Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The Sunday Oregonian. (Portland, Ore.) 1881-current | View Entire Issue (June 29, 1902)
THE SUNDAY OBBGOOTAN, EOBTLAD, JUNE 29, 1902. Entered at the Postofflce at Portland. Oregon, as eecond-clasa matter. REVISED SUBSCRIPTION RATES. By Mall (postage prepaid. Id Advance) Dally, with Sunday, per sacnth t fX Uaily, Sunday excepted, per year Y Daily, with Sunday, per year Sunday, per year ... i The Woekly, per year.. ...... . X The Weekly. 3 months w To City Subscribers Daily, per week, delivered, Sunday cf ?ifrxr' DiUly, per week, delivered. Sundays includeCo. POSTAGE RATES. United States. Canada and Mexico: JO to 14-page paper ; 1 to 28-page paper .........-- Foreign rates double. News or discussion Intended lor publication In The Oregonlan should be addressed invaria bly "Editor The Oregonlan." not to the name of any Individual. Letters relating to adver tising, subscriptions or to any business matter should be addressed simply 'The Oregonlaa. Eastern Business Office, 43. 44. 45. 47, 43. 49 Tribune building. New York City; 010,"11:nr Tribune building. Chicago; the S. C. Beckwlta Epeclal Agency, Eastern representative. For eale in San Francisco by L. E. Lee, Pal ace Hotel news stand; Goldsmith Eros., 230 Sutter street: F. W. Pitts. 1003 Market treet; J. 1C Cooacr Co.. 740 Market street, near the Palace Hotel; Foster & Orear, Ferry news stand; Frank Scott. 80 Ellis street, and N. "Wheatley, SI3 Mission street. For sale in Eos Angeles by B. V. GKta' 250 So. Spring street, and Oliver A Halne. sua a Spring street. For sale in Sacramento by Sacramento Siowa Co., 429 K. street, Sacramento, CaL For eale In Chicago by the P. O. News COj, 617 Dearborn street, and Charles MacDonold. ta "Washington street. TTni. n1 In rmnVm Ytv TnrlrnloW BfO., 101 tFarnam street: Megeatb, Stationery Ox. 1803 j Earnam street. For aale in Salt Lake by the Salt ! Ncws JCo., 77 W. Second South 6treet. For aale In Ogdea by C H. Myers. 1 For sale in Minneapolis by R. G. Heaney-& Co.. 24 Third street South. I For aale In "Washington, D. C, by tb Ebbett SUouse. news stand. , For aale in Denver, Colo., toy Hamilton & Kendrick, 00C-912 Seventeenth street; Louthan Vfc Jackson Book & Stationery -Co., IBth and La.wrence atreet; A. Series, Sixteenth and Cur hcis streets; and H. P. Hansen. m 1 TODAY'S "WEATHER Fairj warmer; rortti Jpest winds. YESTERDAY'S "V7EATHER Maximum tem ben WPI perature, CO; minimum temperature, OX; pro pltatloa, none. ORTLAITD, 6TJXDAY, JUICE 20, 1002. LHTTICAIi STUDY OF THE BIBLE, If the religious unrest of today is not profound as It "was from twenty to Kdrty years ago. the fact is due to the terowing acceptance of the historical method in dealing with the concepts tand traditions of religion. Many of the ichief difficulties have been cleared Jaway, and "where they have not been twholly cleared away ground has been established for advance or inquiry on )a rational basis; so that the human snind begins to see a reasonable method In the treatment of the great problems jof life and spirit. This result is largely due to modern critical study of the Bible itself. The unrest is "working its own cure. But it is -establishing a new basis for the estimate of the progress of the religious spirit In man. No one -who pays any attention to what is going on In the religious world can fail to see that the one great ques tion now before it is that relating to the Bible, its nature, character, history and authorship. Nearly all the controver sies, discussions, doubts and specula tions which today so largely occupy the attention of the churches have been in spired by modem critical study of the Bible, and can find their -ultimate solu tion only In the settlement of the ques tions raised by this criticism. The o callcd progressive theology movement In the Congregational churches, the contro versy over Christian eschatology, the recent revision of the standards of the Presbyterian Church, the Broad Church movement in the Episcopal Church, and the remarkable growth of liberal ideas and of a questioning spirit in all de nominations, have their origin in and derive their strength from that spirit of Investigation which has been fostered by modern biblical criticism and by sci entific methods of research. A great array of facts has been brought to light, which, if admitted and many of them must be admitted utterly overthow the old theories of the - erbal Inspiration, .the infallibility ant. the inerrancy of this remarkable literature. Many ot the conclusions of the criticisms have already been tacitly accepted by the churches, both Christian and Jewish; indeed the consciousness of the age is deeply tinged with the new thought about the Bible; and it is evident that the process is destined to go on indefi atftely, in spite of the frantio efforts of vthe conservatives. Individuals in the churches who adopt the views of the critics doubtless will be disciplined still though In decreasing numbers. But mo ecclesiastical machinery can arrest the movement of which they are the product. Whether for good or evil, It Is "working its way into the very heart of modern Christianity. For modern criticism has established lits right to exist by what it has done. ITrue, its conclusions are not always sure, but the work points to truth as Its result, and the traditions of the church and the conclusions of critics must be tried before the bar of truth and fact, presided over by the rational end historic spirit. The old dogma which forbids any examination of the Bible, or any rational Judgment in re gard to it, is out of harmony with the historical fact that the present books of the Bible were gathered together by the exercise of the very same rational weighing of evidence which is, by that dogma, forbidden. In making up the present Scriptural canon, fallible men did exactly what the critics are doing now; that is, they used their