Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Keizertimes. (Salem, Or.) 1979-current | View Entire Issue (Jan. 24, 2020)
JANUARY 24, 2020, KEIZERTIMES, PAGE A9 MYSTERY: ‘I don’t think we should just tear it down’ (Continued from Page A1) The husband was also willing to donate money toward the manicur- ing of the area. Ms. (Valerie) Perry suggested the Rose Society be con- tacted to take care of the roses and perhaps add more bushes. Carroll Sovereign passed away in Everett, Wash., in 2010 at the age of 96. His obituary in the Everett Herald read: “He was married at various times, but the love of his life was Rose Jackson. During their 28 years of marriage, they shared true fulfi llment and happiness.” The city has been unable to locate any other surviving rel- atives. At a certain point in time, the memorial was a heartfelt tribute to a beloved woman. In the decades since it was erect- ed, the shrine has fallen into a state of disrepair. The lattice trellis is rotting away. The tallest branches of the rose bushes rise roughly 14 feet in the air and then slump over. Ivy is doing its best to throttle one of the rose bushes entirely. Rose Sovereign’s memorial began raising a host of ques- tions at Keizer Parks Advisory Board meetings in 2019. Aside from launching a quest to fi g- ure out where it came from, members of the parks board have wrestled with questions from who performs mainte- nance duties and whether a donation should continue to be maintained in perpetuity. The city has some of the bases covered in existing policy. Donations of trees and ameni- ties such as shelters, tables and benches are already addressed, but the Sovereign memori- al fell outside the established guidelines in a few areas: ros- es require a different type of maintenance than trees, the trellis is not a shelter in the tra- ditional sense and the plaques are not permitted with other “living memorials” for vandal- ism and maintenance reasons. At a meeting of the parks board in on Jan. 14, board members approved updates to Keizer’s park and public space donation policy. The changes are intended to help navigate issues related to the Sovereign memorial and others that arose in recent years. The main changes pertain to replacing memorials, assign- ing maintenance duties to the donor and termination of a monument or memorial. A last minute addition was made to require some sort of statement about the purpose of a me- morial during the application process. “A write-up would help understand the nexus between the donors and the signifi - cance of the memorial and it would stay in the city records,” said Lawyer. Such a statement would help future city leaders deter- mine the appropriate termina- tion process when memorials reach the end of their life cy- cle,” said Dylan Juran another member of the board. If adopted by the city, the new policy would state that memorial would be replaced “only under extremely rare and unusual circumstances.” That portion of the change pertains to a previous situation in which sand volleyball courts were replaced at Keizer Rap- ids. The original courts were installed by an Eagle Scout, but another donor with the fi nancial ability to upgrade the courts replaced them years later. Additionally, maintenance of memorial sites would be the duty of the donor while the memorials themselves would become property of the city. Donor families would be giv- en the opportunity to reinvest in the sites so long as current contact information is on- hand at city hall. The city would also get the right to terminate a memorial when it is damaged or defaced or if applicable laws change. As for what will happen with the Sovereign memo- rial, it is likely facing its de- mise in the near future. Board Member Tanya Hamilton said it wasn’t a decision to make lightly. “I don’t think we should just tear it down. It’s a sensi- tive topic for a lot of people,” Hamilton said. The new policy will permit the city to remove memorials predating the new policy at the end of their “salvageable life span.” KLL: Lack of succession plans may be a barrier (Continued from Page A1) was the time and resources it takes to oper- ate this facility. If it meant paying a little more and not having to do anything, would you pay a little more,” Lawyer said. “We want there to be consistency and sustainability and there’s al- ready a lack of consistency between the two reps of KLL.” He added that without being able to guar- antee a Keizer-connected entity winning the long-term lease, it was too uncertain of a gam- ble. The representatives of McNary Youth Baseball, Bo Lane and Rob Tavares, both supported the city as- suming control of the space even if it meant paying higher usage fees. “I think the reality is the city should have taken over a long time ago. The issues we are dealing with come from only one organization managing the complex,” Lane said. “Parents would much rather pay $1,000 for a tour- nament ball team than pay $200 and have to work at the park.” Councilor Marlene Parsons said she was wearing two hats – city coun- cilor and grandmother – as she made her support for a long-term lease known. “The city is not wanting to take over the park,” said Councilor Parsons. “I pay a parks fee every month and I would like