Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Morning Oregonian. (Portland, Or.) 1861-1937 | View Entire Issue (Sept. 26, 1908)
, IHK 31QKM.G. OREGOMAX, SATURDAY, SEPTE31BEB 26, 1903. 5 ' . i ' " " ii ' FOMKEfl DENIES TOOL OF TRUSTS Answers Roosevelt and Hearst and Says He Was Only Em ployed as Lawyer. VOTED FOR ELKINS BILL Ohio Senator Declares He Never Re ceived Reward for Aiding Trusts In Senate Xever Sought Joint Indorsement With Taft. ir.tntinueti From First Page. y rim. but only tu assist in executing the a lerp of the courts, and o reorganizing as t conform to all law, mate and National, i to comply fully with all the orders of I ,t court that had been marfe against it. Radical t'hungr in Ethic. It my tatementa In this behalf are true they make a complete defense against Mr. Hearst's charges and all deductions therefrom of Improper ct-ntluct, unless the ethice In volved have been radically changed from w hat they have always heretofore been up Pw.l :o bi. From the beginning of our government Senators and Concressmen who er lawyers have been regarded as free to (-n tin tie the practice of their profession, if they io desired, during their terms of office. Insofar an they might be able to do so with out interfering with their public duties; and In nuch practice free to take any kind of pmployinent that wae offered which did not In any way conflict with their duties as mem bers of t n areas. No body has ever before been criticised on such account. The only question has been as to the character of the badness a Senator or member of Congress wa at liberty to take, and uniformly and universally It has be?n comldered that there was no prohibition of any class of business Mitside of those named In the statutes and inch business as might conflict with public duller. ... Did Not Influence legislation. TVhn I accepted the employment of the Standard Oil Company in 1830 It was not fore seen by me and probably not by anybody else, that It would become the object of .Federal legislation or of Federal prosecution or action of any kind and that employment was when the company decided to reorganize under the law of New Jersey, which was before any thing of that nature occurred. That I was not in the employment of the company after the service I have mentioned were rendered and that such employment did not afterward Influence me to favor the com pany in legislation. Is shown by the, part I tik in the enactment of the EI kin law, ap proved February 1ft. lttXl. Fnder thi statute the Attorney-General ham brought and caueed to bo brought all the prosecutions against the Standard Oil Company, of which we have read so much, Including the case in which Judge Iwuidts Imposed the fine of 929,240.000. IWllued Offer In- 1906. But If that fact Is not sufficient, the fol lowing correspondence Is not only additional proof, but conclusive tn Its character, to the same effect: "26 Broadway, New York. May 7. 19o6 My TVar Senator: In the possibility of an action being brought against u in Ohio, are you tn a position to accept a retainer from us In connection with such a matter? Your early response will oblige. "Yours very truly. . "r.1rne41 JOHN I. ARPHBOUX'.' "To Honorable J. H. Foraker. 1H Sixteenth street. N. W., Washington, 1. C" To which I answered, as follows: "Washington. 1. C, Hay It. 10", "John l. Archbold. q.. No. 21 Broadway, New York My Tear Sir; My duties in the Senate have so multiplied that I And it neces-r-ary to retire entirely from the practice of the law. I have not taken any new em ployment for more than two years past. "n this account, as well as because of my relators to the puhlic service, I cannot ac cept a retainer In the contingency named, as I would be glad to do If It were otherwise. Assuring you of my proper appreciation f the compliment involved In the Inquiry you make, I remain, very truly yours. J. B. FORAKER. Proof Not Standard Oil Man. For weeks prior to the date of these letters the newspapers were tilled with an nouncements threatening the company with very serious litigation and wit h criminal prosecutions in the courts of Ohio. It was in view of these threatened proceedings that the company again sought to employ me; surely an idle and unnecessary perform ance if already employed, and these letters further show that I declined sut-h employ ment, among other reasons, becausf I could not accept the same consistently with my re'ations to the public service. The condi tion had greatly changed since my former mployment, largely because of the prosecu tion against the company under the Elkina law. which I had helped to frame: further more, the employment proposed was differ ent tn its character from that which I had previously accepted. That Is to say. In stead of being an employment, as the for mer employment was, to aid the company In complying with the orders of the court and the statutes of the state, it was to be an employment to resist suits and prose cutions Instituted by the state. I submit that these proofs should be suf ficient to show to any fair and unpreju ilu'ed mind that I was never employed ex- ept prior to l!'l. and that my employment then had no relation to anything that was In conflict with my public duties, but had reference solely to the reorganization of the company and its Ohio affairs, with which Congress had nothing whatever to do. Letter He Cannot Find. Mr. Hearst, to create a different belief, read at J-niisville the following letter; Broadway. New York. Feb. 2-"., lrf2: To Hn. J. R. Foraker. Washington-D. "!ear Senator: Again my dear Siator. 