Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (Dec. 29, 2017)
News Page 4 "I w ill never allow any partisan interest, personal prejudices or hang-ups to come ia the way of serving communities who go without. I w il never do that. Never." FCC COMMISSIONER MIGNON CLYBURN E X E C U T IV E E D ITO R Tien th e F ederal C o m m u n ica tio n s W C o m m issio n v o te d th is m o n th to g u t in te r n e t neutrality protections, simple. We were faced with a couple of Commissioner Mignon Clyburn did not hold uninterrupted - the landline phone questions as to whether people like you and back her outrage. The FCC, in her words, connection went dead: Straight to a dial me, businesses large and small, should be had “pulled its own teeth” in passing what tone, without any clear culpability on either able to reach the online applications and the sjie called the “consumer-harming, end. We resumed the call, but it was hard services of our choice, without interference. F re e d o m O rd e r.” " ~ ' —— The issue and the question before us were market and the power'it now hSsu<?vgrtered Clyburn, along with fellow Democratic our lives. Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, were that travels over the internet should be the two dissenting votes in a party-line, 3-2 treated equally. To me it was a very simple J o a n n e Zuhl: Leading up to the vote, decision to roll back 2015 protections you’ve described it as the most difficult wee question, and the (commission’s) answer, to against blocked, throttled or prioritized me, was one that s troublesome: That we your career on the FCC. You’ve referenced internet access. threats and intimidation, personal attacks, don’t think that the expert agency in First sworn in in 2009, Clyburn is the Nazis cheering, russian influences, fake telecommunications should be the referee longest-serving member of the FCC. With on the field or a cop on the beat when it comments. A n d you’ve noted repeatedly tha this recent vote, she said, the commission the majority on the FCC ignored the public comes to protections to what has become an had abandoned its pledge to serve the large, and even lawmakers who were callin, essential service and platform in our American people. And that if history offers for a delay o f the vote. lifetimes. That we don’t think protections, any lessons to the future, consumers — This doesn t sound like garden-variety are necessary for a service or an offering notably people of color and marginalized that, in too many places in this country, is a capitalism at play here. What was going or populations - will likely see greater barriers monopoly. and how does it compare to a couple o f yeai to internet access in the future. Between 50 and 70 percent, depending ago when you were debating net neutrality “When the current protections are 2015? on the stats you see, of those of us who abandoned, and the rules that have been wish or do subscribe to high-speed internet M ignon Clyburn: One of the things I officially in place since 2015 are repealed, at home have only one option. This is not a have to note is that the emotions are verj we will have a Cheshire cat version of net competitive market for the majority of piqued right now. You’ve got individuals a neutrality, she wrote in her dissenting citizens. companies in the debate that seem to be opinion. “We will be in a world where And so for an agency to say it’s going to entrenched, extremely emotional and rigi. regulatory substance fades to black, and all take itself out of the day-to-day regulatory when it comes to their positions. And wh( that is left is a broadband provider’s toothy construct I find problematic. Agencies like you have an atmosphere where there is n< grin and those oh so comforting words: we the FCC were put into place to be a room for give or take, you can find yourse have every incentive to do the right thing. substitute for competition. We are supposed in a place of great discomfort. I can think What they will soon have, is every incentive to be the public’s eyes and ears and never in my 19 years of public and to do their own thing.” protection when competitive forces don’t regulatory service have I seen as significaj Inexplicably during her interview with allow those market regulatory opportunities. display as on this particular item. Street Roots - just as Clyburn began Were supposed to be there protecting. And I consider that unfortunate, because it addressing the critical need for Americans fo Y Y l ° urselves 0Ut of the game- The often clouds what the merits or demerits ( to be able to access the internet, ah If , h matter iS’ a" Of the emotions and the issue are. Which to me are pretty all of us being so rigid in the debate really when it comes to this essential service. You work with communities that more than anybody need the options and opportunities and platforms and finding ( about essential services. They often get 1 from a mobile device - mobile broadbanc access. If that is not protected or treated the same way - which in 2015 we said it would be, that you deserved to have p r o te c tio n o v e r y o u r m o b ile d e v ic e an d mobile broadband access as well as fixed wired access - it will be disadvantaged communities and individuals who don’t h< a permanent home, that rely on that mob device as literally their lifeline to the wor It leaves the most vulnerable even more vulnerable, by treating mobile access differently and not offering the same leve of protections, and treating all of us differently when it comes to punting regulatory protections. When I took my o; of office, that’s not what I signed up for. J.Z.: The proponents say repealing the ne neutrality rules will foster more competition among broadband providers and greater access. Obviously you don’t agree with that position. M.C.: I do not. I look at the way of the wor as it is. Whatever the barriers or the markets, there’s a reason why the majority of us have only one provider for high speec access where we live. There are incentives for those internet services providers, who don t look the same as they did 10 or 15 years ago. And remember, internet service providers, particularly the ones who have the majority of the market share, they own See FCC, page !