Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Portland observer. (Portland, Or.) 1970-current | View Entire Issue (Oct. 30, 1980)
Page 2 Portland Observar October 30.1900 EDITORIAL/OPINION « □ N o -N o tax limitation □ Jim Hill - House District 31 James Hill is a can didate for House District 31 in Salem. A Democrat, Hill has received major en dorsements and is considered to have a strong chance of elec tion. Hill is a graduate of the Indiana University Law School and currently is employed as an Appeals Division Hearings Officer on Income and Property Tax in the Oregon Department of Revenue. We encourage our Salem readers to vote for Jim Hill. LI Judge Ed Peterson - State Supreme Court Judge Ed Peterson was appointed to the Oregon State Supreme Court in 1979 and prior to that was in private practice for 22 years. His work included trial and appealate cases for individuals and businesses. He has taught, lec tured and written for legal journals. During his short stay on the Supreme Court he has earned the respect and endorsement of most of Oregon's judges and lawyers. His opponent, Shirley Field, was removed from the District Court, the State's lowest court, in 1978 because she was determined to lack "knowledge and judgement". Now she is seeking a position on the State's highest court. Judge Peterson is clearly the only choice. He should be retained on the State Supreme Court. U No - No new jails Measure 8 authorize the sale of $85 millon worth of bonds to provide a prison building fund. The measure does not say what type of facilities will be built or where they will be located, does not provide for staff or rehabilitative programs. It does not address prevention. Although called a $85. million expenditure, the measure allows future legislatures to con tinue to borrow at an inflated rate until it reaches a $288.5 million expenditure in 1990. The most commonly mentioned use of this money is to build another large maximum security prison to relieve overcrowding at Oregon State Penitentiary. The population at OSP should be reduced through the establishment of half-way houses, work-release programs, intensive drug and alcohol programs to assist addicts and alcoholics, realistic job training and job placement programs, psychatric treatment, etc. Those locked up for preventive detention and minor non-violent crimes should be placed on probation rather than jailed. Prevention programs should be designed and financed to deal with problems of very young children and their families. The most important step to solving the overcrowding problem at OSP is eliminate the poverty and racism that cause crime - not to build more prisons. The Observer recommends a "N O " vote on Measure 8. Letters to the Editor-------------- U Yes - Let them vote Measure two extends the right to vote to mentally handicapped persons who have not been adjudicated incompetent to vote. The State Constitution says "No idiot or mentally diseased person shall be entitled to the priviliges of an elector." This measure provides that persons who might be considered mentally retarded accord ing to testing, academic achievement, or otherwise, still have the full right to par ticipation in the elective process. It is long overdue. Vote "Yes" on Measure 2. L Yes - Zoo/Metro Measure 26-12 establishes a tax base to finance the zoo and to subsidize the Metropolitan Service District. The zoo is now financed by serial levies, which are not eligible for property tax relief. This measure would replace those bonds with a new tax base, making it eligible for property tax relief. □ Yes - Support PCC This measure, 26-13, is similar to the Zoo/Metro measure, creating a new tax base for the Portland Community College. 1st Place Best Ad Result ONPA 1973 Subscriptions $7 50 per year in Tri County area; 58 00 per year outside Tri County area P ostm aster Send address changes to the Portland Observer, P 0 Box 3137, Portland, Oregon 97208 5th Place Best Editorial ONPA 1973 The Portland Observer was founded in October of 1970 by Alfred Lee Henderson The Portland Observer is a champion of |ustice, equality and liberation; an alert guard against social evils; a thorough analyst and critic of discriminatory practices and policies; a sentinal to warn of impending and existing racist trends and practices; and a defender against persecution and oppression The real problems of the Black population will be viewed and presented from the perspective of their causality; unrestrained and chronoically en trenched racism N ational and in ternation al arrangements that prolong and increase the oppression of Third World peoples shall be considered in the context of their ex ploitation and manipulation by the colonial nations, including the United States, and their relationship to this nation's historical treatment of its Black population 283 2486 A m oci «*«» 1st Piece Community Service ONPA ,973 The Portland Observer IUSPS 959 680) is published every Thurs day by Exie Publishing Company, Inc , 220, North Killingsworth, Portland, Oregon 97217, Post Office Box 3137, Portland, Oregon 97208 Second class postage paid a, Portland, Oregon Honorable Mention Herrick Editorial Award NNA ,973 2nd Place Best Editorial 3rd Place Community Leadership ONPA 1975 3rd Place Community Leadership ONPA 1978 3rd Place In depth coverage ONPA 1979 N ational A dvertising R ep resentative A m e lg a m a te d Publishers. Inc. N ew York MtMMt - ZauMM «•» L No - Don't eliminate vote voters. In the meantime prices have risen and roads and highways have been severely This measure would change the office of the The most dangerous measure on the ballot damaged by ice storms, studded tires and State Superintendent of Public Instruction this year is Measure 6, the property tax heavier trucks. The Highway Department from an elected official to one appointed by limitation which limits taxes on real property to estimates that half of the state's highways are the Governor from a list of candidates one per cent of the true cash value as of July proposed by the State Board of Education. in need of repair. 