reason to weigh the facts and evidence, in accord ance with which they decided that cer tain books were "inspired," while others were not. And on this very point there always has been a dispute, which is to be settled at last only by acceptance of a rational definition of inspiration. If criticism has a right to examine any part of the Bible or any inherited opinion about it, it has a right to ex amine every part and every opinion. No half-way method can be enforced. The object of the criticism is to find out what the Bible is and what it claims for itself, as opposed to the great body of criticisms and interpretations whioh tradition has gathered about it In this view the study of the Bible Is simply one branch of that science of his tory whose object is to make the past real to the present. Christianity Itself Is both a history and a literature, and is subject, therefore, to the laws of his torical Inquiry and of literary criticism. To divorce the Bible from history and humanity, and to turn it into a mys terious Delphic oracle, is to destroy Its essential character. This scientific and historical criticism has revolutionized the old conception of the Bible. It has Introduced the ele ment of historical perspective, and has taught .the necessity of discrimination "between the various part It has made aotual to us the Biblical past. In its Teal aspecta. It has brought out the Ideas of development and of religious evolution which so mark the history of the Bible. It has laid the foundation of a sane exegesis in opposition to the fan tastic "squatter sovereignty exegesis," as some one has-happlly'called it, which formerly dominated the minds of theo logians" and pulpiteers. It has taught men to weigh and sift that which tradi tion, often ignorant and nearly always over-credulous, took for granted, and thus has ruled out of court the appeal to blind credulity, which from the be ginning has done eo much to arrest or to turn aside from its true course the orderly and rational development of religion. It has done much to settle the question of authority, by showing that it Is "a variable quantity, depend ing on testimony, probability and truth. It has brought out the law of discrimi nation, in estimating the' value of dif ferent portions of these books, and has done much for their rational Interpreta tion by reconstruction of the conditions under which they must have been pro duced. It gives weight to probable evi dence, which In all departments of thought is the very guide of life. Here, for example, are the first Ave books, the Pentateuch, or six, the Hexa teuch, including the Book of Joshua. "What are they, and how were they composed? It Is now the universally accepted judgment of competent schol arship that they are a composite of narratives and laws, belonging to the history of Israel, covering a very long period, made up of materials altered, adjusted and reset at different times, to suit changing conceptions in the na tional and religious life of the people. Of the various documents wrought Into these books, some are older than others by many centuries; the seams upon which they were united are everywhere plainly visible, and it Is possible to as certain from study and comparison at about what time the work of the later editors was done and what was the purpose of It. Thus, what is called the Yahwistlo document was composed in the north Israelite kingdom within the ninth century, B. C, or quite at the beginning of the eighth; while the elo hlstlc document was written in the same kingdom by an author acquainted with the other document, and who must I have lived about 750 B. C. Both works were known and received in Judah, or the southern kingdom, also; but they could not satisfy permanently the exist ing and gradually unfolding require ments of the latter kingdom, and both alike were accordingly so expanded and recast that in the second half of the seventh century distinctively Judean edltionsof both had come Into existence; which again at some period later than G50 B. C, thus supplemented and worked over, were combined into a sin gle whole. The continuous redaction of the Hexateuch Is a fact accepted by the scholarship of the world. Upon this problem more labor has perhaps been expended than upon any other in liter ary history, and though there remain some differences of opinion as to minor details, the general result is placed be yond the bounds of dispute. The work was brought gradually into Its present form, to meet or suit the changing re ligious consciousness from which It emanated. Much of the matter, more over, is in historical contradiction, with the setting that holds It; for it is a record of an effort to reconstruct the history of past times on a basis to meet the supposed wants of the present and future. Each of the divergent accounts has Its distinctive language and char acteristic turns of speech and style. Indeed, the narratives differ so widely In this respect that even without refer ence to their contents scholars are able to place diversity of authorship and differences of time above the reach of doubt, merely by noting the divergen cies of form. Study of the Bible, therefore, is a lit erary and historical problem, subject to the general canons of literary and historical criticism. The result does not diminish the value of the contents, but It changes from tradition to reason, from the unscientific to the historical spirit, the grounds of authority for Judging them. A SECRET OP AUTHORSHIP. The first requisite of authorship Is something to say, but almost equally essential is knowledge how to say it. Many a worthy intellectual enterprise Is wrecked because navigated with bad grammar and unseaworthy vocabu laries. This important truth is suggest ed by the appeal of a correspondent: Authorities hero differ as to the correctness ot this expression: "Which of the places, Eon- don, Brighton or Leeds, will bo