Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (Aug. 31, 2018)
Street Roots • Aug, 31-Sept. 6,2018 News Page 7 Oregon DOJ drops criminal prosecution o f ‘sanctuary'repeal signature gatherers Its investigation concluded there was insufficient evidence supporting complaint alleging voters were misled into signing the petition Teens do better outside oldetc says attorney DeAnnlHorne, who will participate i | a ganel exploring the impact jjrf tilin g youths as adults,las well as reform efforts Fled | by state lawmakers I BY EMILY GREEN SENIOR STAFF REPORTER again at that time to see if it’s really necessary to make the transfer, McCullough said. « “When they’re in Oregon Youth Authority facilities, they have really robust programs for teaching those young people life skills and really getting them prepared to be able to leave the facility and be successful, healthy members of our society,” she said. “There is a lot of concern about those youth having all of the progress that they’ve made in an Oregon Youth Authority facility undone when they head to Department of Corrections and they spend time there.” The League of Women Voters of Portland is kicking off a series of civic education programs with a panel focused on the impacts of Measure 11 on juvenile justice. The panel, at 7 p.m. S ept 11 at the Multnomah County Building, is free and open to the public. At the event, McCullough will join Babak Zolfaghari of Community Healing Initiative and attorney DeAnna Horne in sharing stories about how Measure 11 has affected Oregon youths. The panelists will also talk through potential legislative fixes they think would better serve youths in the criminal justice system and then take questions from the audience. Home, who co-chairs the Oregon Criminal Defense law yers Association’s legislative committee, recently sat down F | \ h e Oregon Department of Justice I said Wednesday it has insufficient A evidence to move forward with the criminal prosecution of signature gatherers accused of lying to students at Portland State University in order to obtain signatures to put a controversial initiative on the ballot. The initiative, which will give Oregon voters the option to repeal Oregon’s 30-year-old sanctuary status limiting local law enforcement’s ability to use resources to enforce federal immigration laws, is now headed for the November ballot as Measure 165. Street Roots first reported on complaints alleging signature gatherers working for Ballot Access LLC were lying to Portiand- area voters to get signatures in February. That’s when an incident at Portland State University prompted student Robin Fisher to file a formal complaint with the Oregon Secretary of State’s Office. This complaint was referred to the Oregon Department of Justice for a criminal investigation. Fisher told Street Roots a man working for Ballot Access LLC explained he was collecting signatures for “a ballot initiative to protect the sanctuary-state status of Oregon and stop Donald Trump from making decisions for Oregonians.” A video recording showing that the signature gatherer seemed to be misinformed about what the measure would do was deemed inadmissible because Fisher made the recording without the signature gatherer’s knowledge. According to a letter sent to the Secretary of State’s Office from the Department of Justice, witnesses interviewed during the course of the investigation into Fisher’s complaint gave “differing versions of the circulators’ statements.” The complaint has been referred back to the Secretary of State’s Office, which could pursue the complaint as a civil matter. Fisher’s was not the only formal complaint filed that related to signature gatherers working on the anti-sanctuary measure for Ballot Access LLC. While several other similar complaints were filed with the Secretary of State’s Office in relation to the anti-sanctuary status initiative; none are under criminal investigation with the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice is, See MEASURE 11, page 11 See PETITION, page 11 DeAnnaDorne, who co^j^frs Criminal Defense Lawyers A$g legislative committee, hat^worl Metropolitan Pubtic Defenders BY EM ILY GREEN SENIOR STAFF REPORTER If YOU GO WHAT: Panel on the impacts of regon’s practice of automatically Measure 11 on juvenile justice, hosted trying 15-, 16- and 17-year olds as adults when they’re charged with a by the League of Women Voters of crime that carries a mandatory minimum Portland sentence under Measure 11 may be WHEN: 7 p.m. Sept 11 challenged in this year’s legislative session. It’s one of four broad areas of reform to WHERE: Multnomah County Building, how Measure 11 is applied to juveniles that 501SE Hawthorne Blvd. is Under review by stakeholder workgroups, COST: Free including state corrections and county prosecutor groups, as well as justice reform advocates. Oregon Sens. Michael Dembrow and face a mandatory minimum sentence (D-Portland) and Floyd Prozanski when charged with any one of 21 Measure (D-Eugene) are leading the effort 11 crimes. These crimes range from While the details of the legislation are second-degree assault and robbery to rape still being fleshed out, these workgroups and murder. are examining opportunities for granting According to a report from the Oregon early release to youths serving Measure 11 Council on Civil Rights earlier this year, sentences and giving all people sentenced Oregon has the nation’s second-highest to life in prison for a crime they committed rate of sending youths to adult court, with while they were a juvenile the possibility of nearly 4,000 juveniles tried as adults parole. between 1994 and 2012. “We’re looking at making sure the court The other category of reform under is considering the right factors when consideration would address the transfer of they’re looking at a youth and looking at youth offenders from juvenile detention, the way their brain has developed,” said run by the Oregon Health Authority, to Kimberly McCullough, policy director at adult prison, run by the Oregon ACLU of Oregon and member of the Department of Corrections. This happens legislative workgroups. “A youth at 16 can when they turn 25 and still have time left be, really, a very different person than they on their sentence. An inmate may only are later down the road,” she said. have a few months or a year or two Oregon voters passed Measure 11 in remaining to be served when this happens. 1994, dictating that juveniles age 15 and It may be good policy to review their case older be automatically tried in adult court O