Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (Oct. 14, 2016)
News Street Roots • Oct. 14-20, 2016 NADER, from page 4 the shelf, they don’t get on the ground because the people are not shaping our political e c o n o m y th e top 1 percent is. That’s why we call it “Breaking Through Power,” because the shift of power from the- few to many in all kinds of structured manners on, all kinds of aspects of our I society is what produces a functioning democracy. If it isn’t shifted, you have a deteriorating democracy that is largely dysfunctional, except for its ability to serve and subsidize the plutocracy and its allied oligarchy in Washington, otherwise known as the corporate state - the merger of Wall Street and Washington - with the government -r being turned against its own people. E.G.: Your book contains some examples of breaking- through power, such as when activists took on Big Tobacco, and when they demanded a higher minimum wage and won. B ut at the end of the day, you can still buy cigarettes in every convenience store across America, and nowhere in the U.S. is a minimum wage equal to a living wage. I f breaking through power is so easy, why have we failed to do so in areally meaningful way? IF YOU 6 0 Ralph Nader at Powell s What: “Breaking Through Power" discussion and signing When: Noon Saturday, Oct. 22 Where: Powell’s City of Books, 1005 W Burnside St., Portland On campaign finance reform What: Honest Elections in Multnomah County Ballot Measure 26-184 benefit and information session When: 7 p.m. Oct. 22; doors open at 6:30 Where: First Unitarian Church of Portland, main sanctuary, 1211 SW Main St. Cost: Suggested donation of $3 to $20; no one will be turned away due to inability to pay BREAKING THROUGH POWER' In his new book, “Breaking Through Power." Ralph Nader lays out a blueprint for organizing citizens in each congressional district to engage with their U.S. representative and senator on a list of bipartisan-supported reforms. But if you haven't read the book, there are other ways to get involved right away: To get involved in lobbying Congress, Nader suggests visiting Citizen.org. It’s the website for Public Citizen, a citizens interest group in Washington. D.C., that he founded in 1971. In the website's “Action Center," visitors can find an array of ways to get involved in current campaigns, such as Help Elizabeth Warren Change Wall Street and Tell Congress to End Forced Arbitration, by signing petitions, contacting their elected officials or sharing their stories. Nader suggests people interested in advocating for full Medicare for all can start by visiting SinglePayerAction.org. Page 5 E.G.: Right now we’re in an election cycle where both frontrunners have historically low approval ratings. Here in Oregon, it’s expected 38 percent of voters won’t vote for either of them. Where do we go from here? R.N.: It’s not an election*, it’s a selection of two candidates in a two-party duopoly by the forces of plutocracy and oligarchy, so let’s not call it an election. An election implies choice, and when you have both parties - parties of war, parties of Wall Street, parties of police abuse, parties of the status quo - you don’t have an election; you have a selection. Of course, it reached grotesque proportions in 2000 whèn Bush was selected by a 5 4 Scalia-led judicial coup d’état (he laughs). . There should be a binding “None of the Above” on the ballot so those 38 percent can vote “no confidence” in the whole sham, and if it wins, it requires new elections, for mayor or whatever, and new candidates, if a binding .“None of the Above” wins. That has about 90 percent support when you explain it to people. E.G.: You also write about, in your book, and this.is one o f the priorities mentioned at the end: reclaiming the public airwaves. Why place so much emphasis on this when most people have subscription cable or get their news and entertainment from the internet? Why are public airwaves still important? R.N.: Because we’ve never reached the 1 For periodic ways to get involved, visit percent threshold of people mobilizing in Nader.org to sign up for his weekly congressional and legislative districts to column. make those, changes. Those changes were R.N.: Because they draw community made by a fraction of 1 percent of th e audiences. The internet draws individuated people. - Facebook, Instagram - cluttered A few thousand people challenged the audiences, No. 1. No. 2: We own this property, the public tobacco industry, for example. What if a million people did that? A few thousand \ airwâVës, and the cable - we give the people picketed McDonalds and Wal-Mart. monopoly licenses. So why isn’t there a What if 200,000 people did that? cable channel for labor? Why isn’t there a That’s why I subtitled