tho most, con venient for you to reach?" Some say "and" should be used rather than "or." "What Bays Tho Oregonlan? One of the expressions used Is wrong and the other is right, and perhaps the right one is. after all, the more objec tionable of the two. "We shall not say which, because It Is not worth while. There Is no choice between two abom inable expressions. Say, Would Lon don, Brighton or Leeds be most con venient for you to Teach? Multitudes never learn that the ob ject of language Is to make progress in thought between speaker and hearer, or between "writer and reader. "Whether we aim to charm or to Instruct, or to edify, the purpose Is the same to reach the understanding most effectively. To run that race we must cast aside every weight; and there is no more grievous weight than the habit of compelling tho reader or hearer to stop every little while to wonder if the oantence in hand is not Incorrect. If you wanted a man to stop your runaway horse, you would not address him In such terms as would leave him long In doubt as to your meaning. Ton would want him to un derstand at once and act forthwith. Something less urgent, perhaps, but no less direct, Is the purpose of every spoken and written word. The aim is to effect some mental or physical ac tion, or both, and anything that inter feres with that end is objectionable. It Is not enough, then, that a sentence should be grammatically correct. It should so avoid all appearance of evil that even the finicky reader will not constantly be diverted from the thought by a question of accuracy and an In vestigation then and there. If you say, A group of men was seen surrounding the broken vehicle, half your readers will begin to wonder whether "was" shouldn't have been "were." No such question would arise If It had been sim ply, said that the broken vehicle was seen to be surrounded by a group ot men. Carelessness in the choice of words not only sets readers to speculat ing about grammatical accuracy and elegance, but often leaves them In doubt as to the writer's meaning. Clearness and conciseness are the great objects In style. To confuse the reader Is fatal to effective impressions, to distract his atianilon from the thought to the form J of expression Is to lose him by the way- side. Here Is a secret of authorship. The great writer carries his readers along with him to the end of the chapter. KO STANDARD OP STATBEHOOD. Notwithstanding the force of the an tagonistic criticism which Mr. Charles Francis Adams has stirred, up by his. proposal of a statue for General t Lee, and without abating anything The Ore gonlan has said In opposition to his encomiums of the Confederate leader. It may beconceded that Mr. Adams has arrived at a perfectly correct conclusion through most lame and Impotent pro cesses of reasoning. "What ho predicts about a statue to Lee will probably come true; but all the steps by which he is persuaded-of Its verity must be cast away. A very moderate amount of historical knowledge and penetration should have shown Mr. Adams the Impossibility of estimating one man from the career of another, however numerous the points of superficial resemblance which Inge nuity may supply. The great man's place In history Is determined to a very limited extent by his own charac ter. It depends very largely upon the exigencies of his time and the public sentiment with which he has to deal, and It is most profoundly determined by the fate which time and chance visit upon its remote consequences. Nothing more pertinent can be asked of the great man's career, than this: What la the net result of his life upon the course of history? Time and chance have Identified Lincoln with the over throw of slavery and the death of seces sion, both of which were National move ments that would have found another exponent in his- absence. Time and chance have identified Washington with the achievement of American independ ence, whoso debt to him Is greater than the Civil War's debt to Lincoln, but not such that without him the record would have been otherwise. A man like Crom well or like Bismarck', who contributes of his own personality to distract di rection of the course of history, shares in a class whose ranks can never be entered by a defeated leader like Lee, however pure his purposes or amiable his character. Cromwell destroyed the divine right of Kings a stroke in com parison with whlcH Lee did nothing at alL Perhaps even Napoleon will some day occupy a lower place In fame than Cromwell will, for, though he personi fied on the Continent that spirit cif de mocracy which Cromwell had repre sented In Britain, his work, stamped indelibly on France, departed from Eu rope In general, except as it built up In Germany an opposition to France whose harvest was not fully gathered until two generations after Trafalgar saw the German armies in the streets of Paris. No dispute like that which has fol lowed the Adams address should be withheld from the test of that chief pro ducer of controversy confusion of terms; and it affords the suggestion that the difficulty with Mr. Adams and his critics may after all be that they oc cupy different premises as to the quali fications for.statuehood. This was cer tainly the trouble over the Frederick offering from Emperor William. Some thought its acceptance would register an Indorsement of monarchy, and others that we should merely acknowledge a courtesy. Admit all that Mr. Adams' critics say, they agree to his character ization of Lee, and If they will only concede that statues with National ap proval may be raised to such a man as he describes positively and such a man as they 'delimit negatively, then all ground of argument Is removed. Assur edly no sjatue to Lee will ever give him rank with Cromwell or Washing ton, Lincoln or even Grant, but some day a statue will doubtless register the pride posterity feels In the memory not only of Lee, but of half a