1 venture to write you a word regarding the bill Introduced by Senator Jones, of Arkansas, known as If. B. 02. Intended to ft mend the at Hi protect trade and com merce against unlawful restraints and mo jiop.1tes. Introduced by him. It really seems as though this is very m.necessarily twere and even vision, it Is not much bet ter to tst the application of the Sherman law Instead of resorting to a measure of this kind? I hope you will feel so atout It and I will he greatly pleased to have a t-ord from you on the subject. "With kind regard s, "Very truly your. "JOHN" TV ARCHT101.P" 1 "have no recollection of ever receiv ing any such letter and a most diligent Search falls to disclose any such letter In my flies or any copy of any answer to any such letter In my letter book. But waiving all that, the letter shows that Mr A reti noid d d not pretend to hare any right to address me on any such subject, except as any ci-isen might have done. Such requests re of dally occurrence in the experience rf every Senator. If I ever received such, a letter my Inability to find lr. or to find inv answer. Is doubtless due to the fact that 1 simply referred It to the judiciary committee for consideration In connection ith the bill. No Connection With 4VW).00 Draft. I would not deem It necessary to make nn explanation If it were not that Mr. Hearst. In rea ling this letter. coupled It with the fallowing letter: "JH Broadway. New York. Jan. 27. J(n2. "My dear Senator: Responding to your favor of the 2."th. It given me pleanire to hand you herewith certificate of deposit for ;.o,uon. In accordance with our understand ing Your letter states the conditions cor rectly and I trust that the transaction will be successfully consummated. "Yours very truly. "JOHN n. ARCHBOI.t).- Mr. Hearst accompanied the reading of these two letters, together w ith comments calculated, if not Intended, to convey the impresion that the one had reference to the other and that they const i tut ed evi dence that it was for money received try ing to influence legislation In accordance w:th the views of Mr. Arviiboid. The dates of the two letters show that the money was sent almost a month prior to the letter About the Jonea bill. Tola in sjouid -cniinry .pongq, A rfucnnnect the two In the average mind. but I have already shown in a former atate ment that the certificate of deposit waa sent on account of the proposed purchase of the Ohto State Journal, and that the proposition to purchase being abandoned, it was returned on the 4th day of February, only a week after It was received. Says Hearst Misrepresents.. Mr. Foraker here Introduces letters to verify his statement as to the newspaper proposal He continues: If Mr. Hearst had read these accom panying letters, particularly that from Mr. Archbold of January 21, my letter of Feb ruary 4. returning the money, he would have known that the certificate of deposit had no reference whatever to the Jones bill or any other b.111. Mr. Hearst states In his speech at Co lumbus that the letters had been furnished to him by a 'gentleman." whose name he vmulrl not give for fear the Standard Oil Company might persecute him. He repre sents the gentleman did not find these miss ing letters. Perhaps, if he found them he did not furnish them to Mr. Hearst. In any event, perhaps the omission to read them waa made because, if read, they would have defeated the object to be ac complished. However that may be. this cor respondence surely and conclusively dis poses of that matter. Tell About Price's BUI. Tntll now, I have not made any state ment about the letter Mr. Hearst read at Columbus from Mr. Archbold to me dated March 9. 1000, calling my attention to two bills Introduced In the Ohio Legislature by Mr. price. I have delayed saying anything about this letter because, having no recol lection on the subject 1 have been trying FO RAKER'S DEFENSE. No secret that he was employed by Standard OU Company In 1S09 to as sist In executing orders of court against Standard Oil trust. Senators and Congressmen who are lawyers always free to take any em ployment which did not conflict with duties as members of Congress. Was offered retainer by Archbold after 1901 and such employment did not Influence action on legislation, an shown by his part In enacting anti rebate law in 1903, under which $20, 240,000 fine imposed. Was offered retainer by Archbold in Ohio suits In 106 and declined, saying he had retired from practice of law and would interfere with duties In Congress. Cannot And letter from Archbold, read by Hearst, asking him to oppose Jones anti-trust bill in 1.02 nor can he find answer, and has no recollec tion of such correspondence. Says $50,000 draft sent by Arch bold was In connection with deal for purchase of Ohio State Journal and gives letters verifying this statement and fact money repaid. Draft bad no connection with opposition to Jones bill, as Implied by Hearst. Can find no trace of Archbold's letter asking him to oppose Price's bills In Ohto Legislature. Probably referred it to Governor Nash. Have not sought to Influence Ohio legisla tion since became Senator. Archbold has written regarding bills in Senate, but -only as every other citizen might. Never any sug gestion of. compensation or reward from Standard or any other trust, corp'oratlcn or person. Not word of truth In statement he was representative and defender of trusts In Senate. Cox proposed Joint indorsement of Taft for President and Foraker for Senator In interest of harmony. Bur ton eald Taft would not accept Joint Indorsement. Hostilities renewed and continued till after Taft's nomina tion, when they stopped and he was assured Burton spoke without author ity, but Taft's letter refusing Joint Indorsement exonerates Burton. Not opposed to Government regula tion of railroads, only to ratemaking and commodities clauses of rate bill, " to ascertain if I received the letter and what 1 did with It or did on account of it. I cannot find any trace of such a letter in my files or of any answer In my letter book. I have not been able to communicate with Mr. Price, who introduced the bill mentioned, but he has stated In a public Interview that he abandoned the bill be cause Governor Nash told him that Senator Banna and I were both opposed to the measures, and feared It might damage President McKlnley's Interest in the cam paign on which we were then entered, if the bills should be insisted upon. Mr. Price's statement suggests to my mind that in all probability I reerred the letter to Governor Nash. In any event, I know that I took no action with resepect to It or any bill pend ing in the Ohio Legislature at that time or any other time since I became a member of the Senate, March 4, 1897. In no instance since that date have I sought to Influence any legislator on any subject except by argument in the open. No Pay for Action as Senator. While I have occasionally heard from Mr. Archbold during the period that has eiapsed since the termination of my em ployment in the early part of 1901. I do not recall receiving any letter from him. exoopt the one relating to the Jones bill, and that had no reference to pending bills or to anything with which I had any of ficial duty to perform. In any event, he never addressed me on any subject since my employment, except only as any other ritlcen with whom I was acquainted might have done, and there was never a sugges tion from him or from anybody else that I was under the slightest obligation to sup port or oppose any proposed legislation In behalf of that company; nor was there evr a suggestion by anybody that I should receive any compensation or reward of anv kind whatsoever on that account. And what is true in this respect as to the Standard Oil Company is also and equally true as to other trusts, corporation or per son. Not Representative of Trusts. Notwithstanding that the President savs In his answer to Mr. Bryan, of September 23, that I was a representative and do fender of corporations in the Senate, there Is not a word of truth In any such state ment, whether made by him or anybody el so. and there Is not a scrap of evidence t hut can be produced supporting any such charge that cannot be as fully and satis factorily explained as has been explained the letter about the Jones bill and the proposed purchase of the Ohio State Jour nal. This brings me to Mr. Taft's letter and what the President has said in his com ments on the same. Story of Offer to Taft, If the President, in publishing It, had not withheld the name of the man to whom it waa writ ton, it might be easier for me to show that I am not responsible for that man's action. The man himself would have refuted the impression the President apparently seeks to create, that he wrote either at my. instance or in my interest. 1 have not at any time or in any way sought Mr. Taft's help for re-ejj When Mr. Taft's candidacy for the Presidency was first announced. I was sur prised to learn from the newspapers that the programme of those having it in charge involved my "elimination" from public life. An open declaration of war, such as the "elimination" proposed Involved, naturally brought controversy and strife when there should have been only peace. Finally. Mr. "ox announced a harmony proposition Taft for President. Harris for Governor and me for Senator. He did that on his own mo tion; not only was there not a request, but contrary to my desire... Nevertheless, 1 pub licly announced that, if it expressed the wish of the Republicans, no one, would support Taft more than I. Taft's Declaration of Mar. Thereupon. Mr. Burton gave out an In terview in which he stated that Mr. Taft would not accept from the Republicans of Ohio any indorsement for the Presidency if coupled with an indorsement of me for the fen a tors hi p. I am repeating from memory and do not expect to give his ex act language, but I know I am accurately stating the effect of it. This appeared to be such a gross public insult and so un called for that hostilities were immed iately resumed. They continued until Mr. Taft was nom inated, then, so far as 1 was concerned, they stopped Instantly and I supposed from the character of Mr. Taft's response to my note of congratulation- that they stopped on his part; at least. I was so assured by his friends and managers, and in that con nection I was also assured that Mr. Burton hud no authority to give out his offensive interview. Much more of the same character might be mentioned, but I have said enough to show that Mr. Taft's letter performs the cry Important office of exonerating Mr. U art on from -Ah-bargs -cf having apokes without authority and flies responsibility for bis offensive utterances wnere xt oo longs. Grounds of Taft's Opposition. Now as to the letter Itself. It gives as the reason for Judge Taft's hostile attitude that "He T) has opposed the vital policies and principles of the Administration and In his opposition has seised upon and magnified an Important but Incidental Tnatter to em barrass the Administration, using in this without scruple a blind prejudice to accom plish his main purpose. It Is really a question of political principle. In respect to this the Legislature of Ohio expressed what I believe to be the sentiment of the people of Ohio In a resolution asking the Senators to support the rate blH. "Senator Foraker declined to follow this resolution. When the issue is whether he shall be returned, it must be determined if this Is to be a, representative form of gov ernment, not by the question whether he has followed his conscience but by the question whether he really represents the principles that his constituents desire sup ported and put into practice." This quotation shows that the grounds for Mr. Taft's opposition to me were twofold; tbs rate bill and the Brownsville matter. Why He Opposed Rate Bill. As to the rate bill, Mr. Taft says of me. in his letter enumerating the reasons why he could not accept an Indorsement for the Presidency If coupled with an indorsement of me for Senator: "He has opposed the vital policies and principles of the Administration," and adds as another reason that I would not vote for the rate bill, although requested to do so by the Ohio Legislature. Mr. Taft knew I had never opposed the policy of supervising and regulating the railroad and interstate carriers. He knew that my opposition to the rate bill was not because I was opposed to the policy of regulation and supervision, but only to some few methods proposed by that meas ure. For instance, he knew that my ob jection was confined to certain clauses, among them the ratemaking clause and the commodities clause. This bill contained some provisions, on account of which I disliked to vote against It and so stated in the .Senate, but it con tained others that seemed to me so vicious that I could not doubt that it would bring upon us not only panic, idleness, suffering and distress, but still other evils that did not then seem to be generally foreseen, f siirdl cmfw vbgk crafw vbgk crofw shr Bad Kffects of Rate Law. The Senator maintained that the pro vision of the bill turning the rate making power over to a Commission has impaired confidence in railroads so seriously as to stop all railroad construc tion and do such injury to all kinds of business that it will require a long time for the country to recover. Billions of dollars have been lost on account of shrinkage of values of all kinds of securities and thousands of men rendered idle In every section of the union. Another result of the rate bill, he said, has been the abolition of low through rates for our foreign com merce, causing transcontinental lines to abandon competition for that busi ness and forcing the American llag off the Pacific Ocean. Drive Out All Standard Men. But what manner of man is Judge Taft, anvhow? I have known him for a great many years, and I thought intimately, and yet at times I feel as though I did not know him at all. July 20, 1H07. when he wrote the letter the President published, he was so devoted to the trust-smashing policies of the ad ministration that he could not consent to he made President if. as a part of the same movement, I waa to be honored with a re-election to the Senate, because of ray opposition to that special feature of "my policies," and now, since the Standard OH Company matter, there Is manifested tho most unusual Indignation. Apparently every man who has any re lation to the company Is to be driven out of public life. If so, I shall probably have a great deal of company. Taft and Standard Lawyers. Onlv one month ago, when Mr. Taft vis ited Middle Bass and Toledo, he was the truest of C. T. Lewis, of the law firm of Dovle & Lewis, who have been the at torneys of the Standard for many years, standing next in rank in that relation to Virgil B. Kline, and when Mr. Taft had occasion to pass back and forth between Middle Bass and Toledo, where I had the pleasure of meeting him, he traveled on the yacht of Mr. Richardson, a prominent magnate of the Glass Trust, and while he doubtless paid his fare, at least the papers so announced, when traveling ro Springs to Toledo on his way to Middle Bass, vet nevertheless he rode In the pri vate car of one of the officers of the road of which also Doyle & Lewis are attorneys WThat a series of unpardonable crimes. . There did not seem to be any such righteous dislike of these Standard OU and other trust representatives rankling in the bosom of Mr. Taft on the ocasions to which I refer. On the contrary, he acted like a good, square, sensible, honest-minded man, who really enjoyed the company he was keeping and the entertainment he was re ceiving and who recognized, as the late Senator Hanna was accustomed to say, that there were "good trusts as well as tad ones." and even decent people In the em ployment of the Standard Oil Company as well as objectionable people, and all that is to his credit. Recommended Standard Judge. It is also highly to his credit that when, three years ago, the President bad occasion to appoint a United States District Judge for tiie Northern district of Ohio, Mr. Taft, knowing the abilities and high character of John H. Doyle, did not hesitate to rec ommend him to the President in strong language for appointment to that Judgeship. The Standard OH relation to Judge Doyle, then well known to Mr. Taft. did not pre vent him from recognizing his high char acter and general fitness for such a sacred trust, and I happen to know, as did Mr. Justice Moody, who was then Attorney General, that the President, on the recom mendation of Jude Taft, was Intending to appoint Judge Doyle and would have done so. no doubt, except for reasons which did not reflect on Judge Doyle, he finally appointed Judge Robert W. laylor. Standard Was In Good Repute. But If the Standard Oil Company was in good enough -repute only three years ago to warrant Judge Taft in recommending Judge Doyle and president Roosevelt In appointing him to a judgeship, much more was It in sufficiently good repute, six or seven years earlier, before any of the recent virulent attacks were made on it, to war rant me in accepting employment of the character mentioned. What a pity It Is that Judge Taft's let ter was not allowed to continue its slumber until after the election. Action on Brownsville Case. Replying to the charge of Mr. Taft that the Senator's attitude in the Brownsville matter waa for the pur pose of embarrassing tlie administra tion by magnifying an unimportant matter to promote race prejudice, Mr. Foraker says: In this whole matter I had no revenges to seek or personal ends to serve, but was anxious to soe that common Justice was done to tho representatives of a noble and loyal race, every one of whom la by nature a Republican. Tho colored voters are known to be more or less displeased with the action of the Republican party in not passing some relief measure for those scldiers and many of them have signified a purpose to vote against Judge Taft because of his official relation to the matter. Mr. Foraker adds that, because of Mr. Taft's characterization of the "negroes chief grievance' as an 'Incidental and un important matter," no self-respecting negro can vote for him without feeling that he is making great sacrifice. "With the exception of the Brownsville matter, the rate bill and Joint statehood for New Mexico and Arizona. Mr. Foraker says that he has supported the Roose velt administration and has been in charge of many of lus measures on the "floor of the Senate. In Justification of his position in opposing the Joint state hood bill he mentions the fact that the Republican National platform declares for separate statehood for Arizona and New Mexico. Ridicule Roosevelt's Opinion. The Senator ridicules the President's statement that the panic of last October was precipitated by a lot of rich men In Wall street who wanted to bankrupt themselves and the whole country that they might discredit Mr. Roosevelt, and says it is more preposterous even than the story that the same men raised a fund of $5,000,000 with which to prevent President Roosevelt from naming his suc cessor. Mr. Foraker says there is no founda tion, for such a charge. Jn conclusion he says: OX ix nakl this) 4.eft- svy 4 rTr We're bold in our buying for the Fall, as we've learned there's nothing too new or too ultra for the young men ' of this city, so in addition to the regular recognized models we've made a selection of suits cut in strikingly original lines. Look at 'em before others buy them. mm DTHIERS CL1 166-170 Third Street. anything that will work the slightest injury to the Republican party. I shall regret it. but I shall always feel that those who have no consideration for me, my family or good name, but would gloatingly rejoice it they could accomnlish the shame and hu miliation they have attempted, are not en titled to any consideration at my hands and that my duty to the party should be sub ordinate to duty to family and the good name I have striven to make, that I may leave it to them as their heritage, more priceless in their estimation than anything else within my power to give them. POLICE IN CLOSE CONTEST HOLD REVOLVER. SHOOT WITH . CTXCIXXATI FORCE. Local Team, TTnder Captain Moore, Only Seven Points Behind Crack Shots of Country. The police departments of Portland and Cincinnati; O., held a shooting: match yesterday with revolvers. Cincinnati -won the competition by the narrow margin of seven points in a possible score of 2000. Cincinnati's score was 1410 while Portland made a most excellent showing with a score of 1403. The teams shot In their re spective cities and the scores were ex changed by telejrraph last night. The tar gets will be exchanged later by mail. The local team was organized by Cap tain Moore of the first night reilef. and besides himself included Serjeant Endl eott and Patrolmen Graves, Craddock, Blackman, Richards, Arnold, Humphrey, Hyde and Hill. The Cincinnati team is the crack team of the country, having de feated Chicago, St. Louis, New York, Kansas City and San Francisco. There fore, the close score made indicates that Portland's police department has some of the best revolver shots to be found in the police service of the United States. In view of the fact that the Portland depart ment had never entered upon such a com petition before and has had little or no practice for such an event its performance Is especially creditable. The Cincinnati team has an up-to-date shooting gallery In its central station which 1s available to the members of the department at all times for practice. The local team is re quired to go outside the city limits to do Its practicing. "The local team shot yesterday at the Columbia Slough between 10 A. M. and noon. Patrolman Galbraith acted as scorekeeper and the umpires of the match were connected with local dealers in sporting goods. The conditions of the match were: Twenty shots for each man at a two and three-quarter-inch target, distance, 60 feet. One of the provisions was that the trigger pull was to be not less than four pounds, and as nearly all of the revolvers on Captain Moore's team registered only three and one-half pounds to the trigger pull they had to be altered the day before the contest, thus placing the competitors at a distinct disadvantage. PAVING PLANT DAMAGED lire Causes $1000 Loss to Warren Company in Vancouver. VANCOUVER. Wash., Sept. 25. (Spe cial.) The plant of the Warren Con struction Company, -which Is laying 40 blocks of blrullthic pavement In this city, suffered 1000 damage by fire early this morning. The building In which the machinery was located was totally destroyed as were also the carriers, but the bltullthic mix ers were only slightly Injured and the boiler and engine were not injured at all. The tar-like bitulithic mixture that was being heated In the big cauldron boiled Ideal food for children. WHEAT FLAKE CELERY makes the children plump and strong and prevents sour stom ach and constipation. The best food for growing children, in valids and the aged. M For sale by all Grocers COFFEE The rule is: good coffee or none. Good, water is better than poor coffee. ; Yx rroCTTrrBTB yor mmy if jr 4n't 5 "T1 4S( 4' Young Men's Clothes Ederheimer, Stein & Co., Makers PROVIDED especially ' this "Fall for young fellows of high school and college age. Bought the smartest Young Men's styles; of makeis specializing Young Men's clothes. That's why the garmentsjve're selling best meet your ideas of the sort of clothes youpught to have. You've probably guessed the makers name is Ederheimer,' Stein & Co. No other name so closely associated with stylish clothes for Young: Men; no other house devoting; so much thought, study and ripe experience to this one branch of clothesmakingr. We've got the newest models; many nifty styles of cuff and lapel ; patterns are the richest American and foreign weaves. You'll find your choice among them. Sani'l Rosenblatt & Go THIRD AND MORRISON over and th fire ran all over the ground. On this account the firemen were unable to use water on the burning building. The plant will be repaired at once. Tomatoes Hit by Frost. ALBANY, Or., Sept. 25. (Special. ) Tomatoes have suffered severely from frOFt the past two nights. The frost was unusually heavy for so early In the Fall and considerable damage to tomatoes is reported from the big gardens in Ben ton County, Just across the Willamette from this city, and also from the gardens in the Santiam bottoms. Calls for Bank Statement. "WASHINGTON Sept. 25 The Control ler of he Currency today issued a call on National banks for a statement of their condition at the close of business on Sep tember 23. city, 2; Marrinc Ucenne. BAKER-HALL, Owen F. Baker, Glennie Hall, 20. Wedding' and visiting cards. W. O. Smlt & Co.. Washington bldg . 1th and Wsh. Philadelphia, the Greatest American City, Bids a Hearty Welcome To Every Visitor During Founders Week. PHILADELPHIA FOUNDED AS A CITY IN 1683 i Philadelphia ' is a city with 307, 647 dwellings; 65, 000 built within the last ten years. Philadelphia has 846 churches; 334 hospitals and asy lums. Philadelphia hat 1400 association devoted to tho re lief of suffering. Philadelphia has 31 1 public schools. Philadelphia has 1 800 miles of graded and paved streets. Philadelphia manu factures each year 28,000,000 yards of woolen goods, enough to make uniforms for all tha armies of Europe now in active er- Philadelphia is the city which, having only one -sixtieth of the Population of the Republic pro duces one-twentieth of. all its manu factures. Philadelphia manu factures each year 12,000.000 dozen hose and half hose, enough to allow 2 pairs for every man. woman and child in the United States. Philadelphia manu factures each year 34,000,000 yards of worsted goods, enough to make a suit of clothes for every man over 19 years of age now resident in the New England and Mid dle Atlantic States. Philadelphia is the city which gave birth to the Bill of Rights. Philadelphia is the home of the Declaration of Independence. Philadelphia is the birthplace of the Constitution of the United States. . PHILADELPHlAS 225HANNTVERSAKY; S' WEEK ttvx t Tvnrxr L 1683 YCf7VS 1 PHILADELPHIA OCTOBER -f -Pfty jj r'DAV. October 4th Belifloiu Dsy Open sir serrlc in Falrmonnt Tark and original squares; all denominations and sect. MONDAY. October 6th Military ! Largest mobilisation of troops slnos Civil Tar. TtTEODAY. October th Municipal Pay Parade, i llama ling avolutJwa of maoici pal department. WKIKNKSDAY. October Tth iDdokv trial Da; Orer 100 floats In line LluatraUng rotation of Industries. Til I RHIAY, October 8th OhlldrciTi and Nsvs) Day. 100,000 children at Inde pendence Ball: 10 1'nitml States and For- etcn wrhlp nd foo other ersn oo Hirer With rrtrat pyrotechnic display Id eventns;. FRIDAY. October 8th Historical Par Historical pageanl, first ever given In the United States: 40 floats and 5,000 auroMnft men In oostame. 8ATIRDAY, October 10th AUiletlos At Knights Templar Day Motet boat and automobile races and athletic contests. Knights Tempi sr review aad closing ceremonies at City iialL fe-fe Philadelphia manu factures each year 180.000,000 yards of cotton piece goods, enough to make a pair of sheets for every family in the United States. Philadelphia has s jobbing and whole sale trade of $500.- 000,000 annually. Philadelphia manu factures each year Z000.000 dozen un derwear, enough to give 2 shirts . and drawers to every one in Pennsylvania Philadelphia has 650 miles of Electric Tramways, includ ing Elevated. Sur face and Subway Lines. Philadelphia has 105 National Banks. Trust Companies and Saving Funds, with total capital and surplus of 170 mil lion dollars and de posits of 587 mil lion dollars. Philadelphia 15 Electric Railway Cars per day. builds Philadelphia's History Dramatized on Franklin Field Every Evening During Philadelphia has 16,000 Manu facturing Plants,em ploying 2 5 0.0 00 skilled laborers,each year consuming $400,000,000 of raw material and pro ducing $700,000,000 of manufactures. Philadelphia has 57 Parks and Squares, one of them being the largest park in the world, contain ing over 3400 acres. Philadelphia manu factures 8 locomo tives every working day, or 2663 in the year. These loco motives on a per fectly level track would haul 168.000 loaded cars of 50 tons capacity. Philadelphia manu factures each year 4,800.000 hats. The bands, end on end, would reach from Philadelphia to Denver. Philadelphia in past 52 years has bor rowed 136 million dollars; has paid off 73 million of this debt, and now, with only 63 million dol lars outstanding, owns property valued at more than 277 million dollars. Philadelphia manu factures each year 45,000,000 yards of carpet, enough to put a belt around the earth and leave a remnant long enough to reach Cincinnati. Founders' Week OH 108.0