the book “I f s cable channel for students? Why isn’t there Easier Than We Think,” because what these a cable channel for consumers? For few people have shown is that if they were environmentalists? Why do they have 650 joined by up to 1 percent of the people, say channels, and it’s all junk, and it’s so 2.5 million people who have Congress watch' fractured, it’s almost grotesque - you can’t as their hobby, around an agenda that’s characterize i t supported by a majority of the people, it How come we don’t have a cable channel would prevail, no matter how powerful we on civic activity that’s succeeding and think corporation^ are. improving one community, that other I wrote a book called “Unstoppable: The communities want to know about so we have Emerging Left-Right Alliance to Dismantle best practices? the Corporate State,” where I identified 24 It’s because our expectation level is at major areas that are supported by left-right, zero. We all grow up corporate unless we but the ruling powers focus on what divides . free ourselves, and so we have the low- expectation levels of corporatism. How us, and divide-and-rule strategy has been Ralph Nader testifies before Congress in 1966 about car safety. Nader’s advocacy led to reforms working for over 2,000 years as a way of many ads do kids see by the time they’re of the automobile industry’s safety practices. 1 11? They’re all ads by corporations. You entrenching autocratic power. . When you get down to where people live, don’t see an ad for mass transit Yqu see ads So my first answer is: Why don’t you show for cars, horsepower, speed, glamour, style. E.G.: “Breaking Through Power” lays out work and raise their families, the so-called up? / priorities that you say have left and right The progressive press is estranged from a polarization, ideological divide dissipates You think the rightwing media wouldn t support, along with a blueprint and strategy critical, penetrating, realistic critique of our rapidly, because they’r e facing reality, and show up for a C-PAC convention every year? for how to organize and break through this conservative families are defrauded just like society. They don’t show up locally. They There’s serious, serious deficiencies in power. Are you attempting to start a liberal families. Their kids are exposed to don’t show up nationally. They’re in a rut of liberal and progressive arenas in this movement, and i f so, what role do you see bad water and dir, just like liberal families. satisfying themselves with exposés and country that prohibit even intimating an independent media playing? We regulated the auto companies with denunciation, and they never go to action. association with the word “movement” It’s less than a couple thousand people working If we propose ways that utility ratepayers R.N.: Well, the first role is showing up. a farce. If you go and look at around the country on Congress, And as far could organize themselves, or insurance Yorn: media did not show up for “Breaking brealdngthroughpower.org you’ll see what I‘ as tobacco is concerned, you saw the part policy (holders) can organize themselves, Through Power” (conference in Washington, mean. - 64 hours of videotaped where the best estimate is just a few etc., they would be bored. They’re bored D.G.). Eight days: four days in May, four presentations, people who actually change thousand people? But tobacco use now is with electoral reforms. days in September. They weren’t there. Isn’t things, and none of the progressive media Once in a while they’ll mention instant- down from 45 percent in 1964 to under 18 that amazing? showed up. And of course the mass media’ runoff voting and proportional percent. So whfleyou can still buy it, we Democracy Now! wasn’t thefe, In These didn’t show up, the corporate media. representation - but they won’t pursue it, don’t want to drive it underground. Haven’t Times wasn’t there, Mother Jones wasn’t If you don’t show up for the future of our and they won’t publicize it where it exists, we learned with marijuana and other drugs?«: there, Nation magazine wasn’t there. This is country as you see it and agree with it, then like in San Francisco, where they have You don’t drive it underground. You create a the major gathering of progressive civic there’s not much more to discuss, and criminal incarceration society. It’s being instant-runoff voting. leaders and doers on more issues and more there’s not many more recommendations They get high from exposing and treated as a health problem, which is what reforms than has ever been brought that can be made in answer to your denouncing - they love i t And they don’t go hardcore drugs should be treated as - a together in Amèrican history - and they question. • health problem. didn’t show up. See NADER, page 7