dozen men who fought on the Southern side. Time will never make slavery adorable or se cession right; but statues to men of Lee's eminence and character will mul tiply in manycitles, South and North, If cot at public expense, with publlo approval and to public edification. The marble quarries will not be exhausted until the level of our public men is no ticeably raised. A IARGE ASPECT OF LABOR COX TBXTIOX. There is always this grave danger In disputes between capital and labor like those now vexing the local Industry of Portland, namely, that through the stubbornness or passion of one or both sides to the quarrel the productive power of the community may suffer some permanent diminution. This must certainly follow if In the settlement which, first or last, ends every strike, labor and capital do not reach some ground of complete "and cheerful accord from which as a basis they may go for ward In cordial spirit. When, after a period of mutual Irritation, one side or the other through superiority of re source, "wins out," there Is almost cer tain to develop an arbitrary and haughty temper on the one hand and a sense of humiliation and Injury on the other. Fires may be rekindled; work may go on; but the co-operative mood through which and through Which only greatest results are achieved, is lost. And with this loss there Is unfailingly a decline in moral force and ultimately. If not Immediate ly, in Individual efficiency and in gen eral economic power. There is another form of loss, always serious and often permanent and ruin ous, when a settlement Is enforced In the Interest of class selfishness. Every man observant of industrial facts has witnessed the decline of certain trades because they have been carried on in ways fatal to the interest or the char acter of the workmen who operate them; and everybody has seen the degradation of those trades in which, through a whimsical effect of the union principle falsely applied, the productive capabil ity of the least efficient has been estab lished as the standard of duty. Eng land has lost to Germany her old pre eminence In the cutlery trades because the Sheffield operatives were forced to endure conditions fatal to their health and skllL In some parts of the United States the mason's trade, once of special dignity and profit, is losing its character under a rule which prevents workmen of epeclal aptitude, splrl and skill from .putting forth the full measure of their working powers. Contentions between employer and employed long pursued and at last crys tallized Into permanent class hatred have brought British Industry to a po sition where It can no longer meet the world's competition. Both sides exhibit unmistakable signs of moral deteriora tion. The "master" as the phrase goes there has lost his old generosity, his old wiHIngness to venture his capital; the "man" has lostihe quality of Intel- llgent .and persistent Industry. The fine combination of industrial forces which first enabled England to beat Holland in her own arts and finally to conquer the commerce of the world no longer exists and apparently cannot be re stored. British capital will not cre ate the costly modern plants neces sary to maintain an all-round com petition avith the United States and Germany because it is afraid of the labor element; and there Is rea son In this timid policy, for In many parts of England the men cannot be In duced upon any consideration to work the week through'. Mutual hatred has supplanted the sense of mutual duty and the spirit of good will upon which the great fabric of British industry was built up. The productive and economic powers of the nation have declined, not because their opportunity is less than formerly, but as a consequence of the moral decay and the economic waste of a quarter-century of contention with Its effects of business paralysis and class lil-wlll. The lesson of British experience ap plies with as much force to one side of our labor quarrels as to the- other. It Is no part of our business to Judge be tween employer and employed In the matters over which they are now con tending here at Portland, and most cer tainly we shall not attempt It. But we venture this " word ot counsel and warning, namely, that long quarrels make long and bitter enmities, and that long and bitter enmities be tween the forces of industry lead in evitably to personal deterioration all round and to the destruction of eco nomic power. GAB, AND OTHER EVIDENCE. The only way In which the New Eng land Anti-Imperialist League can be satisfied as to the fitness of the Filipinos for Independence is to have some of the chiefs come over here and "Inform us what they want, that we may Judge whether they are fit for the high re sponsibilities ot citizenship." This is the utterance of Mr. Bourke Cockran at Faneuil Hall Friday night, when a petition to Congress embodying that re quest was circulated and signed. How fitting and altogether lovely It Is that Mr. Cockran, especially, should pro pose to Judge the Filipinos by some words their orators might -utter upon appearance here. Mr. Cockran Is an orator himself, and doubtless has the true oratorical faith in words. Many minds survive, even In this day of pop ular education, In which the beautiful pictures that a glib talker paints of his desires and purposes are legal tender for the reward of service actually per formed. The world may be roughly di vided Into the posers and the perform ers, and their numbers show that each path leads to success. Men continue to he taken very 'larsrelv at their owri valuation. We give them their desires in sheer admiration of their address and effrontery. Yet It may be pointed out that there are other ways of ascertaining Filipino capacity beside listening to harangues from their great chiefs, even if the tes timony of our soldiers and sailors and judges, Dewey, Wheaton, Otis, Taft and the rest, is to be cast aside as value