Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Eugene weekly. (Eugene, Oregon) 1993-current | View Entire Issue (May 29, 2003)
The Jewel of Junk & Stuff Julie Daniel of BRING talks about grassroots growing up. Story by Bobbie Willis These first true days of spring, the sun glints and shimmers through BRING Recycling Center so that every window pane and piece of broken glass sparkles like gemstone; so that every mishmash piece of sheet metal or metal tubing or metal frame, pipe or wire catches and throws back a lit- tle shine; so that every discarded ceramic sink and bathtub and toilet gleams softly, but so compellingly that something in you believes, no in- sists, it can all be resuscitated, brought back to life — that it can all be used again. Julie Daniel, general manager and co-director of BRING tells me that this spark, this belief in resuscitation — or more specifically in the reuse part of reduce-reuse-recycle — is where the future is at for a grassroots, nonprofit recycling center such as BRING. “The world of recycling is changing,” she says. “And in a way, BRING is almost a victim of its own success.” F or more than 30 years, BRING has worked to make recycling a com- munity value here in Lane County. “And it is a core community value,” says Daniel. “Recycling is one of the things that defines us. We have in- credible participation here and people are very loyal to the process.” She explains, “When BRING started in 1971, we made recycling happen in the com- munity. We introduced the concept and really built a market for a system that has now be- come part of the mainstream — what was started by activists and visionaries and envi- ronmentalists has become mainstream.” And within the mainstream, recycling has grown up, become an industry. “So now,” says Daniel, “your garbage haulers — not a nonprofit — are who pick up your recy- cleables. Materials are sorted in big facilities that handle enormous streams of material.” Don’t get Daniel wrong. “I don’t see that as being a bad thing, it’s just a fact. Garbage and waste commodities are big industry, big companies. It’s very capital intensive. You 10 MAY 29, 2003 need very expensive equipment — and a lot of it — and big facilities and all kinds of cap- ital investments that very few nonprofits can muster. And why would we?” she asks mat- ter-of-factly. “Why would we do something that the for-profit sector can do far cheaper and more efficiently than we can?” But this brings into question the role of a local, grassroots recycling center such as BRING. The organization is an anomaly, Daniel explains. “Recycling was started by nonprofits, and by and large those nonprofits have gone out of business. There are only a handful — BRING among them — left in the country today.” To maintain its survival, BRING will make some major organizational shifts, including even more emphasis on edu- cation, and relocating the center to a signifi- cantly larger site in Glenwood. Roots to Reinvention About five years ago, when Daniel moved from an office position with BRING to take on the role of co-director with Business Manager David Wollner, the facility was starting to feel the for-profit squeeze-out in recycling. She says, “I think that when David and I put our heads together and started look- ing at the organization, we realized that recy- cling would not be in our future forever. We can’t really compete as processors or collec- tors of materials. We just don’t have the ca- pacity, and there really isn’t the volume of materials in this town.” This organizational examination led the directors right back to BRING’s mission statement: to promote “a healthy, sustainable environment through education, innovative waste reduction, reuse and recycling pro- grams and by involving the community in re- source conservation.” And it suddenly became clear that there was a direction in which a nonprofit recycler could grow. Says Daniel, “BRING from the very beginning was a little different from other nonprofit recyclers in that we did more than just recycle. We’ve always had an edu- cational component. Back in 1974, before en- vironmental education was even a twinkle in the eye of government, BRING had an envi- ronmental educator.” And so BRING has decided to focus more intently upon education. If grassroots could make recycling mainstream, could education make reuse and reduction mainstream, as well? More Radical Change While BRING heartily endorses recycling as not only a core community value, but also as a true step toward conserving resources, Daniel still admits: “It’s not enough.” Daniel and Wollner had taken a hard look at the statistical information on recycling pro- vided by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). “They keep very detailed sta- tistics,” Daniel explains. “And that’s where you come up with a thing called the recovery rate,” or the percentage of materials recov- ered and recycled. “What we noticed,” Daniel says with some shock, “was that the recovery rate was climbing higher and higher and higher. We went from 20, 30, 40, into the low 50s — an