit M a in S Maatdanc*, M a in l i l t . Ilnxelton, J. M. lluxelton, A. L. liuxel poatoftice nddren* of the other reputed A*. kieCAROAR n. />. & ton, J. W. lluxelton, George Ilnxelton. owner* lieing unknown; thnt »uid as Koyol Ilnxelton. The unknown heira nt sessment in due und unpnid and that Dentist law of F. M. Ilnxelton, Derenaed, The the nnid ia required to be paid to the S u e c M w r to unknown heir* nt law o f Koval 11. Treasurer of the City o f Cottage Grove |P. /.. ¡NOR I M Ilnxelton, Derenaed, M. D. Kedford, within ten dny* from the date of the ------Kedford, her bunhnud, nr the A L L W ORK O U A R A N TE E D Until publication of thi* notice. Dated thi* seventh dny of October, Lawson Bldg. Cottage Orovo, Ore. unknown heir* nt luw of anid M. D. Kedford if decenaed; And nil other per 1UI4. *nn* or pnrtie* unknown rimming any J. K. YOUNG, City Recorder. right, title, eatnte, lien or intereat in ./. E. YOUNG the renl e*tnte described in the com ATTORNEY A T LAW plaint herein; Defendant*: Other on Main S t i r r t CO TTAO K U K O V K DR. II A. J. It it OH KOOK j HENDRY DENTIST OVER FIRKT N A T I O N A L COTTAGE DROVE HANK Keep Your Stomach and Liver Healthy. A vigorous Htomni'h, perfert working I.iver and regular nrting Howele I* guar anteed if you will uae Dr. King'* New Life Pilla. They inaure good dig«* lion, correct Conatipntion nnd have nn excellent tonic elTeet on the whole *y* tem— Purify your lilood nnd rid you of nil liody poiaona through the Bowel*. Only 26« nt your druggixt. P.OLK'S' * Business Directory OREGON and WASHINGTON ( A Director/ o f each City, Tow n and V illage, liv in g descriptive akatch o f each place, location, population, talo- graph. ahlpplng and banking point; alao Claaainad Olfactory. com plied by bualnaac and profession. < R. u * P O L K « CO..* S K A T T L B IN T H E N A M E OF THE HTATK OF OREGON: You nre hereby required to uppenr mid answer the eomplnint tiled ugninst you ill the above entitled suit on or be fore the 27th day o f November, 1014, nnd if you fail »0 to un*wer for want thereof the Plaintiff will take judg ment against you n* prayed for in »aid eomplnint, nnniely: Thnt the deed re rorded on page 21)7 of Volume " M " o f the deed record* of Lnne County, Oregon, be reformed nnd corrected by making the nnme* of the grnntee there in M. d. Kedford tnatend of M. 1*. Red ' ford: that the deed recorded on page 21**1 of Volume ‘ ‘ O ’ ’ o f *nid deed record* tie reformed nnd corrected by ■nuking the description therein rend Lot* 3, 4, 5 nnd ff, in Block 1 o f Hntal ton '* Second Addition to Cottage Grove in Lane County, Oregon; thnt plnintiff be decreed to be the Inwful owner of Lot* 1, 2, .1, <1, 7 nnd 8 in *nid Block I; that the title thereto be quieted in him; nnd thnt you and each of yon be forever bnrred nnd estopped from claim ing any intereat therein adverse to hi* title. Thi* numinous in nerved hv public» tion thereof once each week for nix successive week* in The Coftnge Graze Sentinel by order o f the Hon. I,. T. Harris, Judge o f said Court, made nnd entered on the tlth day of October, 11)14, nnd the flrnt publication thereof FARMERS, BEWARE-TAKE CARE T h e f o l l o w i n g l e t t e r is s u b m i t t e d to t h e v o t e r s o f O r e g o n b y the H o p G r o w e r s a n d D e a le r s A s s o c ia tio n on b e h a l f o f 1*400 f a r m e r s r e p r e s e n t in g 2 5 * 0 0 0 a c re s o f l a n d d e v o t e d to t h e H o p I n d u s t r y o f O r e g o n i l or many years wc have been engaged in the grow ing and marketing o f Mops. One land is particularly suited for this purpose. Our work and our energy has for years been devoted to the development o f this industry. The time has now come when you are being asked, by your V O T E , to ruin US. ft is urged that we can ‘‘use this land to raise something else." This may be true. Mow are we going to get along however while we are waiting to “ raoe” something else? Y O U know that the hardest condition that a producer has to meet is the securing o f a market for his product. Mow are we going to get along until we secure that market? Suppose that we should decide to raise apples, prunes or loganberries, etc. You know the years it takes to develop them. Mow are wc to get along in the meantime? You know that each o f these products, and many others, are frequently a “ glut” on the market. Suppose that we start to produce what you are producing. Then you will have more competitors— the market will be flooded— Y O U will receive less for what you produce. W e fully realize that many sincere people favor State W id e Prohibition B E L I E V I N G that it will be the mean* o f correcting the “ Liqu or Habit.'