Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Portland observer. (Portland, Or.) 1970-current | View Entire Issue (July 6, 1988)
> % 1 ► * ¥ ♦ * V ¿ lit'» * ♦ w ■» < « July 6, 1988, Portland Observer, Page 3 Black History Corner: Washington’s Shameful History In that same period, Benjamin by John Hope Franklin Banneker, a free Black mathema tician, astronomer and almanac- o understand Washington’s writer, helped Maj. Pierre Charles current racial tensions, it would be helpful to go back to the L’Enfant, the French engineer, survery the area that would be beginning. From its earliest days, come the District of Columbia. the Nation’s Capital was marked Whatever role Banneker played in by a legalized racism, sanctioned executing the final plans for the by Congress, that denied basic city, it did not succeed in making rights to free Blacks as well as to his existence in the capital any slaves. Not only were free Blacks easier than in his native Maryland. barred from voting, holding office Indeed, the founders of the new and serving on juries, but they city, members of Congress and were also required to observe a those in other positions of influ special curfew designed to keep ence went to extraordinary them off the streets after 10 p.m. lengths to see to it that Blacks en The District of Columbia, like joyed none of the rights and privi the rest of early America, simply leges associated with citizenship. could not accept the idea of full In some ways, however, free rights for tree Blacks. By 1860 Blacks in the District were better Washington, seen as a haven for off than they would have been if runaway slaves, was home to Congress had not replaced the more than 11,000 free Negroes,' laws of Virginia and Maryland. and yet Black people here were When the D istrict was first denied even the semblance of created, Congress perm itted equality. Maryland laws to continue in The legal foundation for racial force in the segment ceded by discrimination dates back to the that state, while Virginia laws pre C onstitutional Convention of vailed in its former territory. 1787, which protected the institu Soon afterwards, however, both tion of slavery and the slave trade states increased their control in a variety of ways, including one over the free Negro population. provision for the return of fugi After a slave plot was uncovered tive slaves, another that determin in Richmond in 1800, the Virginia ed apportionment for representa Assembly declared that any slave tion by counting five slaves as brought into the state and kept for equal to three white persons and a year had to be seized and sold, one that barred the closing of the and the person who had brought slave trade before 1808. Such pro the slave into the state was to be visions made it possible for fined $400. In 1806, Virginia de Washington to become “ the very creed that any free Black who re seat and center” of slavery and mained in the state for a year fol the slave trade early in the 19th lowing his emancipation would century. forfeit his freedom. But not all of the District’s Meanwhile, Maryland barred Black residents were slaves even free Negroes from entering the at the time of Thomas Jefferson’s state and remaining more than inauguration in 1801. There were two weeks. At the end of that time some 783 free Negroes in Wash the free Black was liable for a fine ington in 1800 compared to 3,244 of $10 for every week he remained slaves. By 1810 the number of in the state. If the person did not free Blacks had increased to pay the fine, he was jailed and li 2,549; it reached 4,048 by 1820 able to be sold for a term suffi and 6,152 by 1830, when for the cient to pay the fine and cost. firs t tim e free Blacks o u t From legislation such as this, pre numbered slaves. cedents and experience were es The existence of slaves are free tablished that would facilitate the Blacks in the same community enactment of vagrancy laws dur posed problems that taxed the ing the Reconstruction era and creativity and ingenuity of the peonage laws of a still later most gifted statesmen. The situa period. tion was especially difficult in But the laws of Virginia and Washington, a city created by a Maryland did not long prevail in national government that would the District of Columbia. The Con remain reluctant to give local stitution of 1787 has assigned to authorities the power to deter T mine the future of slaves and free Negroes as well as a host of other issues. In 1787 the framers of the Con stitution made no distinction be tween free persons, white and Black, and one could have reason ably assumed that free Blacks en joyed the same rights and priv ileges as whites who, by this time, were not generally encum bered by indentures — contracts binding one to work as an appren tice or servant for a specified period in payment of an obliga tion. But while the Constitution was silent on the treatment of free Blacks, both early con gresses and the municipal gov ernment of the new capital placed restraints on their participation in civil and political activities. The First Congress decreed in 1790 that only white persons could become naturalized citizens of the United States. The Second Congress restricted membership in the m ilitia to white males. A few years later, when Congress enacted a fugitive-slave law, it did not bother to protect free Blacks who might be falsely accused of being fugitive slaves. There’s only one way to come out ahead ot the pack. Congress authority to “ exercise exclusive legislation in all cases" in the District. As plans for the District matured, Congress began to enact legislation affecting all of its residents, Black and white, slave and free, replacing the laws of Virginia and Maryland with laws of its own. Yet if the situa tion was improved, some inhabit ants, especially free Blacks, had difficulty in appreciating it. As with all other immigrant Blacks, those migrating into the District had been excluded from citizenship by the First Congress, which specified that only white aliens could become naturalized citizens of the United States. This did not prevent traders from bringing in slaves from Africa and the West Indies to sell on the live ly markets of the District. Like wise, Blacks were excluded from service in the m ilitia by an act passed by the Second Congress. Having performed valiantly in the War for Independence and in the critical years following the war, the 5,000 Black veterans watched with obvious dismay as Congress limited service in the m ilitia to “ free able-bodied white male c iti zens” between the ages of 18 and 45. It was indeed remarkable that only white men could defend a country whose independence had been won