to see part of that fee go to the little league fi elds,” said Grandmother Parsons. Councilor Dan Kohler supported the long- term lease option, but said he had “cautious concerns” over making it the recommenda- tion. “We’ve had two groups use the short-term agreement and we’ve seen the people in Keiz- er Little League at the table have all changed and McNary Youth Baseball has a new name. How do we put together a long-term agree- ment when the league management changes from the people that are sitting at the table here,” Kohler said. Both Keizer City Manager Chris Eppley and Keizer Public Works Director Bill Lawyer said the city’s cost to run the facility would require higher fees from participating families. “I want nothing to do with managing that complex but, if we are going to do it, I want to do it right and it will affect the fees,” Bill Lawyer said. If the city had to hire additional employees to manage the facility, em- ployee benefi ts require- ments would add to overall cost of operations. Eppley said it might even mean the park lies dormant for a season if youth leagues aren’t will- ing to extend the current contract. — Bo Lane “[Taking over the park] would be a funda- mental departure from the way the city was founded – minimalist government at the lowest possible cost,” Ep- pley said. “We don’t take on new programs if we can avoid it. This is a signifi cant divergence from our business model. That said, the city council can tell me to get over it and say we are moving in a new direction.” In the end, Matt Lawyer, Lane and Tavares all voted against the motion to seek a long- term lease. Lane asked if there would still be opportunities to oppose the move when the city council takes up the recommendation. There will be, possibly as soon as February. “I think the reality is the city should have taken over a long time ago. ” public notices NOTICE TO INTERESTED PERSONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the undersigned has been appointed personal representative of the Estate of Ramona F. Clason, Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 19PB09168. All persons having claims against the estate are required to present them, with vouchers attached, to the undersigned personal representative at P.O. Box 350, Sublimity, OR 97385, within four months after the date of fi rst publication of this notice, or the claims may be barred. All persons whose rights may be affected by the proceedings may obtain additional information from the records of the court, the personal representative, or the attorneys for the personal representative. Dated and fi rst published: January 10, 2020. Lorraine Kay Cozby Personal Representative Milan E. Castillo Attorney for Personal Representative P.O. Box 350 Sublimity, OR 97385 Phone: (503) 769-8089 1/10, 1/17, 1/24 SHERIFF’S NOTICE On 11th day of February, 2020, at 10:00 AM, at the main entrance of the Marion Co. Courthouse, in Salem, OR, I will sell the following real property: 12148 Sky Lane NE, Aurora, in the case of 12148 SKY LANE SBL LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. BEV TECH, INC., AN OREGON CORPORATION, TJ 2 LLC, AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MADDOX AIR FREIGHT AND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., AN OREGON CORPORATION, THOMAS J. JUZA, Defendant(s). For more information go to http:// oregonsheriffssales.org 1/10, 1/17, 1/24, 1/31 TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF SALE S&S 19-125806 TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF SALE A default has occurred under the terms of a trust deed made by Kiana Brammer and Tanner R Brammer, as tenants by the entirety, whose address is 14362 Marion Road SE, Turner, OR 97392 as grantor to AmeriTitle, as Trustee, in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for Academy Mortgage Corporation, its successors and assigns, as named Benefi ciary, dated July 31, 2018, recorded August 9, 2018, in the mortgage records of Marion County, Oregon, in Book 4108, at Page 477, as Instrument No. 2018 00038708, Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper is the present Benefi ciary as defi ned by ORS 86.705(2), as covering the following described real property: as covering the following described real property: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5, BLOCK 9, OF THE TOWN OF MARION, SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 9, SOUTH, RANGE 2, WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN MARION COUNTY, OREGON; (PLAT VOLUME 1, PAGE 7) THENCE SOUTH 78 DEGREES 30’ EAST 210.