less. Our early colonists learned as much when, after moving addresses, subsequently disguised as "supposed speeches," the" great chiefs sallied forth to massacre and burn. Mr. Cochran's Information Is really lying very near, sp near and simple that we doubt If he will sse It, or, seeing, apprehend. It is this: Manila, Juno 27. There Is no positive proof that tho four American teachers of Cebu, Island of Cebu, who have been missing since June 10, when they started on a day's outing, have .been killed, but there Is little doubt that they were murdered, as members of the con j stabulary. who killed a man for resisting ar rest, found on his person a revolver, watch and chain, which had belonged to Mr. Thomas, one of the teachers referred to. This 13 quite as pertinent to Mr. Cock ran's Inquiry as any speeches the great chiefs would deliver here, even though prepared in Boston by Edward Atkin son and Ervlng WInslow. One of the most moving appeals against our Philippine policy is the course of Great Britain In enforcing her sovereignty in South Africa. Though it has nothing to do with the casev it nevertheless Is a powerful contributor to disaffection In this country. How much would be left of antl-lmperlallsm, out side the sentimental circles of Eastern centers of light and leading, that is, of darkness and scuttle. If "Down with England and up with Ireland" could be drawn out of it? STRICTLY TEIXERIAN. Nobody can tell what the people of Colorado will think of Teller's speech on Cuba, but at this distance it looks as if the sacred beet-sugar cause had been dealt by him a very damaging blow. He says two things that have a very ugly look. One Is that beet sugar doesn't need the excessive protection Its representatives are contending for, and the other Is his assertion that they are ready to accept the House bill with the Morris amendment striking out the dif ferential on the refined product. He says: "When you get ready to take 20 per cent of duty off steel and Iron, I speak for my people when I say we will arreo to a reducUon of duty on sugar. "Wo can make all the sugar necoseary for the United States in this country if we aro given only equitable protection. There is a reciprocity in protection that must bo maintained, and that we are going to insist on. "Wo aro prepared to take the bill as it came from the House, and we will take it now. It is doubtful If there is an intellU gent man, woman or child In the United States, with even a slight acquaintance with the Cuban negotiations and de bate, who will believe these assertions. The Oxnard people are too well known, both in ambition and in methods, to admit of the theory that If, they can only secure equitable reduction on tariff protection "now given iron and steel and allied industries, they will gladly Join in giving Justice to Cuba. It la also well known that" the Morris amendment struck Its most effective terror not in the Havemeyer but hi the Oxnard camp. It was the Oxnard Interest that made the Senate safe against the House bill, and, Senator Teller to the contrary not withstanding, it Is the Oxnard interest that still holds up Cuban relief of any we have the man who wept over the dastardly crime contemplated against the people's money at St. Louis in 18S6, who dwells In plaintive tones in the Senate upon the tolling masses and the man with the blistered hand now standing up in the Senate to make a dishonest bluff and a spurious plea for tariff reform. Alas, that so young and vigorous a state should be unable to shake itself from the dominion of so old and disreputable a demagogue! The story of the captivity of Mira Ellen 11.- Stone among Bulgarian brl- gands, as told by herself In a series of . articles in a popularmagazlne, Is botn romantic and realistic. It is safe to say that hundreds of thousands of mothers will read with Intense and sympathetic Interest the recital of the conditions and circumstances under which the babe of Mrs. Tsllka Miss Stone's companion ta captivity came Into the world, and of the trying Incidents that followed that event. The bed of straw In a dark and narrow cabin In the wild and rugged mountains, upon which the young mother lay, having spent ten hours pre vious to the birth of her child In the saddle; the old crone brought from some unknown quarter to assist the mother; the coarse swaddling clothes In which the Infant was wrapped; the lusty cries by which she proclaimed he right to life and nourishment; the ten der awo with which the brigands re garded the infant, and the diligence with which they sought to provide for her needs; the Journey of the young mother on the second day In a tfbx strapped to the back of a horse over steep mountain trails; the shifts and makeshifts to which they were driven during the seven weeks af captivity that continued after the babe's birth, to keep her clothing clean and dry and her little body warm, are some of the features of this story of motherhood and Its care3 and anxieties under most un toward conditions. Miss Stone Is her self a heroine In this story, though Mrs. Tsllka Is the heroine of this part of It; and the recital of her part in the events detailed will command for her greater admiration than the history of her endeavor covering a long period of years as a theoretical missionary. Manly men will instinctively honor and womanly women love this brave woman who, wholly Inexperienced but tenderly sympathetic, ministered devotedly and unselfishly to this sister woman in the stress of maternity far from home and friends and professional care. Why it Is that the Democrats In Con gress are so watchful of every opportu nity to disport their Idiocy offers the curious a perennial source of specula tion. Congress is about to adjourn, and, lest their other follies might pos sibly escape attention, they hurrledjy rush Into caucus and thrust upon the waiting land a declaration which cul minates in this arraignment: That the Republican majority In Congress is dominated and controlled by tho trusts and monopolies, which have tho great industries of our country In their grasp, is shown by its ac tion la- passing an anti-trust bin through the House of RepresentaUvcs of the GGth Congress in the closing hours of tho session, and ttie Senate refusing to consider the same, as a sub terfuge to tide over the election ot 1000. The only practical Way of strength ening the hands- of the Government, to deal with the trusts, as recognized by Bryan as well as by constitutional law yers, Is to amend the Constitution. A bill to that end was offered by the Re publicans in the House in 1900 and was defeated by the Democrats. 