Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Portland observer. (Portland, Or.) 1970-current | View Entire Issue (Jan. 25, 1979)
Portland Observer Thursday. January 26,1979 Pag« 7 To a certain part of the community The follow ing are the comments o f Herb Cawthorne to the Portland School Board Monday evening. They wonder If there will be a Boise next yeer. School Board rejects pairing (Continued from Page 1 Column 6) as in the case o f the Early Childhood Centers and Jefferson Performing Arts Program, they are not expected to remain outside o f their neigh borhood for the duration o f their school years. In the case o f the Jef- erson program, they may attend the school to which they arc bused only part o f the day. In all cases, White students have the option to return to their neighborhood school if they so choose. 3. The Black community is the Only place in the District where no middle school has been established to receive a large number o f students who face grade elimination. 4. The Portland School District continues to place more resources and energy into recruiting Black stu dents to transfer out than it does on encouraging White students to trans fer to other schools. 3. In order fo r the D is tric t’ s current desegregation program to be successful, a large number o f resident Black students will not be able to attend their neighborhood school for the remaining grade levels that arc left. Again, 1 repeat, the principles o f integration and integration achieved in an equitable manner arc the paramount objectives o f the C o a lition. Methods, approaches, strategies to achieve this may be various and need mutual and con tin u in g w ork. When the School Board makes a com m itm ent to equity in integration policies which it supports by concrete programs which demonstrate an understanding o f and commitment to equity, the Coalition w ill feel proud not only of its own work but o f the School Board as well. Public Response Vesia Loving accused the Board o f ramrodding a dissatisfactory program down the Black community’ s throat. “ You are supposed to be here to rep resent all the people. When it comes to Blacks you have a different stan dard . . . Why do you want to be elected when you know you’ re not doing a good job?’ ’ Mrs. Sarah Cogan explained that one-way busing “ sends out a negative message about Blacks and the schools in Albina.’ ’ She suggest ed that as a start, the Board redraw boundaries within the Sabin/Alame da/Beaumont cluster and the Wood- lawn/Vernon/Columbia - Whitaker cluster to desegregate the Black schools in the clusters. B ill Scott, candidate fo r the School Board, called the Newman proposal a "basis for constructive dialogue.” Jim McConnell, executive director o f PACT, the community veteran program fo r Southeast P ortland said, “ PACT recognizes that busing out o f the local neighborhoods is not desirable for any community. “ However, PACT, in considera tion o f the quality o f the study and recommendations o f the School C o a litio n , supports the pairing recommendation as the most viable and w orkable solution to the inequities in the present system and recommends adoption by the School Board.” Steve Buel asked the Board to say what it means. He ridiculed the lan guage o f Newman’ s proposal — “ redress substantially,” “ appro priate la titu d e ,” “ appropriate priorities,” “ increase attendance,” “ include in his considerations,” “ expeditiously as possible,” etc. Paul M ilius said, “ I think you have sold the white community short in insisting that your actions in re sponse to citiz e n ’ s demands fo r equity should be governed by a nameless few and limited to what is acceptable to the bigoted lunatic fringe.” Following remarks by the audience, the Board passed Newman’s resolu tion. Board members Crowell, Mc Namara, Newman and Rieke voted Yes. Board member Priestley voted No. Mrs. Wiener was absent. 1 w ould like to address my comments to a certain part o f the community. I don’ t think we should address our remarks only to the Board o f Education. We have at tempted to do that, to this point. We have found in the process a concern fo r politics -- a concern that the white community w ill not tolerate a fair system o f desegregation; that the white community somehow does not like bussing. And the implication is that the Black com m unity does. Because the white community does not like bussing, would not tolerate bussing, somehow those o f us in the Coalition who are to be reasonable (the reasonable leaders) must under stand that now is just simply not our time; that our time w ill ocme if we w ill be reasonable. I submit to you that the Board o f Educaton, as it has expressed to us in various other forms, in spite o f your opening comments, Mr. McNamara, suggests that Black children must be treated differently if they are to gain integration and that integration does them significantly more good far beyond the good it would do other children. I, o f course, do not believe in that premise. I don’t believe that politics should guide your choices as to in tegration. I f you are looking for the kind o f harmonious community that you say your are, and if it is a fact that the greatest crime we can do the next generation is to leave them in a segregated situation - i f that is in fact true, then your political am bitions should be set aside and I would hope that you would do that. I have beendiscouraged in the process somewhat, but 1 have also been heartened. I ’ ve been discouraged when you said that our concern was excessive or that it was an over reaction. We certainly dont feel that it is. 1 say to myself, “ Don’t get so discouraged that you get un- envolved.” And 1 w ould say to the Black parents who know, that in Dr. Blan chard’ s comments some time ago he said teh problem was an over reac tion and that white children do share the burden. And M r. Newman said something similar, that our concern was excessive. To those Black paren ts who know, that we signed forms when we left the King area or the Humboldt area -- a form that said we could not come back. No white children did that and we know that is discriminatory. To the Black mother who is alone and who has children in two d if ferent schools, who barely has enough money to make ends meet -- much less the gas to try to be a par ticipant in those schools. We know that th i disciplinary problems are three times as high in terms o f suspensions fo r Black children. For those o f us who know that 1 ask that we not measure the school district by the response o f the School Board in that we still get involved with those well-meaning principals, teachers, parents, students and that we work with them to get out o f the system the very best education that we can get - while we use other methods to attempt to make you un derstand, whether the white com m unity understands or not. I ’ ve talked to many o f these people and they understand the inequity. You can sit down and talk to them man to man about the inequity. They don’ t try to tell you that it doesn’t exist and that you are somehow deluded. They must be a part o f the solution. I f you try to give us a solution that does not involve white people -- actively, whole heartedly -- it is not a solution. It is still one-way bussing. It says to the Black child, "Y o u are inferior. You must bus. Your schools when you learn together are inferior schools. They cannot be good schools, no matter what we do.” This is a false premise. They can be good schools. I don’ t believe you can have it both ways, where you can continue to get the support o f the Black community by saying to it, “ This is good for you” , when the testimony that has come before you should convince you that Black people no longer believe that. Many Black people are saying, “ Well, i f your response is going to be the way that it has been, why not just give us back our schools? Restore them to K-8; our children can come back; we can get involved in those schools. We w ill take the responsiv- ility for the low achievement. We’ ll use the resources we’ve gotten. In the past ten years we’ ve gotten a lot o f people through college, who are educated and who can help. Let them come back. Let us know where they are and we’ll deal with them that way.” That’s really not a good solution and you know it. But we need to get some leadership from those o f you on the Board in expressing to the white community the necessity o f doing this, even if they don’ t like it. The City of Bend, Deschutes County, OR, hereinafter called the Owner, through BECON, hereinafter called the Engineer, is inviting separate Proposals to furnish and deliver the following equipment: Sealed proposals will be received at the office of the City Recorder, 10722 S.E. Main Street, Milwaukie, Oregon, until 2:00 p.m., on Monday, February 26, 1979, for construction of Ardenwald Storm Drainage Improvements in the City of Milwaukie, Oregon, at which time they will be publically opened and read at the City Council Chambers, Bids will be accepted or rejected within thirty (30) days after the date of opening. The City of Milwaukie is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Contract No. 20A: Mechanical Bar Screen Snahrt1 Proposals addressed to James W . Kerfoot, Recorder-Treasurer of the City of Bend, Deschutes County, 710 Wall Street, Bend, OR 97701, will be received at the office of James W . Kerfoot, Recorder-Treasurer of the City of Bend, 710 Wall Street, Bend, OR 97701, until 9:30 a.m., local time, on the 23rd day of February 1979, at which time they will be publicly opened and read in the City Commission Room at 720 Wall Street, Bend, OR 97701. Each proposal for bid shall be completely sealed in a separate envelope, properly addressed as specified, with the name and address of the bidder and the name of the project plainly written on the outside of the envelope. The Contract Documents for the Owner's purchase of equipment include the Bidding Requirements, the Proposal, the Contract forms, the General Con ditions the Suoolementary Conditions, the Specifications, and the Plans. Copies of the Contract Documents may be reviewed