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 30’ EAST 89.1 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 30’ WEST 210.0 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MARKET ROAD NO. 35 FROM MARION TO JEFFERSON; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, 89.2 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THE TOWN OF MARION: THENCE SOUTH 78 DEGREES 30’ EAST, 10 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.. COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 14362 Marion Road SE, Turner, OR 97392. Both the benefi ciary and the trustee have elected to sell the said real property to satisfy the obligations secured by said trust deed and a notice of default has been recorded pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes 86.735(3); the default for which the foreclosure is made is grantor’s failure to pay when due the following sums: Monthly payments in the sum of $1,774.66, from June 1, 2019, plus prior accrued late charges in the amount of $175.68, plus the sum of $60.00 for advances, together with all costs, disbursements, and/ or fees incurred or paid by the benefi ciary and/or trustee, their employees, agents or assigns. By reason of said default the benefi ciary has declared all sums owing on the obligation that the trust deed secures immediately due and payable, said sum being the following, to-wit: $262,638.72, together with accrued interest in the sum of $8,383.28 through December 10, 2019, together with interest thereon at the rate of 5.25% per annum from December 11, 2019, plus prior accrued late charges in the amount of $175.68, plus the sum of $4,774.70 for advances, together with all costs, disbursements, and/ or fees incurred or paid by the benefi ciary and/or trustee, their employees, agents or assigns. WHEREFORE, notice hereby is given that the undersigned trustee will on May 6, 2020, at the hour of 9:00 AM PT, in accord with the standard time established by ORS 187.110, at the main entrance of the Marion County Courthouse, located at 100 High Street, N.E., in the City of Salem, OR, County of Marion, State of Oregon, sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash the interest in the said described real property which the grantor has or had power to convey at the time of the execution of said trust deed, together with any interest which the grantor or his successors in interest acquired after the execution of said trust deed, to satisfy the foregoing obligations thereby secured and the costs and expenses of sale, including a reasonable charge by the trustee. Notice is further given to any person named in ORS 86.778 that the right exists, at any time that is not later than fi ve days before the date last set for the sale, to have this foreclosure proceeding dismissed and the trust deed reinstated by paying to the benefi ciary of the entire amount due (other than such portion of the principal as would not then be due had no default occurred) and by curing any other default complained of herein that is capable of being cured by tendering the performance required under the obligations or trust deed, and in addition to paying said sums or tendering the performance necessary to cure the default, by paying all costs and expenses actually incurred in enforcing the obligation and trust deed, together with trustee’s fees and attorney’s fees not exceeding the amounts provided by said ORS 86.778. Notice is further given that reinstatement or payoff quotes requested pursuant to ORS 86.786 and ORS 86.789 must be timely communicated in a written request that complies with that statute, addressed to the trustee’s “Reinstatements/ Payoffs – ORS 86.786” either by personal delivery or by fi rst class, certifi ed mail, return receipt requested, to the trustee’s address shown below. Due to potential confl icts with federal law, persons having no record legal or equitable interest in the subject property will only receive information concerning the lender’s estimated or actual bid. Lender bid information is also available at the trustee’s website, www.logs.com/ foreclosuresales.html. In construing this notice, the masculine gender includes the feminine and the neuter, the singular includes the plural, the word “grantor” includes any successor in interest to the grantor as well as any other person owing an obligation, the performance of which is secured by said trust deed, and the words “trustee” and “benefi ciary” include their respective successors in interest, if any. Also, please be advised that pursuant to the terms stated on the Deed of Trust and Note, the benefi ciary is allowed to conduct property inspections while property is in default. This shall serve as notice that the benefi ciary shall be conducting property inspections on the said referenced property. Without limiting the trustee’s disclaimer of representations or warranties, Oregon law requires the trustee to state in this notice that some residential property sold at a trustee’s sale may have been used in manufacturing methamphetamines, the chemical components of which are known to be toxic. Prospective purchasers of residential property should be aware of this potential danger before deciding to place a bid for this property at the trustee’s sale. The Fair Debt Collection Practice Act requires that we state the following: This is an attempt to collect a debt, and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. If a discharge has been obtained by any party through bankruptcy proceedings: This shall not be construed to crossword be an attempt to collect the outstanding indebtedness or hold you personally liable for the debt. Dated: 12/16/19 /s/ Kelly Sutherland, Janeway Law Firm, LLC, fka Shapiro & Sutherland, LLC., Successor Trustee 1499 SE Tech Center Place, Suite 255, Vancouver, WA 98683 www.logs.com/ foreclosuresales.html, Telephone: (360) 260-2253, Toll-free: 1-800-970-5647, S&S 19-125806 1/17, 1/24, 1/31, 2/7