134 to 131, the necessary two-thirds being lacking. Only five Democrats voted for the bill. Has the Democratic caucus ever heard of that? t It is in accord no doubt with the rule of politics, in practical operation, that the events which carried Walter F. Matthews to the head of the party or ganization in Oregon should carry him also Into one of the Important Federal offices. He Is a competent man for the position of United States Marshal, and may be expected- to perform Its duties with Intelligence and fidelity. There are vicissitudes of fortune In politics, and not every man gets his innings, but Matthews this time Is fortunate. As In the case of every person who ha3 taken active part In the organization and management of party politics and campaigns, he has had his opponents,' critics and enemies, in his own party as well as In the other. These things are matter of course. But Matthews will drop out of the active work of poli tics now, and he will be found -a straightforward and capable official. Rural mall delivery Is growing In fa vor with the citizens of Oregon; the postal authorities promptly respond to requests for Its extension In suitable lo calities, and such localities are being constantly discovered. What with sub urban electric-car service, rural mall delivery and bicycle paths, wide sec tions of the country have In recent years been brought Into touch with the city, and rural neighborhoods with each other. If the drift of rural population toward the cities Is not checked 'oy this means, political economists and "Sociolo gists will have to look anew" for the cause of .this drift, since clearly It can not be the result of- isolation and its deprivations. The "human touch" through these channels cannot be oth erwise than helpful and Inspiring. The Carnegie Steel Company has vol untarily Increased by 10 per -cent the wages paid to nearly 15,000 unskilled laborers In Its service. An event of this kind In the labor" world attracts very little comment beyond the merest men tion. A reduction of 10 per cent In any Instance, en the contrary, Is heralded far and wide, met by a strike, and per haps followed by a boycott. We all know something of the tendency of hu man nature to remain silent In the pres ence of generous deeds and to speak out In loud condemnation of those that are even seemingly ungenerous. If proof of this tendency were wanting, this cita tion would furnish It. The Portland baseball team Is putting up a" good fight, both with voice and muscle. That it has failed for some time to win a game Is not due to an abatement either In skill or effort. It has simply played In hard luck. The steamer Portland Is frozen in the Arctic Sea and drifting on Its way north. x If it has the pluck to which it is entitled by its name, it will discover the North Pole. Which Is fitting. - From the Depths. From the depths, the deepest sea-depths ring in?. Sound the bells of evening, faint, and low; On their chimea the wonder-tiding bringing Of the mystic city there below. Sunken far beyond the flood-tide dashing There the ruins of the city sleep. Golden gllnipoes of Its towers flashing From the mirrored surface of the deep. And the sailor who has seen that vision In the dying daylight' golden glow Steers forever toward that post Elyslan. Heedless of the threatening rocks below. From tho depths, the deepest heart -depths ring ing. Sound those bell notes far and faint and low; On thIr chimes tho wonder-tidings bringing Of the love that crumbled long ego. Sunken deep below tho flood-tide dashing. There the ruins of a love-world sleep; Golden glimpses of its Eden flashing From the mirror ot my dreams no deep. Then my weary self in ocean flinging. Fain -I'd plunge bsneath that mirrored sheen; In my fancy, angel voices elnglng. Call me to that far-off wonder-scene. TVlIhelm Muller. THINGS LOCAL AND OTHERWISE. Cleveland, Hill and Bryan each "spoke a piece" recently, and thereby furnished a theme for discussion. One paper refers to the "hypnotic spell of Bryan's impas sioned and foolish speech at Chicago In 1SS6." The verdict of tho country Is that this speech won him the nomination for President, but there are a few facts in connection with his personal victory that may be worth setting down six years after their occurrence. On that eventful day, July 9, the Democratic National Con tion by a vote of more than two to one. defeated the platform presented by gold Democrats, killed the resolution Indorsing Cleveland's " administration, and adopted the free-silver platform. Early in tho session there had been a demonstration for David B. Hill, which, according to the press reports, lasted IS minutes. A "demonstration" Is an exhibit of lung power of tho same mental and spiritual quality that we see at a baseball match," when Swlpcsey, of the home team, in the last half of the ninth Inning, with two men onxbases, Uft3 a ball over the center- field fence and brings in the three runs needed to win the game; only in a Na tional convention they have features , of flags, state banners and mottoes manu factured on muslin In a paint-shop the day before In anticipation of the great spontaneous outburst. Also, they have the marching of delegates down the