* This has N O T P R O V E N to he the case, for the reason that F I F T E E N States, after a full and fair trial ranging over a per iod o f from one to fifty years have R E J E C T E D IT . Don’t you feel that if State W ide Prohibition had been beneficial that those F I F T E E N States that had it would have kept it and not have R E J E C T E D I T ? It having been proved a F A I L U R E in those States how can it he a S U C C E S S I N O R E G O N ? Thousands there are who favor Temperance hut who hate the thought o f Prohibition from a moral standpoint Liquor far below the standard o f whiskey is brewed and sold with deadly effect. Manhood and S E L F R E S P E C T is weakened. N ow education is accomplishing the ultimate Temperance and licensed regulation o f an open traffic is bringing about True Temperance whereas the history o f Prohibition as a Theory A P P L I E D shows it has wrecked years o f temperance advancement, driven the dis tribution o f liquor “ Under C over” and secreted.it from regulation and control bv law. Under our present “ Local Option Law s” any community, that so desires, can stop the sale o f liquor L O C A L L Y . Th e handling o f this matter is in your hand- L O C A L L Y . Under the proposed law it will lie taken from your hands and administered by the State. Do you feel that the State will handle this matter more thoroughlv than you can Y O U R S E L V E S ? It is claimed that the State will save money in the institutions for the In ^ n e and, Crim inal if this measure goes into effect. Yet the O fficia l United States Statistics show that the State o f Kansas, that is now held up as an example for Oregon to follow , has more in sane and criminals in its institutions than O regon has, per capita. It is claimed that this proposed law will improve economic conditions, yet the same O fficia l United States Statistics show that the per capita wealth o f O regon is G R E A T E R than that o f Kansas. Hundreds o f stores will become vacant ; thousands o f men with families to support will be thrown out o f their employment without compensation, and turned adrift in the sea o f “ unemployed” which is only too large now. Do you feel that "tim es ares o good” that you can afford to experiment and take this great revenue away from the State o f O regon? Don’t you feel that you have a big enough burden to bear now. and with the new National T a x Measure now being framed at Washington it will he H E A V I E R still? D on’t you feel that the F A I R way is to E N F O R C E the laws we now have, which are fully ample in every way to govern the “ Liquor Abuse,” and N O T pass a law that will accomplish no good hut will R U I N U S? W e ask you to talk this matter over with your wife, or your friends or your neigh bors— consider it fully and candidly— consider it in the light o f “ F A I R P L A Y ” — consider it in the light o f a “ S Q U A R E D E A L ” — and then we ask you to g o to the polls anil do for us as we would for you under similar conditions, V O T E 333 X N O , and so save O L ’ R in terests from R U IN . Remember the Local Option Laws will be swept away if Prohibition is voted but they w ill S T A N D A S T H E Y A R E if Prohibition is Defeated. V ery sincerely, H O P G R O W E R S ’ A N D D E A L E R S ’ A S S O C IA T IO N O F O R E G O N . ■sident. HOP G R O W E R S AND D E A LE R S A SSO CIA TIO N OF O REGON Paid Advertisement Fourth.— I)o you think that the hours ethical or otherwise, for taking the into the Inn.I thnn iliil it* creator, unit doe* any man (except in the instance* und wages o f men employed in the var fruits of his labor away from him by No single tax law referred to uhove) charge another man ious industries of Oregon so ideal as to unjust tax laws. could be justifiable that did not re anything for the use o f a single inch need no betterment? Fifth.— I f it is impossible for Ore munerate a man for what it took away of Inndf .2.— Would he not have just ns much gon’s industries to run nt a profit un from him. The answer to question No. 1 makes right to charge him for the use of so der the operation o f laws so broadly much air, if such n thing were pos relative to human welfare, don’t you unnecessary a reply to No. 2 and 3. Questions 4 to 10 can only be an think that an additional argument is sible f 4. —Can you give n sound, logical brought forward for the IffII providing swered by a lengthy treatise on single juNtiflcntion of the ethical liasi* of Innd for the creation of a Department of tax and Socialism, for which we have not space at this time. Industry and Public Works? rent t The Sentinel's contention regarding ¡Sincerely yours, 5. — Can you justify ethically the right the $1500 tax exemption has been that LOCAL COTTAGE GROVE of any person to the unearned inere it snould be opposed by those who do SOCIALIST P A R T Y . ment o f that portion of Mother Karth not believe in single tax. We have not C. B. HAYS, Chairman he happen* to be holding? A. F. HOWARD, Secretary. attempted to show why single tux is a ti.— I f there is no ethical basis for fallacy. Therefore, we do no injustice these things, don’t you think thnt they The Sentinel regrets that the above to the Socialists by not attempting to ought to be done nwny with? The 7.