The Oregon state employee. (Salem, Oregon.) 1944-195?, July 01, 1946, Page 28, Image 28

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    26
Meeting of Directors
(Continued from page 25)
bers because of present raise being
small.
R. M. Smith
Wage adjustments should be obtain­
ed for those who have received no pay
increase in the last 16 years.
Wm. M. Burns, No. 17
Wages foremost problem. Employees
cannot cope with the high cost of liv­
ing.
Ivan Dakin, No. 5
Discussed the meeting of his crew
with a representative of the A. F. of L.
A special dispensation is being given
state employees— $10.00 initiation fee,
amount of monthly dues not known.
I. A. DeFrance
In recognition of the distinctive
character and special nature of employ­
ment in public service the Oregon
State Employees Association has ac­
knowledged that government service is
different from other employment, and
the Association has recognized the ob­
ligation of public employees to limit
the presentation of their case to peace­
able methods. In turn it is the duty of
the state to avoid unfavorable condi­
tion of public employment and pro­
vide adequate machinery for the pre­
vention and removal of employment
problems at their source. The state
should raise wages to parity to improve
the public service.
Others present pointed out that they
did not think anything would be ^
gained by opposing the A. F. of L.,
at present we have a number of mem-
bers who maintain membership in both
groups, that the OSEA fulfills a def­
inite need for state employees.
George Aiken, Budget Director
of the State of Oregon
The state is in a different position
than private enterprise which if costs
go up can raise their retail prices. The
state operates under a biennial budget
adopted by the legislature two years in
advance. Having been unable to fore­
see the present dilemma, the individual
department budgets are incapable of
handling the drastic cost of parity pay.
The appropriation departments, in
many cases, have already depleted their
funds, and have called on the e m e r ^ ^
gency board for assistance. Many o l^ V
the self-sustaining departments would
be able to grant a wage raise, but he
opposed favoritism or partiality for any
one department.
Capital Outlay, money that has been
carried over from year to. year, can be
used for no other purpose and a sug­
gestion was made that legislative ac­
tion might make some of this sum
available to finance a parity plan. He