aisles with fai less decorum than the Salva tion Army observes. Influences far re moved from reason often sway the minds of men assembled In large numbers for a lofty purpose. After tho demonstration by the. Gold Democrats, the free-silver delegates, who were largely In the majority, and had the sympathy of most of the 20,009 spec tators, waited their opportunity to outdo tho Hill men In the expenditure of lung power and pedestrlanism. The natural place for It was after the address of Bryan. Ha was listened to with great Interest, cheers greeted him frequently, and when he" concluded with tho famous phrase, "You shall not press down upon the brow ot labor this crown of thorns. Tou shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold," there was a gen erous outburst of enthusiastic applause. This died down as Bryan took his seat and sllenco followed. Then began the wild free-silver demonstration. Com pared with It. the Hill demonstration a few hours before was a Quaker prayer meeting. It would havo taken place In -any event, and was not consequent upon Bryan's speech. The Idea that his or atory aroused the convention to 30 min utes of Irrational, continuous ebullition 13 not based on fact. A correspondent asks: "What is the meaning of 'yellow in Journalism?" To answer in one sentence,. It means doing nearly everything that is not and neglect ing everything that Is legitimate journal Ism. Perhaps the chief fault of the "yel low" newspaper is palming oft highly col ored fiction for fact. Exaggerating com monplace occurrences," manufacturing sen sational stories out of the most slender material, garbling news so as to make it more salable on the streets, exploiting crimes In which women are involved, malting heroes out of prizefighters, in vading homos and opening graves in search of food for a cortain type of un regulated mind, and violating every rule of ethics, are chargeable to the "yejlow" newspaper. Ithas no conscience, and docs not see things in their right propor tion. It affects contempt for the rich and devotes unlimited space to a record of their minutest doings; theirs and their man-servants' and maid-servants'. It takes a low view of life, and has no seri ous purpose. If a rich man happen to be proprietor, it is a3 likely to make lavish expenditure of money for low-down serv ice as for creditable undertakings. To Illustrate: A New Tork "yollow" paper engaged ex-Senator Ingalls, of Kansas, to write up the prizefight be tween Corbctt and FItzsiramons, and plumed itself more over this "enter prise" than over sending Richard Hard ing Davis to Cubaas war correspondent. It gave more prominence to a signed article by a pugilist on how It feels to be knocked out than to a sermon by Ly man Abbott. Within three months, one San Francisco paper gave up more spaco fcr several days to the murder of an .ob scure woman than to all other news. If Mrs, George Gould's coachman wire to elopo with her nurse-girl, tho "yellow" Journals of New York would likely give it the entire first page, with copious Il lustrations of the "contracting parties," the. entire Gould family, the team which tho groom drove regularly, tho cradle in which the eloping nurse rocked her charge, its cloak and cap, and the room In which it slept. And most ot the pic tures would necessarily be "faked," but this would not detract from tho paper's "enterprise." A San Francisco gentle man, who visited Portland recently, and was discussing the newspapers of that city with a party of friends at the din-nor-table, made this remarkable, state ment: "Whenover I read in any of our papers a story reflecting on the Integrity of a reputable citizen (and I have to read them often), I make up my mind at once that it Is not true. It has come to thl3 pass: Publication of sensational stories by the San Francisco press stamps them a3 false." A shameless piece of work was an In terview by the .representative fif a New York paper with tho Queen of Spain, about two years ago. Beginning under false pretenses -with a bishop, he secured a letter to the pope, and through him an audienco with tho unhappy Queen, who spoke from her sore heart. "Only inter view ever given to a newspaper by the Queen of Spain obtained by the Blower," were tho headlines, and the correspondent unblushlngly told, and the paper pub lished the whole story of the fraud he practiced to get the audienco. and con fessed thattho poor woman implicitly be lieved she was speaking confidentially to a sympathetic friend. Occasionally these "yellow" newspa pers set out to get genuine news and suc ceed. Some of them have been tho Initi ative agency in securing reform of local abuses. The pity of it Is that they do not exert their energies In the wholesome di rection all the time, instead of devoting them towhat at best Is merely sensation al. But there aro only a few "yellow" newspapcra after all; less than a score which havo a large number of readers. Boston has only one and Chicago one, while Philadelphia, Baltimore. St. Louis and tho other cities of the Mississippi "Valley are free from them. It is believed by genuine .newspaper men that "yollow1 journals have seen their most prosperous days. Ii. Heartsease. Walter Savage Lander. There Is a flower I wish to Wear, But not until first worn by you Keartseas of all earth's flowers most rare; 3rlng it; and bring enough for" two. SLINGS AND ARROWS. The Trust. See the kind, benignant- trust. , Butcher trust. Admit Its right to proflt ev'ry cold outsider must. See the prices, rising, rising, higher, higher, ev'ry day. Till it would not be surprising To see fathers fond advising That their progeny eat hay. Whilo the trust, trust, trust. In a manner wise and Just. Pulls inch by inch upon Its cinch And gathers in the dust. For the trust, trust, trust, trust, trust, trust, trust. For the hooted, persecuted butcher trust. See the suffering and ansulsh of the trust. Fuel trust. How