— Don’t you think that it ought to letter was not written early enough in expose single tax at this time. The Shop” Where Good be so arranged that the land held for the campaign to permit of going into Socialists make the 01500 tax exemp thoae purposes could be placed at the detail regarding the questions asked. tion clear. It is pure single tax limited Printing is Done disposal o f the people who would use Because o f demands upon space the re and should be supported by those who believe in single tax and opposed by plies must be very brief. it for u better purpose? We are pleased to have the Socialists those who do not believe in single tax. H.— Considering the advance in the specialisation of Hgriculture, does it not be so frank as to say that the ?1500 tax All The Sentinel has asked, and all that seem possible that it must be under exemption measure itself hides the real it now asks, is that no voter go to the taken on u scale similar to that pre issue— the land question. It is because polls not knowing that the measure is With every the measure is a long step towards a single tax measure. When you get The Live Wire you get vailing in other industries? something. .. !).—Considering the sorinl importance single tax that The Seutinel opposes it. voter understanding that it is single o f this undertaking, don’t you think No discussion of single tax is possible I tax The Sentinel is satisfied that the society ns a whole ought to obtain the now, but regardless o f whether we result will be satisfactory to it. To the second set of questions: iiltimnte direction nnd management of could show single tax to be right or First.— When the May editorial was ngrieulture, instead o f leaving it to the wrong, no deep thinker can help but renlixe thnt Oregon has got to assimi written the workmen's compensation mercy o f profit seekers? 10 .—Considering the advance in de late some of the laws it has before go act was not in operation. The state mocracy, don’t you think thnt this un ing any further— and that single tax ments made therein were true at that What the conditions are now Cottage Grove, (let. 17.— Editor Sen dertnking will hnve to be democratical in any one state would put it at a ser time. tinel: It Ncem* to the memben^of this ly controlled? ious disadvantage for a long time, at The Sentinel has not learned, but our body thnt the controversy raging be We also note with much interest your least, with other states not having thnt questioners can learn, i f they renlly tween your paper and the B 'Renites chivalrous championship of Oregon’s system of taxation. Development of wish to, by going to the same source of over the merit* of the |l5<H)-eieniption industries ngainst “ frenk” labor laws. Oregon is now at n standstill. I f we information that we would have to. Second.— That law has not been long a* n tux luw, und even the proponed law We would like to know : are going to preserve a state upon which itnelf, hn* admirably nerved the purpose First.— What part did the working to try these experiments in the future, enough in operation to give so sweeping of hiding the real iaaue. We believe men’s compensation net piny in the we have got to leave them alone at an opinion at this time. It has, un thi* isNiie to be the Innd question. rinsing of some o f the iocnl lumber present. Too much experimenting now doubtedly, increased the cost of public Hence we nre going to take the liberty mills, as you intimated in n May edi mean* nothing to experiment upon improvements, which may be interest of submitting n few questions which we torial thnt it did? later. Whether national «ingle tax ing to the over burdened taxpayer. The believe will not only seek to obtain Second.— Has the eight hour law on might prove beneficial The Hentinel has Sentinel, however, is not an advocate of your view* on thi* subject, hut will pre public works been a detriment or a not now the space to discuss. As a an endless workday. Third.— The statements made in the sent our nide n* well. benefit ? state law The Hentinel is certain be 1. — Ha* any man (except in certain Third.— Is the regulation of the hours yond doubt thnt it would create havoc. industrial review are undoubtedly true. reclamation undertakings, etc.l, ever nnd wages of women employed in the The questions asked will be answered The Sentinel would, however, endorse some kind of a national law of that rrented a single cubic inch of Innd, any various industries renlly such a menace by number. more thnn he hn* crented a »ingle cubic ns the little column in your paper on 1.— The man who hns cleared the land eharacter. inch of nirt Oregon ’a industries sometimes intimates und put buildings upon it hns put more Fourth.— Decidly no. 2, — I f he him not, then by what it right ia? we have failed to find any justification, Fifth.— No. C T5he SENTINEL SOCIALISTS ASK SENTINEL SOME QUESTIONS