1, 1977. Reasons for voting NO include: The State Superintendent of Public Instruc The highway fund did receive a boost this • This restriction on the amount of taxes tion administers the education department; spring when the people voted to remove the raised would severely damage, if not currently he is elected. The State Board of cost of parks and state police from the high eliminate, all state and local services. way fund and pay for them out of the general Education make policy; they are appointed by • It would make the sale of bonds for fund. Also, when other state agency budgets the Governor. Proponents of this measure say veterans' home loans, housing for the elderly, were cut this summer due to shortage of it would take the Superintendent out of the capital construction, highways, energy pro funds, the highway budget was kept in tact. political arena since he would not run for elec jects, etc. nearly impossible because it would This protection of the highway fund at the tion, and would assist coordination and restrict the ability of the State to repay loans. expense of this needed proqram does not cooperation between the Superintendent and • It would be permanent. Two-thirds of the the Board. negate the fact that Oregon's roads, high eligible voters would have to agree to levy any In theory, the election process could make a ways and bridges - especially in many rural additional taxes. areas - need repair. "political football" out of the Superintendent's • It applies to all real property and does not office, and a strong citizen group could under We recommend a YES vote on Measure 4. differentiate between owner-occupied homes, mine sound educational decisions by threaten rentals, large property holdings. The owners ing to oppose the Superintendent's reelection. of large apartment complexes and large land L Yes - Protect animals Organized groups could run candidates who owners (including large corporations, would Measure 5 forbids the use or sale of snare, would not be sound adm inistrators, who benefit most. would not foster good educational programs. leghold traps except for predator control and • It would eliminate the Homeowner and protection of human health. This type of thing could happen in any political Rental Property Tax Relief (HARP, now position. Should the danger of the election of The fur business is big business. Those who available to middle and low income home a poor candidate be an excuse to remove the .think the cruel use of leg traps to hold coyotes owners and renters. election process? for the kill is entirely a method of saving the Why a "tax rev« It"? How much taxes do we On the whole, the elected Superintendents farmer's sheep should check out the latest really pay? In Portland, home owners are billed have been of a good quality as the other elec coyote fur coats being sold by one of Port approximately $20 per $1,000 assessed value, ted officials - and as the appointed officials. land's finest shops. or about $600 on a $30,000 home. Of this, one New methods are available to protect sheep third or $200 is paid by the State leaving a bill Passage of this measure would allow the Governor to appoint the Superintendent and from coyote - fencing and trained dogs to of $400. Low income persons receive all or the Board, with no input from the public. name two. Contrary to the opponents ad most of it back through HARP. In fact, any The Observer recommends a NO vote on campaign, young trees can be saved without family with $17,000 income or less will receive Measure 1. billing the already scarce beavers. at least $100 rebate, leaving only $300 or less Leg traps are cruel, inflicting unnecessary to be paid. pain and injury. The animals turn and twist off Senior citizens can defer payment until their I J Yes - Raise gas tax their legs trying to get loose, or they remain in estate is sold, and even though they are not Measure 4 will increase the state gas tax the trap, suffering, until they die of hunger or paying taxes they can file for HARP and from 7C to 9C per gallon and slightly increase thirst, are killed by other animals, or are mer receive their annual refund just as if they were the "weight and mile" tax paid by truckers. cifully killed by the trapper. paying. The Legislature has attempted for many The measure does not prohibit mouse, rat or Are the people of Oregon really unwilling to years to increase the gasoline tax, but each gopher traps or live box traps. It prevents un pay taxes to support education, police and time an tax increase has been stopped by the necessary cruelty and torture of animals. fire, water, public, public health, and other essential services? Oregon's existing tax laws