by men of many races and nationalities. The District of Columbia did distinguish itself from its neigh bor states in the way it permitted slaves to obtain their freedom. Em anicipation was relatively easy — granted either because of heroic deeds, hum an itarian owners, purchase or misrepresen tation; once freed, residence for ex-slaves was permitted. Further more, Blacks who had been freed in other states could come into the District with relative ease. This made it possible for run aways to enter the District and "lose” themselves in the growing free Black community. It is small wonder that by 1860 there were 11,131 free Negroes and only 3,185 slaves in the capital. But freedom did not solve all or even most problems. In early Washington, the free Black com munity was subject to what the late George Washington Univer sity Prof. Letitia Woods Brown, in describing the nation as a whole, Portland, OB 9/201 trict of Columbia. Congress sent a signal to all states and other jurisdictions that they could do whatever they wished to Blacks who were not slaves. In barring persons who were free but not white from voting and holding office and in requiring them to register, post bond and be off the streets by 10 p.m., the city of Washington — with the blessing of Congress and the pre sidents— made a mockery of the democratic process and the prin ciples of equality. This was as profoundly incongruous in a dem ocracy as slavery itself, and it made it infinitely more difficult for a country to find its way, groping and halting, toward equality and justice for all. IN SUPPORT OF THE SCHOM BURG-Ossie Davis, the renown actor-writer- director, center, discusses fundraising plans for the Harlem-based Schom- burg Center for Research in Black Culture with John P. Mascotte, right chairman and chief executive officer, The Continental Corporation and wit i Howard Dodson, chief of the Schomburg Center. Mascotte was the host at a recent luncheon for close to a hundred corporate executives who were made aware of the Schomburg’s goals at Continental’s headquarters in the Wall Street area, as a part of the Continental Community Commitment Series. Davis, who is co-chairman of the Schomburg Commission for the Preservation of Black Culture, was the master of ceremonies. Founded in 1925 by Arthur Schomburg, a Puerto Rican historian of African descent, the Center is a part of the New York City library system and houses more than five million historical items available to the public. It is currently in a $ 4.5 million, five-year fund-raising campaign that started in March, 1987. The Home Team is on your side. their visits more pleasurable! WE WILL BEAT ANYBODY’S PRICE ON: ★ CEREALS ★ PET FOODS ★ SOAPS and DETERGENTS ★ CAT LITTER ★ CHARCOAL BRIQUETS ★ SALSAS & BEANS ★ FROZEN & DELI ★ CANNED & PACKAGED FOODS ★ MUCH, MUCH MORE! The Bee Company, Inc. 2121 S W Broadway Especially reprehensible to free Blacks was the rigid registra tion system with its requirement of posting a bond for good behav ior. Another galling requirement was that all Blacks be in their places of abode by 10 p.m. They vigorously contested the legality of these restrictive measures but without much success. One long time resident, William Costen, a free Black, did get some relief when he refused to register and post bond, arguing that he was living in the District before the ob noxious laws went into effect. The court agreed that the board could not prescribe the terms upon which residents who al ready lived in the city when the laws went into effect could con tinue to reside. It could, however, apply the law to subsequent sett lers. Even earlier free Black sett lers, however, were required to be off the streets by 10 p.m. Perhaps the principal reason that free Negroes were merely slaves without masters, as Univer sity of Maryland Prof. Ira Berlin re fers to them, was that neither Congress nor the town fathers could conceive of Blacks except as slaves. While giving due atten tion to slaves and slavery, the framers of the Constitution gave no attention whatever to free per sons of color. They merely be queathed to the government of the new capital the onerous task of trying to establish a policy to deal with Black people who were not slaves, but who were denied citizenship and equality by white people at every level. In failing to face the issue and to solve it where it had the au thority to do so, namely in the Dis On June 24th 1988, the Royal Esquire Club, at 1708 N.E. Alberta. Portland Oregon opened Its newly constructed downstairs lounge to its members and their guests. Jeff Parks, general manager of the establishment, observed the difficulty some of the senior members experienced climbing the stairs and hopas the new addition will make D o n ’t pay su p erm arket prices! S hop here first! No m em b ersh ip costs! No co u po ns needed! Serving P ortland fo r o ver 30 years! Am erican Heart Association In Oregon called “ periods of harsh repres sion accompanied [by] explosions of prejudice. Even in interludes of relative calm, the pressure of community efforts to restrict and contain could be felt at all times." One way to restrict and contain the free Black community was to disenfranchise it at the outset. Thus the Seventh Congress, meeting in 1801-1802, reached the conclusion without serious de bate that no Blacks should vote in the District of Columbia; suffrage in City Council elections was restricted to “ free white male in habitants of full age who have re sided 12 months in the city and paid taxes the preceding year.” Likewise, only free white males were eligible to be mayor or to sit on the Board of Aldermen or the Board of the Common Council. Free Blacks, moreover, could not testify in court against white peo ple or serve on juries. The Board of Aldermen and other officials were to “ restrain and prohibit the nightly and other disorderly meet ings, of slaves, free Negroes and mulattoes.” FOOD Mon-Sat ♦ 9:30 a m. - 6:00 p.m. FOOD STAMPS STAMPS 800 N Killingsworth WELCOMED WELCOMED 283-3171 you think the cost of buying a ie is out of your reach, then you aid reach for the phone and call a nher ol The Home learn, hat's your local real estate agent, he or she can show you a great ction of value-priced HI D homes lUghout Oregon and S.W. ihington. In fact, HUD has an rdahle home available right now he area you want to live. 'or a preview of currentlv-available I) properties, check our listings ad in the real estate classified section ot your Friday or Sunday Oregonian. Then call any real estate agent. We want you to come home a winner. HlID and your real estate agent. . . Were The Home Team." HUD DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT