Eugene weekly., August 31, 2017, Page 21, Image 21

What’s up with the face paint? Martin tells him it’s his “death mask.” Then he con-
fesses, with a kind of resigned exasperation, that he “made it up,” and he needs to wash it
off so he can go pick up his son from jail.
It’s a sublime moment, at once funny and complexly melancholy, and it points to the
better angels that often guide this excellent but flawed film. After years of Indian stereo-
types in Hollywood — of both the grotesquely racist and idiotically romanticized variety
— the admittedly made-up hoodoo of Martin’s ritual is a refreshing bit of raw humanity,
and a nod to perpetual unease and vulnerability with which we reckon our violent and
desecrated past.
Wind River is Sheridan’s directorial debut, and it’s a welcome one. As the screenwriter
for two of the better thrillers in recent memory, last year’s Hell or High Water and 2015’s
Sicario, he’s proven himself capable of balancing socio-political commentary with the
more subtle and intimate rhythms of gritty human drama.
Violent crime thrillers that focus on social ills are tricky, and Sheridan isn’t completely
immune to those tendentious quirks that seem to take the audience by the nose and lead it
into easy indignation. At its weakest, Wind River panders to our expectations that good be
all good and evil be all evil, with no brokering complications. This is amplified by Renner’s
character, a kind of outback Wyoming guru who speaks in gnostic truisms about suffering
and fate.
Renner is a solid actor, but I spent half the film wanting desperately to bop him in the
nose; as the hero, he’s perfect to the point of being unlikable, uncomplicated by the psychic
darkness that make Eastwood and Bogart so fantastically compelling on screen.
Fortunately, Sheridan does so much right in this film that he overcomes his own twee
profundities. Set in the barren vastness of Wyoming, the movie conjures an atmosphere
that is at once expansive and hypnotic, its dire beauty threatened at every moment by ex-
plosive violence, which it delivers in shocking jolts.
As Jane Banner, the lone FBI agent called in after the body of the Native woman is dis-
covered, Elizabeth Olsen is a total surprise; Banner, an agent from Florida, is completely out
of her element in this cruel and snowbound landscape, and yet she’s immediately outraged
by the erasure of this crime. Olsen balances such indignation with a sense of desperate sad-
ness always veering toward futility. It’s a great performance, and it anchors this film in a
tragic sensibility it might otherwise lack. (Cinemark 17, Regal Valley River)
eugeneweekly.com • A ugust 31, 2017
21