Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (April 15, 2016)
Page 8 QUIZ, from page 7 getting people housed and off th e streets, we will decrease th e dem ands on our fire and police, saving money, improving public health, and strengthening com m unities in th e process. T he public cost of serving people who are hom eless is up to five tim es g re ater than it is to serve people in supported housing. Safe, stable and affordable housing is a basic need and hum an rig h t It n eeds to be th e city’s top priority because it is o ur biggest and m ost urgent problem . This is an emergency. L et’s sta rt acting like it. AMANDA FRITZ T hese are th e decisions I’ve had to m ake every year for seven years, except th a t in five of th e budgets I ’ve voted on, th e choices w ere on how to m ake cuts ra th e r than how to improve 2 0 1 6 PORTLAND CITY COUNCIL RACE services. I have already voted to allocate $10 million to housing this year, before considering any o th er cuts and additions. We are suffering an affordable housing crisis. All city services are im portant to our community, however. I m ake my decisions after considering broad public input, asking th e questions, “Who pays, who benefits, and is th at fair?” I prioritize basic services, spending taxpayers’ m oney wisely to provide both essential and quality-of-life functions. T his year, I will prioritize police accountability, affordable housing and assistance to people experiencing houselessness, and fair w ages including city parks em ployees who for decades have been paid un d er $15 p e r h our w ith no benefits. DAVID MORRISON Well, in an em ergency situation we could double up on th e housing tem porarily. T he Yes or No: As commissioner, will you end the practice of contracting ■ for military and militarized equipment for use by our police bureau? LANITA DUKE* Yes, I would advocate to th e M ayor for th e abolishm ent of co ntracting for m ilitary and m ilitarized equ ip m en t for use by o u r police bureau. I w ould advocate for bringing back C om m unity Policing. I su p p o rt th e D e p a rtm e n t of Ju stic e 2015 reco m m endations th at, “P P B shall e n su re th a t officers u se non-force and verbal tech n iq u es to effect com pliance w ith police o rd e rs w h en ev er feasible, especially in th e c o u rse of conducting w elfare checks o r effecting a rre sts for m in o r offenses o r for p e rso n s w hom officers have re a so n to believe a re experiencing a m en ta l h e alth crisis; de-escalate th e use of force a t th e e arlie st possible m om ent; only r e s o r t to th o se u se of force w eapons, including less- lethal w eapons, as necessary ; and refrain from th e use of force against individuals who are already u n d e r control by officers, o r w ho m ay ex p ress verbal disco n ten t w ith officers b u t do n o t oth erw ise pose a th re a t to officers o r o th ers, o r im pede a valid law en fo rcem en t function.” MICHAEL DURROW: Yes. Having a SWAT tea m is p ru d e n t b ecause som e crim inals and m o st dom estic te rro rists (like th e KKK, W hite Pow er M ovem ent and th e B undys) are heavily arm ed. H ow ever using shock troops against un arm ed p ro te s te rs is unethical and only escalates th e violence w ithin society and re se n tm e n t tow ards th e police. SHANNON ESTABROOK: D epends w hat e q u ip m e n t CHLOE EUDALY: Yes. Intim idation doesn’t lend itself to successful com m unity policing and th e increased m ilitarization of o ur police can lead to m ore forceful and potentially deadly 5, interventions th an necessary. AMANDA FRITZ: T his is n o t w ithin m y pow er as a com m issioner, since th e m ayor is in charge of th e Police B ureau and th is type of internal S tandard O perating P ro ced u re decision is n o t subject to council approval. I w on’t prom ise things I can’t deliver. DAVID MORRISON: T h e m ilitarization of o ur police forces is a “psy-op” o r psychological tactic to ra ise th e b a r on w h a t w e perceive is “n orm al” for th e police. I t is disgusting and should b e abandoned. I t se rv es no p u rp o se o th e r th a n to rem in d th e public th a t th e re is a “te rro ris t” around each corner. YES. m ost im portant thing is basic services: roof, bathroom s, kitchen. T hen w ork o ur way out of that. We could also ask landlords to lower re n t and use th e loss as a tax write-off. STEVE NOVICK T he question is both vague (police and parks need m oney for critical services - which ones?) and unrealistic - social service agencies need a hell of a lot m ore th an $5 million. I’ll respond by referring to th is budget: In ongoing money, w e’ve com m itted $5 million in new m oney to housing, I need $1 million to help th e way overworked 911 staff, th e police say they absolutely need $1.8 million to do background checks, and we need $1.3 million to avoid laying off firefighters - b u t if we fund all those, parks will take big cuts. We’re not going back on th e $5 million, m y top o th e r p riorities are 911 and fire, b u t I h ope we can get m ore m oney > Please place the following items in order of priority as commissioner. Note with 1, 2 and 3: Increase parking Bike infrastructure Low- or no-fare public transit LANITA DUKE: B ack in th e day, recreationally 15-21, 2016 for parks and police. ANN SANDERSON In this scenario, I would first ask which option has th e m ost potential risk to th e people of Portland and w hich has th e m ost potential b e n e fit I will always try to m ake policy decisions th a t are inform ed by th e b e st possible analysis of facts. Having said that, my inclination is always to say th a t we need to take care of people’s basic n eed s first; housing is a basic need. SUZANNE STAHL I would spend $5 million on social service agencies to tre a t and place th e houseless. M any individuals th a t a re chronically houseless have dual diagnoses, m ental health issues and drug addictions. Additionally, individuals th at have recently lost th eir housing due to rising re n t can also develop health issues, both AMANDA FRITZ 1 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n s it 2 . Bike in frastru c tu re 3 . In c re a se parking DAVID MORRISON 1 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n s it 2. Bike in frastru c tu re 3 . In c re a se parking STEVE NOVICK 1 . Bike in frastru c tu re LANITA DUKE 2 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n s it (note: Tri- 1 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n s it M e t is th e resp o n sib le go v ern m en t entity) 3 . In c re a se parking 2 . In c re a se parking 3 . Bike in frastru c tu re ANN SANDERSON MICHAEL DURROW 1 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n sit 1 . B ike in frastru c tu re 2 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n s it 2 . In c re a se parking 3 . Bike in frastru c tu re 3 . In c re a se parking STEVE NOVICK: I ’d like a definition of m ilitarized equipm ent, b u t instinctively, yes. ANN SANDERSON: S ee above about th e danger of Yes/No answ ers. A police force is n o t an arm y and should n o t look like one. I am in favor of a sincere, effective com m unity policing m odel w hich m akes officers a p a rt of th e com m unity th e y serve. T h a t said, I also w ant to m ake su re officers have th e equ ip m en t they n e e d to b e safe. SUZANNE STAHL: U sing th e m ilitary and its equ ip m en t is unfounded and n o t necessary. As com m issioner I would end th is practice. SUZANNE STAHL SHANNON ESTABROOK 1 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n s it 1 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n sit 2 . In c re a se parking 2 . Bike in frastru c tu re 3 . Bike in frastru c tu re 3 . In c re a se parking (I w an t se rv ice s to be as equitable as possible. I and th e disability com m unity and o th e r com m unities c an n o t rid e bikes, b u t can take public tran sit.) CHLOE EUDALY 1 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n s it (plus g re a te r ADA accessibility) 2 . Bike in frastru c tu re (coupled w ith curb c u ts and o th e r ADA im provem ents) 3 . M ore neighborhood parking p e rm it zones to encourage visitors to walk, bike o r bus. FRED STEWART: T h e re is som e equipm ent th a t I would n o t su p p o rt th e City of P ortland purchasing o r owning. Som e equipm ent, I would, of course, s u p p o r t I will look a t each item and deem th e value of th a t item based on th e n e ed s of th e P ortland Police, the values and civil rig h ts of th e people of Portland, and th e cost to purchase and train officers to use said item s. AMANDA FRITZ: e. Never. DAVID MORRISON: e. Never. MICHAEL DURROW: d. Rarely. STEVE NOVICK: d. Rarely. SHANNON ESTABROOK: I sm oke m arijuana ANN SANDERSON: A long, long tim e ago in a never, as in ever. galaxy far, far away. CHLOE EUDALY: I sm oke m arijuana rarely. I SUZANNE STAHL: d. Rarely. p re fe r cocktails and rem aining c o h e re n t FRED STEWART: e. Never. FRED STEWART 1 . Low- o r no-fare public tra n s it 2 . Bike in frastru c tu re 3 . In crease parking Portland painter and cultural icon Charlotte Lewis, who died in 1999, gave Lanita Duke this card on her birthday. “I t captures the spirit and love o f a mother and daughter, ” Duke says. Complete this sentence: I smoke marijuana______ ___________ a. For medicinal purposes only. d. Rarely. b. To decompress after a stressful day. e. Never. c. Recreationally. Hey, it’s legal. b u t now rarely, d. Street Roots This image from You.AreHerePortland.com was submitted by A n n Sanderson. Prints from YouAreHerePortland.com are created by artists Lyn Nance-Sasser and Stephen Sasser.