Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Smoke signals. (Grand Ronde, Or.) 19??-current | View Entire Issue (Feb. 1, 2003)
6 FEBRUARY 1, 2003 Smoke Signals A Glitch Mars An Indian Home Ownership Refinance continued from page 1 While some homeowners are frustrated at their inability to refinance the original loans made under the program, before Section 184 came along, it was not possible to finance a house at all in Indian Coun try. Lien restrictions on Tribal Trust land, enforced to keep the land in Tribal hands, have had their limitations. Until the Section 184 provisions came along, lend ers universally declined to offer mortgages on Tribal Trust land. (Trailer park land is another example where the land under a home is often not owned by the homeowner, and when trailer park homeowners obtain mortgage loans, the loans often come at pro hibitive rates. The category is known as 'preda tory' lending See Predatory Lending Sidebar page 7). "The feds stepped in because they realized that Native Americans could not enjoy the benefits of home ownership," said Linda Layden, Director of the Tribal Housing Authority for the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde (CTGR). The step came in the name of Nebraska Congress man Douglas Bereuter, who introduced the Hous ing and Community Development Act of 1992. Sec tion 184 of this law addressed the problem by allow ing HUD to guarantee loans on Tribal Trust (and other Indian) lands.' It took until 1995 before Con gress finally provided $1 million for the purpose, which enabled HUD to guarantee $12 million worth of mortgage loans. The first loan was made that year to a Tribal member in Idaho. In Grand Ronde, the first Section 184 loan came in 1997, when the Grand Meadows subdivision opened. The question comes up, however: why not include a refinancing provision from the beginning? THE BLAME GAME The plan's architects overestimated demand for the program, and worried that putting aside dollars for refinancing (which nobody needed at that point) might take dollars away from those wanting a first shot at housing, according to a knowledgeable HUD source who asked not to be identified. Everything was fine until the technology bubble popped at the end of the decade and the economy stumbled. Although there still was no immediate need for refinancing, by the middle of 2000, the le gal framework for refinancing was enacted, and by the middle of 2001, HUD reportedly had the process prepared for implementation, but officials speaking only on background said that Tribes blocked the ef fort. If the feds blame the Tribes, housing officials for the Tribes say that HUD has had the power all along to implement the process that will allow refi nancing of 184 loans, but has declined to do it. Ac cording to Russell Sossamon, Chairman of the Na tional American Indian Housing Council (NAIHC) and Executive Director of the Choctow Housing Au thority in Oklahoma, "I don't know of anyone (in Indian Country)," he said, opposed to the refinanc ing provision. A range of Indian and non-Indian sources said that the refinancing issue got tied up with Negoti ated Rule Making (not yet mandatory on this issue) and Consultation (mandatory) processes demanded by the Tribes, and got lost in there. Communications between Tribes and federal Housing officials have often been testy. "A lot of Tribes," said Kristy McCarthy, Executive Director of the Council for Indian Housing Development (CIHD), "don't want HUD to cherry pick and de cide (which issues to negotiate and which to act on unilaterally). The position of the Tribes is that HUD hasn't been consulting with them on anything," said McCarthy. Nevertheless, HUD would have the Indian com munity believe that the agency is "strongly in fa vor" of issuing refinancing regulations, and an email from HUD public relations spokeswoman Donna White in early December promised, "The Depart ment will soon release information to lenders, Tribes and homebuyers announcing that mortgagors may refinance existing mortgages on Tribal Trust lands and in Indian areas using the HUD Section 184 loan program." In January, a HUD official told a gathering of the Northwest Indian Housing Association (NWIHA), however, that the new rules, which re portedly will emerge in a "Public Indian Housing Notice," were still being reviewed by HUD lawyers. Internal breakdowns - because the department was without a permanent Assistant Secretary for Indian Housing for 18 months have left the refi nancing provision for dead so many times, accord ing to the HUD official, that office staffers have taken to calling it 'Lazarus.' "We were hoping it would be a Christmas present," the HUD official said. "Now, we're hoping it will be a Valentine's card." WHO BENEFITS FROM 184 LOANS? 113 Tribes have adopted mortgage ordinances that permit them to use the Section 184 loan guarantee, according to Donna Fairbanks, a Technical Assis tant Specialist with NAIHC. Of those, 75 Tribes have actually used the program. Within those 75 Tribes, about 1,200 individuals or families across the country have been granted Section 184 loans since the program was funded in 1995, according to a HUD webpage. About one hundred 184 loans have been made in the four northwestern states, and 34 have been granted in Oregon, nearly all at Grand Meadows. Demand for the program has been far smaller than expected, according to Chester Carl, former Chair man of NAIHC and CEO of the Navajo Housing Au thority in Arizona, Utah and New Mexico, because "if you look at the requirements that HUD is impos ing on Tribal members... it's not conducive to the actual environment of the Tribal communities. . .In addition, the number of (mortgage) institutions par ticipating is very minimal. . .What Congress intended was to allow HUD to provide assistance to families, but unfortunately, that's not happening." Nationally, 30,000 Native Americans are on the waiting list for rental housing in Tribal areas, ac cording to the Tribal Law and Policy Institute. 200,000 housing units are required immediately in Indian Country to provide those in need with ad equate housing, according to NAIHC. If way too few Indians are being served by all In dian housing programs, nevertheless, success among those participating in the Section 184 program has been high. Of the 1,200 guaranteed loans, only 12 now have defaulted, and none in the Grand Mead ows development. Today's success shows signs of weakening, however, as the economy continues to sputter. Still, based on current refinancing rates and the original mortgage rates paid by these homeowners, Harjo estimates that perhaps 20 homeowners in Grand Meadows could benefit by refinancing. At least, Harjo said, they could benefit if they planned to stay put for ten years or more. With approxi mately $2,000 in closing costs required for a refi nance in this area, it takes some time to recoup that new investment in the property. HERE IN GRAND RONDE For some homeowners in Grand Meadows, who purchased a home under Section 184 at Grand Mead ows, this program has meant the possibility of home ownership where it was not previously possible. But with interest rates now at 31-year lows, the family