allow those who are unable to pay to avoid paying. Those who are able should be glad to To the editor: Hiding Behind the Public Inters!, Because this is repugnant to most pay for the services they receive. It is dishonest fo r PUD shows that most activists have a d if Americans, it is being done behind Vote NO on Measure 6. proponents to lead people to believe Portland Observer Bruce Broussard Editor/Publisher -------------------------- — I * IM I that PUDs form ed in the 1980s could furnish adequate power at rates comparable to those o f the four operating PUDs in Oregon. Operating PUDs were formed years ago and have had power contracts for low-cost electricity throughout the years. However, the days o f adequate power and low rates fo r public power utilities are rapidly coming io an end. This is because o f a power short age. This means that if new PUDs are form edfand 14 o f them are proposed througho ut Oregon), there w ill not be adequate firm power available fo r them. (How could BPA supply them i f it is unable to meet the needs o f the four existing PUDs?) This means that (using the case o f the proposed Multnomah County PUD) if voters, after having spent 5250,000 for an engineer’s study, subsequently ap prove the 51.3 billion dollars that ODOE estimates it could cost to buy PG E’ s and P P & I’ s d is trib u tio n systems, they w ill not own one kilowatt o f power nor one bolt on a generating facility. Informed activists certainly can’ t have our w elfare or our pocketbooks at heart. H. Peter Metzger, in his booklet, G o v e rn m e n t-fu n d e d A c tiv is m : To the Editor: As State Superintendent o f Public Instruction, I understandably am concerned about the devastating ef fect the passage of Ballot Measure 6 w ill have on local school districts and community colleges. Something else troubles me. Measure 6 w ill enact a constitutional amendment which w ill lim it the rig h t o f citizens to make local decisions a ffe ctin g their public schools and other local govern ments. Under present law, voters can say "Yes” or " N o " to higher taxes. Under Measure 6, even if an overwhelming majority o f the voters wanted to exceed the Levy Lim itation in order to provide more services, they would be prohibited in practically all circumstances from doing so by the State Constitution Why have more state regulation? Oregon's present local budget law ferent p o litic a l and economic ideology - an ideology that the vast majority o f Americans do not hold. In his w ritings M r. Metzger shows that several hundred leading activists, through hiring and ap pointment (and in turn hiring and appointing their ilk ) to key regulatory and policy-m aking positions in the Federal govern ment, use the power o f these o f fices to channel tax dollars to create, tra in and fund organizations to bring about the change they desire. This is being done without the con sent o f Congress or the knowledge o f the taxpayers. The goal is the nationalization of energy, corporations and utilities. Nationalization means government ownership o f industry. To the editor: Contrary to the scare tactics used by the anti-P U D advertisements, passage o f Measure I I w ill not establish PUDs(Peoples U tility Districts); it w ill merely set up a legal, elected board o f directors that can commission a feasibility study to determine the source and cost of power and, if advisable, to submit a measure to the voters two years from now allowing them to establish a PUD. The feasibility study w ill cost no more than 5250,000, or 40« to 50« per property tax payer. I f a PUD is authorized at that provides a greater degree of control over local government budgets than the law o f any other state in the Union. It makes good sense to me to keep the control we have now, rather than lose it to a state constitutional amendment. „ VernA. Duncan the humanitarian facade o f "public interest” - behind so-called environ mental protection, consumer protection and anti-nuclearism. What we’ re confronted w ith, because o f the capture and m anipulation o f the Federal regulatory bureaucracy, is the Government using government to create more government. PUDs are a strategic part o f this. The solution isn’t more govern ment it’ s recinding existing govern ment guarantees and requiring in vestor-owned utilities to compete in the free market. It is imperative that Americans wake up before it’ s too late and our freedom is lost. Beverly Bottorf time, the PUD w ill sell bonds to purchase the existing distribution facilities o f PGE and PP&L and establish a utility district owned by the citizens. I am running for a position on the PUD board of directors because I believe the public - the u tility customers - should have a voice in our energy future. Citizens don't have a voice in the decision makeing process. The private utilties are con trolled by their board of directors, with about 75 per caent o f the mem bers living in the east. The customers have to suffer for the mistakes o f the board, because the private utility is guaranteed a a 16 per cent return on its invest ments by Oregon law. I would be proud to serve the community on the new PUD board and urge you to vote for Measure 11. Robert Phillips QUALITY CHILD CARE by TRAINED FAMILY PROVIDERS through the CHILD CARE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Cad 4-C's Project Referral Office 232 3464 » f