Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Eugene weekly. (Eugene, Oregon) 1993-current | View Entire Issue (Aug. 28, 2003)
Offensive & Defensive Lines ducks strength: by Jerry Thompson After a disappointing 1993 season the Ducks were picked to finish 7th in the Pac-10 despite having experienced and talented players on the offensive and defensive lines. 1994 turned out to be a magical season with a trip to the Rose Bowl for the first time in 37 years. The Ducks are rated anywhere from 5th to 7th this year and it’s not inconceivable that the same scenario could happen. Oregon’s offensive and defensive lines have the potential of being the best fans have seen in a long, long time. The “O” Line 2-Deep: Left Tackle: Left Guard: Center: Right Guard: Right Tackle: 72 - Adam Snyder, 6-6, 314 74 - Nick Steitz, 6-4, 317 53 - Dan Weaver, 6-6, 295 60 - Joey Forster, 6-4, 302 79 - Robin Knebel, 6-6, 318 62 - Jerome Randolph, 6-5, 296 70 - Josh Hagemeyer, 6-4, 288 76 - Enoka Lucas, 6-3, 295 59 - Ian Reynoso, 6-4, 289 77 - Mike DeLaGrange, 6-6,3 40 Backing up the top ten are Josh Atkins (6-6, 315 tackle) and Shawn Perkins, 6-6, 285 guard). The “D” Line 2- Deep: Left End: Left Tackle: Right Tackle: Right End: 47 - Chris Solomona, 6-5, 290 94 - Junior Siavii, 6-5, 332 96 - Haloti Ngata, 6-4, 337 53 - Igor Olshansky, 6-6, 305 92 - Devan Long, 6-4, 262 99 - Robbie Valenzuela, 6-2, 298 45 - Matt Toeaina, 6-3, 277 30 - Quinn Dorsey, 6-4, 270 More depth is provided by end Darius Sanders (6-5, 265) and tackles Victor Felipe (6-3, 302) and Nuvraj Bassi, 6-6, 290. Veteran line coaches Neal “Zoomer” Zoumboukos and Steve Greatwood have seen a lot of players come and go each having been with the Ducks C E NT E R D AN WE AV E R that they have very high hopes for their units. More About the Offensive Line: Zoumboukos: “They’ve got size and they’ve got athleticism. Sometimes we’ve had size without athleticism D E FE N SI VE EN D C H R IS S OL OM O N A Ducks Illustrated photos: Walt Grondona who love to play, who are excited about it. They’re not egotistical. They’re not in it for the money or for over 20 years. They are notoriously cautious in their evaluations of their players and error on the side of understatement. They both stress the word “potential” concerning their 2003 lines, but its obvious 6 AUGUST 28, 2003 Ducks I llustrated or we’ve had to give up size to get athleticism. This group has both and that’s exciting. This group is a throwback to football players years ago who are doing it for the love of the game who love to practice D E FE N SI V E TA C K LE JU N I OR S I AV I I the scholarship. They just like playing football and it’s a pleasure to coach