Image provided by: SEIU Local 503; Salem, OR
About The Oregon state employee. (Salem, Oregon.) 1944-195? | View Entire Issue (Jan. 1, 1947)
10 40-Hour, 5-Day Week Requested For Oregon State Employees It will be surprising to many to re-, alize how long we have been moving to w ard 'a 40-hour, 5-day work week. . The very fact that we have the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act withJ its pro vision for a 40-hour week indicates that years of agitation and experimentation preceded its passage. One of the chief developments of the industrial age has been the gradual shortening of hours of labor. As early as, 1845, Sarah Bagley of the Female Reform Association, petitioned the Massachusetts Legislature to limit factory hours to 10 a day. The 10-hour day was the first to be written into State laws. Then with increasing'mech anization and speed of production, it was gradually supplanted by a 9-hoUr day and by the latter part of the nineteenth century the 8-hour day and 4 8-hour week had become the accepted standard. This was followed by a Sat urday half holiday——the 44 and 41- hour week. By 1926 the 40-hour, ¿5- day week had begun to take root, as shown by a survey of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and by other sources. In October, 1926, Henry Ford created considerable controversy by adopted the 5 -day week in his manufacturing de partments. Said Mr. Ford in 1929, "It has now been sufficiently demonstrated to us that the five-day week for men brings better results, than the six-day week.” And the movement was on its: way, with the blessings of Mr. Ford, the labor unions and various industrial ex perts. During the depression, the, 5 -day week was established to give employ ment to more workers or to make up for drastic cuts in wages. Since then, wages have traveled back up from de pression depths but the 5 -day week has become enough of a general standard to be retained, Some are still requesting justification for the shortening of working hours— and valid reasons are plentiful. First, shorter hours afford the desirable and necessary leisure time- for the pursuit of personal development and creative avocations. The late President Roose- % velt in a report to Congress in 1942, Stated that "Any new declaration of personal rights, any translation of freedom into modern terms . . . must include: The. right to rest, recreation, and adventure; the opportunity to en joy life and to take part in an advanc ing civilization.” H e concluded that this right merits a place beside the right to work, education and equality before the law. Second, it is stated by many effi ciency experts that production does not decrease with the elimination of Saturday morning working time. Per sons who have surveyed the situation in industrial plants make these points. .(F) The tendency of workers is to pro duce less on a Saturday morning than on a week day morning because of fatigue, interest in personal week-end activities and resentment at having-to work when similar employees are free. (2) Employees will work harder and devise more ef ficient methods to , get the work done in five days in order to merit the sixth day off. (3) More effi cient machines and methods make in creased production possible in shorter time. A fter i study of industrial plants, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has con cluded that "the 40-hour week and the 8-hour day yield the highest output.” Third, it provides those with finan cial burdens an opportunity to obtain additional wages which their chosen oc cupation may not provide in their reg ular salary. An all day Saturday job may bring in the additional money which will enable a man or woman to continue the work he or she prefers. Fourth, shorter hours are of benefit to health and safety. The person who does hard physical work is often worn- out arid unable to support himself in