Image provided by: SEIU Local 503; Salem, OR
About The Oregon state employee. (Salem, Oregon.) 1944-195? | View Entire Issue (March 1, 1947)
will appreciate the principle that if the immediate benefits in individual cases ■are somewhat limited a t this time that all employees will eventually receive the long term advantages which are gainable under the pay plan. Recognized Imperfections One of the less desirable features of the installation process was its effect of equalizing salary rates as between older and newer employees i n many in stances. This resulted because the new pay levels and minimum rates were considerably higher than previous scales for many employments. Funds were not available to provide blanket readjust ments of salaries within thé new ranges. Again,, the Commission believed th a t within existing financial limitations the overall benefits, to employees in higher ranges more than outweighed this cur rent difficulty. Suggestion was made by the Commission' that older em ployees whose work was meritorious should be given first consideration in making future salary adjustments. Facts and Figures As< ari indication of results, employees ¡should bear in mind that merely to ad just to new minimum rates; about 2600 monthly employees were automatically raised and an additional 1000 employees on flat hourly rates also received ad justments. The total cost of this ad justment aloné approximates one and one quarter million dollars for the next biennium. Approximately one half mil lion dollars additionally was required to , place the pay plan into effect in March rather than July. In addition to thé above figures of Course, are costs of other merit adjustments which will continué to be made within the new ranges. The formalized procédure outlined for approval of salary advancements m ay appear restrictive in many - re spects. The necessity for maintaining necessary controls in connection with expenditure of some $60,000,000 in salaries over the next biennium, as well as, guaranteeing equitable treatment of 7 all of the some 9,000 employees re quires that such a system be adhered to. Long Term Benefits Under the new scales, beginning sal aries for lower classes are higher than ever before enjoyed by state employees. Maximum salaries to be reached i n ’a position w ith conscientious effort and merit are likewise higher than ever be fore and promotional opportunities; for employees have been greatly broaden ed. The plan is one which now, as well as later, will bring significant benefits to employees. The attainment of these and other benefits will always be con ditioned however, on the quality and sincerity of the services which are giv en 1Iby employees to the public of this state. Retirement Date Set On April 7 , Mr. Jerry S. Sayler, Ex ecutive Secretary of the Public Em ployees Retirement System, issued a let ter, regarding the effective dates for retirement of public employees. "O n December 31, 1946 the Presi dent of the United States proclaimed that hostilities of World W ar II had ceased. The proclamation" as it affects retirement of members of the Public Employees Retirement System is ex plained below. "A ny member of ¡the retirement sys tem classified as a police officer or fire man, who on July 1, 1947 is 60 years of age or older,” and "A ny member of the retirement system other than a police officer or fireman, who on July 1, 1947 is 65 years of age or older may be retired on that date, or any subsequent date before Decem ber 31, 1947, by action of the employ er, and m ust be retired on' December 31, 1947 unless prior to that date the employer and the retirement board have- m utually, agreed that the retention of such over-age employees is in the pub lic interest. (Continued on page 8)