the President's activity consumes it with disgust. "Why should anybody worry if It sells a ton of coal For the figure that the av'rage mortal 3eu upon his soul? How it spouts and fumes and rages, At the thought of paying wages That will cut into its roir. Oh. the trust, trust, trust. It is talked about, and cussed And the public' will not yield to it their last remaining crust. To tho trust, trust, trust, trust, trust, trust, trust. To tho groaning and the moaning fuel trust. See the labors and the struggles of the trust. Railroad trust. How the cold and heartless Government its merger seeks to bust. See Its pennUess attorneys prowl the precincts of the court. "With affright in their demeanor, asking- Justice of some sort. See the presidents and managers, cast down and sorrowful. Try to sidetrack the Injunctions with their Una athletic pull. Ah, the trust, trust, trust. All Its rolling stock will rust. And the Sheriffs get the tariffs and the coaches coat-with dust. If tho cruel courts persist in this unjust at tempt to make Ev'ry railroad give Its shippers,, one and all, an even break; If the fare, fare, fare. Is to be upon the square. Go to work with pick shovel ev'ry poor official must Of the trust, trust, trust, trust, trust, trust. trust. Of the busted and disgusted railroad trust. What Adam Was Doing-. It wa3 midnight. Suddenly, in the Adam residence there was a cry, then a series of howls, and one of the neighbors, pass ing by, heard the head of the house use language that was calculated to loose tho thunderbolts of Heaven on the whole neighborhood. She stopped, ran up to tho door, and, pres3tng the button, listened eagerly at the speaking tube. "What in the world Is your husband doing?" she asked, as the dulcet voice of Eve inquired her errand. "Oh," replied Eve, "he Is merely rais ing Cain. "It requires strong language to raise a child like that." And thus an expression was coined which promises to outlast history itself. Two Letters. To Gr-v-r Cl-v-1-nd: Betrayer of your party, with alarm Your self-assumed dictatorship I view. The cross ot gold for you has subtle charm; 'Twill wreck the cause to mako a boss of you. When I consider of tha things you've done, I feel compelled to beard you in your lair, I see you gloating o'er slxteen-to-one. And warn my well-loved party to beware. VT. J. B, Lincoln. Neb., June 22. To V.r. J. B.r Vacuous prattler, fatuous tool, Loquacious vender of trito metaphor. Dull sophist of a long-exploded school. Unsound logician, irritating bore. Mendacious meddler, voluble mistake. Cheap sciolist, embalmed garrulity, Think not with blatant blethering to maka A quadramanus (look It up) of me. G. X Buzzard's Bay, June 25. Anent the Glorious Fourth. NEW YORK, June 23. Thomas A. Edi son refuses to talk about his latest in vention, but it Is understood that ho has nearly perfected a bomb which has a capacity of 12 14-year-old boys and 24 7-year-old girls, or If preferred will reduce four men to ashes in one explosion. Every city which has heard of the Invention 13 striving to get it for their Fourth of July celebration. PEKIN June 28. Burn Hi, the eminent doctor of' science, has perfected a rocket which on test elevated 84 coolies to a height of 2000 feet. When they landed they evidently felt fine, as they covered three cantons. Dr. HI says that here after no American inventor can claim that he has outdone Chinese fireworks In de structlveness. WASHINGTON, June 28. It to reported that General Frederick Funston has been reprimanded for stating in an after-dinner speech that the suppression of tho Filipino rebellion cost more lives than the small boys of the country lose annually to the Fourth of July festivities. Such an exaggerated statement, it Is felt, will do much toward making the public believo that war corresponds to General Sher man's definition of it. BOSTON, Juno 28. Dr. Nort E. Charles ton has suggested that It would be econ omy to move all the youth of the coun try to Martinique for the Fourth of Juli as the gases from tho mountain effect a painless death, while the noise and tho display are almost equal to that of tha average celebration. Dr. Charleston also points out that lingering deaths from lockjaw only run up doctors' bills, and says that this method would-be far more humane, and just as efficacious. HADES, June 28. King Herod remarked this afternoon that if ho had known about the Fourth of July he would have de ferred his historic massacre till some tlmt after the Declaration of Independence. A Prisoner. If I could only talk, I guess I'd make my cruel mother fear The things I'd do to her. unless She comes and lets me out ot here. They've built a gate that's two feet high Across tha porch to keep me in. And It does, too, for all that I Can get above it is my chin. And when I come .out every day, Mj mother comes along, and brings My blocks and toys, and says: "Now play Here, baby, with your pretty things." And Just a3 soon as she is gone. Thona little boys across the street Came out and run around their lawn. With railroad cars, and things to eat. And lots of dogs come running past. So If I Just could get away -I'd" follow after very fast. And. catch one for my own, soma day. But I must stand here with my face Pressed bard against these dreadful bars. And see those lucky children race Along- tho sidewalk with their cars. I see all sorts of things I need The flower pot and garden hose; I know I could be good Indeed If I could get my hands on thoso. With all my strength I pound and shake The gate, but it won't move a bit. It's Just so mean it will not break. And I cannot climb over it. Some day I'll be a great biff man. , And then that gate won't be too strong. And I'll be happy, for I can Have things I've needed for so long. And when I've had a good long play, I'll go and get some other men. And we'll go off somewhere and stay Until It's supper time again. , J. J. MOXTAGOT6.