or obtained at the office of BECON (Bend Engineering Consultants), South Highway 97, Bend, OR 97701, ATTEN TION Mr. Scott Hicks, Phone (503) 382-4114. Questions about the content of these Contract Documents should be directed to Mr. Scott Hicks, BECON, P.O. Box 1174, Bend, OR 97701, (503)382-4114. Each Proposal must be accompanied by a certified check or Bid Bond executed on the prescribed form, payable to the City of Bend, Deschutes County, Oregon, in an amount not less than 10 percent of the amount bid. The contractors for this work shall furnish labor, materials, equipment, and ser vices of all kinds and complete the work in accordance with the plans and specifications therefore. Prices quoted in the Proposal shall remain firm for a period of 90 days after the date stated for opening of Proposals. At the Bidder's option, prices quoted will be subject to negotiation after said 90 days have elapsed. Plans and specifications may be examined at the Public Works Department, City Hall, 10722 S.E. Main Street, Milwaukie, Oregon. Plans and specifications may be obtained by application to the Public Works Department. A ten dollar ($10) non-refundable deposit is required with each application. Prices quoted shall be f.o.b. factory with freight and full insurance paid by the Bidder to the City of Bend, OR 97701. The successful Bidder for the following Contract will be required to furnish a Per formance and Payment Bond for faithful performance of the Contract in the full amount of the Contract price. Bidders on this work wiH be required to comply with the provisions of the President's Executive Order No. 11246 and requirements issued thereunder. The requirements for bidders and contractors under this order are explained in the Contract Documents. The right is reserved to reject any or all Proposals for each bid item, and to con sider that Proposal for any individual item of equipment which is to the best in terest of the Owner. Dated this 24th day of January 1979. BID NO. 98 IN V IT IN G PROPOSALS FOR: A N A C R O B IC DIGESTERS Sealed proposals will be received in Room 113, City Hall, Portland, Oregon, 97204 until 2:00 P.M. March 22, 1979 for furnishing all materials, equipment and labor for construction of Columbia Blvd. Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge Facility, Phase I, Anaerobic Digesters for the Bureau of Sanitary Engineering. Plans and specifications may be obtained at the above address. For additional in formation, call Carlton Chayer, Buyer, Purchasing Division, 248-4002. No proposal or bid will be considered unless accompanied by a certified check, cashier's check or a bid bond, payable to the City of Portland for an amount not less then ten percent (10%) of the aggregate amount of the bid as guaranty that the bid shall be irrevocable for the period specified in the proposal. Said bond to be forfeited as fixed and liquidated damages should the bidder seek to revoke his offer for any reason not authorized by law and not consented to by City within the irrevocable period, or neglect or refuse to enter into contract and provide a suitable bond for the faithful performance of the contract, in the event the said contract is awarded to him. NON —DISCRIMINATION: No proposal or bid will be considered unless the bid der is certified as an EEO Affirmative Action Employer as prescribed by Chapter 3.1G0 of the Code of the City of Portland. All bidders not currently certified should file the required documentation with the Contract Compliance Division, Room 209, City Hall, 1220 S.W . Fifth Avenue, Portland, Oregon, 97204, 248- 4896, at least five (5) days prior to the Bid Opening. Failure to achieve certifica tion by the Bid Opening Date and Time shall result in the return of your Bid Unopened. The successful bidder shall be required to certify that he is in compliance with ORS 279.350 relative to prevailing wage rates. Prequalification of bidders will be required for this project. Federal Funds will be used in this project and federal provisions relating to Equal Employment Opportunity and the Davis-Bacon Act apply. There is a $100 deposit on plans and specifications which is refundable. Harold F. Vaughan Purchasing Manager City of Portland The principle items of work are as follows: 1. installation of approximately 2800 linear feet of 15-inch to 30-inch diameter storm sewer pipe. 2. Installation of 12 manholes. 3. Installation of 21 catch basins. 4. Installation of approximately 400 linear feet of 8-inch and 10-inch diameter storm sewer inlet piping. 5. Restoration of approximately 1376 square yards of asphalt concrete paving. 6. Approximately 2265 square yards of asphalt concrete overlay. 7. Approximately 30 cubic yards of crushed rock surfacing. 