Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The skanner. (Portland, Or.) 1975-2014 | View Entire Issue (June 26, 2013)
Opinion Deep Racial Gulf on Affirmative Action I n the months leading up to this week’s Supreme Court decision on affirmative action, a public opinion poll by ABC News and the Washington Post showed that 76 percent of Americans oppose affirmative action in college admissions. However, a poll conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute showed that 68 percent of Americans favor the principles behind affir- mative action. How do Americans really feel about affir- mative action? The short answer is that it depends on how the question is asked. The ABC/Washington Post question, asked June 5-9, was posed this way: “Over- all, do you support or oppose allowing universities to consider applicants’ race as a factor in deciding which students to admit?” Of those responding, 76 percent opposed, 22 percent voiced support and 2 percent were undecided. Public Religion Research Institute, which conducted a poll May 15-19, phrased its question differently: “In order to make up for past discrimination, do you favor or oppose programs which make special efforts to help blacks and other minorities get ahead?” More than two-thirds of the respondents – 68 percent – favored such efforts, 24 per- cent opposed, 6 percent were unsure and 2 percent provided other replies. Note the wording of the questions. The ABC/Washington Post question provided no context for evaluating affirmative action admissions, only whether respondents sup- port or oppose using race as a factor. On the other hand, the Public Religion Research Institute approach placed the issue within the context of “past discrimination” and using “special efforts” to help people of color get ahead. An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, con- ducted May 30-June 2, showed Americans evenly divided on the issue. Respondents were asked to choose between two statements: A) Affirmative action programs are still needed to counter- act the effects of discrimination against minorities, and are a good idea as long as T HE C URRY R EPORT George E. Curry there are no rigid quotas and B) Affirmative action programs have gone too far in favor- ing minorities, and should be ended because they unfairly discriminate against whites. In that poll, 45 percent of the respondents said affirmative action programs are still needed to counteract the effects of discrim- er 11 percent of Blacks feel affirmative action should continue, but did not feel as strongly about it. Among Hispanics, 29 per- cent were in that category and 14 percent of Whites. When supporters – strong and not as strong – are added together, 82 percent of African Americans want to retain affirma- tive action, compared to 68 percent of Hispanics and 34 percent of Whites. When you add the two categories of those wanting to abolish affirmative action, a majority of Whites – 56 percent – support such a move, compared to 7 percent of African Americans and 24 percent of His- panics. A CNN/ORC poll, conducted June 11-13, That same poll showed how differently Blacks and Whites view the proper role of government ination against people of color. But the same margin – 45 percent – said they feel the programs have gone too far and should be ended because they unfairly discriminate against Whites. asked the question: Do you approve or dis- approve of affirmative action programs at college and law schools that give racial preferences to minority applicants? The reference to “racial preferences” is a How do Americans really feel about affirmative action? The short answer is that it depends on how the question is asked A closer examination of the numbers show a deep racial divide. For example, 71 percent of African Americans strongly believe affirmative action programs are still needed, compared to only 20 percent of Whites and 39 percent of Hispanics. Anoth- loaded term unlikely to elicit a favorable response. In this case, 68 percent of respon- dents said they disapprove of affirmative action as it was defined, 29 percent approved and 3 percent expressed no opin- ion. Affirmative action should be viewed in light of overall racial attitudes in America. As we approach the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, people of color and Whites have closely aligned views on whether Dr. King’s dream of equality has been fulfilled. In the CNN/ORC poll conducted Jan. 14- 15, respondents were asked: “Martin Luther King gave his famous ‘I Have a Dream Speech’ at a civil rights march in Washing- ton in 1963. In your view, do you think the U.S. has fulfilled the vision King outlined in that speech, or don’t you think so?” According to the poll, 51 percent of Whites in the U.S. believe Dr. King’s vision has been fulfilled; 49 percent of non-Whites subscribe to that view. Unfortunately, the poll does not separate the Black responses. In an Aug. 4-7, 2011 USA/Gallup Poll, 55 percent of Black respondents said they believe relations between Blacks and Whites will always be a problem, compared to 44 percent for Whites, with 2 percent unsure. That same poll showed how differently Blacks and Whites view the proper role of government. When asked about the role government should play in trying to improve the social and economic position of Blacks and other people of color, 59 percent of Blacks said the government should play a major role, 32 percent said a minor role, 8 percent said no role and 1 percent was unsure. Among Whites, only 19 percent said the govern- ment should play a major role, 50 percent said a minor role, 30 percent said no role and 1 percent was unsure. George E. Curry, former editor-in-chief of Emerge magazine, is editor-in-chief of the National Newspaper Publishers Associa- tion News Service (NNPA.) He is a keynote speaker, moderator, and media coach. Curry can be reached through his Web site, www.georgecurry.com. You can also follow him at www.twitter.com/currygeorge and George E. Curry Fan Page on Facebook. Week on the Web Letters to the Editor Gender Equality Dear Editor: I am writing in response to The Skanner’s editorial entitled “Controversy Underscores Why Portland Needs a Sustainable Equity Network” which highlights the need to contin- ue raising awareness about the pervasive equity issues still present in our community. I could not agree more with this sentiment but am troubled by the fact that issues of gender equity are consistently downplayed. While I was not present at the Quartet gathering, sex- ism was at the heart of the comments of Baruti Artharee directed towards Commissioner Smith. Despite the role that gender played in this incident, the City of Portland’s Office of Equity and Human Rights mission states that it is “starting with issues of race and disabili- ty.” This incident clearly illustrates the need for all of us in our community and the City of Portland to rethink how it prioritizes equity issues. Regards, Elizabeth Nye Executive Director, Girls Inc. of NW Oregon Last Thursday Committee Resigns in Protest at Mayor Hales Attempt to “Shrink” Festival ... NW News For The Skanner News on your smart phone go to www. theskannermobile.co m or scan this QR code with your app. Singer Bobby ‘Blue’ Bland Dies at 83 ... Music Department of Labor Awards $1.17 Mil- lion Each to Prisoner Jobs Programs in Portland and Seattle .... NW News Trayvon Martin’s Parents Leave Courtroom as Jury Shown Photos of Dead Teen ... Breaking News Seattle Mayor Announces New Literacy Program for Local Students .... NW News Rudy Crew Heading Back to New York as President of Medgar Evers College .... NW News VIDEO: Flooding Hits Alberta Province, Forces 75,000 People from their Homes in Calgary ... Breaking News www. The Skanner.com has a photo archive, automatic updates for weather and sports, the latest news from Portland and beyond ... it’s your go-to place for news you won’t see in mainstream publications. It’s your community. It’s The Skanner online June 26, 2013 The Portland Skanner Page 5