Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (July 15, 2016)
Page 4 News Street Roots • July 15-21,2016 Conversations about the serious SHORTAGE of treatment beds for Oregon’s YOUTHS BY EMILY GREEN STAFF WRITER t’s been six months since an Oregon Judicial Department task force quietly released a report outlining troubling shortfalls in the state’s placement and treatment of children with mental health needs in its custody. Most pressing, it was revealed, is that some juveniles with severe mental health needs are being warehoused in correctional facilities when there are no treatment beds available. The majority, 73 percent, of juvenile court judges surveyed across Oregon indicated they’d been forced to commit one or more youths suffering from mental health disorders to a juvenile detention facility during the prior year simply because there was nowhere else to send them. One judge committed more than 20 juveniles to detention facilities for this reason. It’s a situation that’s “probably only gotten worse since we began our discussions,” Nan Waller, task force co-chair and Multnomah County Circuit Court presiding judge, told attendees of a July 6 task force meeting in Salem via speaker phone. The task force’s last mandated meeting was in January, when it adopted its final report, but members indicated the issues they discovered were too important to leave unresolved, and they decided to meet again this summer to discuss ongoing efforts to drive solutions. In the months since, their agenda has moved forward, but slowly. While the extent of the treatment bed shortage appears to be significant based on surveys of caseworkers and judges across the state, the number of additional beds needed is unknown. This is because, traditionally, statewide data haven’t been tracked and mental health screening isn’t consistent among counties. Task force staffer Megan Hassen told meeting attendees there was a possibility of getting an appropriation to analyze this data so the task force would be able to formulate a specific request it could take to the I with mental health disorders are moving forward. But progress is their prescription plans are subject to varying levels of protections. These problems, along with treatment shortages, are anything but new. Mark McKechnie, director of Youth, Rights & Justice, said he’s been working on many of these issues for 10 years or longer. “The issues addressed in the report are things that we’ve been concerned about for a very long time,” he said, “and many of the recommendations are repeats of recommendations that have been made previously.” At the July task force meeting, Paula Bauer, a treatment services program manager at Oregon Youth Authority, expressed frustration with the declining services available. In 2014, Oregon Supreme Court Chief “If you compare the size of the system in Justice Thomas Balmer convened the the 1990s to the population of kids we were Juvenile Justice Mental Health Task Force in response to the increasing number of youths serving then, and compare the size of the system now to the population of kids we’re with mental illness within Oregon’s juvenile serving now,” she said, “there’s a deficit of justice system and concerns about the services.” system’s inadequacies. Furthermore, she said there is no After a year of research and deliberation, program designed to serve the most . members of the task force including challenging kids in the system - severely representatives from Oregon Judicial traumatized juveniles who act out repeatedly Department, Oregon Health Authority, Oregon Youth Authority, and advocacy group and have difficulties keeping their placements. Youth, Rights & Justice released their One proposal on the table would be to report on Feb. 4. start a pilot program that would serve about Statewide, the report found, the shortage 24 youths in this category, and it’s a of both residential and emergency beds for proposal the task force is considering. youths in mental health crisis has led not “The 24 beds we’re proposing is a tiny only to youths’ being sent to detention drop in the bucket,” Bauer said, “but they centers instead of getting needed mental won’t go unused.” health treatment, but also numerous While the bureaucratic process toward incidents of child welfare workers’ staying allocating more resources inches along, overnight in their offices or hotel rooms there are traumatized youths sitting in with youths while they search for more juvenile detention facilities because they suitable arrangements. have mental health care needs that are not This scenario is mirrored in the state’s being met. foster care system, and Richardson said that A spokesperson for Gov. Kate Brown’s no more than 12 children at any given time office, Bryan Hockaday, said Brown is fully are being housed in hotel rooms with two aware of the problem. state employees - an expensive temporary “The governor is very concerned about solution. the immediate need that children in Oregon The task force’s report also indicated that and families are facing,” he said. as youths bounce between the care of Task force members met with the different state agencies, their service providers and medications often change, See TASK FORCE, page 5 their medical records don’t follow them, and TOO SLOW to keep up with rising demand. Oregon Legislature. “I also heard from judges that we don’t have time for that,” she said, noting that juvenile court judges say they have youths on their dockets right now who need treatment services that aren’t available. In the months since the report’s release, the shortage of placements in treatment facilities has been compounded by the Oregon Department of Human Service’s increasing loss of foster care beds at a time when it was already coming up short. Its interim director, Reginald Richardson, said at the same meeting that his department has lost 400 beds in family-run foster homes over the past two years, and it’s lost more than 100 beds in residential facilities over the past 12 months. He attributed the loss of foster families to his agency’s failure to “be a good partner” to foster parents. He said several factors have contributed to the loss: not including foster parents as part of the team, the agency’s history of removing children from foster homes with “very little notice,” placing challenging children who previously would have been placed in residential treatment facilities or a higher level of care into family homes, and not being transparent with foster parents about their needs. “Our best recruiters were our foster parents,” Richardson said, “and they are speaking with their legs: They’re walking away from us.”