8. Approximately 76 cubic yards of select backfill. Complete descriptive literature, as required by the Contract Documents, shall be submitted with the Bidder's Proposal for the Engineer's review and evaluation. They do not create an acknow ledge on your part that Black children have been forced, that the schools in their com m unity have been all changed — whereas the schools in the other communities are only changed when there is a middle school cluster created and there is a m iddle school to which those children can go. But you changed every school in the Black com m unity. M r. Newman’s resolution does not speak to that. I might conclude my comments by saying that I have a special regard for education and for all the children in volved in it. I have a special regard and respect fo r the e ffo rts M r. Newman has made up to this point. I speak directly to him because he has been the architect o f these programs and I think he has done so w ith elements o f support from the Black community. I do ask that the mem bers o f the Board recognize that things do change. Sentiments have changed. The sense that a one-way bussing system is tolerable has changed. Those o f you who may act to this issue politically w ill do your city a disservice. The City of Portland reserves the right to reject any and/or all bids in whole or in part, and to waive irregularities not affecting substantial rights. A D VER TISEM EN T FOR BIDS INVITATION TO BID ON EQUIPMENT TO BE FURNISHED CITY OF BEND, OREGON Integration The Black community has to do it. You find it very easy to express to the Black community its necessity for doing it. It doesn’t like it. And I say, why can’ t that same message be carried by you to the white com munity. I say this not in a sense of confron tation with you. I say it in trying to share with you and the public my general feelings regarding the matter. To the degree that I can speak to Mr. Newman’ s resolutions, they do not create the atrmosphere for tw o - way movement. Therefore they do not respond to the equity issue. Funding for the project is provided by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Act of 1974, Grant #B-77-DS-41-004, and local con tribution. Bidders on this work must comply with all applicable government requirements including, but not limited to, affirmative action programs and other Equal Oppor tunity actions as explained in the specifications. A pre-item bid conference will be held on February 20, 1979 at 1:00 p.m., in the Milwaukie City Council Chambers. A certified check, cashier's check, or bid bond in the amount of not less than five percent (5%) of the bid shall accompany each proposal. The City of Milwaukie reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive infor malities, or to accept any bid which appears to serve the best interests of the City. BID NO. 99 IN V IT IN G PROPOSALS FOR: SLUDGE LAGOON REH A BILITATIO N Sealed proposals will be received in Room 113, City Hall, Portland, Oregon 97204 until 2:00 P.M. March 22, 1979 for furnishing all materials, equipment and labor for construction of Sludge Lagoon Rehabilitation at Columbia Blvd. Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge Facilities for the Bureau of Sanitary Engineering. Plans and specifications may be obtained at the above address. For additional in formation, call Carlton Chayer, Buyer, Purchasing Division, 248-4002. No proposal or bid will be considered unless accompanied by a certified check, cashier's check or a bid bond, payable to the City of Portland for an amount not less than ten percent (10%) of the aggregate amount of the bid as guaranty that the bid shall be irrevocable for the period specified in the proposal. Said bond to be forfeited as fixed and liquidated damages should the bidder seek to revoke his offer for any reason not authorized by law and not consented to by City within the irrevocable period, or neglect or refuse to enter into contract and provide a suitable bond for the faithful performance of the contract, in the event the said contract is awarded to him. N O N -D IS C R IM IN A T IO N : No proposal or bid will be considered unless the bid der is certified as an EEO Affirmative Action Employer as prescribed by Chapter 3.100 of the Code of the City of Portland. All'bidders not currently certified should file the required documentation with the Contract Compliance Division, Room 209, City Hall, 1220 S.W . Fifth Avenue, Portland, Oregon, 97204, 248- 4696, at least five (5) days prior to the Bid Opening. Failure to achieve cer tification by the Bid Opening Date and Time shall result in the return of your Bid Unopened. The City of Portland reserves the right to reject any and/or all bids in whole or in part, and to waive irregularities not affecting substantial rights. The successful bidder shall be required to certify that he is in compliance with ORS 279.350 relative to prevailing wage rates. Prequalification of bidders will be required for this project. The work is divided into sections and it is the intent of the City of Milwaukie to award as many sections of the work as it has funds available. Federal Funds will be used in this project and federal provisions relating to Equal Employment Opportunity and the Davis-Bacon Act apply. By order of the City Council of Milwaukie, Oregon Harold F. Vaughan Purchasing Manager City of Portland CITY OF BEND, OREGON James W . Kerfoot Recorder-T reasurer I »